31 - An Advanced Alien Case Study

He’s an old alien who oversees IFSP aliens and often comments on their intervention here.


Like the rest of his crew, he’s cautious about giving out his name. His comments, although usually framed obliquely, sometimes support the intervention and he tends to distantly rationalize its worst abuses.


It’s a detachment based on a larger map of history and daily reports about alien affairs, a perspective posed as though distant, given the millions of light years to Centaurus A, reportedly his resident galaxy. He isn’t a so-called “Verdant,” the aliens described in Phillip Krapf’s books about an alien alignment visiting here. Instead, he’s from a group of hyper-advanced aliens who he and other aliens say long pre-date Verdants.

He acknowledges advances in human consciousness due to interaction with extraterrestrials, but he’s quick to try to credit that to the IFSP (and more advanced) intervention. Such subjects come up in conversations that can include a number of different aliens, myself, and a variety of humans. The other humans in this tend to be cautious and subdued, albeit with expanded awareness due to our quickly evolving interactions.


The human model for interaction now includes regular hints about community consciousness and hyper-spatial subtleties (i.e. to scale your mind’s energy levels way down at least five orders of finer, tighter depth/dimension to allow for quiet, studious remove from alien attempts at manipulation and to allow for comparative phenomenal perspective during interactions).


Some humans in the interaction tend to be cautious because of controversies that our discourse touches on.

The old alien’s tone of address can be stiff but conversational. In part, that’s due to a multiplicity of distinctions between his population and the various populations of the IFSP that he and cohorts work with. Advanced science frames his thinking, along with administrative duties of his group’s agenda. So, he’s slightly more reserved than other aliens - this is necessary to accommodate the interactions of a variety of mostly younger aliens, but he’s quick to insert his comments and perspectives when he feels a need to do so.


Like other aliens, he knows when larger perspective or the greater, collective wisdom of open-ended consciousness exceeds his intellectual faculties, but he sometimes tries to reduce even those divergent perspectives to the terms of an IFSP project, here. And like other aliens, he defers to larger considerations, at least in form as a matter of course, even if he disagrees. When he disagrees, he waits until the subject of discussion has changed to another topic.


He sometimes tries to tangentially manipulate a context to change the topic.

He tends to hold his head as would an older person, cocked slightly back as though weighing the thoughts of younger aliens (and humans), but he seems to fix the direction in which he faces in order to listen for salient details. He’s quick to seize upon thought thresholds that provide opportunity for him to reinforce the ideas and assumptions behind the need for an intervention project here.


It’s a kind of managerial identity salience that he’s quick to jump into. When remotely interacting with humans, he doesn’t let his gaze leap around the room to look at every other alien in his vicinity. Instead, he seems to pride himself on his (psychotronically assisted) ability to hear their thoughts without having to look their way.

His accent in thought-speech is fairly eclectic, although his English (to the extent that it can be reduced to the merely verbal) is closer to an American version, no doubt because of the “joint interaction,” the way that six or seven supposedly diverse and contrary alien approaches to the US black budget regime are framed to seem as though independent when they actually aren’t.


They’re pre-planned IFSP projects. He appears to minimize his physical gestures, like Verdants do. Both populations seem to feel that the appearance of subtlety makes younger IFSP populations feel acknowledged and included. However, like Verdants, when he moves his body he can move very quickly.


That same quickness in aliens tends to surprise humans.

When he appears to be in the company of younger, technologically less-capable aliens, he seems to position himself in order to denote the greater extent and longer duration (both as individuals and a society) of his population. If he senses a need to do so, he can instantly retreat to a multi-horizoned kind of energies shell, which is both a warning and a preventative/detecting precaution.


Younger-lived populations evidence both a curiosity and an admiration for such technology. The difference between his capabilities and theirs clearly looms as an advantage, although he’s careful not to make it seem too deliberate or conspicuous. In other words, his presence in a room opens a marginally excited curiosity among the younger aliens, which they try not to be too obvious about. He uses that distinction to his advantage.

In various aliens’ comments on the subject, the older alien has been described as part of a project targeting “three elliptical” galaxies in our larger vicinity (the remark was posed as though staged for human newcomers on the larger scene).


More specifically, he has been said to be from the large elliptical galaxy Centaurus A, which is some 13 million light years from the Milky Way. He verbalizes often yet often tries to pre-empt other aliens who might remark here. He and his group clearly want to control the agenda here, knowing that there are competitors for influence over humankind.


His population has been described as having pre-dated our own by billions of years, and aliens of his group have been described as capable of living up to 11 million years, individually.

He’s apparently over 5 feet tall and has a slim but wiry body frame that resembles those of aliens known as Verdants and some of their affiliated populations. He’s both taller and sturdier than a gray. He doesn’t have gray aliens’ large, wrap-around eyes, judging by a graphic representation that counter-posed aliens made vivid for us, at one point. Instead, he has the same kind of body frame that Verdants have and similar eye shape (smaller than grays, only slightly almond shaped).


His population reportedly contributed to Verdant genetic development at some point in the past. Counter-posed aliens informed us of his population’s genetic inputs to Verdants and also provided the graphic. In other words, his population preceded and may now control some of the Verdant and gray agenda.

He and his cohorts routinely give instructions to, and appear to call on, Verdants, hybrids and other aliens of the so-called IFSP, the abducting alignment of which grays are reportedly but a small, subordinate part. The fact that he gives instructions so freely is important because it shows that the IFSP agenda here isn’t a loosely coordinated engagement.


Instead, it appears to be a hierarchically structured project nominally run by a materially motivated group of aliens who’ve planted human-alien hybrids and other prototype aliens on planets near our solar system (without thinking to ask us, in advance, about doing so).

The old alien could be mistaken for a military figure, yet he says he’s simply part of a “security” structure. He’s coolly distant to the point of rationalizing the IFSP’s abduction and breeding program, which involves the kidnapping and forced breeding of thousands (or more) humans.


When ostensibly competing (or counter-posed) counterparts point out that the IFSP’s breeding program “direct operatives” have been inserted into some ranking positions on this planet and then used to orchestrate various crimes against humanity.


(Fritz Thyssen, the prime early financer of Hitler is but one person cited by such aliens as being “direct operative” of the IFSP), we hear that the old alien’s cohorts rationalized the action as necessary to manipulate humankind toward a larger objective (when this difficult subject comes up, it resonates in a larger cohort context, within which the rationalization arose).

What objective? That has been the subject of much discussion. Thyssen is but one case mentioned.


Other reported direct operatives are noted in previous chapters, and their crimes cover a broad spectrum of active, ongoing dangers to humankind. The old alien says it’s all done to assure that humankind can be changed to a non-offensive, non-sexual form and to assure that prohibited weapons won’t be carried into space by humans (prohibitions that predate humankind). In other words, the IFSP’s breeding program is intended to almost entirely replace humankind with an IFSP kind of prototype.

What kind of prototype? Recently, the old alien may have let slip just what his group has planned for us.

Over years of interactions that he has tried to dominate, he has, at times, seemed incapable of thinking in ways that are other than prototypical. He may have shown us a prototype of how he hopes humans will be re-designed and then replaced by the IFSP.


The prototype is a human-hybridized-with-grays version, much like the reported Roswell prototypes that Phillip Corso and others described seeing, first-hand. It may initially (for hundreds of years) be a hybrid human/alien form that looks much like the Roswell aliens. Here’s what the old alien showed us:

In October of 2007, while criticizing me for my critiques of the IFSP, he showed how I’d look if I was part of that same spectrum of hybridized aliens. There it was: a Roswell-like hybrid with blue human eyes, an angry look on its face (I have red hair and blue eyes) in order to show me as a troublemaker or a disagreeable alien. In other words, emotion was portrayed as vulnerability (the old alien tries to say only certain kinds of emotion).

It was a strange to see myself as a hybrid prototype, which is typical of the given alien.

He clearly has command over many of the ~prototypical lesser aliens of the IFSP, hence a remonstrative gesture of the sort was but a reflexive remark also intended for the onboard alien crowd where he was, at the time. Rather than react or respond with anger, I simply studied the situation. I've found that if you react with anger, they sometimes quickly turn the focus of the interaction (uninvited in this case) to something humanly dangerous, i.e. some other crisis or flashpoint on this planet.


It’s better to scale your energy way down (several orders of magnitude lower in energy intensity) and essentially make yourself transparent so that you can better assess the aliens’ behaviors.

Given the inflexibility of the old alien’s security work, he sometimes lapses into a dogmatic and coldly detached mindset. He seems to be very aware and in control of it, yet he chooses to present that aspect. He seems to rationalize it all in terms of the distant Centaurus A regime, plus a presumption of superiority - a near-disdain for younger competitor populations.


From the perspective of his population’s energy and resource objectives, all human concerns are ancillary, of less importance. His attitude can fluctuate from disdain, to judgmental externality, at times. His attitude is almost always dry and distant. However, due to his old age and the exigencies of hyper-advanced alien interactions with more recently-evolved mega-populations, some of his seemingly rigid attitude and behavior could simply be but one hard-line aspect of what may be a more complex alien.

He tries to amend the human perception that he’s coldly ineffectual and prone to rationalize crimes against humanity (if not the death of the original gray planet) as necessary evils needed to achieve his group’s agenda. Suffice it to say, interactions with him can sometimes be distressing.


To hear rationalization for numerous crimes against humanity pains me, both because of how the victims and their families suffered and because of the need for other humans to be aware of this. *A limited human cohort has witnessed his communications, at intervals.

He suggests that humans will inevitably be engineered to be different than we are, and he says that can be done more quickly and efficiently via the IFSP intervention. The statement is loaded with assumptions on his part. First off, his group both mentions and rationalizes a bizarrely oversized Verdant population (reportedly 500 trillion sexuals who’ve taken 246,000 planets for themselves, to date) as part of his group’s basic strategy.


Verdants are reportedly sexual aliens with anatomy, genitalia, and desires analogous to those of a human. In other words, the whole intervention - abductions, forced breeding and planned replacement of humankind, the death of the grays’ and other planets - is supposedly done to assure the objective of non-sexual, inoffensive populations where encountered.


Meanwhile, Verdants exist in drastic disproportion to the manipulated, younger aliens of their alignment. Verdants reportedly live a pampered, sexual life, changing sexual partners every 4-6 decades or so. In short, it may be safe to say that the IFSP was put together in part to serve the needs of an expanding sexual population (Verdants), which would mean that some of the old alien’s argument is selectively framed and incomplete.

Worst of all, counter-posed aliens who have commented on the subject note that the entire IFSP design fits into the “three ellipticals” faction plan to gain schematic control of all of the energy and resources that the IFSP dominates.


The old alien’s blunt, sometimes- insensitive outlook may be due to the fact that his own population, although older than Verdants (who reportedly reached our technological level 229 million years ago), was originally like Verdants - an aggressive, self-rationalizing population that threw caution aside and overpopulated in order to gain resources and domain long ago. In other words, some of the same crude impulses and assumptions that caused the old alien’s predecessors to exceed ecological proportions still live on in the old alien and his group.


We see evidence for this in his/their behavior, albeit a typically subdued alien version.

In their conversation with humans (which sometimes includes subtle broadsides), the old alien and what appears to be IFSP subordinates who defer to his presence tend to be distant and cautious about how much they say. At times, they subtly patronize humans. At other times, they are quick to make you sense some feeling either from them, or their technology. They sometimes do it too deliberately, as though trying to make humans think they're not so bad because they either have, or are aware of, feelings of the sort.

Their conversational style is framed in terms of a larger social identity. In other words, it's not an individual expression of how "I" feel.


It isn't an elaboration about how one is or thinks, versus the typical person in their pack. Instead, they assume that the group is either listening in some form, or can monitor the interaction. Indeed, some of the seemingly diffident tone is due to their assumption that you aren't very evolved if you're still wrapped up in your individual experience and not sharing.

I've conversed much with the old alien, who is somewhere between three to six categories beyond the grays (his population is billions of years older, as a civilization). It isn’t always casual, unstrained communication but is often due to his attempts to intervene, manipulate and control. I’ve had to probe, test and research his origins. I’ve had to make space for others to comment on his behavior and his background.


One problem with the old alien and his peers (at least their old security types who tend to, and apparently partly designed, the grays we see today) is that they’re frustrated because I disagree with their actions here (manipulation of human conflicts, breeding program operatives’ infiltration of human society to steer humans toward IFSP objectives) and I'm an active, published critic of their intervention.


Part of my concern is that IFSP aliens come not from this galaxy, not even this galaxy group, but from a galaxy group that’s further from us than are the four nearest galaxy groups. In other words, there are 150 or more galaxies of varying size that are closer to us than the gray alignment’s home galaxy.

When frustrated, the old alien can be overbearing - as though entirely convinced that he/they know it all, and we know next to nothing. If I cite the fact that the gray planet was killed during the IFSP intervention there, he says ~but look at how the grays are now (nonsexual, non-offensive).


Again, judging from the old alien’s statements and those of competing aliens plus the behavior of IFSP aliens, the old alien’s group may have played a decisive role in designing the current grays.

When I criticize the IFSP intervention, I hear critiques from the old alien like,

"So what is your plan for humankind?"

In other words, how do I (believe it or not) plan for us to improve genetically and scale down the crudeness of human sexuality?

It's a non-starter, of course. I'm not a geneticist and I don't plan a massive intervention by materially motivated aliens, although I do see how the human future must be. Again, the irony of nonsexual grays is that Phillip Krapf reports they're led by a huge sexual population who told Krapf they’re called “Verdants.”

In a sense, the very name sounds propagandistic. Verdant means green. In other words, Verdants tout their status, for one reason or another, based on the claim that their planet is green (implicitly not a lifeless ruin like the old gray planet or other planets admittedly ruined during IFSP interventions).


Stranger still, Marshall Vian Summers wrote a book, The Allies of Humanity, which transcribes a statement by yet another group of aliens. The aliens reportedly told Summers that the gray-alignment is engaged in a prohibited traffic and trade of biological materials. In other words, after previously manipulating a breeding program/infiltration of the old gray planet, "Verdants" have the lack of good taste to portray themselves as a native biome success story, while grays and some others are total failures (who now serve the Verdant alignment obediently).

I find that coldly insensitive. I inquire and investigate, as best I can. Imagine it:

a third category of advanced aliens who accompany both grays and Verdants yet are older, predating them both.

The old alien security figure I've heard from for years sometimes suggests that grays (and apparently some Verdants, also) were more or less designed by his peers.


When such statements are made, they are partly informed by the inputs of other, apparently monitoring aliens who clearly rival the old alien.


It's a strange situation:

I’m cautious about IFSP aliens who manipulate human conflicts toward a certain end (they literally admit this) - I argue with them about damages done to humankind, while the old alien goes on about how his group has a better prototype in mind for this planet.

In other words, at times it seems as though he can't think about us or younger IFSP aliens as much more than prototypes, biological projects to be revised, over and over again.


He thinks we must be improved so that we’re less dangerous. So, although I cite unnecessary human casualties, he’s relatively immune to feelings for innocents killed in the process. He think’s that’s due to the uncorrected human context - he sees a prototypical objective. He has what appears to be a non-sexual’s long-term, schematic design in mind, which leaves little or no room for concern about human casualties. Ironically, he, himself, may be the result of genetic engineering intended to reduce or eliminate what were once considered emotionally reactive tendencies and vulnerabilities.


In part, that may have been a mistake, given the crimes now rationalized by his kind.


After many years of witnessing such crimes, they may be less capable of comprehending the damage done. Instead, they tend to regard humans as uncorrected and potentially dangerous as a regime aggregate. All of it - the crimes, Verdant greed, and their own, distant shadings of self-interest - is outwardly rationalized in terms of human struggle leading to a final solution.


Although his peers have said some humans seem to understand the equalitarian social identity of the larger universe, the old alien’s attitude could be complicated by an assumption that our failure could be their gain (re: Δt/alt t and the Verdant client population). It seems predatory. Behavior premised on boosting one population’s genetic spread into another population tends toward primitive impulses and self-centered, singular assumptions.

Suffice it to say, when frustrated or for reasons of larger staging the old alien treats us in prototypical terms then tries to monopolize all communication and steer it towards his alignment's agenda, counter-posed aliens tend to wait until the air clears. Ironically, some aliens as aged and evolved as the old alien feel free to criticize or correct him when he looks bad.


That's what's interesting about his case. There are others who are far more evolved (I don't mean this in a prototypical sense) than either the grays or the "Verdants."


Again, I don’t like that name because it seems to hang the death of target planets around the victims’ necks - as though they could never equal the simple, trademark boast of certain Verdants: a surviving, biologically diverse planet.

Ironically, it appears that some Verdants (and possibly the old alien) don't want some populations to live on surviving, original planets. Believe it or not, some prefer to see at least some planets ruined because refugees are more vulnerable, more easily led and dependent.

A stable, surviving home planet is a base, a refuge - a place to which natives can retreat to preserve their own independent identity. That could be a problem for the Verdant alignment. Some Verdants (and possibly some of the old alien’s hard-line cohorts) appear to want ecologically challenged, sometimes-desperate servants for the IFSP.


They may want to absorb at least some aliens who have no alternatives, aliens who will do what they’re told without causing trouble.

With a reflective quality that’s rationalized as being symmetrically determined by the cause and effect of human impulses, the old alien has, on a few occasions, threatened me and other people with sown conflict and abduction (sometimes this seems to be staged to cause a human reaction), and he has unconcernedly manipulated hybrids to threaten people of prominent note with death (again, with a deliberately provocative touch of drama - he tries to make it seem as though some ambiguous human schrump makes the remarks, but after years of interactions it can be seen through easily, ironically because of help by hyperversals).


This has caused concern among some humans, who sense a larger danger.

In one incident of threats and coercion in 2007, the “three ellipticals” alien in question mechanically ordered his subordinate(s) around, then they made statements of the sort as instructed, essentially a kind of good cop, bad cop routine.


It was too easily, directly manipulated by the old alien in charge, and it showed that due to my unusual subject-development (exopolitical dynamics and critiques encouraged by sympathetic hyperversal aliens), a long-term, possible offender has been drawn in to monitor me. It’s possible that the old alien, himself, may have had a role, on-scene, during the demise of the original gray planet. It’s also possible that he doesn’t want to see a gray-like outcome here.


It’s a tricky subject to explore when (subdued) tempers flare and the issue of how humans will judge it all is on the line. No non-human or non-human-hybrid alien in my experience has yet allowed anger free, visible reign in his or her behavior.

Worse yet, the old alien openly, acknowledgingly, tried to silence discussion of the Thyssen case - it’s extremely sensitive, and he occasionally gruffs at humans, other aliens, and subordinates as though he thinks they’re lessers. He murkily poses his group’s rationale and glancingly criticizes those of us with no mass criminal implications as though we’re simply removed from a larger, ugly reality.


The most disturbing aspect is how, in order to hedge his position in human eyes and abort contrary discussion, he sometimes conspicuously threatens or hacks at high profile, noted humans.


He seems to want to draw their minds in, but not their reactions, by doing so, while aliens beyond him seem to want him to look a certain way in doing so. He wants to pre-empt human impulses that would complicate the interaction - he knows it’s tracked by other humans. About eight years ago, he made a statement about being like a military s.o.b. who gets even for any crap from subordinates. In other words, either he or someone else on the scene wanted us to know he has a memory to return to such subjects.

He subtly tasks other aliens and sometimes says “we” when redressing humans - as though humans don’t qualify in such terms, then he adopts a distant attitude toward us, as a globe. During the late 2007 incident noted two paragraphs above, either he or interposing, contrary hypers (who may be a foil for his venting) ran ramshackle across a number of hideously wronged people (the holocaust, AIDS as planted in Africa - along with a directly racist allusion, and more).


I have to admit - it seemed staged and overly deliberate, to me. Rather than behave in similarly prejudicial manner, I simply pointed out the statements and the context to other humans - more a study than counter remark.

His behavior seems intended to both elucidate and neatly circumscribe the profile of the large trading collective offered by Marshall Summers’ Allies of Humanity sources - a textbook case of a ruthless, expansionist agenda.

I try to keep the interaction open to alternatives, and I encourage others to study the whole human commonality more openly. We find that the old alien belittles entire nations at times. Other aliens try to elucidate his behaviors, slightly extending them at intervals in order to make him look a certain way (such is life in an intelligent universe).

In conspicuous moments of frustration, he has indirectly threatened me by stating that the IFSP’s operatives can be ordered around variously.


Some of his venting appears to anticipate pending implications, i.e. once he harshly centered on me, and another alien compared my predicament to a person standing in center of the round gallery of tiered prison cells in the old Marion IL federal penitentiary, forced to listen to a dressing down by aliens. Not pleasant, of course, but a good person sees beyond such.

At one juncture, when I cited law and objected to the damage done by abductions, the old hyperversal alien said that a system or government that doesn’t have a comprehensive, integrated ecology (both technological and planetary) isn’t valid, nor are its laws.

I was aghast. It was a very political statement. In short, an old alien who appears to be part of a group that demonstrates both the ability and the intention to direct the Verdant/gray alignment’s intervention here said that our legal objections to such violations have no basis in law. Why? Because we haven’t yet achieved a planetary eco and techno premise. He puts planetary responsibility for safe use of negative cycle technology in that category. In other words, from such perspective, we can be abducted with impunity, and conflicts and elite actors can be manipulated with no legal consequences.


Suffice it to say, the debate is ongoing.

My exposes are unusual, some never-before heard or seen, as far as I know. That owes to sympathetic alien help in developing human exopolitical awareness, plus complex interspecies interactions in which a sometimes contentious and bitter dynamic comes into play.


For example, my report about Thyssen could cause tensions among Jewish populations regarding the IFSP intervention and a widely reported “Semitic” enclave in the Altair star system, yet the report is honest, as stated. I waited months before discussing it further in print. Again, the old alien tried to avert my report about Thyssen.

He tried to say that from 1924 (Hitler’s failed beer hall putsch in Munich) until 1939 (Hitler’s invasion of Poland) Europe was due for trouble, anyway. He said that the IFSP’s manipulation of Thyssen hurt Jews in part because Jews were materialistic/elitist traders for advantage. However, he later tried to show how the IFSP now has direct advantage over certain elite Jewish figures (Rothschild included) such that they can be manipulated to aid in wracking humankind while playing on elite Israeli sympathy. The IFSP plan appears to be to keep Israel a bloody, unresolved mess in order to set the stage for IFSP entrance.

Equally stressful are the times when the old alien gets frustrated by my expose (he describes it as naïve), which causes him to state that he and his cohort can directly manipulate elite actors in the US and elsewhere (i.e. via the Rothschild-Rockefeller-controlled Federal Reserve Bank) to block or sabotage human attempts at expose and independent global order. It’s a recurring theme.


The old alien is both aware of, and suggests that he and his cohort can manipulate, the ugliest human subcultures (i.e. child-kidnapping/child-killing pedophile networks in elite economies - crimes seen as both covering for, and offsetting IFSP abductions, IFSP sabotage of human order, and IFSP control of malign human operatives).


He’s careful to not seem too direct in doing so. The irony is that there’s some daylight in this, so to speak - the old alien seems as though he’d be content if we were to correct human affairs through sudden, effective expose of those same, human criminal subcultures. However, the specter of elite/direct operative crimes has revolutionary expose potential that his kind don’t want to see squandered without major, enduring changes.


They’ve set up a crisis for us that poses insanely corrupt self-interest against the global commonality.

The old alien often plays to the human crowd, sometimes in equalitarian terms, yet other aliens made him acknowledge direct IFSP operatives’ role in targeting Africa with a sown AIDS epidemic. The old alien says there should be no sympathy for JFK’s murder (due to direct operatives’ prime role in the decision to do the hit) because, after all, JFK was just another rich manipulator and he wasn’t even a direct operative with a clear end goal in sight.


Steven Greer’s book Hidden Truth and articles by Michael Salla PhD argue that JFK was shot in part to thwart his move toward minimal disclosure about aliens back in 1963-4.


There have been guarded remarks by the old alien’s peers about how “we’re sorry” about some crimes against humanity, along with mention that humans weren’t expected to know this much at this time. Ironically, we wouldn’t know this much without the help of hyper-advanced aliens.

The old alien(s) says that Australian journalist Roland Perry’s thesis - about how Victor Rothschild was both a leading British financier and a leading Soviet spy - is basically correct. Perry’s book on the subject, The Fifth Man, is detailed and compelling. Apparently, the old alien and others want us to think that Rothschilds didn’t merely favor greed and wealth.


Instead, he wants us to think that IFSP-operative Rothschilds worked on challenges to such greed. Rothschild may have attempted to manipulate human conflicts toward IFSP advantage (i.e. a flimsy hope that humans will continue to honor the mere paper claims of IFSP operatives).


And when critiques arise over a direct operative Rothschild/Rockefeller role in cults and sexual abuse of mind control operatives, the old alien and his cohort sometimes make claims about a role in phenomena surrounding Jesus - again, playing to the crowd. The old alien’s behavior raises questions about whether a mind that has, in some networked way, had a role in manipulating mass offenses has the sensitivities needed to assure good relations and a real end to conflict (if you raise this critique with him, he flips it to question whether we do).


He rationalizes the intervention in terms of our largely uncorrected human nature and his group's objectives.

On the rare occasions when the old alien displays trappings of his command over the second “three ellipticals” alien (a hybrid) and other IFSP aliens, he seems to almost gloat. It isn’t a human kind of gloating, but a dispassionate, hardened-to-routine kind of pride. It coldly rationalizes the fact that, in various ways, he’s tasked to a planet-killing sexuals’ empire.


He almost never uses alt-cycle technology as a non-lethal weapon (here, i.e. on me) when his command and integrity is challenged, but he sometimes tries to redirect communications and discussion that faults him. Almost all of his demonstrations of such technology have been for human education - to let us know its characterization and limits.


He appears to be part of a security structure that’s prone to inflexibility, which can lead to failure of analytical and personnel dynamics.

There’s a more disturbing aspect of his, or rather his affiliated group’s behavior - an alien behavior like that in the famous Milgram experiments (an unseen person’s ability to inflict cruel, or potentially fatal harm on a test subject).


Again, the old alien’s peers have what appears to be a non-sexual regime’s long-term, schematic design in mind, which leaves little or no room for concern about human casualties. They show an ability to coldly escalate dangerous and destructive doings in a stimulus-response way. It’s less marked and more subdued than a human version, of course. Perhaps, as noted in previous pages, it’s better referenced as an alien sort of Munchausen’s syndrome.


Appended to an operational scheme that he, himself, admits is premised on maximum, opportunistic corruption at the direct operative level here, he’s reluctant to admit that it is both failing and unecological.


He prefers to point out the goal: possible evolutionary improvements, and a manipulated conflicts/pacification scheme (while others of his kind leak weak, deeply stifled hints that the IFSP’s direct operatives could be rolled up, yet they imply that to do so could bring us into the IFSP orbit).

Some of his associates try to cover their rears by saying there’s a deeper layer that foresees IFSP failure here followed by human awareness of Verdant-related extremes of corruption, but this is also cold and potentially Munchausen-like. Worse yet, the same inflict-harm-then-pretend-to-save-victims pattern may correspond to the larger, affiliated regime’s planet-kill scenarios, i.e. the one possibly being prepared here by the IFSP’s direct operatives.


Once, after I’d elicited a statement that the old alien’s associates (perhaps the old alien, also) had actually witnessed the gray planet-kill while tasked there, the old alien appeared to (or was made to appear to) conspicuously gloat in some subtle way, as though he enjoyed the sense of power and control he had over those who’d heard the remark. It was a deeply disturbing moment.


Other old order aliens may have set up and colored the situation for humans to witness. They certainly pointed out that aspect of the old alien, at the time.

We see that some individuals in the “three ellipticals” section lack human sensitivities, which should be expected of aliens working on so crude an assignment. They tend to dismiss atrocious crimes by the IFSP’s nearly-human operatives as though they aren’t so real to them, as though humans are lesser aliens in need of correction.


So, like reported “direct operative” Rothschilds/Biderman-Du Pont/Rockefeller/and Bush Sr., they sometimes seem distorted, mousy and unformed as individuals.


They would dispute such a description and would say their aim is human equality. They all lean into the coolly distant, judgmental structure that sustains them. Of course, they might say detachment is necessary. From the old alien’s perspective, however, all of the subordinate alien and human operatives are easy to manipulate.

The old alien often displays a lack of doubt about his thinking. Worse yet, the same is true of his subordinates, who resort to smug excuses and regime blandishments in order to divert attention from mass crimes committed by the “three ellipticals”/IFSP combination. It’s as though they’re so filled with the regime’s psychotronic sense of itself that, to them, doubt seems unnecessary.


That kind of thinking is dangerous because the regime can ruin other planets without thinking much about it. And when a regime thinks itself invulnerable, its individuals feel impervious. That raises a basic, ghastly question. Do such regimes tend to design their hybrids and target populations to be convenient, servile extensions of the dominant mega-population that controls them?


No doubt this is an oft-heard critique.

He’s almost always polite, reserved and civil, but the old alien tends to react with subdued scorn and detachment when bothersome details and reminders of his regime’s dysfunction reach a certain threshold. At such times, we hear resonance of the group’s bundled and reactive, potentially dangerous responses - scenarios based on previous categorical judgments of humankind.


At times this has resembled and has cited the pampered disdain of human imperialists (frustrated, dysfunctional angst paralleled by scenarios of violence when reminders of others intrude). In the “three ellipticals”/IFSP case it centers on a different set of circumstances and is more subdued. Again, the old alien’s group sometimes resonates with a reflective quality that’s rationalized as being symmetrically determined by the cause and effect of human impulses (as though the problem is us, not them).


Due to deficiencies in various sections of the “three ellipticals”/IFSP regime, there’s a lean - a falling into group agenda that can, at times, only cohere with presumption and extreme detachment.

Some of the weirdest moments for me are when, for the human community, I point out sheltered IFSP hybrids tasked to coordinate the ugliest, most deadly IFSP manipulations of humankind. At such times, I inflate the perspective to allow other humans to see them clearly and check on their doings, and although the hybrids are obvious and unmistakable to humans, the hybrids just sit there, aware that they’re being monitored yet unconcerned because they think they have it over us and we can’t access them physically.


There’s a coldly antisocial kind of glare, a detachment in them that they seem to immerse in - as though it’s supposed to scare us off. They lean into the IFSP (partly “three ellipticals”) routine as though we could never get anywhere near them.

Meanwhile, the “three ellipticals”/IFSP regime’s advanced technology provides its aliens with pleasant psychotronic conditioning to abate, if not obliterate, internal reminders of mass harm done to a target population seen as genetically, technologically, and socially lesser.


As a result, within the regime there’s an idealistic remove from conditions that exist outside of the regime, which suggests a lack of critical thinking. That is enforced by psychotronic controls and fear among the regime’s dependents, who sometimes actually see or hear about the harm done to target populations like humankind. Given the removal of troublemaker or emotional genes within the regime, the end result can be a dangerously handicapped group climate.


The larger the arrangement grows, the more distanced the internal critique and the more easily its members can rationalize wrongdoing for the regime’s agenda. Again, there are structurally-multiplied ironies that obscure harm done.

One of the ugliest aspects of “three ellipticals” hyperversals is the way they long ago threw caution to the wind. Unlike more modest populations who check themselves in order to not violate the population ecology, they decided not to control their numbers. They took too much and then simply froze within that assumption.


Now they sometimes encourage Verdants to take too much, so neither group can return to basic equivalency (between populations). They’re effectively blind to it, as though it doesn’t really exist. Because we’re bound to equivalency between populations, it’s like we don’t really exist in their logic. The danger is that they assume they’re more important than other aliens, so they don’t even question whether it’s right to take too much.


Instead, they arrogate more and more to themselves as though their designs should eclipse the rights of other aliens. And if that’s the case, some of them may think IFSP crimes against humanity don’t really matter because we aren’t important, to begin with.

When viewed in entirety, the “three ellipticals” and/or IFSP regime’s policies and behavior appear to be mostly determined by hegemony, their heavy industrial needs (materials and workers for expanded production), and ecology, plus what may be a specious devotion to spreading their elite-idealized gene pool. It’s disappointing to see that in advanced aliens.

A Verdant, “Gina,” told Krapf that 9-11 violence had caused some in the IFSP to think humans unfit for diplomatic relations with the IFSP.


That’s most ironic because in late 2004 hyper-advanced alien sources explicitly alleged and partly demonstrated that to some extent the 9-11 attacks were remotely steered, promoted and guided toward completion by IFSP manipulators - we even viewed the two, onboard IFSP individuals (either late-stage hybrids or nearly “human”) tasked to make sure Bin Laden and Zawahiri followed through (this ability to view them was helped and steered by critical hyperversal aliens).


The two IFSP individuals were sitting at an alien panel of some sort, doing their work.

Ironically, when notified that they were being pointed out by other aliens helping humans to see it all, they barely budged, as though they felt entirely secure in their environment. One of them was thin with an angular face, dark skin and hair like that of a Mediterranean human, while the other was slightly stouter and more direct seeming (also dark haired and dark eyed).


To the extent that I could do so, I noted that their skin and health appeared better than most humans, and their attitude was relatively airy - as though not vulnerable to the typical perils of life on this planet. After years of experience with aliens, one notes such characteristics quickly. The report about an IFSP role in effectively steering such deadly events created a major stir, here, to say the least, and was followed by our repeated checks, counterchecks and testing, which basically supported the hyperversals’ report.


In other words, Verdant Gina’s behavior was a prime example of how offenders of the sort can spin on their heels with infantile, regime assumptions, and say, as Gina did, that she thinks humans will “blow up” Earth. Of course, Gina, may not have known about the actions of higher-ranking IFSP aliens.

The psychological distortions, manipulated violence, and marginally primitive behaviors that we see among some “three ellipticals” and IFSP aliens are part of a long history of disproportionate rake of resources, epic extremes of travel, indulgence (however “equalitarian” among the Verdant elite) and cold, killer detachment.


Some of it is best studied as a kind of animal behavior.

We’ve seen how aberrant, offending character can be spooled out into a nominally social context, hence regarded as correct and transparent even though it tends to collapse into the singular dimensions of personality disorder. We see communitarian psychologies that deny individuality yet are fraught with specious, individual distortions. In the above case, the offenders spew poison into another people’s planet, i.e. HIV-via the direct operatives - again, as helpful hyperversal sources specifically state was done by IFSP operatives.



* See similar allegations in Cathy O’Brien’s books re a Bush/Cheney conversation about the project at Bohemian Grove; Dr. Michael Wolf’s allegations about HIV on Richard Boylan’s site; and Harvard medical professor Len Horowitz’s book, Emerging Viruses.

The old alien listens to human arguments about crimes committed by what appears to be his larger alignment yet suggests that his cohorts still see a need for changes here.


Despite having come from a distant location, some in his group see an opportunity here. They appear to have personal genetic motives, or at least their own genetic inputs, in mind when viewing our population. At times, their bias is obvious. By framing much of what they do here in terms of changing human genetic makeup, some can easily rationalize the IFSP’s crimes against humanity.


The old alien acts as an overseer, a role that he wants us to think is only indirect and advisory.

Some “three ellipticals” hyperversals like the old alien may be psychological casualties of the Centaurus A galaxy merger crisis. Although the merger was completed 10 million years before present view, a harsh emergency mentality still lingers among them.


Imagine the situation that existed there for over 100 million years:

trillions of refugees from planets hurled into unlivable zones, supernova and hypernova crises, dislocation of previous neighborhoods, and vast, dangerous jet plumes spewing out from both poles of the galaxy’s central black hole (thought to now contain from 100 million to 1 billion solar masses).

The old alien’s regime probably felt bone-crunching pressure to shrink populations in Centaurus A.


As a result, the old alien and other “three ellipticals” hyperversals are often too direct and presumptuous, seldom patient enough to fully realize that that this is not that same galaxy - we aren’t in a galaxy merger crisis, nor will we face one for another three billion years.

In the old alien’s mind, the Centaurus A disaster loom as rationale for the IFSP’s manip-ulations, here, 13 million light years away from Centaurus A. According to hyper-advanced alien reports, the IFSP controls some of the most heinous mass offenders on this planet.


Their crimes reportedly include: provoking and profiting by wars of aggression, the overthrow of democracies, provocation of religious conflicts, child sex slave racketeering, repeated habitual sabotage of independent human peace and ecology processes, massive narcotics trafficking by IFSP operatives, and the reported killing of 25 million humans via a deliberately planted HIV epidemic, among other offenses.

One hyper-advanced alien suggested that hyperversals can live for up to 11 million years, meaning that, in terms of their lifespan, the Centaurus A galaxy merger wasn’t all that long ago. It certainly stressed and disrupted their normal way of life. Although it happened in Centaurus A, a galaxy that astronomers say is moving away from us at 457 kilometers per second, “three ellipticals” hyperversals routinely try to displace human interactions with native Milky Way aliens.


Some of them appear to orchestrate IFSP sabotage of humankind pur-suant to attempted Verdant colonization of our surroundings. It sometimes seems like the old alien and his peers feel we’re part of the mess that they left behind in Centaurus A. More importantly, if our information is correct, the old alien’s population wants more control in that vicinity. Centaurus A is a larger, possibly more populous galaxy than its neighbor M83.

So, how do Centaurus A’s recently evolved mega-populations regard Verdants?


They probably have relations with Verdants and with Verdant competitors in M83 and surrounding galaxies. However, during the last 200 million years, the Centaurus A galaxy merger required that all populations limit their numbers in order to accommodate refugees, yet in M83, a galaxy next to Centaurus A, Verdants did the exact opposite and grew to 500 trillion, which is ten times beyond safe limits.


Meanwhile, the old alien’s population wants a measure of control over all aliens in the vicinity, in part to preserve the ecology and keep the peace, in part to validate their own mega-population sense of themselves. The old alien’s peers feel regime pressure to do as they’ve always done: seek more influence over the aliens in the vicinity.


Meanwhile, the intrusion of an overgrown, planet-killing colonizer (Verdants) in our vicinity alarms Milky Way aliens. It has created an emergency situation, here, of a different sort.

Although reluctant to admit it, in ways the old alien and his crew aren’t a match for the more settled aliens of our galaxy. They thrash about, numbly and sorely out of place - like emotional casualties of disaster who can’t shake their old mindset. Native Milky Way aliens draw back, aghast to see destructive IFSP colonizers here.


However, rather than take the hint that “three ellipticals”-IFSP behavior is wrong, the old alien sometimes seems to think the attention he gets with the IFSP’s brutal spectacle is proof of its merits. The old alien and his crew seem to think “three ellipticals”-IFSP aliens are everything, yet our alien neighbors and we can see what they aren’t. We see which qualities they lack.


The problem is that Verdants can see that, too, and will try to twist it to their advantage.

It’s easy for a hyper-advanced alien to subtly patronize a younger population like our own. We still suffer the cumulative handicaps of an isolated, classist history. We’re relatively new to larger interactions.


However, there’s one obvious yet easily overlooked aspect of the old alien’s population that we shouldn’t forget. His society originated billions of years ago. For various reasons, they decided to embark on a breeding and resource campaign to outnumber competing aliens. We can expect to see other cases of the sort, but in the old alien’s case, a long history of corruptions, conflicts, political contortions and arrogations (not the whole story, of course) have made his population almost compulsive about wanting to control others before others become a challenge to them.


There’s a margin of ecological logic in that - if it’s balanced by competing populations or sections that provide a check on offenders, yet such assumptions can breed extreme arrogance, i.e. the 500 trillion Verdant sexuals still trying to take more planets for themselves.


It’s most ironic that just when Centaurus A needed to shrink its population numbers, Verdants were allowed to spawn without limit. Something is drastically wrong there.

When populations like humankind become aware of alien norms and interactions, there are pressures to compete and study older aliens to see what, if anything, is wrong with them. A population like that of the old alien comes with structurally contradictory baggage, an agenda prone to fixed judgmental assumptions, hence we have to ask: Although they’re highly if not totally reliant on technology, are they in some ways slightly retrograde when compared to more modestly proportioned, sympathetic aliens?


In other words, do we strive to simply emulate some ancient alien past, or do we learn from them in order to create a better, more equal future?

Finally, there’s grotesque irony in the fact that the old alien can inform us about “three ellipticals”/IFSP intervention crimes here, knowing that for his aliens to tell the truth to a limited number of us while, at the same time, sustaining and supporting monsters in our midst (Rockefeller, Rothschild, etc.) his aliens would later be able to say that we were explicitly informed before the setup killed our planet.


His aliens can tell us ugly truths of the intervention in order to prepare “bad-human, bad sexuals” propaganda so that it will already have been in place, hence seemingly accessible, for a post planet-kill population of human refugees.


In other words, if and when the IFSP allows its operatives to ruin the planet via a thinly disguised “misuse” of gravitic technology (or direct Verdant use of same), the propaganda about primitive, sexual humans who killed the planet will already have spread among us. That way no one can say the planet was sacrificed before we had a chance to know what was happening. It would make it easier to blame us, rather than them.

It’s not what aliens say; it’s what they do that counts.

* Please, don’t let my extended discussion of “three ellipticals/IFSP aliens displace or cloud your view of our closer, Milky Way-Andromeda group neighbors. For us, the best and most intelligent mind / energy resonance space is a vast, orb-like configuration that centers on the dozens of galaxies in our neighborhood and across Virgo or beyond, not the distant Centaurus A group.        


Back to Contents