|
October 5, 2009
from
PreventDisease Website
It's almost surreal, like something out of a sci-fi flick, but
nano-microchips invisible to the
naked eye are a reality that are already being hosted in wide-range
of applications.
The question is, how long will it take
governments and
big pharma to immerse nano-microchips
inside of
vaccines to tag and
surveil global
populations?
Nanotechnology deals with structures smaller than one micrometer
(less than 1/30th the width of a human hair), and involves
developing materials or devices within that size. To put the size of
a nanometer in perspective, it is 100,000 times smaller than the
width of a human hair.
More than ten years ago, simple low-cost techniques improved the
design and manufacture of nano-microchips. That unlocked a multitude
of methodologies for their manufacture in a wide-range of
applications including optical, biological, and electronic devices.
The joint use of nano-electronics, photolithography, and new
biomaterials, have enabled the required manufacturing technology
towards nano-robots for common medical applications, such as
surgical instrumentation, diagnosis and drug delivery.
Japan's Hitachi says it has developed the world's smallest and
thinnest microchip, that can be embedded in paper to track down
parcels or prove the authenticity of a document. The integrated
circuit (IC) chip is as minute as a speck of dust.
Nano-electrodes implanted in the brain are increasingly being used
to manage neurological disorders.
Mohammad Reza Abidian, a
post-doctoral researcher at the U-M Department of Biomedical
Engineering said that polymers in nano-tubes,
"are biocompatible and have both
electronic and ionic conductivity."
He further stated,
"therefore, these materials are good
candidates for biomedical applications such as neural
interfaces, biosensors and drug delivery systems."
Depending on the objectives of such
studies, research could theoretically pave the way for smart
recording electrodes that can deliver drugs to positively or
negatively affect the immune response.
Through nanotechnology, researchers have also been able to create
artificial pores able to transmit nano-scale materials through
membranes.
A UC biomedical engineering study appearing in the journal Nature
Nanotechnology, Sept. 27, 2009, successfully inserted the modified
core of a nano-motor, a microscopic biological machine, into a lipid
membrane. The resulting channel enabled them to move both single-
and double-stranded DNA through the membrane.
Professor Peixuan Guo who led the study said past work with
biological channels has been focused on channels large enough to
move only single-stranded genetic material.
"Since the genomic DNA of human,
animals, plants, fungus and bacteria are double stranded, the
development of single pore system that can sequence
double-stranded DNA is very important," he says.
Such engineered channels could have
applications in,
-
nano-sensing
-
DNA sequencing
-
drug loading, including:
"The idea that a DNA molecule
travels through the nanopore, advancing nucleotide by
nucleotide, could lead to the development of a single pore DNA
sequencing apparatus, an area of strong national interest," Guo
said.
Scientists working at Queen Mary,
University of London, have developed
micrometer-sized capsules to
safely deliver drugs inside living cells.
These "micro shuttles" could
hypothetically be loaded with a specific microchip controlling the
dose of medication to be opened remotely, releasing their contents.
Besides monitoring the dosage, the same microchip could be used to
surveil the patient in conjunction with various tracking systems.
Scientists in the United Kingdom
have recently reported advances
towards overcoming key challenges in nanotechnology. They
demonstrated how nano-particles could move quickly in a desired
direction without help from outside forces. Their achievement has
broad implications, the scientists say, raising the possibility of
coaxing cells to move and grow in specific directions.
Doug Dorst, a microbiologist and vaccine critic in South
Wales, says these advances have an immense appeal to vaccine makers.
"Biotech companies and their
researchers have quickly moved most funding initiatives towards
nanotechnology to increase the potency of their vaccines," he
said.
If microorganisms inside of vaccines can
be coaxed into targeting or invading specific cells, they could
achieve their goal at an accelerated rate over conventional
vaccines.
"Depending on which side of the
vaccine debate you're on, whether pro or con, nano-bots inside
vaccine preparations could advance their effectiveness
exponentially by either dramatically improving or destroying
immunity depending on their design," he added.
Dorst claims that present day nano-bot
technology could just as easily be used to advance biological
weapons as they can to advance human health.
"For every fear that biotech
propaganda proliferates about deadly diseases and how vaccines
prevent them, it is one more lie to incrementally convince the
masses that vaccines are effective."
The worry for Dorst is that one day
vaccines,
"will do what they've always been
intended for... control of the global populace."
Nano-emulsion platforms are already
capable of developing vaccines from very diverse materials.
Mixtures of soybean oil, alcohol, water
and detergents can be emulsified into ultra-small particles smaller
than 400 nanometers wide (about 1/200th the width of a human hair).
These could be combined with any number of nano-microchips with all
or part of disease-causing microbes to trigger the body's immune
system.
In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de
Lausanne (EPFL) announced in an article in the journal,
Nature Biotechnology, that they had developed a,
“nanoparticle that can deliver
vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a
fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies.”
The article went on to describe the
effects of their breakthrough:
“At a mere 25 nanometers, these
particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through the
skin’s extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph
nodes. Within minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs
thousands of times greater than in the skin."
Russia has recently announced a new
manufacturing plant that will strictly produce nano-vaccines.
Project plans include development of two
vaccines for human flu and bird flu and three biopharmaceuticals for
boosting the immune system and increasing the efficiency of
antibacterial and antiviral drugs, among other initiatives.
The human body is very resistant to nano-particles that attempt to
invade human cells. Scientists are intensely investigating methods
to disrupt human enzymes that may degrade nano-particles. Experts at
the University of Liverpool
found a way around this obstacle that
could mean more efficient, topical drugs in the future, which could
act a whole lot faster than the ones currently in use.
All these nano-technological advances raise many issues and concerns
about the toxicity and environmental impact of nano-materials, and
their potential effects on medicine, global economics, as well as
speculation about government surveillance. These concerns have led
to a debate among advocacy groups and governments on whether special
regulation of nanotechnology is warranted.
The Environmental Protection Agency issued a news release
last week saying that it had,
“today outlined a new research
strategy to better understand
how manufactured nano-materials
may harm human health and the environment.”
Interesting as that strategy document
is, it was hardly hot off the presses.
Indeed, many companies advertise their use of such
billionth-of-a-meter-scale constituents as a measure of a product's
state-of-the-art status, implying that ultra-small ingredients are
an inherently good thing. They aren’t. Nor does size necessarily
make these materials worse than others.
At this point it's just
maddeningly unpredictable what nano things will do.
Proponents of nanotechnology are very critical of regulatory
measures that may impede its progression. Many of these critics have
staunchly dismissed concerns as being fear-hyped conspiracy theories
based on science fiction.
In the popular video game series Metal Gear Solid, many characters
and soldiers in general, have "nano-machines" in their bloodstream,
and are used to block pain, allow members of fire teams/patrols to
share sensory information, heal bodily damage, as well as
manipulating viruses central to video game's plot line.
Through the use of special effects and computer-generated imagery,
several blockbusters starring Keanu Reeves including The Matrix
Trilogy and The Day the Earth Stood Still, have dramatized how nano-bots
could effectively take control of their organic and inorganic
targets.
Star Trek episodes and their theatrical releases such as Star Trek:
First Contact have also depicted how nano-probes (nanites) could
infect an individual's bloodstream through a pair of tubules.
Regardless of the recurring themes of nano-bots in video games,
sci-fi shows and movies, nanotechnology is a reality, and nano-microchips
are well on their way to being utilized in ways which may be
detrimental to human health and freedom on a global scale.
The development of nano-microchips are a major thrust of governments
and pharmaceutical industries who want the ultimate power and
leverage over global populations for more profit and more control.
In December 2000, Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland,
Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD stated that it is technically
possible for every newborn to be injected with a microchip, which
could then function to identify the person for the rest of his or
her life. Such plans are secretly being discussed in the U.S.
without any public airing of the privacy issues involved.
Today's microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves
that target them.
With the help of satellites, the implanted person
can be tracked anywhere on the globe. Such a technique was among a
number tested in the Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl Sanders,
who invented the intelligence-manned interface (IMI) biotic, which
is injected into people.
(Earlier during the Vietnam War,
soldiers were injected with the Rambo chip, designed to
increase adrenaline flow into the bloodstream.)
The 20-billion-bit/second supercomputers
at the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) could now "see and hear"
what soldiers experience in the battlefield with a remote monitoring
system (RMS).
When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair
is 50 micro-millimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye, it
draws neuro-impulses from the brain that embody the experiences,
smells, sights, and voice of the implanted person. Once transferred
and stored in a computer, these neuro-impulses can be projected back
to the person’s brain via the microchip to be re-experienced.
Using a RMS, a land-based computer
operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to
the nervous system, affecting the target's performance. With RMS,
healthy persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear
voices in their heads.
Every thought, reaction, hearing, and visual observation causes a
certain neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain
and its
electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into
thoughts, pictures, and voices. Electromagnetic stimulation can
therefore change a person's brainwaves and affect muscular activity,
causing painful muscular cramps experienced as torture.
The NSA's electronic surveillance system can simultaneously follow
and handle millions of people.
Each of us has a unique bioelectrical
resonance frequency in the brain, just as we have unique
fingerprints. With electromagnetic frequency (EMF) brain
stimulation fully coded, pulsating electromagnetic signals can be
sent to the brain, causing the desired voice and visual effects to
be experienced by the target.
This is a form of electronic warfare.
U.S. astronauts were implanted before
they were sent into space so their thoughts could be followed and
all their emotions could be registered 24 hours a day.
The mass media has not reported that an implanted person's privacy
vanishes for the rest of his or her life. S/he can be manipulated in
many ways. Using different frequencies, the secret controller of
this equipment can even change a person's emotional life. S/he can
be made aggressive or lethargic. Sexuality can be artificially
influenced. Thought signals and subconscious thinking can be read,
dreams affected and even induced, all without the knowledge or
consent of the implanted person.
This secret technology has been used by military forces in certain
NATO countries since the 1980s without civilian and academic
populations having heard anything about it. Thus, little information
about such invasive mind-control systems is available in
professional and academic journals.
The NSA's Signals Intelligence group can remotely monitor
information from human brains by decoding the evoked potentials
(3.50HZ, 5 milliwatt) emitted by the brain.
Prisoner
experimentees in both Gothenburg, Sweden and Vienna, Austria
have been found to have evident brain lesions. Diminished blood
circulation and lack of oxygen in the right temporal frontal lobes
result where brain implants are usually operative. A Finnish
experimentee experienced brain atrophy and intermittent attacks of
unconsciousness due to lack of oxygen.
Targeting people’s brain functions with electromagnetic fields and
beams (from helicopters and airplanes, satellites, from parked vans,
neighboring houses, telephone poles, electrical appliances,
mobile
phones,
TV, radio, etc.) is part of the radiation problem that
should be addressed by democratically elected governments.
However, there is currently no interest
by any national government to seriously address this issue.
The timeline for integrating nano-microchips inside of vaccines is
speculative. It could be just a few years, months or perhaps it is
here and we already unaware of their integration within
pharmaceuticals. Regardless, due to the many military and political
advantages, their implementation is inevitable.
However fraudulent, it was an imperative for world powers and
pharmaceutical cartels to promote the effectiveness of vaccinations
and enact national pandemic preparedness policies which mandate
vaccinations.
In 2005 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed international
health regulations that would bind all 194 member countries to
pandemic emergency guidelines which could
enforce such a mandate.
Without these procedures of public health (and propagandized vaccine
campaigns) in place, there would be little or no voluntary
cooperation from the public to roll up their sleeves and accept the
inoculations.
Public participation is an essential
tool that will soon allow big pharma to inject the most
effective surveillance tool ever designed into billions of people.
Although nanotechnology manufacturing is currently available on a
global scale, before biotech companies are able to initiate mass
production and testing of nano-microchips inside of vaccines, they
will likely sell the idea to the public. Through various "health
enhancement scenarios" they will encourage participation and
publicly announce regulatory approval from the same policies and
regulatory agencies they helped create.
By mid-summer of 2009, the WHO and the Center of Disease Control
(CDC) effectively
hyped a false flu pandemic and convinced the world
to submit to H1N1 vaccines. Additional doses of propaganda and
possibly a biological event, may equally convince populations to
knowingly accept microchips inside of vaccines under the guise of
a
"greater good" for humanity.
When our brain functions are already connected to supercomputers by
means of radio implants and microchips, it will be too late for
protest.
This threat can be defeated only by educating the public, using available literature on biotelemetry, nano-robotics and
information exchanged at international congresses.
The time to act is now!
Videos
Nanotechnology Takes Off
Brain Chips
Downloadable Memories, and Micro Chips
in The Swine Flu Vaccine
See too:
One Mainframe To Rule Them All
|