Chapter 5
Whose World Is It, Anyway?
The Tree of Life and The End of Time
One of the very ancient aspects of the idea of Celestial Archetypes
was the concept of the “Axis Mundi”, or “Center of the World”. This
was a point where Heaven, Earth and Hell met and where Time was
abolished and passage to one region or another was possible. At any
point where there was a convergence of the three realms, a “temple”
was considered to exist whether one was constructed there or not.
This center was the zone of the sacred - of absolute reality - and
was symbolized by trees, fountains, ladders, ropes, and so forth.
Interaction with these symbols was considered initiatory and took
place in a timeless state. Thus, it has been theorized that
religious rituals were developed in an attempt to “connect” to this
Divine Model or archetype. In this way, a sacrifice was not only an
imitation of the original sacrifice of the God, it somehow was seen
to be an alignment of the three realms, the creating of a “passage”
of some sort along the Axis Mundi. So, for a moment, during the
ritual or sacrifice, the supplicant was identifying him or her self
with the primordial gesture and thereby abolishing time, the burden
of the Terror of History, and regenerating him or her self and all
the related participants.
There are endless examples of scapegoats
and dying Gods and sacrificed kings, as well as a host of
“substitutes” in terms of a variety of animals and other products
offered to the Gods. We are going to suggest that it is, indeed,
through “sacrifice” that man “identifies with the Gods”, and “aligns
himself with the Axis Mundi”.
But, it is in a sacrifice of a very
different sort - one that sacrifices our “animal nature”, and that
this has been corrupted to mean that an “external” sacrifice or
ritual is required. We are going to suggest that this “ladder” or
“tree” image is a reflection of our very own DNA, and that it is
through the DNA that man regains his “Timeless State”.
What is important, however, is that the myths are only a much later
formulation of an archaic content that postulates an absolute
reality, or levels of reality, which are extra-human or
hyperdimensional.
There is another interesting key to the ancient myths and rituals:
in nearly every case, there is a conception of the end and the
beginning of a Cyclical Temporal Period; and, coincidental to this
idea, is an expulsion of demons, diseases and sins.
These ideas are
demonstrated by the ubiquitous carnival celebrations of the New
Year.
...This annual expulsion of sins, diseases, and demons is basically
an attempt to restore - if only momentarily - mythical and
primordial time, “pure” time, the time of the “instant” of the
Creation. Every New Year is a resumption of time from the beginning,
that is, a repetition of the cosmogony. The ritual combats between
two groups of actors, the presence of the dead, the Saturnalia, and
the orgies are so many elements which denote that at the end of the
year and in the expectation of the New Year there is a repetition of
the mythical moment of the passage from chaos to cosmos.
62
62 Eliade, op. cit., p. 54.
At this
period, the expulsion of evils and sins takes place by means of a
scapegoat, and the cycle is closed by the Hierogamy (“sacred
marriage”), which initiates the new creation. The more ancient
ceremonies are nearly global in their proliferation among
“primitive” societies, and it could be conjectured that it is to
these “purer” examples we should look for the more common elements
to discover if there is any hidden meaning that might serve as a
clue.
For the most part, the beginnings of these rites comprise a series
of dramatic elements that represent a condition of universal
confusion, the abolition of order and hierarchy, and the ushering in
of chaos. There is a “symbolic Deluge” that annihilates all of
humanity in order to prepare the way for a new and regenerated human
species. In numerous myths and rites we find the same central idea
of the yearly return to chaos, followed by a new creation. The chaos
that preceded the rebirth was as essential as the birth itself.
Without chaos there could be no rebirth. In many of the more
“modern” versions, the Deluge and the element of water are present
in one way or another as either libations or baptism. Baptism is the
subjective, microcosmic equivalent of a macrocosmic level deluge: a
return to the formless state.
This formlessness, this chaos, was exemplified in many ways:
fasting, confession, excess grief, joy, despair or orgy - all of
them only seeking to reproduce a chaotic state from which a New
Creation could emerge. It is also interesting to note that, at the
time of renewal, the New Year festival, it was thought that the fate
of men was fixed for a “whole year”. In short, it was the “formation
of the Ark” that determined if and how and who would pass through
the deluge.
What is important in the preceding idea is that the end of a past
year and the beginning of a new year are predicated upon the idea of
an exhaustion of biological resources on all cosmic planes, a
veritable end of the world. In this view, the “end” is not always
occasioned by a deluge, but can also occur through the effects of
fire, heat and other causes.
Fulcanelli writes:
Nature herself gives us the
unequivocal signs of weariness: she is becoming lazy. It is only
by dint of chemical fertilizers that the farmer now obtains
average value crops. Ask a peasant, he
will tell you that “the earth is dying”, that seasons are disturbed,
the climate modified. Every growing thing lacks sap and resistance.
Plants wither and prove unable to react against the invasion of
parasitic insects or the attack of diseases.
63
In Le Probleme des
centaures, Georges Dumezil studies and discusses the scenario of the
end and beginning according to a large selection of material derived
from the Indo-European world including Slavs, Iranians, Indians and
Greco-Romans. He noted several elements from initiation ceremonies
that have been preserved in more or less corrupt form in mythology
and folklore. Another examination of the myths and rites of Germanic
secret societies by Otto Hofler brought out similar relationships.
Both of these researches point up the importance of the twelve
intercalary days, and especially New Year’s Day.
...We shall recall only a few characteristic facts:
(1) the twelve intermediate days prefigure the twelve months of the
year; (2) during the twelve corresponding nights, the dead come in
procession to visit their families; (3) it is at this period that fires are extinguished and rekindled; (4) this is the moment of initiations, one of whose essential
elements is precisely this extinction and rekindling of fire; (5) ritual combats between two opposing groups; and (6) presence of erotic elements, marriage, orgies.
Each of these mythico-ritual motifs testifies to the wholly
exceptional character of the days that precede and follow the first
day of the year, although the eschatocosmological function of the
New Year (abolition of time and repetition of creation) is not
explicitly stated... Nevertheless, this function can be shown to be
implicit in all the rest of these mythico-ritual motifs.
How could
the invasion by the souls of the dead, for example, be anything but
the sign of a suspension of profane time, the paradoxical
realization of a coexistence of ‘past’ and ‘present’? This
coexistence is never so complete as at a period of chaos when all
modalities coincide. The last days of the past year can be
identified with the pre-Creation chaos, both through this invasion
of the dead - which annuls the law of time - and through the sexual
excesses which commonly mark the occasion.64
63 Fulcanelli, op. cit., p. 504.
64 Eliade, op. cit., pp. 67-68.
Take particular note of
the ideas of “exhaustion of physical resources, invasion by the
souls of the dead, and sexual excess” as being indicative of the
suspension of time. These are significant in our present time
wherein it seems there is a veritable “invasion“ of “otherworldly”
visitors masquerading as “aliens” as well as a rapid descent of
morality into greater and greater sexual excesses; a veritable
frenzied “return to chaos”, as it were!
The rites still mark the abolition of all norms and violently
illustrate an overturning of values and a reversion of all forms to
indeterminate unity. The very locus of the orgies, when the seed was
buried in the ground, demonstrates the dissolution of form into
orgiastic chaos. We are in the presence of a very ancient idea: a
return to primordial unity, the end/beginning in which limits,
contours, distances, no longer hold sway.
What is primordial and
essential is the idea of regeneration through chaos, repetition of
creation: a Time Loop.
In the last analysis, what we discover in all these rites and all
these attitudes is the
will to devaluate time. […] time can be annulled.65
65 Ibid., pp. 85-86.
A New Heaven and a New Earth
Because of our own experience with COINTELPRO operatives as we have
chronicled on our website, and will be publishing in more depth in a
future volume, we - and our global research team - undertook an
investigation into the phenomenon in order to track the threads and
connections. This led to the study of psychopathy and our growing
awareness that there was something terribly amiss on our planet that
was being covered up by the psychiatric and medical communities.
The
follow-up to this research was, naturally, more questions posed to
the Cassiopaeans about the specific nature of the beast we were
seeing “hidden within the picture”. The answers were both shocking
and revealing, indicating that there are actually TWO distinct races
of humans on Earth, and TWO main, intersecting realities. As noted,
this was an unsettling notion, but we soon found evidence from other
sources that it is something that has been known and taught in the
interior circles of the most Secret of esoteric groups down through
the ages.
There is even evidence that this was the great truth
taught by the man around whom the Jesus legend was wrapped.
In Fulcanelli’s Le Mystère des Cathédrales, a most mysterious
chapter was inserted in the second edition, which discusses an
architectural monument found at Hendaye, “a small frontier town in
the Basque country”.
Fulcanelli tells us:
…[I]t is the strangest monument of primitive millenarism, the rarest
symbolical translation of chiliasm, which I have ever met. It is
known that this doctrine, first accepted and then refuted by Origen,
St. Denis of Alexandria and St. Jerome although the Church had not
condemned it, was part of the esoteric tradition of the ancient
hermetic philosophy. […] We must recognize that the unknown workman,
who made these images, possessed real and profound knowledge of the
universe. 66
66 Fulcanelli, The Mystery of the Cathedrals, (Las Vegas:
Brotherhood of Life 1984) p. 166.
Here we have found the suggestion that the core of hermeticism, alchemy, is the doctrine of “primitive chiliasm”. Note
the term “primitive.”
When researching religious matters, one always comes across prophecy
and miracles. It seems that those who are to be kept in fear of the
Lord need an unequivocal sign from time to time. Miracles and
visions can sway whole armies. We can think of the battle cry “Great
is Allah!”, and the claim of the salvific blood of Christ that was
held up as a shield against the Saracens.
We should also be reminded
of the mandate of
Yahweh to “utterly destroy” just about everybody
who wasn’t hanging out with Joshua and his gang. Such “visions” go
back into our primeval past. Around 5,000 BC, the divine Ishtar was
said to have appeared to Enme-Kar, the ruler of Uruk, telling him to
overthrow the city of Aratta.
But, at the moment, we are mostly
concerned with visions in the context of the Bible since it is the
Bible that underpins the beliefs of a staggering number of human
beings on planet earth at the present time, including their “revised
forms” in the New Age and Human Potential movement.
Hans Conzelmann, Professor of New Testament Studies at Tottingen
admitted that the Christian community continues to exist because the
conclusions of the critical study of the Bible are largely withheld
from them.
Joachim Kahl, a graduate in theology of Phillips
University, Marburg, noted,
“The ignorance of most Christians is
largely due to the scanty information provided by theologians and
ecclesiastical historians, who know two ways of concealing the
scandalous facts of their books. They either twist reality into its
exact opposite or conceal it.”
Dr. Johannes Lehman, co-translator of a modern edition of the Bible
remarked:
“The evangelists are interpreters, not biographers; they have not
illuminated what had grown dark with the passage of generations, but
obscured what was still light. They have not written history, but
made history. They did not want to report, but to justify.”
The “original texts“ that are so often referred to in theological
hairsplitting do not exist. What do exist are transcripts that
originated between the fourth and tenth centuries. And these are
transcripts of transcripts, some fifteen hundred of them, and not
one of them agrees with another. More than eighty thousand
variations have been counted. There does not exist a single page of
the “original texts” without contradictions.
The most prominent of
them, the Codex Sinaiticus, has been found to contain sixteen
thousand corrections, which can be traced back to seven correctors.
These correctors made their “corrections” because each one
understood the verses differently, and they transformed the
functions according to what they perceived to be the needs of the
time.
Dr. Robert Kehl of Zurich writes:
“Frequently the same passage has
been ‘corrected’ by one corrector in one sense and immediately
‘recorrected’ in the opposite sense by another, depending entirely
on which dogmatic view had to be defended in the relevant school. At
all events, a completely chaotic text and irremediable confusion has
already arisen owing to individual ‘corrections’, but even more so
to deliberate ones.”
Father Jean Schorer, for many years spiritual adviser to the
Cathedral of Saint-Pierre, Geneva, concluded that the theory of the
divine inspiration of the Bible is in such contradiction with the
most basic, elementary knowledge base of normal human reason, and is
so obviously refuted by the Bible itself, that only ignorant persons
would defend it, while only people completely devoid of any kind of
culture would believe it.
Dr. Robert Kehl writes in Die Religion des modernen Menschen:
Most believers in the Bible have the naive credo that the Bible has
always existed in the form in which they read it today. They believe
that the Bible has always contained all the sections, which are
found in their personal copy of the Bible. They do not know - and
most of them do not want to know - that for about 200 years the
first Christians had no ‘scripture’ apart from the Old Testament,
and that even the Old Testament canon had not been definitely
established in the days of the early Christians, that written
versions of the New Testament only came into being quite slowly,
that for a long time no one dreamed of considering these New
Testament writings as Holy Scripture, that with the passage of time
the custom arose of reading these writings to the congregations, but
that even then no one dreamed of treating them as Holy Scriptures
with the same status as the Old Testament, that this idea first
occurred to people when the different factions in Christianity were
fighting each other and they felt the need to be able to back
themselves up with something binding, that in this way people only
began to regard these writings as Holy Scripture about 200 AD.
Further on, we will look at the creation of the Bible as it really
happened, but for now, let us just say that in examining this
process, we find nothing of the “Holy Ghost” in there. That’s the
plain fact, and a lot of people in the “business” of religion know
it.
Nevertheless, our institutions of higher learning generally have a
special faculty allotment for the teaching of theology, financed by
the taxpayer, whether Christian or Jew. One assumes that the
students who study this theology are also given exposure to other
studies, such as math, languages, science, and so forth. The
question then becomes: what kind of strange distortion, what
incomprehensible corruption takes place in the minds of human
beings, so that they so completely separate their academic knowledge
from what they hear preached at them from the pulpit? What kind of
brainwashing can so effectively cause the simplest of facts to be
forgotten?
How does this happen? It is literally staggering to a logical,
intelligent human being that the fairy tale of the Bible - as God’s
word - has endured so long. There is nothing to which we can compare
this in the entire seven thousand years of human history of which we
are aware. Calling it all a “pack of lies” seems rather harsh, but
it is increasingly evident that it is certainly intentionally
misleading, and, in that case, what shall we call it?
How about COINTELPRO?
Christian theologians claim that the teachings of Jesus (which is
the established religious dogma) are unconditionally valid. Rudolf
Augstein asks,
“...With what right do the Christian churches refer
to a Jesus who did not exist in the form they claim, to doctrines which he did not teach, to an
absolute authority which he did not confer, and to a filiation with
God which he never laid claim to?” 67
67 Jesus Menschensohn, Munich, 1972.
Naturally, all of these
problems have led to many interesting theological solutions. It is
amazing how creative true believers can be when faced with facts
that this or that idea they have held for a long time is no longer
tenable. Nowadays, the presence of widespread sharing of information
relating to anomalous appearances of what are now being called
“aliens” has naturally led to the identification of Jesus with the
“interstellar astronaut” theory. Jesus is an “alien”.
Dr. Vyatcheslav Saitsev of the University of Minsk claimed that
Jesus came from outer space. His idea was that Jesus was a
representative of a higher civilization, and that this is the
explanation of his supernatural powers. He noted,
“In other words, God’s descent to Earth is really a cosmic event”.
He may not be so
crazy. The only question is: considering the work of
COINTELPRO to
conceal, distract, disinform, which God was it who “descended”?
Meanwhile, the Holy Blood, Holy Grail guys are busy cooking up a
“divine bloodline”.
Laurence Gardiner, who has connected the
Holy
Grail Bloodline to
reptilian aliens augments this idea. At the same
time, we have a host of true believers around the planet preaching
the gospel of those cute and helpful Grays, and the reptilian Lord
who really loves us and never did anything to humanity except teach
them all about how to be civilized.
Simultaneously, we have an obvious “gradual revelation” plan going
on via the government and its space program, and now a big push by
George Bush and the Fundamentalists of both Christian and Zionist
tendencies to institute a
One World Government under the rule of the
US beast empire.
We have a right to ask:
-
What the heck is really going on?
-
What does
it mean to talk about the “New Jerusalem” when, in point of fact -
as we will shortly explicate - anything and everything that had to do
with the Old Jerusalem was lies and disinformation issuing from that
crafty
Yahweh/Jehovah guy with control issues?
The reality seems to be that Judaism, Christianity and
Islam were
specifically designed and created just to produce a particular
situation that is desirable to someone at a certain point in time,
and again, we see the same operation being run on humanity in the
present day as the New Age - Human Potential movement. When we step
back from the situation, the one thing that we see is that prophecy
is at the center of the Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition.
The
prophets of these religions claimed to be in direct contact with the
Creator of the Universe, and this creator seems to have been
singularly “personal” in the sense of having personal traits, whims, likes and
dislikes. His prophets are, naturally, privileged messengers,
receiving his divine revelations, and these revelations divide
mankind into those who believe them and those who don’t. Naturally,
those who don’t are damned. Sounds a lot like what is going on today
among the Contactees.
The Christian religion, and its New Age
offshoots, is the chief proponent of the many End of the World
scenarios with which we are most familiar. Scenarios about the end
times originate mostly in the body of apocalyptic, eschatological
writings of the New and Old Testaments. It is in the final book,
Revelation, that most striking and symbolic representations about
the end of the world are said by many to be depicted.
It is a difficult work to comprehend. Probably no other piece of
writing in history has been examined more thoroughly and interpreted
more widely. It is the end-of-the world legend, a doomsday tale on
moldy bread with virtual reality special effects in abundance. It is
the inspirational fountainhead for mad prophets, spittle spewing
pulpit-pounders, apocalyptic Enochian magicians, fanatical true
believers, grade-B moviemakers, and knaves and snake-oil salesmen of
every form and sort.
Does this mean that we can just discard Revelation and the other
prophecies altogether? It would be nice to think so, but as we have
already noted, even though the Control System is always stepping in
to do damage control, they do it oh, so carefully!
While the above
is rather accurate in terms of the many and varied interpretations
that have been given to this Mother of all End Time Prophecies,
there is no point in throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Anybody with eyes and ears can perceive that there is something amiss
in our world, in our reality, and once that is seen, and once the
questions are asked, which then leads to research, we come to the
idea that something is really going to happen!
What seems to be true is that the writers of both the Old and New
Testaments couldn’t just toss out the oral traditions. They used
them in a very special way. It often seems that whatever was
positive was twisted and turned backward. With an awareness of how
history can by mythicized and then historicized, and any combination
thereof, we can look at the scriptures with a different eye. We can
theorize that there must have been a real person around whom the
legend of Jesus - the mythicized history - was wrapped.
We can
theorize that he was teaching something important and dramatic for
it to have made such an impact. We can also theorize that this
“impact” was seen as useful to utilize it as the centerpiece of a
Control System, while at the same time burying the teachings
themselves. The very nature of the Matrix itself and our current day
observations, as well as a broad historical review, suggest that
whatever he was really doing and saying, it was most certainly
twisted, corrupted, and emphases shifted in fairly predictable ways.
Early Christians are said to have believed that the end of the world
and the reappearance of their Messiah were imminent. We are told
that, from the earliest days of the organized church, anticipation
of the millennium - the thousand-year reign of the returned Christ -
was in conflict with ecclesiastical policies that were growing apace
in the new church hierarchy.
In what is today Turkey, a man named Montanus claimed to have
experienced a vision of a heavenly New Jerusalem about to descend to
the earth. Montanus and his idea were perceived as a threat to ecclesiastical authority.
Hippolytus, writing in 215 AD accused the Montanist believers of
heresy, including listening to revelations from female seers.
Montanism continued to spread, especially after Tertullian - the
brilliant legal scholar who had been born in Carthage and converted
to Christianity in 196 AD. - joined the movement. He too reported a
vision of this heavenly city descending from the sky, a metaphor
that has persisted for centuries.
The ubiquity of this vision is interesting for a lot of reasons,
most particularly when one considers the possibility that these
early Christians may have been interacting with hyperdimensional
realities. While some Gnostic groups “spiritualized” the events
foretold in Revelation, there were still those who insisted that
this paradise was quite real and physical and could exist on earth.
This idea became known as chiliasm, a form of apocalyptic vision
that depicted the millennium as a physical and material period.
A Gnostic prophet named Cerinthus said that there would be an
earthly kingdom of Christ, and that the flesh of human beings again
inhabiting Jerusalem would be subject to desires and pleasure. He
added,
“The kingdom of Christ would ... consist in the satisfaction
of the stomach and of even lower organs, in eating, and drinking and
nuptial pleasures”.
One writer described Cerinthus and his followers
by noting,
“there was great enthusiasm among his supporters for that
end...”.
No doubt.
Many chiliasts believed that in the millennium all manner of
physical craving would be satiated, that men would find all women
beautiful and willing to partake in carnal delights. Others taught
that women would bear many children, but without the pain of
childbirth or even the inconvenience of sex. It can be noted that
there is a thread of sexual allusions in the millennialist vision
that - through the centuries - has emerged again and again.
It is fairly simple to see in the “seed” of the primitive chiliasm
of the early Christian ideas the concept of Time Loops and hyperdimensional realities as well as the idea of cyclical
catastrophes signaling both the end and the beginning of “worlds”.
However, there seems to have been something else about this early
Christianity that created problems for church fathers who were busy
codifying dogma and constructing a far-flung ecclesiastical empire.
Since “end time fever” would not go away, it was codified as,
“believe in our dogmas, and you will go to heaven at the End Time”.
“It will only happen once, and we are the agents of the
God who is
going to destroy everybody who does not belong to our club.”
The
question is: if the early Church fathers eliminated “primitive
chiliasm” from Christianity, what ELSE did they eliminate? As noted,
what we know as Christianity today is, according to many experts,
little more than an amalgamation of many mythical representations of
the dying and resurrecting God theme. More than anything, it
reflects the Tammuz drama with a major overlay of the Egyptian
religion of the time.
What is most revealing is the fact that the only writings
contemporary to the times of early Christianity which mention it
specifically, remark that it was a “vile superstition”. Yet, what we
have as Christianity today is nothing more or less than the same
religious practices of the peoples who branded it a “vile
superstition”.
Tacitus tells us that in the time of Nero:
There followed a catastrophe, whether through accident or the design
of the emperor is not sure, as there are authorities for both views,
but it was the most disastrous and appalling of all the calamities
brought on this city through the violence of fire. …A rumor had
spread abroad that at the very time when the city was burning, Nero
had mounted on his private stage and sung of the destruction of
Troy, comparing the present disaster with that ancient
catastrophe.... In order to put an end to these rumors Nero provided
scapegoats and visited most fearful punishments on those popularly
called Christians, a group hated because of their outrageous
practices.
The founder of this sect, Christus, was executed in the
reign of Tiberius by the procurator Pontius Pilatus. Thus the
pernicious superstition was suppressed for the while, but it broke
out again not only in Judaea, where this evil had its origin, but
even in Rome, to which all obnoxious and disgraceful elements flow
from everywhere in the world and receive a large following. The
first ones to be seized were those who confessed; then on their
information a vast multitude was convicted, not so much on the
charge of incendiarism as because of their hatred of humanity.
68
68 Leon, Harry J., trans., “Selections from Tacitus” in
MacKendrick, Paul and Herbert M. Howe, Classics in Translation, Vol.
II: Latin Literature, C (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press,
1952).
Pliny the Younger, who lived c. 62 to 113 AD, was sent by Emperor Trajan as a special representative to the Roman province of Bithynia
in Asia Minor. His task was to keep the peace.
When he had trouble
dealing with Christians, Pliny wrote to the emperor asking how he
should proceed against them describing what he knew about their
religion:
However, they asserted that their guilt or mistake had amounted to
no more than this, that they had been accustomed on a set day to
gather before dawn and to chant in antiphonal form a hymn to Christ
as if to a God, and to bind themselves by a pledge, not for the
commission of any crime, but rather that they would not commit theft
nor robbery nor adultery nor break their promises, nor refuse to
return on demand any treasure that had been entrusted to their care;
when this ceremony had been completed, they would go away, to
reassemble later for a feast, but an ordinary and innocent one.
They
had abandoned even this custom after my edict in which, following
your instruction, I had forbidden the existence of fellowships. So I
thought it the more necessary to extract the truth even by torture
from two maidservants who were called deaconesses. I found nothing
save a vile superstition carried to an immoderate length.
The contagion of the superstition has pervaded not only the cities
but the villages and country districts as well. Yet it seems that it
can be halted and cured. It is well agreed that temples almost
desolate have begun to be thronged again, and stated rites that had
long been abandoned are revived; and a sale is found for the fodder
of sacrificial victims,
though hitherto buyers were rare. So it is easy to conjecture what a
great number of offenders may be reformed, if a chance to repent is
given. 69
69 Heironimus, John Paul,
trans., “Selected Letters of the Younger Pliny,” in MacKendrick,
Paul and Herbert M. Howe, Classics in Translation, Vol. II: Latin
Literature, C (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press 1952).
So we have these clues:
1. Christians were hated because of their outrageous practices. 2. Their beliefs were described as a pernicious superstition. 3. The pernicious superstition had its origin in Judaea. 4. Christians were convicted because of their “hatred of humanity”.
5. Pliny describes their practices as “benign” but that the core
belief was a “vile superstition carried to an immoderate length”. 6. This “vile superstition” was pervasive and apparently led to the
temples and ancient rites including sacrifice being abandoned.
The question that comes to mind is: what would the peoples of that
time have considered a “vile superstition” or “outrageous practices”
when one is aware of what they considered normal religious practice
which included dying God myths and gnosticism and sacrifice and all
the other accoutrements of Christianity as we know it today?
The
only real clue we have is the remark:
“not so much on the charge of incendiarism as because of their hatred of humanity - a vile
superstition carried to an immoderate length”.
Their what?
“Their hatred of humanity.”
In Book III of his Gnosis, Boris Mouravieff discusses what he calls
“pre-adamic humanity” and “adamic humanity”. Here are some excerpts
of what Mouravieff has to say:
In the first volume of Gnosis, we already referred several times to
the coexistence of two essentially different races: one of Men, and
another of Anthropoids. We must emphasize the fact that from the
esoteric point of view the latter term has no derogatory meaning.
…The Scriptures contain more than one reference to the coexistence
on our planet of these two humanities – which are now alike in form
but unlike in essence. We can even say that the whole dramatic
history of humanity, from the fall of Adam until today, not
excluding the prospect of the new era, is overshadowed by the
coexistence of these two human races whose separation will occur
only at the Last Judgment. 70
70 Mouravieff, Boris, Gnosis, Volume III, translated and edited by
Robin Amis, (Robertsbridge, UK:Praxis Institute Press 1993) p. 107.
…The human tares, the anthropoid race,
are the descendants of pre-adamic humanity. The principal difference
between contemporary pre-adamic man and
adamic man – a difference which is not perceived by the senses – is
that the former does not possess the developed higher centers that
exist in the latter which, although they have been cut off from his
waking consciousness since the Fall, offer him a real possibility of
esoteric evolution. Apart from this, the two races are similar: they
have the same lower centers, the same structure of the Personality
and the same physical body, although more often than not this is
stronger in the preadamic man than in the adamic; regarding beauty,
we must not forget that preadamic man and woman were created by God
on the sixth day, in His image and after His likeness, and that the
daughters of this race were beautiful. 71
By identifying himself
with the ‘I’ of his Personality, Adam lost consciousness of his real
‘I’ and fell from the Eden that was his original condition into the
same condition as the pre-adamics… The two humanities, coming from
two different creative processes, later mingled on the level of
organic life on Earth… From then on, the coexistence of these two
human types, and the competition, which was the result of this,
became the norm… we can see that throughout the centuries, even in
our own day, adamics in their post-fall condition, have been and are
generally in an inferior position to the pre-adamics.
…For the moment we will restrict ourselves to repeating that
contemporary adamic man, having lost contact with his higher centers
and therefore with his real ‘I’, appears practically the same as his
pre-adamic counterpart. However, unlike the latter, he still has his
higher centers, which ensure that he has the possibility of
following the way of esoteric evolution. At present, pre-adamic man
is deprived of this possibility, but it will be given to him if
adamic humanity develops, as it should during the era of the Holy
Spirit. 72
71 Ibid., pp. 108-109.
72 Ibid., p. 129.
So now we come to an idea that just might fit the bill of
a “vile superstition” as well as an explanation for the remark that
the early Christians had an “excessive hatred for humanity”. We also
have a sudden flash of insight about some of the odd remarks
attributed to Jesus such as “I come not to bring peace, but a
sword”, and his address to the Pharisees that they were the
“children of their father, Satan”. We also come to a fuller
understanding of Fulcanelli’s remark about Primitive Chiliasm.
Quoting and paraphrasing Mouravieff:
The Era of the Holy Spirit has two faces - one of Paradise regained
and the other a Deluge of Fire... We can even say that the whole
dramatic history of humanity, from the fall of Adam until today, not
excluding the prospect of the New Era, is overshadowed by the
coexistence of these two human races whose separation will occur
only at the Last Judgment. It is to this that Jesus referred in
parables when he spoke to the crowds, but described in clear terms
for the benefit of his disciples; the most noteworthy description is
the parable of the tares and the good seed, on which he made the
following commentary:
He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man: the field is the
world: the good seed are the children of the kingdom: but the tares
are the children of the wicked one: the enemy that sowed them is the
devil: the harvest is the end of the world... The coexistence of a
race of Anthropoids and a race of Men, confirmed here, is necessary
from the point of view of the General Law, to maintain uninterrupted
the stability in movement of organic life on earth. It is also
necessary because of the principle of equilibrium. The first race is
a counterbalance, which allows the race of Men to pursue its
esoteric evolution.
Jesus confirmed this when he spoke about the End
in the following terms:
Then, shall two be in the field; one shall be taken, and the other
left. Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be
taken, and the other left. Tares grow without having to be
cultivated. Good seed, on the other hand, demands a great deal of
care if it is to bear fruit.
Pre-adamic man was never an Individuality. Created as a Personality
on the 6th day (symbolically speaking), he is deprived of every
possibility of direct, “individual individuation” - if one may put
it thus - for his existence was placed under the law of collective
Individuation, which is governed by [the Thought Center of Nonbeing]
with the aid of a whole hierarchy of spirits who are subject to its
authority. Pre-Adamic man does not reincarnate. Not having any
individualized element in himself, he is born and dies but he does
not incarnate, and consequently he cannot reincarnate. The
individualization of pre-adamics is collective, and is directed in
groups by certain spirits of the hierarchy.
This does not, however,
prevent preadamics from entering the evolutionary field that forms
the experiences of adamic man in great numbers, and since adamic man
suffers from a lack of discernment because of his corrupt state,
this disturbs and slows his evolution. Because of the Principle of
Equilibrium, humanity on this earth is divided into two equal parts - adamics and pre-adamics. The equilibrium between them is
automatically adjusted to follow fluctuations of the incarnations of
adamic souls. However, if the adamic race, by casting its pearls to
the swine, denies its divine nature to an inadmissible degree, this
balance will be broken in favor of the tares.
In the parable of the
talents, Jesus foresaw this possibility of such a degeneration -
where the servant buried the one talent entrusted to him and, on
returning it to his master without having made it multiply, was
told:
“Thou wicked and slothful servant ... and cast ye the
unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and
gnashing of teeth.”
There is no need to emphasize the esoteric
meaning here...
When the two humanities were created, they were placed under
different authorities. The Fall necessitated special measures and
thus the Staircase was provided. From that point on, Adamic man was
subjected to the law of birth and death and kept only a dim
consciousness of his higher self in spite of the almost complete
obstruction of his channel of communication with the higher centers,
which still exist in him.
This gives him the possibility of a
choice.
If he hears the Voice of the Master, the higher intellect,
and resolutely steps onto the Staircase, and if he reaches the
Fourth Step and resists the Trial by Fire, then, when he crosses the
Second Threshold, he will be welcomed as a Prodigal son... it is an
event that will be understood only by those who have accomplished
it.
If the adamic humanity, en masse, abandons the combat that leads to
restoration of their former estate -
Ascension - and if this
desertion goes beyond the tolerances of balance, the good seed can
be progressively stifled by the tares. The world will then head
straight into catastrophe - which this time will take the form of a
Deluge of Fire.
If the equilibrium, which is already in jeopardy, were to be
reestablished, then with the integral and simultaneous incarnation
of adamic souls, the Time of Transition would enable Adamic man to
enter the Era of the Holy Spirit[ – a reality where one was in
constant touch with the Creative Principle, 4th density]. Then would
follow a thousand years consecrated to the perfecting of the TWO
races, and after a second millennium, the reign of the Androgyne,
the Last Judgment would definitively separate the tares from the
good seed.
At this point, Adamic man would begin an even higher
evolution, and would at last attain the Pleroma, [6th density.] At
this point, and only at this point, will the Tares of the present
time cease to be tares and be promoted to the ranks of “good seed”.
They would begin their own long, evolutionary course that the
adamics have already achieved. Then they, in their turn, will
receive the higher centers of consciousness which, given them in
potential, would be the talents they must make fruitful.
At this point, the Adamics who degenerated into pre-adamics, would
also have the possibility of taking up their abandoned evolution
again while an equal number of the most able pre-adamics would
receive the talents that were initially given to the former and this
would help them leap forward on the road of esoteric evolution. They
may be compared with gifted, hardworking students who get a double
promotion while the incapable and lazy ones do another year in the
same class.
Meanwhile, the two races are totally mixed: not only
nations, but even families can be, and generally are, composed of
both human types. This state of things is the belated result of
transgressing the Biblical prohibition against mixed marriages.
The
dominant position of the pre-adamics that is a result of the
esoteric failure of the adamics is now creating a critical situation
of unprecedented gravity. The remainder of the Time of transition
offers the last chance for humanity to reestablish the threatened
equilibrium and so avoid a general cataclysm. If we do not take this
opportunity, the tradition of “Solomon” will finally overcome the
tradition of “David/Perseus”.
Then, deflected from the goals of
Ascension, and even going beyond the limits of what is necessary and
useful to feed the Matrix, the false prophets and their followers,
thinking that they are right, will hurl pre-adamic humanity -
the
children of this world - against the adamics - the children of light - and will provoke a final frightful and useless struggle.
If this should happen, if the adamic humanity does not manage to
quell the revolt against the Love of the Son, a resistance that
would ensure victory, the balance will finally be broken, and
humanity will be destroyed in the Deluge of Fire.
Mouravieff’s
description of the “Fall” of the Adamic race also follows the same
lines as the description given to us from the Cassiopaeans where we
see that this is a symbolic version of the “Fall” of our
consciousness unit.
In the following excerpt, note that our term
“Lizzies” is a short-hand notation for those theorized denizens of hyperdimensional realities whose “essence” is “read” as
reptilian:
08-28-99
Q: Well, this is one of the problems I am dealing with in trying to
write this history of mankind. As I understand it, or as I am trying to figure it out
from the literature, prior to the ‘Fall in Eden’, mankind lived in a
4th density state. Is that correct? A: Semi/sort of. Q: Please be more specific. A: 4th density in another realm, such as time/space continuum, etc. Q: Okay, so this realm changed, as a part of the cycle; various
choices were made: the human race went through the door after the ‘gold’, so to speak,
and became aligned with the Lizzies after the ‘female energy’
consorted with the wrong side, so to speak. This is what you have
said. This resulted in a number of effects: the breaking up of the
DNA, the burning off of the first ten factors of DNA, the separation
of the hemispheres of the brain... A: Only reason for this: you play in the dirt, you’re gonna get
dirty. Q: (T) What were we before the “Fall”? A: 3rd density STO.73 Q: (T) We are STS at this point because of what happened then? A: Yes. [...] Q: (T) We were 3rd density STO at that time. Was this after the
battle that had transpired? In other words, were we, as a 3rd density race,
literally on our own at that point, as opposed to before? A: Was battle. Q: (L) The battle was in us? A: Through you. Q: (T) The battle was through us as to whether we would walk through
this doorway... (L) The battle was fought through us, we were literally
the battleground. (T) Was the battle over whether or not we walked through that door? A: Close. Q: (T) Okay, we were STO at that point. You have said before that on
this density we have the choice of being STS or STO. A: Oh Terry, the battle is always there, it’s “when” you choose that
counts! [...] Q: (T) This must tie into why the [aliens] keep telling people that
they have given their consent for abduction and so forth. We were
STO and now we are STS. A: Yes, ... “When” you went for the gold, you said “Hello” to the
Lizards and all that that implies. Q: (T) ...By going for the gold, we became STS beings because going
for the gold was STS. A: Yes. Q: (T) And, in doing so, we ended up aligning ourselves with the 4th
density Lizard Beings... A: Yes.
Q: (T) Because they are 4th density beings and they have a lot more
abilities than we at 3rd density... A: You used to be aligned with 4th density STO. Q: (T) And we were 3rd density STO. But, by going for the gold we
aligned ourselves with 4th density STS. A: Yes. Q: (T) And by doing so we gave 4th density STS permission to do
whatever they wish with us? A: Close. Q: (T) So, when they tell us that we gave them permission to abduct
us, it is this they are referring to? A: Close. Q: (J) Go back to what they said before: “Free will could not be
abridged if you had not obliged”. (T) We, as the human race, used
our free will to switch from STO to STS. (L) So, at some level we
have chosen the mess we are in and that is the Super Ancient Legend
of the Fallen Angel, Lucifer. That is us. We fell by falling into
that door, so to speak, going after the pot of gold, and when we
fell through the door, the serpent bit us! A: But this is a repeating syndrome. Q: (L) Is it a repeating syndrome just for the human race or is it a
repeating syndrome throughout all of creation? A: It is the latter.
73 The Cassiopaeans use the terms
Service to Others (STO) and
Service to Self (STS) to describe the manifestations of the two
basic principles. STO describes the state of living according to the
Creative Principle; STS describes the state of living according to
the Entropic Principle. Much of our work in this life is to
understand these two basic principles, aligning yourself with one or
the other.
The adamic race with its full set of DNA, with its connection to the
higher centers in place and functioning, is what the C’s describe
here as 3D density STO living in a “semi/sort of” 4D state aligned
with 4D STO. That sounds very much like a “Golden Age” when man
“walked with the Gods”.
In making the choice to experience greater physicality, the
consciousness unit fractures and “Falls” from the STO state, loses
its connection with the higher centers, and finds itself more or
less at the same level as the pre-adamic race, those who have no
possibility of reaching the higher centers because the DNA hardware
isn’t in place.
However, because this new 3D STS existence was not
the “natural habitat” for a body with the potential to reach the
higher centers, the fallen race is at a disadvantage compared to the
pre-adamics.
Q: In Book III of his Gnosis, Mouravieff discusses what he calls
“pre-Adamic
humanity” and “Adamic humanity”. As I read this I could see that the
thing I was
struggling to understand in terms of psychopathy as discussed in the
AdventuresSeries,74 was exactly what Mouravieff was describing.
However, he
was using the
Bible to explain it, and that just didn’t quite work. Nevertheless,
the basic idea is
that pre-Adamic human types basically have no “soul”, nor any
possibility of
growing one. This is certainly shocking, but there have been many
recent scholarly
discussions of this matter based on what seems to be clinical
evidence that, indeed,
there are human beings who are just “mechanical” and have no “inner”
or “higher self” at all. Gurdjieff talked about this and so did
Castaneda. Are Mouravieff’s ideas about the two basic TYPES of
humans - as far as they go - accurate. A: Indeed, though again, there is a “Biblical Gloss”. The pre-Adamic
types are
“organic” portals between levels of density.
This, of course, raises the issue of whether or not trying to “help”
or “save” such individuals is a waste of time. Another clue to the
“vile superstition” and “hatred of humanity”. Q: Is it a waste of time to try to help or “save” such individuals? A: Pretty much. Most of them are
very efficient machines. The ones
that you have
identified as psychopaths are “failures”. The best ones cannot be
discerned except by long and careful observation. Q: Have any of us ever encountered one of these “organic portals”
and if so, can you identify one for the sake of instruction. A: If you consider that the population is equally distributed, then
you will
understand that in an ordinary “souled” person’s life, that person
will encounter half as many organic portals as souled individuals.
BUT, when someone is in the process of “growing” and strengthening
the soul, the Control System will seek to insert even more “units”
into that person’s life. Now, think of all the people you have ever
met and particularly those with whom you have been, or are,
intimate. Which half of this number would YOU designate as being
organic portals? Hard to tell, eh? Q: (B) Is this the original meaning of the “pollution of the
bloodline”? A: Yes.
74
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/adventureindex.htm
This certainly gave a whole new meaning to the experiences I have
described in the Adventures series published on our website. It also
became clear that the work of discerning these “Organic Portals”
from souled human beings is CRUCIAL to the so-called “ascension”
process. Without the basic understanding of transformation of, and
conservation of energies, there is no possibility of making any
progress in such a pursuit.
During the session quoted above, one of the attendees stated that
there was a member of her family who she was certain was one of
these “organic portals”.
The C’s jumped to respond:
A: Now, do not start labeling without due consideration. Remember
that very often the individual who displays contradictory behavior may be a souled
being in struggle. Q: (L) I would say that the chief thing they are saying is that the
really good ones - you could never tell except by long observation.
The one key we discovered from studying psychopaths was that their
actions do not match their words. But what if that is a symptom of
just being weak and having no will? (A) How can I know if I have a
soul? A: Do you ever hurt for another? Q: (V) I think they are talking about empathy. These soulless humans
simply don’t care what happens to another person. If another person
is in pain or misery, they don’t know how to care. A: The only pain they experience is “withdrawal” of “food” or
comfort, or what they want. They are also masters of twisting perception of others so
as to seem to be empathetic. But, in general, such actions are
simply to retain control.
Q: (A) What does having a soul or not
having a soul have to do with bloodline? A: Genetics marry with soul if present. Q: Do “organic portals” go to fifth density when they die? A: Only temporarily until the “second death”. Q: (V) What is the “origin” of these organic portal human types? In
the scheme of creation, where did they come from? A: They were originally part of the bridge between 2nd density and
3rd density.
Review transcripts on the subject of short wave cycles and long wave
cycles. Ark had been reading the transcripts and noted that the C’s
had said that sleep was necessary for human beings because it was a
period of “rest and recharging”. They had also said that the SOUL
rests while the body is sleeping.
So, the next logical question was
“what source of energy was tapped to recharge both the body and the
soul”?
A: The question needs to be separated. What happens to a souled
individual is
different from an organic portal unit.
At this point, we stopped and discussed the possibility that the
life force energy that is embodied in Organic Portals must be
something like the soul pool that is theorized to exist for flora
and fauna. This would, of course, explain the striking and
inexplicable similarity of psychopaths, that is so well defined,
that they differ from one another only in the way that different
species of trees are different in the overall class of “Tree-ness”.
So, we divided the question and asked first:
Q: ... where does the energy come from that recharges Organic
Portals. A: The pool you have described. Q: Does the recharging of the souled being come from a similar pool,
only maybe the “human” pool? A: No - it recharges from the so-called
sexual center which is a
higher center of
creative energy. During sleep, the emotional center, not being
blocked by the lower intellectual center and the moving center, transduces the energy from the sexual center. It is also the time
during which the higher emotional and intellectual centers can rest
from the “drain” of the lower centers’ interaction with those pesky
organic portals so much loved by the lower centers. This respite
alone is sufficient to make a difference. But, more than that, the
energy of the sexual center is also more available to the other
higher centers. Q: From where does the so-called “sexual center” get ITS energy? A: The sexual center is in direct contact with 7th density in its
“feminine” creative
thought of “Thou, I Love.” The “outbreath” of “God” in the relief of
constriction. Pulsation. Unstable Gravity Waves. Q: Do the “centers” as described by Mouravieff relate at all to the
idea of “chakras”. A: Quite closely. In an individual of the organic variety, the
so-called higher chakras are “produced in effect” by stealing that energy from souled
beings. This is what gives them the ability to emulate souled
beings. The souled being, in effect, perceives a mirror of their own
soul when they ascribe “soul qualities” to such beings. Q: Is this a correspondence that starts at the basal chakra which
relates to the sexual center as described by Mouravieff? A: No. The “sexual center” corresponds to the solar plexus. Lower
moving center - basal chakra. Lower emotional - sexual chakra. Lower intellectual -
throat chakra. Higher emotional - heart chakra. Higher intellectual - crown chakra
Q: (V) What about the so-called seventh, or “third
eye” chakra? A: Seer. The union of the heart and intellectual higher centers.
This would “close the circuit” in the “shepherd’s crook” configuration. Q: (V) What about the many ideas about 12 chakras, and so forth,
that are currently being taught by many new age sources? A: There are no such. This is a corrupted conceptualization based on
the false belief that the activation of the physical endocrine system is the same as
the creation and fusion of the magnetic center. The higher centers
are only “seated” by being “magnetized”. And this more or less
“External” [unseated] condition of the Higher Centers has been
perceived by some individuals and later joined to the perceived
“seating” locations, in potential. This has led to “cross
conceptualization” based on assumption! Q: Are the levels of initiation and levels of the staircase as
presented by Mouravieff fairly accurate? A: Yes, but different levels accessed in other so-called lives can
relieve the
intensity of some levels in “another” life.
Summing Up
So it is, according to the most ancient secret tradition, there are
two types of humans on our planet. In the above quoted session, the
Cassiopaeans confirmed that, once the Biblical gloss was removed, Mouravieff’s description was accurate. The most important thing
about the Cassiopaean comments is, however, that they were able to
deepen our understanding by situating the pre-adamic race within
hyperdimensional reality and the Matrix control system.
Let’s look
at four points they raised:
-
The pre-adamic race serve as portals between levels of density.
-
They are “very efficient machines” and “The best ones cannot be
discerned except by long and careful observation”.
-
They steal energy from souled beings so as to emulate them.
-
They make-up one-half of humanity.
One-half of humanity. Stealing energy from souled beings. Think
about it. Sure does sound like what most people would consider a
“vile superstition” and a “hatred of humanity”. Not just then, but
now as well.
But if it is true, it explains why the teachings of Jesus say what
they do. It also explains why it had to be covered up. Because, if
it is true, it means that the two races have been interbreeding for
a very, very long time.
Intermixing of the Races
It is extremely important to understand that the two races have been
interbreeding for thousands, if not tens of thousands of years. It
is impossible to look at the races on the earth today, the red, the
white, the black, or the yellow, and argue that one or the other is
this “pre-adamic” and soulless race. We cannot speak of groups,
nations, tribes, or peoples who are members of the “soulless” race
as a group.
The DNA of the two races is completely mixed, and this
is the real meaning of the pollution of the bloodline. Only those
with the appropriate genetic makeup are actually able to accommodate
a soul and therefore pursue esoteric work, which means that no color
or ethnic group is either excluded or has an advantage.
Consider this further: According to the ancient tradition revealed
by Mouravieff, the DNA of these two races is so mixed that both can
be found within the same families. Jesus pointed out that he would
turn a husband against his wife, a child against the parent, and so
on. And we now begin to really understand what this might have
meant, again, assuming this information to be accurate. We wish to
insist on this point, so that the hard of thinking will not take
this idea and use it to underpin any racist attitudes.
The two races
are so intermingled that it is a question of the individual genetics
of each person on the planet.
This is suggested in these comments
from the Cassiopaeans:
Q: (L) I want to get back on my question that you have not
answered... I want to know who, exactly, and why, exactly,
genetically engineered the Semitic people, and why there is such an
adversarial attitude between them and the Celts and Aryans. A: It is not just between the Jews and Celts, if you will take
notice. Besides, it is the individual aural profile that counts and not groupings or
classifications. But, to answer your question: there are many
reasons both from on and off the planet…. Q: (L) So, the creation of the Germanic “Master Race” was what they
were going after, to create this “breeding ground”? A: Yes. Q: (L) And, getting rid of the Jews was significant? Couldn’t a
Germanic master race be created without destroying another group? A: No. Q: Why? A: Because of 4th density prior encoding mission destiny profile. Q: (L) What does that mean? A: This means encoding to activate after elevation to 4th density,
thus if not
eliminated, negates Nephalim domination and absorption. Jews were
prior encoded to carry out mission after conversion, though on
individual basis….
You will notice that the C’s are pointing us in
the direction of individuals and away from groups. It is not
“groupings or classifications”, it is the “individual aura profile”.
And this coincides with Mouravieff‘s statements on the issue as he
remarks here:
“…But the mixing of chromosomes was already an accomplished fact, so
that the hormonal symmetry of the adamics has naturally diminished
through the generations until it has become stabilized at the point
it has now reached. … certain indications in the Gospel lead us to
believe that the two human races that coexist on the earth are
numerically equal…”
(p. 130)
We repeat: The DNA of these two races is so mixed that
both can be
found within the same families. Your brother, sister, mother,
father, daughter or son. Not somebody “other” across the world or
across the street worshipping a different God or with a different
skin color. It may be somebody you live with every day of your life,
and if so, they have but one reason to be here, to drain, distract
and deflect souled beings from evolving. And it is important also to
note that this cannot be “conscious”. Such individuals are as little
aware that they do NOT have “higher centers” as those who do except,
perhaps, that the latter may feel something is “missing” in their
lives.
The way back to the activation of the DNA necessary to attain the
contact with the higher centers is not through genetic manipulation,
which is seeing the question through the lens of Matrix influences.
The way back is through the ancient spiritual science, the real work
of the alchemists, which through the heating of the crucible, the
neo-cortex, rewires the brain so that the ancient and broken
connection with the higher centers can be reestablished. It is the
fusing of the “magnetic center”, the “birth of the holy child”, the
real “I”.
This is natural “genetic modification” in terms of
enhancing the feedback loop between the Thought Center of Being,
rather than the Thought Center of non-being.
Big difference.
Q: (A) Which part of a human extends into 4th density? A: That which is affected by pituitary gland. Q: (L) And what is that? A: Psychic. Q: (A) Are there some particular DNA sequences that facilitate
transmission between densities? A: Addition of strands. Q: (L) How do you get added strands? A: You don’t get, you receive. Q: (L) Where are they received from? A: Interaction with upcoming wave, if vibration is aligned. Q: (L) How do you know if this is happening? A: Psycho-physiological changes manifest. […] STO tends to do the
process within
the natural flow of things. STS seeks to alter creation processes to
fit their ends.
OPs and the Big Picture
That there exists a soulless race, now numbering close to 3 billion
inhabitants of this planet, certainly helps explain why the Earth is
in its current state. That this soulless race are portals used by
the 4D STS to maintain their control over us further explains the
depth of the manipulations and why it was essential to cover up the
teachings of the man we now call Jesus, but who the Cassiopaeans
have said was actually named Jesinavarah.
Organic Portals are the
terminal connections of the geographic overseer sub-units of the
Thought Centers of non-being. It is through our relationships with
them that we feed and maintain the Matrix. Organic portals are
generic vehicles or portals, in human form, open for use by a
variety of forces, which is why they make excellent matrix puppets.
It just so happens that they’re being used now by 4D STS to control
3D STS / 4D STO candidates through “clapper” and “vampire” functions - keeping us locked into a behavioral pattern matching the
orchestrated norm, and being physically close to us to sap our
energies and to keep us from having enough “escape velocity” to
remove ourselves from the Matrix Control System’s tug, via
development of our magnetic centers.
Thus we see that the “natural” function of the OP, this imitation of
the soul energy, assumes a specific character within the STS
development stream, collecting the soul energy of souled individuals
in order to pass it along the feeding chain to 4D STS. The principal
role of the OP is now to prevent the genuine seeker from advancing along the Way.
This is clear
when we look at the following:
-
OPs collect soul energy from souled individuals.
-
This energy is transmitted to 4D STS.
-
OPs are intermixed in families with souled individuals.
-
When a souled individual makes the commitment to the “work”, he or
she needs to learn to conserve the soul energy, for without it the
work cannot be done. When one makes a commitment to the “work”, one
comes under attack.
This “attack” comes from those closest to you:
family and friends.
The Cassiopaeans said,
“BUT, when someone is in the process of
‘growing’ and strengthening the soul, the Control System will seek
to insert even more ‘units’ into that person’s life.”
So in many ways, the actual work of learning to adjust the lens of
one’s view of reality involves learning to discern the true nature
of the seeker’s relationships, in order to conserve energy in their
relationships with the OPs, so that the seeker can accumulate enough
energy to grow and strengthen the connection to the soul.
Mouravieff
makes this clear when he makes the following comments about
understanding the “film” of your life:
In theory, the film in which a man is born and in which he lives can
go on until the end of the world, on condition that he is happy,
satisfied with himself, attributing his virtues to himself, and
blaming others for his mistakes and misfortunes. Properly speaking,
this kind of existence cannot be considered as human; it could be
described as anthropoid.
This term is justified in the sense that
exterior man, immersed in self-satisfaction, represents the crowning
achievement of millions of years of evolution of the species from
its animal ancestors, yet, from the point of view of esoteric
evolution, he is a possibility which has not yet been realized. If
we envisage the problem of esoteric evolution from the point of view
of the film and the different parts man can play in it, it is clear
that this kind of evolution is impossible as long as the film can
always be considered as running in the same circle.
People who
perform in such a film are those we have called anthropoids,
puppets, the dead who, in the words of Jesus, ‘believe themselves to
be alive’. Esoteric evolution starts when man, by his conscious
efforts, proves capable of breaking the circle and transforming it
into an ascending spiral.
(Book I, pp 234-5)
But to do this, those
secondary roles, those filled by the puppets, the Organic Portals,
must be eliminated from the film.
As we have just said, man most often comes to this idea of evolution
after he has already complicated the film to which he belongs. But
true evolution cannot occur except on the basis of the original film
– after all the artificially added elements have been eliminated.
The latter is conditional on a return to the purity of the centers,
especially the emotional center which – at least at the start – is
the sole receptacle of spiritual influences, and seat of the
magnetic center. The heart must therefore be pure, and if it is not
already pure it must be purified. This is the sine qua non condition
of success.
(Book I, p. 238)
And, as we now know, the heart cannot be purified without great
knowledge which leads to perspicacity. Painful though it may seem to
be, among those “artificially added elements” which need to be
eliminated from our lives are the Organic Portals.
This suggests to us the possibility that the figure around which the
Jesus legend was wrapped was presenting a teaching that denied
everything that all of the other religions promoted.
Such a concept
denies,
-
the value of sacrifice to the Gods
-
it denies the value of
appeasing the Gods
-
denies honoring the Gods
-
denies praying to the Gods
-
denies expecting to be saved by or cleansed from sin by any of the
Gods
It
places the important lesson squarely upon the human being as
described in the Parable of the Prodigal Son.
It describes the son
as going to a Far Country. It describes the “Fall” as “a famine in
the country.” It tells us how the Prodigal Son went to a “resident
of the Far Country” to ask for help. We can easily see that this
resident represents the God of this world in his three monotheistic
permutations. And what did the God do? Sent the Prodigal Son to live
with the pigs. And there we see the clear explication of the Organic
Portals in our lives.
And we also understand the use of the term in
the saying,
“Do not cast your pearls before swine lest they turn and
rend you in pieces”.
And speaking of pearls, we begin to understand
the reason that the “pearl” was used as the metaphor for the
magnetic center “buried” in a field and the necessity to sell all
you own to obtain the field with the pearl of great price. A pearl
is formed over time, layer after layer, around a seed, a kernel, a
grain of sand that is an “irritant”. In this world, souled beings
ARE irritants, but in this world they have the possibility of
“growing a soul”, and ascending.
If we just learn to “make nice and
get along” and suffer as nobly as possible and forgive and forget
while maintaining close “feeding relationships” with
Organic Portals, then we are wasting our time.
Forgiveness and understanding
are, certainly, important. But what is most important is to not use
such as a pretext to prolong the feeding relationship. The big
problem is: discerning the difference between the children of the
Kingdom of Heaven and the children of a “lesser God”. Such an idea,
and only such an idea, would have been most definitely a “vile
superstition”.
In fact, we have something of a parallel in some remarks about
Pythagoras. He was accused of believing the “vile superstitions” of
the barbarians, that a soul is born over and over again into
different bodies.
In the Cathar Gospel of John, the following
passage tells us something very important:
And after that I, John, asked of the Lord, saying: How say men that
Adam and Eve were created by God and set in paradise to keep the
commandments of the Father, and were delivered unto death? And the
Lord said to me: Hearken, John, beloved of my Father; foolish men
say thus in their deceitfulness that my Father made bodies of clay:
but by the Holy Ghost made he all the powers of the heavens, and
holy ones were found having bodies of clay because of their
transgression, and therefore were delivered unto death.
And again I, John, asked the Lord: How beginneth a man to be in the
Spirit (to have a spirit) in a body of flesh? And the Lord said unto
me: Certain of the angels which fell do enter unto the bodies of
women, and receive flesh from the lust of the flesh, and so is a
spirit born of spirit, and flesh of flesh, and so is the kingdom of
Satan accomplished in this world and among all nations.
And he said to me: My Father hath suffered him to reign seven days,
which are seven ages.
And I asked the Lord and said: What shall be in that time? And he
said to me: From the time when the devil fell from the glory of the
Father and (lost) his own glory, he sat upon the clouds, and sent his ministers, even angels
flaming with fire, unto men from Adam even unto Henoch his servant.
And he raised up Henoch upon the firmament and showed him his
Godhead and commanded pen and ink to be given him: and he sat down
and wrote threescore and seven books. And he commanded that he
should take them to the earth and deliver them unto his sons. And
Henoch let his books down upon the earth and delivered them unto his
sons, and began to teach them to perform the custom of sacrifice,
and unrighteous mysteries, and so did he hide the kingdom of heaven
from men. And he said unto them: Behold that I am your God and
beside me is none other God.
And therefore did my Father send me into the world that I might make
it known unto men, that they might know the evil device of the
devil.
Interestingly, the above quote is reflected in a comment made by the
C’s at an early point in the experiment:
Q: […] In a previous session I asked a question about the ‘sons of
Belial’ and the ‘sons of the law of One’, as explicated by
Edgar
Cayce, and whether these were philosophical or racial divisions. You
said that they were initially racial, and then philosophical and
religious. Now, from putting the information about religions
together throughout the centuries, I am coming to a rather difficult
realization that the whole monotheistic idea, which is obviously the
basic concept of the ‘sons of the law of One’, is the most clever
and devious and cunning means of control I have ever encountered in
my life. No matter where it comes from, the priests say “we have the
ONE God, WE are his agents, you pay us your money, and we’ll tell
him to be nice to you in the next world”! A: Clever if one is deceived. Silly truffle if one is not. Q: Well, I know! But, uncovering this deception, this lie that the
‘power’ is ‘out there’ is unbelievable. So, the … ‘Sons of Belial’,
is not the negative thing that I interpreted it as at the time and
the ‘Sons of the Law of One’, became the monotheistic Judaism, which
then was transformed into the Christian religious mythos, and has
been an ongoing theme since Atlantean times. A: Woven of those who portray the lights. Q: And that is always the way it has been. They appear as ‘angels of
light’. And, essentially, everything in history has been rewritten
by this group. A: Under the influence of others. And whom do you suppose? Q: Well, the
4th density STS. A: Sending pillars of light and chariots of fire to deliver the
message.
At one point in the
Gnostic gospel of Thomas, the disciples ask
Thomas what Jesus told him when he withdrew with him and “told him
three things”. Thomas said to them,
“If I tell you even one of the
things he told me, you will pick up rocks and stone me. Then fire
will come forth from the rocks and devour you”.
By now we have an
idea of what was so controversial about what Jesus was saying in
private that even some of his closest followers could not be told.
At another point in this text, Jesus says to his disciples,
following a rendition of the parable of the sower,
“This is also how
you can acquire the kingdom of heaven. If you do not acquire it
through knowledge, you will not be able to find it.”
Repeatedly throughout the Gnostic texts, the seeking of knowledge -
in the sense of Truth, or the unseen reality behind the symbols of
our world - as opposed to belief in salvation from a “God out
there”, was emphasized. That was truly heretical in those days. In
fact, it is heretical now.
If “three day deaths and resurrections” of savior Gods was so
commonplace throughout the Middle East, why was Jesus saying:
“You miserable people! You unfortunate ones! You pretenders to
truth! You falsifiers of knowledge! You sinners against the spirit!
Why do you continue to listen when from the beginning you should
have been speaking? Why do you sleep when from the beginning you
should have been awake, that the kingdom of heaven might receive
you? I tell you the truth: it is easier for a holy person to sink
into filth, and for an enlightened person to sink into darkness,
than for you to reign.” 75
At one point, in the Gospel of Thomas,
Jesus makes a rather astounding comparison:
‘They saw a Samaritan carrying a lamb and going to Judea. He said to
his disciples, “Why is he carrying the lamb around?” They said to
him, “So that he may kill it and eat it.” He said to them, “He will
not eat it while it is alive, but only after it has been killed and
has become a carcass.” They said, “it cannot happen any other way.”
He said to them, “So also with you: seek a place of rest for
yourselves, that you may not become a carcass and be eaten.”
76
75 Meyer, Marvin W., The Secret Teachings of Jesus: Four Gnostic
Gospels – Gnostic Gospel of James (New York: Random House 1984) p.
9.
76 Ibid., p. 29.
That’s a far cry from the accepted Christian image of the “Good
Shepherd”.
The point is, the Gnostic gospels, obviously the “other
Christianity” that was abolished and buried by
the church, had, as
the centerpiece of their teachings, that the Gods of the many
religions down through the ages were merely different manifestations
of the negative forces of the hyperdimensional reality and that this
realm of evil Gods acted on souled beings through the intermediary
of Organic Portals.
But such an idea is extremely difficult to deal
with when an individual has been inculcated for all of his or her
life in a belief system that includes as a precaution the idea that
ideas such as this will come along as the “wiles of Satan”, tempting
a person to renounce their faith.
The Matrix Control System went into overdrive damage control to
stamp out the teachings of Jesus in the middle of the second
century. From that point on, Gnosticism was heresy and the Egyptian
model of the dying and resurrecting savior - the corn God - had been
substituted into the Christian mythological structure, and a
“history” of a “real person” about whom all would revolve was
carefully written. But, not carefully enough.
Obviously, as with the
Old
Testament, real stories and real sayings had to be used or the
adherents of the system would notice.
We are told that by the end of the fourth century the struggle
between the Catholic Church and the classical Gnosticism represented
in
the Nag Hammadi texts was essentially over. The church now had
the added force of political correctness to bolster its dogmatic
denunciation. With this material sword, so-called “heresy” was
surgically removed from the Christian body; without anesthesia, I
should add. Gnosticism was eradicated, its remaining teachers
murdered or driven into exile, and its sacred books destroyed.
All
that remained for scholars seeking to understand Gnosticism in later
centuries were the denunciations and fragments preserved in the
patristic heresiologies.
The Cathars
The years from the fifth through the fifteenth century - the “Dark
Ages” - are among the most mysterious in all of history. It was
during this period that Christianity - as we know it - was imposed
on the Western world, and any significant opposition to the
teachings of the church was destroyed. You could say that this was a
“COINTELPRO program” with a twist. Instead of relying on
psychological manipulation and character assassination only,
the
Church did all of that, and more: they destroyed those who didn’t
agree with their globalization and conquest agendas.
Catharism was viewed as perhaps the most dangerous rival to the
Catholic Church. In the same way that modern day COINTELPRO brands
opposition to the Bush Reich’s global conquest agenda as either a
“cult” or “conspiracy theory”, the Catholic Church labeled
opposition “heresy”.
The church launched a particularly vicious crusade against the
Cathars: 20,000 people were slaughtered in the city of Beziers
alone. Reportedly when asked how to distinguish heretics from
Catholics, the monk in charge of the battle replied, “Kill them all,
God will know his own”. The Cathars who survived then became the
early targets of
the Inquisition - which of course makes us wonder
about the original “witches”.
Were they - in part - Catharist in
persuasion? If so, what part of their extant ideas might be a
reflection of Cathar teachings?
The Cathars were pacifistic, and they embraced tolerance and
poverty. What we would like to know is were they closely associated
with the ORIGINAL Christianity before the official church wiped them
out and replaced the religion of Christ with the religion of men
seeking power?
One thing is certain: they were “well and truly heretical, by every
definition
except their own”.77
As it happens, the Cathars were closely connected to the Grail
Legends. This
brings up the question: did the Cathars have - at least in part -
the knowledge of
the ancient esoteric Christianity? It certainly seems that these are
the teachings that are portrayed in the Grail Legends before the
Catholic Church corrupted them. What is certain is that the earliest
Grail stories described a spiritual process rather than an object.
There are a number of people nowadays who claim to speak with
authority about
what the Cathars did or did not believe, but most of them are
blowing smoke. The
fact is, the only thing we know about what the Cathars believed or
taught is what
is filtered through the accusations of their detractors.
The
following account is
from a medieval source:
“Reynaldus: On the Accusations Against the
Albigensians.”
(“Albigensians” was another name for the Cathars.):
First it is to be known that the heretics held that there are two
Creators; viz. one of invisible things, whom they called the
benevolent God, and another of visible things, whom they named the
malevolent God.78 The New Testament they attributed to the
benevolent God; but the Old Testament to the malevolent God, and
rejected it altogether, except certain authorities, which are
inserted in the New Testament from the Old; which, out of reverence
to the New Testament, they esteemed worthy of reception.79
There is
no surviving version of the Cathar New Testament, so we are without
any idea of what, precisely, they did include as being valid. We do
think that the Gnostic gospels are, very likely, if not the same,
similar, to the Cathar texts.
We do know that they esteemed the
gospel of John as being the “closest” to the truth, and that they
considered the “historical” gospels to be all “made up” stories that
had nothing to do with the “real” Jesus.
They charged the author of the Old Testament with falsehood, because
the Creator said, “In the day that ye eat of the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil ye shall die;” nor (as they say) after
eating did they die; when, in fact, after the eating the forbidden
fruit they were subjected to the misery of death. They also call him
a homicide, as well because he burned up Sodom and Gomorrah, and
destroyed the world by the waters of the deluge, as because he
overwhelmed Pharaoh, and the Egyptians, in the sea.80
77 O’Shea,
Stephen, The Perfect Heresy: The Revolutionary Life and Death of the
Medieval Cathars (Walker & Company).
78 Notice how similar this idea is to the explication I gave earlier
of the Thought Centers of Being and non-being.
79 From Raynaldus, “Annales,” in S. R. Maitland, trans., History of
the Albigenses and Waldenses,(London: C. J. G. and F. Rivington 1832) pp. 392 - 394.
80 Ibid.
This is quite clearly a Gnostic idea.
The Gnostics taught that
Jehovah/Yahweh was an “Evil God” more like a demon than anything
else. But, a part of their teaching as well was that he did have
something to do with the creation of the material world. So, he
clearly wasn’t just a “demon” in the sense of an ethereal attacker
of human beings who could be “cast out” by an exorcism.
No, indeed,
he was far more than that! He was a hyperdimensional being of great
power and cunning!
They affirmed also, that all the fathers of the Old Testament were
damned; that John the Baptist was one of the greater demons.81 This
is an interesting remark since it relates in a curious way to a
comment of “Jesus” in the Secret Book of James.
His disciples are
asking him:
“Lord, how can we prophesy to those who ask us to
prophesy to them? For many people ask us, and they expect to hear a
sermon from us.”
The Lord answered and said:
Do you not know that the head of prophecy was removed with John?
When you
realize what the head is, and that prophecy comes from the head,
then understand
what this means: its head was taken away. At first I spoke with you
in parables, but
you did not understand. Now I am speaking with you plainly, and you
still do not perceive. 82
81 Ibid.
82 Meyer, Marvin W., The Secret Teachings of Jesus: Four Gnostic
Gospels, (New York: Random House 1984) p. 7.
This is, no doubt, an extremely mysterious
remark. Writers of the present day, not understanding the symbolism
of the “talking head” and the head of John the Baptist as it relates
to the head of Bran the Blessed, the Ark of the Covenant, and the
Holy Grail, have erroneously come to the conclusion that John the
Baptist was the true object of worship of the Cathars and Templars.
[Picknett and Prince.] Some writers have even ignorantly proposed
that this “talking head” is the armillary sphere of Pope Sylvester,
and that it “talks” about “precessional cycles”.
It is quite
probable that the remark of Raynaldus about the condemnation of John
the Baptist by the Cathars has some foundation in fact. If so, what
are we to make of the claims of those who propose that there has
been a secret society for millennia that actually worships John the
Baptist and Mary Magdalene in secret? Certainly, if that had been
the case with the Cathars, Raynaldus would have said so because such
a claim was damning enough in its own right. But that is not what he
said.
He said that the Cathars damned John the Baptist as one of the
greater demons. And then we see the “Jesus” of the Gnostic texts
saying that the head of this “demon“ had been related to “prophecy”
and was “removed.”
They said also, in their secret doctrine, (in secreto suo)
that Christ who was born in the visible, and
terrestrial Bethlehem, and crucified in Jerusalem, was a bad man,
and that Mary Magdalene was his concubine; and that she was the
woman
taken in adultery, of whom we read in the gospel. For the good
Christ, as they said, never ate, nor drank, nor took upon him true
flesh, nor ever was in this world, except spiritually in the body of
Paul....83
It is indeed likely that the Cathars did not believe that
the “historical Jesus” was accurately depicted in the New Testament.
Clearly, they did believe that the “Jesus” of the New Testament was
a fraud - and that the gospels themselves were fraudulent. We ought
to pay some attention to the fact that
the Cathars may have believed
that the Great Work had been accomplished by the apostle Paul, and
that Paul may, indeed, have been the man around whom the Jesus
legend was spun.
In other words, was Paul the REAL Jesus? An
interesting idea to hold in the mind while reading his epistles
(those that are confirmably his and not merely attributed to him.
See Wells for the analyses.84)
83 Raynaldus, Op Cit.
84 Wells, G.A., The Historical Evidence for Jesus, (Buffalo:
Prometheus 1988).
In the teachings of Paul, it is evident from textual analysis that
Paul did not know of a “Christ” as a historical personage in the
body of a man called Jesus as represented in the New Testament. He
knew of a “Christ” spirit that was an “anointing” of gnosis. When
his writings are analyzed with all the tools of linguistics, and the
additions, glosses, and interpolations removed (not to mention the
epistles that are clearly not Pauline), we find a series of
teachings that is most definitely Gnostic in flavor and texture.
Not
only that, but the teacher that Paul referred to had quite a
different history than the Jesus of the New Testament. Raynaldus’
remark about Mary Magdalene does irreparable damage to many popular
theories of the present time: that she was the “wife of Jesus”, and
that they produced children together and that these children are the
origin of the idea of the “Sang Real”, or “Holy Blood”.
The point
is, if Raynaldus had simply reported that Mary Magdalene was the
“mistress” of Jesus, and that they had children, then that would
have been sufficiently damning. If he had reported that the Cathars
worshipped John the Baptist as the true Christ that also would have
been sufficiently damning.
However, his version of what they
believed was that,
1) John the Baptist represented a demon
2) and that there was a “bad man” crucified in Jerusalem, who was
connected to Mary Magdalene, but that it wasn’t Jesus.
So he
probably wasn’t making it up. Clearly, the beliefs of the Cathars
were something other than an idea that John the Baptist was the true
Messiah, or that Jesus and Mary had children together, contrary to
what present day expositors of “occult secrets of the Holy Blood,
Holy Grail” would have us believe. It is also likely that the Cathars believed that any physical “crucifixion” that took place was
that of a criminal and not of the “real” Jesus. This was, as they
would perceive it, an overlay of the Egyptian religion of the
resurrection of Horus, or the Tammuz drama, and it was repugnant to
the Gnostic ideas of salvation through fusing the
magnetic center and thereby facilitating direct knowing, as opposed
to salvation by a “sacrifice”.
Their very rejection of the
patriarchs and Yahweh was based on the sacrifice issue, which they
saw as a violent “eating of humanity” undertaken by evil
Archons of
Darkness. Nevertheless, that they apparently did, indeed, have some
idea of an initiatory process that was part of being Christed is
certainly suggested.
This is the Gnostic Staircase explicated by
Boris Mouravieff. They said that almost all
the Church of Rome was a
den of thieves; and that it was the harlot of which we read in the
Apocalypse.
They so far annulled the sacraments of the Church, as
publicly to teach that the water of holy Baptism was just the same
as river water, and that the Host of the most holy body of Christ
did not differ from common bread; instilling into the ears of the
simple this blasphemy, that the body of Christ, even though it had
been as great as the Alps, would have been long ago consumed, and
annihilated by those who had eaten of it.
85 Sure, the Cathars
probably thought and taught all these things.
But then, why not?
They were probably right.
Confirmation and Confession, they considered as altogether vain and
frivolous.
They preached that Holy Matrimony was meretricious, and that none
could be
saved in it, if they should beget children. Denying also the
Resurrection of the
flesh, they invented some unheard of notions, saying, that our souls
are those of
angelic spirits who, being cast down from heaven by the apostasy of
pride, left their
glorified bodies in the air; and that these souls themselves, after
successively
inhabiting seven terrene bodies, of one sort or another, having at
length fulfilled
their penance, return to those deserted bodies.
86
Now, of all the things said by Raynaldus, this last is the most
interesting. But, let
me deal with them in reverse order.
The item that human souls are
those of “higher
beings” is quite in keeping with the many myths and legends of The
Fall - the
former state of man in paradise. But, that this “paradise” is here
described as sort
of “in the air” and not exactly “in heaven”, is most interesting in
terms of hyperdimensional realities. It is also interesting in terms of the
Grail Quest and the
“ascent of the shamans” and the Great Work of alchemy.
The statement
that
clearly describes a belief in reincarnation, and seven incarnations
in particular, is
also interesting since it seems to be a garbling of the seven levels
of reality that are
part and parcel of many other ancient systems of philosophy,
originating, in fact,
in Siberian
Shamanism.87
85 Raynaldus, Op. Cit.
86 Ibid.
87 Many people use the term “shaman” as a catch-all for any
individual possessing any magico-religious
powers in any primitive society. There are discussions of Indian,
Iranian, Germanic, North
and South American, Chinese, and even Babylonian “shamanism,”
particularly when primitive cultures
are being examined. The problem is, if the word “shaman” is taken to
mean any magician, sorcerer,
medicine man, or ecstatic found throughout all religions and
cultures, the word becomes useless and
vague. There are already words for
magicians and sorcerers and mystics and medicine men to express any
number of concepts. When I write about shamanism, I intend to follow
the example of Eliade and restrict the usage to the religious
phenomenon of Siberia and Central Asia.
This is the locale where the
former ancient technology of Europe and the megalith cultures
landed, and was preserved for millennia before being corrupted by
elements from the South. It is the closest we can get to the most
ancient conceptions of the Cosmos, the ancient technology of
transcending space and time.
The item about marriage is interesting in the sense that, indeed, it
seems that the Cathars taught that their followers ought not to have
children so as to not provide more “food” for the Archons of
Darkness - the Matrix. It seems that the Cathar’s main point about
marriage was that if you bring a child into the world, you are
perpetuating darkness because this world is ruled by beings that can
invade the mind, and thereby further entrap the soul. However, they
did not teach an abandonment of marital relations until an
individual was ready to “graduate” and became a “Parfait,” or
“Perfected”.
Some people suggest that the Cathars engaged in some sort of sexual
rites based on other accusations of their detractors. There are also
clues that “sex” of a spiritual sort may have been the rite of
“crucifixion” of the original Christianity, the “Christing”, the
Hieros Gamos, being the Shamanic ascent to the Goddess. Let us just
say at this point that assuming that physical sexual activity has
anything to do with it is misleading - an exoteric blind.
So what we see is that “primitive chiliasm”, if it was related to
Catharism,
included a belief in something slightly different from a physical
resurrection, and
if it was closer to the real teachings of Great Teacher - around whom
the Jesus
Myth was shaped by the church - then it suggests that the
restoration of the
“souled beings” to some sort of “angelic bodies” could be the
explanation as to
why “primitive Chiliasm” and Catharism are closely connected to the
Grail stories - stories that emphasize “romance” and battles with dark forces,
great struggles of a physical and emotional nature that lead to some
great accomplishment: the Great Work of Alchemy.
What we can
hypothesize, based on the evidence, is that these teachings included
the idea of
hyperdimensional realities and literal Time Loops
culminating in cataclysm, with a restoration of a Para-physical
earth - the Edenic State of the Golden Age - on the other side of
the dissolution.
This, of course, leads us to the Mother of all
Grail Stories: Noah and the Ark.
Back
to Contents
Previous
Next
|