January 04, 2017
Facebook is now using the International Fact-Checking Network to weed out fake news. But can we trust it when it’s funded by NWO agents like Soros and Gates?
Why? The multi-billion dollar corporation and CIA data mining operation Facebook has decided to enlist the help of the International Fact-Checking Network in its quest to eliminate "fake news" (i.e. enact censorship through the backdoor).
Those aware of the current psychological operations will know that the entire Russian propaganda and fake news themes are stealthy ways for the establishment to stifle dissent.
They are whipping the public up into a frenzy about purported Russian hacking and Russian interference without a shred of credible evidence, all the while scaring people into thinking they need some "independent" arbiter (outside of themselves) to decipher and decide what is real and what is fake.
It's the ultimate perception grab; they
want you to hand over your power and let your perception be dictated
by them. Now, Facebook has announced it will be using the International Fact-Checking Network and other 3rd party fact-checking organizations to weed out all the fake news.
Guess Who Funds the International Fact-Checking Network?
The IFCN openly states that it is hosted by the Poynter Institute for Media Studies, and that:
Readers of the The Freedom Articles will probably recognize some names here that are an integral part of the New World Order.
These include,
Soros owns and funds a slew of treacherous NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations) such as the National Endowment for Democracy and Open Society Foundations.
The ICFN's Code of 5 Principles
The International Fact-Checking Network has come up with a code of 5 principles by which it operates.
Facebook said it will only work with 3rd party fact-checkers that are signatories to this code of principles, and that once one of these organizations decides that a particular story is fake, it will be flagged as disputed and,
Here are the 5 principles:
Facebook has made it a prerequisite to be a signatory on this code of principles to become a Facebook fact-checker.
However, on the very same page below the code of principles, there is a list of organizations that have already joined.
They include,
...2 MSM outlets...
The Washington Post was the paper that started all the nonsense about Russian propaganda with its own fake news report based on the dodgy research of PropOrNot (a report it later retracted)!
Politifact and Snopes are also on the list, and although they are not MSM (Mainstream Media), their reputations are already quite tarnished due to their past shoddy fact-checking.
Will the International Fact-Checking Network become something akin to a worldwide Ministry of Truth as predicted by George Orwell in 1984?
How Can Fact-Checkers, No Matter How Well Intentioned, Ever Be the Arbiters of Truth?
It's Not About Left vs. Right - It's About Free Speech vs. Censorship
Some commentators and journalists are making this issue into a left vs. right affair, claiming that the fact-checkers are left, liberal or progressive in their political leanings.
While it's true that Soros funds leftist movements, this whole issue is not really about left vs. right. It's about free speech vs. censorship. The fact-checkers will of course have all sorts of biases in their viewpoints, which is why all opinions need to be fully aired so the truth can rise to the surface.
Imagine if everyone looked at every internet story - from the MSM and the Alternative Media alike - and asked with a critical eye: where's your evidence and what are your sources?
There would be no need for fact-checkers, because every reader would become a fact-checker. It would also destroy government lies right from the start ("the Russians are hacking us" and "the zika virus will kill you"), because they would never get a chance to take off.
The only way out of this is education.
The only way people can know the truth is to read widely, inform themselves about the issues, discuss it over and over, get new perspectives, test things out in their own experience and make up their own mind.
Blocking news stories and alternative perspectives will only hamper this (but then, censorship is the whole point of this exercise).
Yes, hoax stories are annoying and click-bait headlines are irritating, but at some point, you have to trust that readers will begin to see through that crap and consciously choose which sites to read and which to shun.
If a site keeps putting out lies and click-bait, at a certain point it will gain a negative reputation and get ostracized.
Collectively, we have to grow up and not expect or call for governments and other organizations like the International Fact-Checking Network to do our fact-checking for us. We have to do it ourselves. It is part of our spiritual journey to be able to mature to the point where we can discern truth from lies.
When enough of us can do that, the world will know peace, for as Julian Assange says, if lies are used to start war, then truth can be used to start peace.
Sources
|