|
by Phillip D. Collins
February 15, 2005
from
ConspiracyArchive Website
|
In the article entitled
"The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship", we
examined the transmogrification of the elite's religious
power structure into a technocratic oligarchy
legitimized predominantly by science. The history and
background of this "scientific dictatorship" is a
conspiracy, created and micro-managed by the historical
tide of Darwinism, which has its foundations in
Freemasonry.
In this article, we shall examine the
"scientific dictatorship" as an enormous project in the
re-sculpting of reality itself.
Phillip D. Collins acted as the editor for The
Hidden Face of Terrorism. He has also written articles
for Paranoia Magazine, MKzine, News With Views,
B.I.P.E.D.: The Official Website of Darwinian Dissent
and Conspiracy Archive. He has an Associate of Arts and
Science. Currently, he is studying for a bachelor's
degree in Communications at Wright State University.
During the course of his seven-year college career,
Phillip has studied philosophy, religion, and classic
literature. He also co-authored the book, The Ascendancy
of the Scientific Dictatorship: An Examination of
Epistemic Autocracy, From the 19th to the 21st Century,
which is available online here. |
Comenius addressed the first formal scientists as "illuminati" and
outlined their scientific purpose,
"...which is to secure…the empire
of the human mind over matter."
Steps of ApotheosisIn the article entitled "The Ascendancy of the
Scientific Dictatorship", we examined the transmogrification of the
elite's religious power structure into a technocratic oligarchy
legitimized predominantly by science.
The history and background of
this "scientific dictatorship" is a conspiracy, created and
micro-managed by the historical tide of Darwinism, which has its
foundations in
Freemasonry.
In this article, we shall examine the
"scientific dictatorship" as an enormous project in the re-sculpting
of reality itself.
The Technocracy
Freemason Aldous Huxley coined the term "scientific dictatorship"
and presented an allegorized version of the concept in his famous
roman 'a clef entitled
Brave New World.
Huxley was mentored by
Freemason H.G. Wells, who also presented a fictionalized "scientific
dictatorship" under the appellation of the "Technocracy."
This is an
interesting designation for a world government managed by functional
elites and scientists. It is derived from the Greek word techne,
which means craft.
Given Wells' membership in the Craft of
Freemasonry,
the synchronicity becomes apparent.
Moreover, the term craft is associated with witchcraft or wicca.
From the term wicca, one derives the word wicker (Hoffman, 63).
Examining this word a little closer, Michael Hoffman explains:
"The
word wicker has many denotations and connotations, one of which is
'to bend,' as in the 'bending' of reality'"
(Hoffman, 63).
This is
especially interesting when considering the words of Mark Pesce,
co-inventor of Virtual Reality Modeling Language.
Pesce writes:
"The
enduring archetype of techne within the pre-Modern era is magic, of
an environment that conforms entirely to the will of being"
(Pesce)
Techne is also from whence the word technology is derived.
The
significance of this fact becomes evident when Pesce opines:
Each endpoint of techne has an expression in the modern world as a
myth of fundamental direction - the mastery of matter, and the
collection of spirit. The myth of matter comes to its end as the
absolute expression of will as artifact; in a word,
nanotechnology.
(Pesce)
Herein is the final objective of
New World Order … the
reconfiguration of reality through the sorcery of technology.
Radical Empiricism
The Epistemological Pretext for Re-Sculpting
Reality
As we have established in previous articles, most of contemporary
science is predicated upon empiricism. This is the epistemological
stance that all knowledge is derived exclusively through the senses.
Lyndon LaRouche explains the inherent flaws of empiricism:
By the nature of our processes of sense-perception, our direct
perception of the world "outside our skins" (so to speak) does not
show us that world "outside our skins," but, rather, the impact of
that unperceived real world upon the biology of our mental-sensory
processes. In other words, the shadows on the wall of Plato's Cave.
(LaRouche)
Thus, the world becomes little more than an ever-shifting pliancy of
impressions. All that a percipient surveys is an amorphous amalgam
of "shadows." It comes as little surprise that an exclusively
empirical approach relegates causality to the realm of metaphysical
fantasy.
The obviation of causality holds enormous ramifications for
science.
What is perceived as A causing B could be merely a consequence of
circumstantial juxtaposition. Although temporal succession and
spatial proximity are axiomatic, causal connection is not.
Affirmation of causal relationships is impossible.
Given the absence
of causality, all of a scientist's findings must be taken upon
faith. Ironically, science relies on the affirmation of such cause
and effect relationships. This is all one can deduce while working
under the paradigm of radical empiricism. Thus, the elite merely
exchanged one form of mysticism for another. It comes as little
surprise that, within certain occult circles, contemporary science
is considered sorcery disseminated on the popular level.
For
instance, Satanic high priest
Anton LaVey regarded science and
technology as "sanctioned, but ineffectual 'occultism'" (Raschke,
214).
In fact, science has become a new form of sorcery for the
manipulation of matter. According to the epistemology of empiricism,
reality is little more than a quagmire of impressions. It is
analogous to a holograph, the fabric of which is pliable enough to
be manipulated. Thus, reality becomes the ever-shifting canvas upon
which scientists paint whatever they wish.
The scientist's role in
this reconfiguration of reality was delineated in an esoteric tract
entitled The Way of Light. Authored by Comenius in 1668, the
manifesto was dedicated to the British Royal Society.
Researcher
Michael Hoffman elaborates:
In it, Comenius addressed the first formal scientists as
"illuminati" and outlined their scientific purpose, "…which is to
secure…the empire of the human mind over matter".
(Hoffman, 23)
Years later, Bertrand Russell would recapitulate the "illuminati's"
(i.e., scientists') role in the establishment of "the empire of the
human mind over matter."
Redefining science as an instrument of
radical empiricism, Russell wrote:
The way in which science arrives at its beliefs is quite different
from that of medieval theology.
Experience has shown that it is
dangerous to start from general principles and proceed deductively,
both because the principles may be untrue and because the reasoning
based upon them may be fallacious. Science starts, not from large
assumptions, but from particular facts discovered by observation or
experiment. From a number of such facts a general rule is arrived
at, of which, if it is true, the facts in question are instances…
Science thus encourages abandonment of the search for absolute
truth, which belongs to any theory that can be successfully employed
in inventions or in predicting the future.
"Technical" truth is a
matter of degree: a theory from which more successful inventions and
predictions spring is truer than one which gives rise to fewer.
"Knowledge" ceases to be a mental mirror of the universe, and
becomes merely a practical tool in the manipulation of matter.
(Russell, 13 - 15)
In other words, science or "knowledge" becomes the instrument by
which the "illuminati" re-sculpts reality. It also becomes an
epistemological weapon against the minds of men, wielded by the
proverbial Descartean "evil demon."
This was the central precept of Weishaupt's Illuminati and the conceit of the Technocracy today:
God
was not in the beginning, but evolved from Man in the end. According
to this conceit, Man could recreate Eden without the God.
It comes
as little surprise that sci-fi predictive programmer and British
intelligence asset Arthur C. Clarke commented:
"Any sufficiently
advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
The Global Holodeck
The technocratic agenda of reconfiguring the "holograph of reality"
is most clearly delineated by William Sims Bainbridge, sociologist
and member of the National Science Foundation.
Citing sci-fi
predictive programmer Gene Roddenberry, Bainbridge writes:
An interesting feature of the popular Star Trek universe is that
mass-media popular culture is absent from its fictional future
world. Several characters play musical instruments and the preferred
styles of music are classical, whether European or belonging to some
other high culture.
Perhaps precisely because the characters are
living very future-oriented lives, they turn to historical sources
like Mozart for their aesthetic recreation.
Presumably, the
copyrights have all expired. Instead of passively watching
television programs and movies, they program their own "holodeck"
virtual reality dramas in which they play active roles, often with
historical settings. Government is certainly not in the science
fiction business, but government-encouraged research is currently
developing the technology to realize the Star Trek prophecies.
(Bainbridge, "Memorials").
Evidently, government-sponsored research programs are already
dedicated to the Technocracy's vision of re-sculpting reality.
Bainbridge is certainly no stranger to this vision, as is evidenced
by his association with Scientology.
In Religion and the Social
Order, Bainbridge presented a mandate for scientists to become
"religious engineers" in the development of a new world religion
(Bainbridge, "New Religions, Science, and Secularization"). This new
world religion, which Bainbridge calls a "Church of God Galactic,"
would find its origins with science fiction literature (Bainbridge,
"Religions for a Galactic Civilization").
In the formulation of his
"Church," Bainbridge used the scientistic cult of Scientology as a
working model:
Today there exists one highly effective religion actually derived
from science fiction, one which fits all the known sociological
requirements for a successful Church of God Galactic. I refer, of
course, to Scientology.
(Bainbridge, "Religions for a Galactic
Civilization")
In the Scientologist bible, L. Ron Hubbard's
Dianetics, one finds a
reiteration of Comenius' mission statement delivered to the
"illuminati" (i.e., scientists).
Hubbard states:
Man has something more: some people call it imagination, some call
it this or call it that; but whatever it is called, it adds up to
the interesting fact that man is not content merely to "face
reality" as most other life forms are. Man makes reality face him.
Propaganda about "the necessity of facing reality," like propaganda
to the effect that a man could be driven mad by a "childhood
delusion" (whatever that is), does not face the reality that where
the beaver down his ages of evolution built mud dams and keeps on
building mud dams, man graduates in a half century from a stone and
wood dam to make a mill wheel pond to structures like Grand Coulee
Dam, and changes the whole and entire aspect of a respectable
portion of nature's real estate from a desert to productive soil,
from a flow of water to lightening bolts.
(Hubbard, 308)
It is very interesting that Hubbard would cite the Grand Coulee Dam
as an instant when man "made reality face him."
Discussing the "Saturnian-masonic"
era of erecting megalithic structures, Hoffman observes:
Actually, with some crucial exceptions, the rise of the megaliths
marked the rise of the Hermetic Academy into its dominant physical
phase. The theory is that the megaliths "pin down" natural forces,
helping to subdue nature's most savage furies. We marvel today at
the Hoover Dam but that symbol laden construction is but a crude
parody of the technology of the megaliths which helped to "dam" the
wildest forces of nature.
(Hoffman, 21)
Evidently, men like Hubbard and Bainbridge see something entirely
different when they view structures like the Grand Coulee Dam and
the Hoover Dam.
They are viewing the "endpoint of techne - the
mastery of matter." It is the Technocracy's project in consciously
shaping the terrain of the global holodeck.
The "Hive Mind"
As was established in the previous article covering this topic,
Darwin's theory of evolution was cribbed liberally from
Freemasonry's occult doctrine of "becoming."
According to this
doctrine, humanity was gradually evolving towards apotheosis. The
architecture of Masonry's evolutionary mythology is a counterpart to
the Biblical account humanity's expulsion from Eden. However, there
are some major modifications.
In The Meaning of Masonry, W.L.
Wilmshurst alleges that:
In all Scriptures and cosmologies the tradition is universal of a
"Golden Age," an age of comparative innocence, wisdom and
spirituality, in which racial unity [emphasis added], and individual
happiness and enlightenment prevailed; in which there was that open
vision for want of which a people perisheth, but in virtue of which
men were once in conscious conversation with the unseen world and
were shepherded, taught and guided by the "gods" or discarnate
superintendents of the infant race, who imparted to them the sure
and indefeasible principles upon which their spiritual welfare
and evolution depended.
(Wilmshurst, 173)
However, Wilmshurst contends that a peregrination of human
consciousness away from the "racial mind" caused humanity to fall
from its former glory:
The tradition is also universal of the collective soul of the human race having sustained a "fall," a moral
declension from its true path of life and evolution, which has severed it almost entirely from its creative
source, and which, as the ages advanced, has involved its sinking
more and more deeply into physical conditions, its splitting up from
unity employing a single language into a diversity of conflicting
races of different speeches and degrees of moral advancement, accompanied by a progressive densification of the
material body and a corresponding darkening of the mind and atrophy
of the spiritual consciousness.
(Wilmshurst, 173)
Recall Pesce's statement that techne was expressed in the modern
world as the "collection of spirit."
This is precisely the objective
of Masonry… the "collection of spirit" through the facilitation of
evolution!
Wilmshurst proceeds to reveal the chief means by which
this will be achieved:
Unable to effect its [Man's] own recovery it required skilled
scientific assistance from other sources to bring
about its restoration. Whence could come that skill and scientific knowledge if not from the Divine and now invisible
world, from those "gods" and angelic guardians of the erring race of
whom all ancient traditions and sacred writings tell?
Would not that
regenerative method be properly described if it were called, as in
Masonry it is called, a "heavenly science", and
welcomed in the words that Masons in fact use, "Hail, Royal Art!".
(Wilmshurst,
175)
Can there be any wonder why Freemasons
Aldous Huxley and H.G. Wells
were proponents of a "scientific dictatorship?"
It is an intrinsic
feature of their Masonic heritage.
This heritage led them to bestow
absolute epistemological primacy upon
Science, spelled with a "S" to
denote its divine role in man's purported ascent towards apotheosis
and the reconstitution of the Masonic "collective soul." This is
scientism.
In a speech before the Royal Institute of International
Affairs in 1936, H.G. Wells succinctly expressed the core precept of
scientism:
"At first the realization of the ineffectiveness of our best thought
and knowledge struck only a few people, like Mr. Maynard Keynes, for
example… It is science and not men of science that we want to
enlighten and animate our politics and rule the world".
(qutd. in
Keith, Mind Control, World Control, 306 - 307)
Wells also wrote about the mythological "collective soul," which he
dubbed "The Mind of the Race."
W. Warren Wagar elaborates on Wells'
"racial mind" doctrine:
It was at once the capstone and the mortar of his [Wells'] faith: a
belief in the emergence in human evolution of a collective racial
being with the collective racial mind, which gathered the results of
the individual mental effort into a single fund of racial wisdom and
grew gradually toward organic consciousness of itself.
Individuals
could escape the frustration inherent in the fact of their
individuality and mortality only by consecrating their lives to the
service of the Mind of the Race.
(Wagar, 100 - 101)
Wells believed that the final coalescence of human consciousness
into a "racial mind" would result in the emergence not of a mere
man, but of perfected Man with a capitalized M (Wagar, 104).
The M
is capitalized to denote the purported divinity that is dormant
within humanity. Wells' Weltanschauung remained consistent with the
Masonic themes of a "collective soul" and man's evolutionary ascent
towards deification.
In H.G. Wells and the World State, author
Warren Wagar elaborates:
But the transcendent reality Wells actually professed to see
emerging here and now was the collective being of humanity, rather
than any "God."
At the level of the individual the species Homo
sapiens might be nothing more than a swarm of unique individuals
descended in an unbroken sequence from remote protozoan ancestors;
yet Homo sapiens was more than a name.
At this moment in cosmic time
it also denoted a class of similar if not identical individuals,
evolving in ceaseless interaction with one another, and through the
unique gift of speech able to pool their experiences and so give
birth to a higher order of being entirely: a racial memory, a
collective mind [emphasis added], the emergent intelligence of an
emergent racial being.
(Wagar, 104)
According to Wells' Weltanschauung, the ecumenical singularity into
which humanity was being compressed by evolution would relegate the
individual to obsolescence:
As Wells grew older, he tended to
look at life more and more from the synthetic level of racial
being and less and less from the analytical level of the
individual. At the end of his spiritual pilgrimage he virtually
accepted the realist argument that the whole is real and the
individual an illusion.
(Wagar, 104)
William Sims Bainbridge may prove to be instrumental in the demise
of the individual.
In an article entitled "US report foretells of
brave new world," journalist Nathan Cochrane examines
Converging
Technologies for Improving Human Performance, a report edited and
contributed to by Bainbridge:
A draft government report says we
will alter human evolution within 20 years by
combining what we know of nanotechnology, biotechnology,
IT and cognitive sciences.
The 405-page report sponsored by the
US
National Science Foundation and Commerce Department, Converging
Technologies for Improving Human Performance, calls for a
broad-based research program to improve human performance
leading to telepathy, machine-to-human communication, amplified
personal sensory devices and enhanced intellectual capacity.
(Cochrane, 1)
Elaborating on this research program, Cochrane explains how this
convergent-technologies plan would be instrumental in the
unification of mass consciousness:
People may download their consciousnesses into computers or other
bodies even on the other side of the solar system, or participate in
a giant "hive mind", a network of intelligences connected through
ultra-fast communications networks.
"With knowledge no longer
encapsulated in individuals, the distinction between individuals and
the entirety of humanity would blur," the report says. "Think Vulcan
mind-meld. We would perhaps become more of a hive mind - an
enormous, single, intelligent entity".
(Cochrane, 1)
Of course, preparations must be made for the humanity's comfortable
acclimation to this new "hive mind."
Cochrane writes:
The report says the abilities are within our grasp but will require
an intense public-relations effort to "prepare key
organizations and
societal activities for the changes made possible by converging
technologies", and to counter concern over "ethical, legal and
moral" issues.
Education should be overhauled down to the
primary-school level to bridge curriculum gaps between disparate
subject areas.
(Cochrane, 1)
The "endpoint of techne" may be drawing nigh as
the Technocracy
constructs its global holodeck.
References
-
Bainbridge, William Sims, "Religions for a Galactic Civilization,"
excerpted from Science Fiction and Space Futures, edited by Eugene
M. Emme. San Diego: American Astronautical Society, pages 187-201,
1982.
-
Bainbridge, William Sims, "New Religions, Science, and
Secularization," excerpted from Religion and the Social Order, 1993,
Volume 3A, pages 277-292, 1993.
-
Bainbridge, William Sims, "Memorials," excerpted from Social
Sciences for a Digital World, edited by Marc Renaud. Paris:
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 2000.
-
Cochrane, Nathan, "US report foretells of brave new world," July
23, 2002.
-
Hoffman, Michael, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare,
Independent History & Research, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 2001.
-
Hubbard, L. Ron, Dianetics, Bridge Publications Inc., 1986.
-
Keith, Jim, Mind Control, World Control, Adventures Unlimited
Press, Kempton, Illinois, 1997.
-
LaRouche, Lyndon, "The Pagan Worship of Isaac Newton," Executive
Intelligence Review, November 21, 2003.
-
Pesce, Mark, "Ontos and techne," Computer-Medicated Magazine,
April 1997.
-
Raschke, Carl A., Painted Black, Harper Collins Publishers, New
York, 1990.
-
Russell, Bertrand, Religion and Society, Oxford University Press,
London, 1947.
-
Wagar, W. Warren, H.G. Wells and the World State, Yale University
Press, New Haven, 1961.
-
Wilmshurst, W.L., The Meaning of Masonry, Gramercy Books, New York
1980.
|
