AlienMind
The Verdants
20. -
Frustrated Aliens’ Impulses
We’ve all seen how frustrated humans can revert to destructive, if
not murderous impulses to secure reproductive access and protect
their food supply. The most corrupt humans will lie, cheat, steal
and even foul the entire global environment in order to isolate
themselves in splendor.
But what about aliens? When challenged
beyond immediate control, how do they react?
Over time and under challenging circumstances, we’ve catalogued a
variety of frustrated aliens’ impulses. In the same way that humans
have animal impulses, we’ve seen various aliens resort to
mind-destructive behaviors to protect their work here from being
disturbed.
Mind destructive, if not brain
destructive behaviors arise, along with attempts to stultify humans:
i.e. a tendency to provoke a human to run off and drink alcohol or
feel extreme anger, or a tendency to (remotely) make veiled but
threatening remarks to provoke and frighten humans (i.e. as part of
the IFSP - Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets - direct operatives’ and three ellipticals’ scheme to thwart,
if not decapitate, independent human initiative).
When pushed beyond their coldly detached
limits, various aliens impulsively toss off mind-destructive, or
brain destructive and thought-stultifying gestures. From an
evolutionary perspective, this resembles socio-biology (wherein
humans prioritize their doings in order to maximize their genetic
proliferation). Among some non-sexual aliens, there is an impulse to
obliterate competing thought systems and impose their own—by any
means necessary. However, because they come from more evolved, less
internally violent societies, the worst of (interacting) aliens’
impulses, to date, appear to be less murderous, less overtly prone
to violence, as are those of the worst humans.
In some cases, advanced aliens will float a veiled threat into a
complex human telepathic interaction in order to pre-empt
predictable human threats to other humans. In such cases, the remark
may be couched in softer, essentially see-through terms (assuming
that the humans are aware of the aliens’ manner and are marginally
deferential).
At other times, however, i.e. in the case of the IFSP’s direct operatives, more advanced, supervising aliens
(including some of the three ellipticals section) may make
threatening remarks posed as though human yet intended to cut off
any thought of an attempt to end their control over direct IFSP
operatives’ doings. This is yet another aspect of the desire to
control the pace and outcome of human doings.
In such cases, basic questions arise about independent, critical
judgment—both in our case (the ability to judge such ET’s as they
are), and in theirs (has their society gone too cold and insular to
be able to criticize itself?).
With alien psychotronic technology,
which can both monitor and be controlled by brain energy, certain
oppressive potentials come into being. No doubt some societies go
through nightmarish phases of psychotronic abuses, yet, over time,
they develop a measure of transparency. Societies of the sort need
to establish a good basis of law and proportionality, right and
wrong, or else they soon fall behind better populations.
I recall initially being impressed by the hyperversals, then
disappointed that they don’t have a more active physical presence.
They tend to use hybrid, genetically engineered copies of
current-cycle aliens who live in this galaxy, in part, to pre-empt
their contact and interaction with neighbors BEFORE they’ve been
assimilated in a larger sense; in part as a filter, of sorts. In
some ways, hyperversals from the last universe cycle are more like
us than not. They can be too obedient, too easily used by the worst
among them.
Some are too idealized in their remove from other
populations, others are designed to interface with dangerous aliens
like the Verdants, for example. Apparently, genetically engineered
hybrids are used for an interface with Verdants so as to avoid
Verdant theft of hyperversals’ genetic material and technology.
As is noted in previous chapters, hyperversals suggest that we do as
they did: we move, as best we can, toward a predominantly non-sexual
reproduction strategy. They go far, far out of their way to suggest
that we integrate into larger entities, which, they suggest, will
allow us to be included in the next universe cycle more easily.
The
question is:
In either case, hyperversals live in our vicinity and
have vital inputs into every mega-population, or galaxy-scale
coalition of aliens.
One hyperversal points out that some independents of the previous
universe cycle made it into the current cycle yet accorded and were
open to various interactions. In other words, they didn’t arrogate
too much to themselves. Of course, from our perspective, how
“separate” would such independents actually be? We know they can
field a critique of larger mega-populations, and who is to say which
are more astute and insightful: independents or large
mega-populations? Both options are incomplete without the other.
This is a major topic of discussion among aliens, given the human
penchant for independence (in the face of the Verdant intervention).
Nonetheless, if we develop better international law and try not to
take too much, if we don’t swarm out and attempt to occupy other
systems (as Verdants do), we are approachable. If we achieve a
better planetary ecology and use electrogravity only sparingly,
under global accords, we have a good chance.
The irony is that,
eventually, we’ll probably interbreed with aliens (not necessarily a
sexual act) and will exchange genetic options. Billions of years in
the future, if not sooner, we’ll look more like the mixed-origin hyperversals. Our heritage will derive from many, many planets, (as
it may already, due to previous genetic manipulations).
From what we’ve seen, to date, hyperversals clearly derive from
different backgrounds and have different physiques. They aren’t
monolithic products of one greedy stab outward to dominate the
cosmos. Instead, they are in large part those humbler others who
probably recoiled at greedy example and organized to protect
themselves from such excess.
Some were the meek, less wasteful
masses.