AlienMind
The Verdants
16. - Hyperversal
Behaviors
In order to rejuvenate themselves, older hyperversals numbed
by their experiences may, at times, withdraw into isolated natural
splendor, or each other’s company and the beauties of the
cosmos - turning away from brutal, manipulated conflicts way down at
our short-lived, human level. Hyperversals say that if left
unresolved, such conflicts can spread, especially in galaxies
stressed by merger with other galaxies.
To a certain extent, hyperversals may rationalize human existence in
terms of hyperversals’ own peculiar surroundings and advanced
technology. Some can’t imagine what it would be like to die due to
some petty virus, to age and expire within a brief 76-81 years like
we do. Some –X3’s err by thinking only in terms of large-scale,
mega-populations rather than (or including) smaller groups or
independents. I see an idealized roundness of attitude surrounding
the fact that hyperversals survived the last universe cycle, while
others may have perished.
I’ve also seen that the –X3’s ( “-“ for
negative energy users, “X” for hyperversals, and “3” for the fact
that they don’t merely work via a positive-negative
energy scheme, but appear to have refined a third, more complicated
dynamic) and their attendant security apparatus sometimes try to
insulate themselves from criticism.
They try to cut critics off,
then blandly generalize about the wondrous, rounded qualities of
their single, localized hyperversal community.
Of course, at this early date in human awareness of hyperversals,
our notion of universe re-cycling logistics may be inaccurate. For
example, it’s possible that initiation of a “new” universe cycle
might be less deadly than we might think.
Steven Hawking says
astrophysics suggests that time emerges continuously within the
universe, even now - 12.7 billion years after what some hypothesize
to have been a “Big Bang.”
If Hawking is correct, the
continuous, ongoing emergence of time (within the finer structuring
of space-time) suggests that hyperversals intent on initiating a
new universe cycle could, conceivably, allow all but the worst
of populations to be included. Continuous emergence of time might
allow the transition to occur continuously, at least from some
advanced perspective. So, a re-cycling of the universe may not be as
bad as some might think.
Meanwhile, a few of the –X3’s have a kind of Oh bother!
attitude regarding human aversion to previous Verdant planet
kills. How can that be? Some hyperversals may have lived so long
that they actually watched and attended previous planet kills while
monitoring Verdant interventions. Suffice it to say, they may
not the most sensitive minds in our vicinity, nor can their judgment
always be assumed reliable regarding humankind.
Over many months of
interactions I’ve noticed that, at times, some –X3’s (and
their related security section) go off on a jag, lapsing into coldly
negative disposition over relatively slight matters. I’ve observed
this on various occasions. This may be an irony of extended-life
geriatric psychology. They grow numb, if not insensitive in
ways that they don’t quite comprehend. Meanwhile, sensitivities
allowed to wither are difficult to regain.
Psychological casualties of the sort can find refuge within the
vacant shell mentality among certain sectors of offending
mega-populations. In a strange way (when seen from above)
that is a controlling, if not regulated place to keep them (more
about this later in a chapter on mega-populations - Chapter 24).
The danger, of
course, is that habitual extinction of sensitivities can, in some
places, gain sway, then be imposed upon others through an evacuated kind of group-mind, shell mentality. When monitored
and persuaded that individual identity has no basis whatsoever,
critics and troublemakers can be silenced to make for a more
efficient regime, yet crude impulses invariably manifest later.
Regimes of the sort can plough through manipulated disaster after
disaster and simply put it all out of mind. After all,
planet-kills are often manipulated by lower-order aliens like the
Verdants and involve the destruction of what appear to be yet
lower populations (from a “hierarchical” perspective, of
course).
One hyperversal responded to the above by saying that my
exposition of the sort could antagonize certain regime-minded
hyperversals who tend to the Verdants. I was asked what
prevents their individual impulses from doing great harm (and was
expected to reply that it was group mind, a community
awareness).
Obviously, in cases of extreme de-sensitization, there
has to be at least some kind of remedial refuge, yet I replied that
the lives and minds of so many cannot be taken for granted.
As for some hyperversals’ over-reaction to trivia, sometimes it
seems to be caused by an acute sensitivity to their involvement in
wrongdoing, i.e. the above-noted attachment to Verdant
abuses. It makes them hyper-sensitive, prone to overgeneralization
and the rationalization of mass crimes as efficacious.
Hyperversals tend to ask whether the entire mess is at least
moving in a more evolved direction. If so, it’s easier for them to
put it out of mind.
Hyperversals’ over-reaction to trivial human
errors may denote conspicuous departure from bad human ecology;
other reactions of the sort feign innocence while the given
hyperversal regime tries to maximize its control (however
indirect) of other populations. I’ve heard a (possibly manipulated)
claim by one hyperversal that his population can manipulate
Verdants to thwart human moves toward disclosure about
aliens.
One hyperversal who is critical
of the – X3-related security section (that reportedly wants
to lord it over three ellipticals) suggested that the “three
elliptical” pretenders go so far as to genetically insert their
operatives into the highest levels of lesser mega-populations for
optimum influence.
The message was accompanied by an image of a hyperversal alien manipulating a Queen Victoria-like figure
(the analogy being in the fact that Victoria married her children
into as many monarchies as she could—to maximize her influence).
As such, the metaphor doesn’t bespeak the numerical strength of the
three elliptical pretenders. Instead, they may be a modest
contingent that uses an age-old prop to get their way.
Sometimes among the “three elliptical” pretenders, we
see a prejudicial, angry regard for current cycle aliens passed off
as though it were but a momentary, animal-like impulse. For example,
we see the “three elliptical” pretenders bundled into the IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets) strategy for maximum control, yet the whole
act is fobbed off as though the consequences aren’t so real, in the
end (to them). When external cruelties (mass atrocities and planet
kills) disturb them too much, they simply put it out of mind.
* Remember, there are better hyperversals actively trying to expose
this.
How can they put such horrors out of mind?
Hyperversals
and other aliens have mentioned some of the following rationale:
-
the new (victim) species was
potentially dangerous
-
they were given some chances but
didn’t quite make it
-
a lesser directly-intervening
collective (or empire) manipulated the planet kill after
being rejected
-
the new species was reckless
[i.e. they tried to use electrogravity too crudely,
too direct current-like (d.c.) rather than use a moderated
alternating current-like (a.c.) version]
-
there isn’t enough room in a
deeply inhabited universe for such a species—they might not
accord with more advanced others
-
the species was too
primitive—just another greedy upstart intent on taking too
much
-
the species ignored all warnings
and planned to venture out with excess weaponry that invites
use during confrontations
-
circumstances didn’t provide for
a more responsible contact with helpful neighbors, hence the
new species wasn’t competent to use the new technologies
-
the new species lived in a
merging galaxy where, instead of reducing population to
adjust for the future merger, they went rabbit crazy
and would have become a population threat
-
an aggressively acquisitive
collective (or empire) intervened and gave them some
advanced technology during a breeding program/takeover
scheme but was rejected, leaving
an artificially greedy
elite (previously used by the intervening aliens) that
hadn’t learned basic eco-humility
-
the new species’ planet or
surroundings are needed by a more advanced, aggressively
intervening empire
-
the intervening collective (or
empire) already cut a deal with certain corrupt
hyperversals but the new species can’t or won’t do so on
their own
-
the new species is wrong for its
mix of neighbors
-
lingering in the back of
prejudicial hyperversals’ minds (i.e. some of those attached
to Verdants) is the assumption that all advanced
spirits dwell in previous generations of hyperversals or
their favorites, while only condemned, failed
spirits take up in newly-evolved species (which isn’t
true, of course, but the thought can resonate in a
corrupt hyperversal’s mind)
Along with other humans, I’ve witnessed
such thoughts bouncing around among hyperversals.
In short, the most coldly manipulative hyperversals seek
refuge within the ideal while trying to keep their own population
numbers modest (from a hyperversal perspective, which is actually a
huge number from the human perspective).
At the same time,
corrupt hyperversals prefer to farm out the coldest killer
routines to aliens like the Verdants (or others).
They may
seek shelter within trivial distinctions that mask bias and
prejudicial overkill—they try to distance themselves from direct
brutality. They may try to bundle lesser aliens into an abusive
mega-population’s evacuated shell mentality, which is a diagrammatic
match for the failed minds and technological security assumptions of
old hyperversals. How so?
Hyperversals of the sort
rationalize the dumping of lesser or offending populations into a
group shell mentality (extinction of emotion, idealization of
the group’s one-ness and right to control others), in part because
it makes them easier to manage, in part because the whole scheme is
conditioned by the given hyperversals’ sense of themselves in
comparison to lesser aliens (hyperversals use multiply-nested
shells of alternate cycle technology to protect themselves from the
prying eyes and wants of lesser aliens, hence the rationalization).
If you confront an offending hyperversal regarding such assumptions,
you get arrogant generalizations (QUICK, impulsive retorts), crabbed
and insular mutterings by bizarrely old characters (all of it
couched in half-truths and ideal-speak).
Again, we’ve been advised to heed our neighbors’ warnings: social
evolution doesn’t always keep up with technological proficiency. We
live in a universe where no regime is to be entirely trusted as
though infallible.
Long ago, some hyperversal populations began with an elitist,
greedy rationalization (imagine the animal rush to take more than
competitors early in a universe cycle, or as technology depleted old
environs). In other words, some hyperversal regimes originally
expanded in a way that is analogous to the Verdants.
Like the
ancient
inequities of Ur, the first large human city—which,
even today, mirror aspects of New York City’s elite
tendencies, we need to remember that even though ancient
hyperversals changed their internal social structure with the
passage of time, their basic impulses may still be those of an
aggressive empire in some cases: cold, insensitive, and prone to
rationalization.
Hyperversals like the Verdant-abetting “three
elliptical” pretenders secure themselves inside multiple layers of
alternate cycle technology while rationalizing the group-mind shell
mentality of offending client states, on the outside.
At various
junctures while probing the “three elliptical” hyperversals
regarding the Verdant strategy, I’ve noticed how offending regimes
essentially trap themselves behind a kind of event horizon without
realizing that they do so.