|
7.1 MAGNETIC FIELDS AND “VACUUM DOMAINS”
Naturally, much of the basic structure of the spherical-torus energy field
discussed in the last chapter can be seen in magnetic fields.
Tesla was the
first to discover that magnetic fields are continually rotating, though no
adequate explanation for this has ever been given until now. It is also not
known why good magnets will continue to last for well over 1000 years
without decreasing in strength. In our new model, a bar of iron ferrite or a
metallic planetary core is not required for a magnetic field to form; the
field is created when aether 1 (A1) and aether 2 (A2) flow together in the
basic spherical-torus form. The north-south orientation of the molecules in
the magnet simply allows this energy current to be harnessed.
“Ball lightning” is one of many examples of a stand-alone magnetic field
that have been observed, and as we published in our previous volume and here
in Chapter Five, such luminous plasma spheres have indeed been produced in
the laboratory through the work of Schappeller, Searl, Roschin &
Godin’s
replication of the Searl Effect and others.
In the previous volume we also
covered the phenomena of “Vacuum Domains,” which are spherical energy
formations of different sizes that can possess the following, very anomalous
effects:
1. [Vacuum Domains] are
capable of penetrating through matter at will
2. They can emit or absorb light and other electromagnetic
radiation in the wide frequency range
3. They can cause
electronic devices to stop functioning because of the strong electric
field that they produce both inside and outside of themselves
4.
They will exhibit a measurable magnetic field
5. They can distort gravitational fields, causing objects
to levitate or to become heavier
6. They can cause air
and dust to rotate inside of themselves, since they are in a constant
state of rotation
7. They can have explosions that do not
necessarily change their form and size
8. They possess a
definite geometric form such as a sphere or “ellipsoid,”
which is basically a stretched-out sphere
9. They will be seen and reported far more frequently in the years when the
Sun’s activity has reached its peak
Most importantly, the advanced physics of Dr. V.L. Dyatlov have clearly
demonstrated that these formations can only emerge when two forms of aether
are blended together, known from Terletskiy’s model as “physical vaccum of
matter” or PVM and “physical vacuum of antimatter” or
PVA. (Of course, here
we have called them A1 and A2, as we feel that the matter / antimatter
classification is too limiting of a definition since both are required to
produce matter.)
The key here is that “Vacuum Domains” represent what
happens when A1 and A2 blend together without being able to stabilize fully
enough to create lasting matter/energy. They very actively draw from the
surrounding gravity and torsion-wave energy to try to stabilize themselves,
and thus create anomalous effects. We can also visualize them as a “bubble”
of one aether that has been introduced into the other, similar to what would
happen if we suddenly release oil into water. In that case, we would see
spheres of oil appear, but they would only last for brief moments.
Briefly, we will bring back an excerpt from our previous volume that shows
the different forms that these domains can take, as seen from the work of
Dr. Aleskey Dmitriev and Dr. V.L. Dyatlov:
7.2 ANOMALOUS “VACUUM DOMAIN” PHENOMENA
1. Ball lightning.
According to the authors, this is the most well known and
studied anomalous phenomenon, and it displays all nine VD properties. Most
scientific papers do not mention any effects of levitation occurring with
ball lightning, but this is simply because the ball lightning is so small
that it would be hard to see. The typical formation of ball lightning will
be between 10 and 30 centimeters in diameter. Some have reported seeing dust
particles rotating inside of ball lightning.
2. Natural self-luminous objects or “plasmoids.”
Here we have objects that
may be seen with the naked eye as bright balls of light, and may show up
even better on film if they are photographed. They usually appear near the
areas of the Earth where there is the most energetic activity, in the form
of earthquake-producing faults in the crust. They have similar properties as
ball lightning, and in this case the large-scale effect of levitation is
more likely to be seen. The authors refer us to a case in Russia known as
the “Sasovo explosions,” described by A. Yu. Olhovatov, where these
formations were witnessed as being capable of levitating objects as well as
producing the explosive effects mentioned in property number 7 in the above
list. The images in the study show these clearly.
3. Poltergeists.
While some cases of “haunting” may involve real entities in
a nonphysical form, others appear to be cases where a VD penetrates through
the walls of a person’s home. In these cases, a ball-like, slightly glowing
energy is seen that can levitate objects, create electric and magnetic
fields, spin the water inside drinking glasses and fishbowls and also cause
damage to people. If the phenomenon is seen to occur repeatedly, it might be
because the house is built over an area of the Earth that is more
energetically active and thereby capable of producing these formations.
Certain people, especially disgruntled teenagers, are able to direct the
movement of these formations, since they are inherently created from
intelligent energy.
4. Tornadoes.
All of us are familiar with the violent funnel-like cloud
formation of a tornado, which can create immense damage and levitate objects
essentially intact. The study of tornadoes is so important that Dr. Dmitriev
actually tackles it in an entirely separate paper entitled
“Electrogravidynamic Concept of Tornadoes,” also on the
Millennium Group
website. Most of the nine properties on the list are
associated directly with tornadoes, including the appearance of visible
forms of light. In the “Tornadoes” paper, Dmitriev refers to the following
case:
In 1951 in Texas a funnel passed over an observer at a height of 6 meters,
the interior having a diameter of about 130 meters with walls of 3 meters’
width. Inside the hollow there was a [pulsating] brilliant cloud, [or
central oscillator.] There was no vacuum inside, because it was easy to
breathe.
In other cases, “swarms of ball lightning” and other luminous phenomena
including “continuous glowing light” and “continuous lightning” are seen in
and around tornadoes. Other anomalous phenomena involving gravity and the
interpenetration of matter [were discussed in the previous volume as well,
since aetheric energy displacements to higher densities frequently occur in
tornadoes.] The idea of an “air suction” to explain the anti-gravity effects
inside a tornado is not sufficient, especially if a person can breathe
inside.
5. “Angels.”
This term refers to a special kind of radar interference that
all systems must contend with. In the early days of radar, there were cases
where blips appeared on the screen that appeared to be airplanes or
missiles. The engineers realized that these were not actually physical
objects and referred to them as “angels,” and now radars are built so that
they will not mistakenly detect these formations. The authors suggest that
“angels” are the same as “natural self-luminous formations,” as they both
occur directly over tectonic faults. In the case of NSLFs, they are detected
just above the faults, whereas “angels” are typically detected some
kilometers above the faults.
6. “Small Comets” or “Atmospheric Holes.”
These were seen on ultraviolet
images of the Earth taken at high altitudes. About 20 times a minute, large
black holes are seen to form in the upper ionosphere, each of which is
approximately 30 miles wide. The conventional hypothesis, put forth by those
who discovered this, is that these holes are being produced by “small
comets” of snow and ice. However, if this many comets were constantly
hitting the Earth, they should be also colliding with the Moon as well, but
there are no tremors on the Moon’s surface to correspond with such events.
Therefore, the authors consider that these may be caused by
vacuum domains
as well.
7. Ionospheric and atmospheric explosions.
In this case, the name is
self-explanatory. Many people have heard spontaneous loud explosions with no
apparent source, and without any signs of inclement weather. These
explosions are associated with luminescent forms of spherical geometry that
have also been seen to penetrate matter.
8. Lithospheric pipe explosions.
These are phenomena that occur within the
Earth’s lithosphere or crust, which can conduct electromagnetic fields and
can have an elastic, pliable quality. Geologists have observed sudden pulses
or explosions of heat within the lithosphere, where an elongated elliptical
tube known as a “kimberlite pipe” is formed immediately thereafter. [Often,
the inside of these pipes will be lined with diamonds, and they are well
known to the Eskimo people, as we stated in Chapter Five.] They are
self-luminescent explosions that produce electromagnetic emissions, and, at
least in Russia, they are considered “the great mystery of modern geology.”
9. “Sprites”, elves and jets.
These anomalies have only been recently
discovered, and conventional explanations for them are still fairly weak.
Above thunderstorm clouds, brief and very large flashes of light can appear
up to 100 kilometers in height. They often appear blue or red depending on
their height. Most importantly for Dmitriev et al., these formations are
often associated with the most intense groupings of lightning strikes that
are moving from the clouds to the ground. This suggests that the lightning
is somehow combining with energy from the Earth to cause these luminous
flashes to form.
10. Luminescences associated with earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.
According to Dmitriev et al., almost all earthquakes and volcanic eruptions
are accompanied by the sighting of luminous formations. They may be seen
before, after or during the events themselves, and therefore are very
closely timed with the events.
In our previous volume, the above ten points were then followed by another
observation that Dmitriev and Dyatlov had missed – the enigma of “NASA
UFOs,” which are spherical energy forms that have been detected on many
different pieces of NASA footage. These appear to be originating from within
the Sun. Another candidate for “Vacuum Domains” is the “Rods”
phenomenon,
where helical tubes of faint, luminous spiraling energy are seen to be
zipping around at high speeds on certain videotapes. It is possible that
these documented “Rod” sightings are of vacuum domains whose spiraling
central axis is more visible than the surrounding sphere.
These formations certainly have their place in a Unified cosmology, and they
help to show us the reality of the existence of A1 and A2, since
Dyatlov has
rigorously demonstrated that we must have two different “aethers” that blend
together in order to solve the puzzle of their formation.
However, in this
chapter we are more concerned with the stable, commonly observed structures
in our Cosmos that demonstrate the unified model that we set forth in the
previous chapter.
7.3 THE PLANETS
On his
Living Cosmos website, Richard Pasichnyk revealed that almost all the
planets have been observed to either have a visible ring or a current of
energy that emanates out along the flat plane of the Equator, which is known
as the ecliptic. Saturn simply has the most visible ring out of all the
planets, but the majority of the others have been found to have them as
well. No solid conventional explanation exists for this. Furthermore, most
of the planets are orbited by several spherical moons that also trace a
perfect path through the ecliptic.
Richard Pasichnyk’s research demonstrates the principle of the counter-rotating energy fields of A1 and A2 in action by observing the
behavior of the gas planets. Counter-rotating bands of gas have been
observed on all of the gas planets, where you will have continually
alternating bands of clockwise and counter-clockwise rotation. The clockwise
areas are known as “belts” and the counter-clockwise areas are known as
“zones.”
In addition, certain planetary atmospheres such as that of Venus
have been seen to actually physically rise and lower in height, revealing a
planet-wide “breath” just like the central oscillator. The
ionosphere of
Venus can change from a height of only 200 kilometers to several thousand
kilometers within a 24-hour period, and the height of the cloud deck
(atmosphere) moves up and down by as much as one kilometer, or 0.62 miles,
across the entire planet’s surface simultaneously. This is known as the
“steady breath” of Venus and occurs over a four-day cyclical period.
Pasichnyk also developed the concept that the center of a planet is not
actually metallic, but a form of glowing plasma-energy similar to that of
our Sun. This evidence is presented in detail in our previous volume, and
shows us another level of how a planet is a microcosm of the Macrocosm.
We
will have more to say on this when we begin discussing evolution.
7.4 THE SUN
Our Sun has a magnetic field known as the heliosphere, which is also in the
form of a spherical torus. The planets all orbit within the plane of the
Sun’s equator or ecliptic. The surface of the Sun has been discovered to
indeed pulsate in and out, which is covered in detail later in this chapter.
[The star Alpha Centauri A is known to pulsate as well.]
Our
Sun also has a
lesser-known magnetic field that travels out along the plane of the ecliptic
called the Parker Spiral, which has a three-dimensional structure that looks
exactly like the spiraling arms of a galaxy:
Figure 7.1 – The Parker Spiral, an interplanetary magnetic formation
This suggests a greater mystery underlying the structure of the
Solar System
that science has not yet understood; if continuous creation is somehow
occurring, then perhaps a solar system could eventually grow into a full
galaxy, and the Parker Spiral field would eventually fill with stars, thus
creating the galactic arms.
As we go on, such a notion will seem less and
less preposterous.
7.5 THE GALAXIES
Everyone knows that a galaxy is a disk of stars, planets and gas that forms
along a flat, ecliptic plane. Most people are unaware of recent discoveries
that a galaxy is also surrounded by a sphere of “dark matter” and / or “dark
energy” known as the Galactic Halo, which we have mentioned in both of our
previous books, labeled here at the top left of the image:
Figure 7.2 – The Structure of a Galaxy, including
spherical Galactic Halo
This spherical halo is known to account for the majority of gravitational
force exerted upon the galaxy, causing it to rotate as if it were one
unified spherical object. This is definitely not how our Solar System
behaves, where Mercury orbits the Sun more quickly than Pluto. (If our
Solar
System were a galaxy, then Mercury and
Pluto would both orbit the Sun in the
same amount of time.)
So, once again in a galaxy we have a sphere of energy,
with matter forming within the zone of the ecliptic plane. NASA has also
observed “axial jets” emanating from the north and south of the centers of
galaxies, and these jets show us the central north-south axis of the
spherical torus energy formation:
Figure 7.3 – NASA artist rendition of “axial jets” emanating from within a
galactic core.
One example of this axial phenomenon comes from a quote in
Science News
Online [2], from the research of C.D. Dermer, J.D. Kurfess and
W.R. Purcell,
among others, discussing these jets of antimatter and hot gas:
"We have no good idea how this radiation is being produced," says Purcell.
The GRO map indicates, however, that the high-altitude radiation connects
with the radiation at the galactic center. Although its resolution is
limited, the map suggests that the emission is part of a stream of matter
and antimatter rising from the center. Radio images hint at a similar
pathway.
Some sort of activity "is building up and breaking open a hole in the plane
of our galaxy and pouring gas into the galactic halo," Dermer asserts.
Although the source of the annihilation radiation is debatable, there is no
dearth of candidates in the crowded environs of the galactic center.
One likely suspect is the black hole, estimated at about 1 million times the
mass of the sun, thought to reside at the core of the Milky Way.
Black holes
are believed to produce jets of matter and radiation that could generate the
gamma-ray emission observed by GRO. [emphasis added]
Furthermore, Ikehata et al. have proven that the shape of a galaxy could be
formed in the laboratory on a stable, ongoing basis by a counter-rotating
fluid-dynamics process, creating an approximate duplication of our model of
the intersecting behaviors of A1 and A2 in the Universe:
http://newton.ex.ac.uk/aip/physnews.393.html#3
MILKY WAY IN THE LABORATORY? A plasma with a spiral-shaped pattern of
particle density, similar to that of the Milky Way galaxy, has been created
stably in the laboratory, supporting the possibility that fluid dynamics
effects rather than gravitational ones may be responsible for our home
galaxy's structure. Injecting a hot argon plasma (rotating at supersonic
speeds) into a cold, stationary argon gas, researchers in Japan (Takashi Ikehata, Ibariki University,
ikehata@ee.ibaraki.ac.jp) observed a
spiral-armed structure (with low-density halos of charged particles) that
persisted for as long as they kept rotating the plasma. The vortices that
typically appear in such hot plasmas became spirals because of the outward
"centrifugal" forces introduced by the rotation. Curiously, the spiral
structure was not observed to form in the absence of the stationary gas,
suggesting that the fluid dynamics interactions between the gas and plasma
are central to the spiral formation process… (Ikehata et al., Physical
Review Letters, 31 August 1998.) [emphasis added]
In Ikehata et al.’s experiment, the hot argon plasma was rotating at a very
high speed and the cold argon gas remained stationary. This creates a very
similar condition to one of counter-rotating fields, since the stationary
gas provides resistance to the rotating plasma much as the counter-clockwise
movement of A2 resists the clockwise movement of A1.
And, as Dr. Paul Wesson indicates in section 2.17 of his paper, “Both of the
standard theories of galaxy formation clearly contain ad-hoc elements, as do
theories of the origin of larger-scale structure.” Then, in section 2.18, he
says, “The spins of galaxies, while problematical in origin, provide a good
data set for testing fundamental physics.”
And what about the black hole problem, since this model says that they do
not exist? A recent article on the CNN website actually presented an
“aetheric” solution for the mainstream world:
(CNN) -- Arguing that black holes are riddled with contradictions,
astronomers have devised what they consider a more plausible destiny for
imploding stars. Taking into account quantum physics, two U.S. scientists
suggest that giant dying stars transform themselves into what they call gravastars, shells of extremely dense matter with exotic space inside…
The first black hole proponents were ignorant of quantum fluctuations in the
universe that affect everything from light particles to gravity, Mottola and
Mazur observed.
“We are usually not aware of the quantum medium [i.e.
aether] we are
immersed in,” Mottola writes in New Scientist, “like a fish in a calm pond
who is not aware of all the incessant jiggling of water molecules.”
Before a
black hole could form (in a collapsing star,) quantum effects would
change space-time around an imploding giant, kicking off a radical phase
transition akin to when liquid water becomes ice. The shift to a new state
would lead to the formation of an exotic new object, the gravastar, a
condensed bubble enveloped by a thin spherical shell of gravitational
energy.
In a paper submitted to Physical Review Letters, Mottola and
Mazur argue
that gravastars are consistent with classical laws of physics but do not
have embarrassing inconsistencies as do black holes. Moreover, from Earth
they would appear much the same as classical black holes. Therefore, those
chaotic dense hot spots throughout the universe that astronomers consider
indirect proof of black holes could just as well support the existence of
gravastars, they say.
Mottola and Mazur hope the
gravastar will shed light on even the deepest
mysteries of the universe. The weighty object could explain intense gamma
ray bursts from the distant universe. More boldly, they suggest the entire
cosmos could itself be trapped inside a giant gravastar… Astronomers call
the work of Mottola and Mazur everything from “astoundingly brilliant” to
“unlikely.” Perhaps it will take decades or longer for anyone to know
really. [emphasis added]
And the shape of the “astoundingly brilliant”
gravastar? You guessed it – a
spherical torus with ejected “rings” emanating along the ecliptic plane.
Thus, the mainstream really isn’t as “lost” as many still assume, since here
we have an article that is openly discussing the “aether,” simply calling it
the “quantum medium” and ascribing fluidlike properties to it with the
analogy of the fish in water.
7.6 THE SUPERCLUSTERS
Groups of galaxies are known to be gathered into sphere-shaped superclusters, again suggesting that a larger-scale pattern of spherical
energy fields is at work. (It is actually more accurate to say that
galaxies
are formed from the energy fields that become superclusters.)
The
breakthrough research of Dr. Halton Arp has revealed that our current method
of calculating stellar distances known as “redshift” is inaccurate, and that
once we correct the distortions that were introduced, we find that the
majority of superclusters are truly spherical in shape, with the largest
concentration of galaxies in their center.
We know that this is the case
with our own local supercluster, which has a massive sphere of galaxies
known as the “Virgo cluster” in the center. Arp’s work also concludes that
the high-intensity bodies known as quasars are actually the seed-forms for
new galaxies, ejected from older, maturing galaxies and connected to them by
visible filaments.
This will be covered in much more detail in later
chapters.
7.7 THE UNIVERSAL SUPER-GALAXY AND SURROUNDING SPHERE
Lastly, we bring in the data from S.N. Kimball’s Symmetric Theory. Recent
measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation of the
Universe have confirmed that all visible matter in the Universe is “flat,”
effectively forming another disk like a giant super-galaxy. (A NASA
scientist published a theory in the mainstream media in fall of 2001 that
this giant universal disk could be caused by two fluidlike energy bodies
that are counter-rotating, again bringing in a fluid-dynamic model.)
The Broadhurst et. al. pencil-beam laser surveys of 1990, as well as other
studies, have revealed that there are walls of galaxies in the Universe that
are separated by vast tracts of empty space, 128 megaparsecs in length.
These walls extended for the full distance that the survey was capable of
observing, exceeding a 2.5 gigaparsec range, which is a quarter of the way
across the entire hypothetical Big-Bang size of the Universe!
The following
article from Physics News mentions this body of data:
http://newton.ex.ac.uk/aip/physnews.304.html#2
IS THE UNIVERSE CRYSTALLINE? As astronomers measure redshifts for additional
galaxy superclusters, the three-dimensional architecture of the universe
becomes more evident. New redshift surveys, reaching ever further into
space, are benefiting from fiber optics and increasing automation. A fresh
analysis of current redshift catalogs offers some evidence for a periodic
arrangement of superclusters, separated by voids, on a scale of 120
megaparsecs (about 390 million light years). Great walls of galaxies on this
scale have been discerned before but the apparent periodicity is new. The
researchers suggest that a new theory might be needed to explain the sort of
immense 3D- chessboard structure they seem to be finding in the data. (J. Einasto et al., Nature 9 January 1997.) [emphasis added]
The “chessboard” vision fails to see that the “walls” that were found by a
pencil-beam laser survey will likely extend around 360 degrees to form
spiraling arms, forming a Super-Galaxy via the fractal principle.
And
there’s still more: in 1994, Lauer & Postman discovered that
the walls of
the Super-Galaxy have a steady velocity, and are all moving in the same
direction – they are rotating. [To put it more specifically, Lauer &
Postman
conducted a full-sky peculiar velocity survey and found that all Abell
cluster galaxies within 150 megaparsecs are moving at a unified speed of
nearly 700 kilometers per second as compared to the absolute frame that is
provided by the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation.]
Lauer &
Postman’s
data was then analyzed statistically in 1995 by Strauss et al., who
concluded with a confidence level higher than 95% that these observations of
large-scale rotational velocity were accurate, thus ruling out all popular
Big-Bang models in the process, which cannot account for such large-scale
structuring.
Figure 7.4 – Nodland and Ralson’s discovery of a “Universal Axis”, or
anisotropy cone.
So if we indeed see that the Universe is a Super-Galaxy formation, then our
next question is if it also has a Universal Sphere with a central axis. Borge Nodland and
John Ralston’s Anisotropic Universe theory indeed reveals
just that.
They found that the torsion fields that exist throughout the
Universe, naturally causing rotation of particles as they travel, are not
evenly distributed, but rather form a Universal Axis. (The word
“anisotropic” means “not equal in all directions.”) Nodland and
Ralston.
found that the closer a particle in space is to this Universal Axis, the
more torsional spiraling movement that it will experience as it travels
along; it is a subtle but quite measurable effect.
As written by P.F. Schewe
and B. Stein in Physics News Update,
Now two researchers, Borge Nodland at the University of Rochester
(bnod@lle.rochester.edu ; 716-275-5772) and
John Ralston at the University of
Kansas (ralston@kuphsx.phsx.ukans.edu ; 913-864-4020), have studied
polarization rotation data for 160 galaxies and have perceived that in
addition to the Faraday effect, there seems to be an extra mysterious
angular dependency at work. Indeed, the rotation varies consistently with
the angle across the sky, as if the universe had an axis… One possible
explanation might be the existence of "domain walls" between different
realms of the cosmos, as prescribed in certain particle physics theories.
This article not only supports the idea of a
Universal Axis, but of
structured “domain walls”, as we just discussed, as well. So,
Nodland and
Ralston have effectively demonstrated that the flat disk of the entire
Universe must also be surrounded by an energy field in the shape of the
spherical torus – a sphere with a central north-south axis. The vortex flow
of A1 and A2 causes the axis to have the greatest amount of energy spiraling
through it, thus exerting the greatest degree of torsional spin on all
matter in the vicinity. Nodland’s team does not see this as a complete
spherical torus, but they do have the “double cone” structure that we
observe in the central area of such a torus in their illustrations.
As seen in Figure 7.4, one pole of the axis is in the direction of the
constellation Sextans, and the other in the direction of the
constellation Aquila.
Nodland and Ralston point out an interesting synchronicity
surrounding the names of these constellations:
In a curious way, the anisotropy direction reveals itself as that
orientation of the needle of a cosmic compass around which the polarization
plane of electromagnetic radiation twists the most as the radiation journeys
through the fabric of space. It is interesting to note that the
constellation Sextans stands for the sextant, the ancient navigational
instrument by which seafarers would orient themselves. Aquila, by the way,
is the messenger from Heaven – the mythological Eagle leading souls to
immortality. [emphasis added]
Though Nodland and Ralston obviously see this as just a coincidence, it is
certainly possible that these constellations were named by the inheritors of
the ancient mysteries, who were well aware of the positioning of the
Universal Axis. As we indicated in Chapter 15 of our previous volume, the
central axis of the spherical torus in the Solar System is often associated
with leading souls to a higher plane outside of the sphere of human
development, much as the legend of Aquila the eagle would “lead souls to
immortality.” The Scandinavian world-tree known as the “Yggdrasil” has an
eagle poised at the north pole of the sphere. Along similar lines, Dr.
Paul LaViolette shows how the constellations of the Zodiac that surround our own
Galactic Center are designed to point directly at that spot, again
suggesting an ancient knowledge of the physics.
So, we are indeed presenting a model of an inflating Universe
instead of a
Big-Bang, where everything suddenly appears all at once. This is not as far
from conventional scientific thought as some may think. Consider the words
of Dr. Paul S. Wesson:
…Photons we see now in the microwave background with the same temperature
should have been outside of each other’s horizons and so out of causal
(direct) contact in the early universe. The appropriate modification is to
have a phase of rapid, perhaps exponential, expansion at early times. This
idea – inflation – now has a big literature. But the energy source has not
been identified. [emphasis added]
Put simply, this means that all the matter-energy believed to be
spontaneously created in the Big Bang could not have been crammed together
all in one area. The unidentified energy source is the counter-rotational
movement of A1 and A2.
7.8 THE UNITY OF THE HARMONIC RATIO OF 34560
Every data point that we have gathered so far creates a compelling case. And
in addition to the above facts, we must remember that we are dealing with a
unified system of spherical vibrations (pulsations) that
behave according to
simple musical (harmonic) principles. Now, if we wanted to prove that such a
model was indeed accurate, then we would need to find a harmonic unification
that persisted throughout the Universe. If every object of matter-energy is
being formed of fluidlike “aether” from a Great Central Oscillator, then
there should be a single musical ratio that forms a “master link” for the
entire known Universe, on all levels of size.
Controversial physicist Ray Tomes has given us a vital new model that indeed
unifies this entire puzzle with the science of harmonics, or musical
vibrations. The Great Central Sun continues its rhythmic movement, and
intersecting wave-pulses are created which follow the laws of music and
vibration, as we said. Spherical-torus energy formations are produced of all
different sizes in the Universe, such as moons, planets, the Sun, the galaxy
and the Universe itself.
Miraculously, Tomes discovered that the average distances between all of
these spherical energy formations at each size level in the Universe are
precisely interconnected by a single musical ratio – 34560.
- If we take the average distance between moons and multiply it by a factor
of 34560, we get the average distance between planets.
- Take the average distance between planets, multiply it by a factor of
34560 and we get the average distance between stars.
- Multiply the average distance between stars by a factor of
34560 and we
get the average distance between galaxies.
- Take the average distance between galaxies, multiply it by a factor of
34560 and we get the size of the known Universe.
This suggests that there is a “fractal”
organization to the Cosmos, meaning
that we have what is referred to as “self-similarity on all levels.” The
geometric formations created by fractal mathematics can be magnified
exponentially, and no matter how deeply you “zoom in” to the formation, you
still see the same geometric structures. Many “Chaos” theorists have already
discerned that the Universe itself appears to work according to such logic
in many different and mysterious ways.
Surprisingly, as we can see from the next chart, this same exact harmonic
ratio of 34560 for the Cosmos can be compressed as well as expanded:
- Compress the average distance between moons by two factors of
34560, and
we get the average distance between cells, either plant or animal.
- Compress the average distance between cells by
34560 and we get the
average distance between atoms.
- Compress the average distance between atoms by
34560 and we get the
average distance between nucleons, which are the smallest natural
“particles” in the Universe.
This next chart shows the master summary of all of these connections,
strongly demonstrating that the entire Universe is interconnected according
to one vast, unified plan:
Figure 7.5 – Ray Tomes’ discovery of the unified ratio of 34560 in the
Universe.
It is literally quite impossible that such a simple system could work so
well from the quantum to the living cell to the super-galactic level,
without requiring any elaborate fixes, shortcuts or math-a-magical
hocus-pocus. (For an example of such a “fix,” before Copernicus placed the
Sun at the center of the Solar System, the geo-centric mainstream scientists
had created elaborate “epicycles” to mathematically explain why the planets
would occasionally appear to travel backwards (i.e. “retrograde”) as they
moved along their ecliptic plane in the night sky.)
Each of the averaged
distance figures cited by Tomes have emerged from mainstream scientific
studies, so there is no validity to the argument of skeptics that Tomes had
“cooked the books” in any way. Tomes was simply the first person to discover
that each of these different classes of spherical energy forms were
partitioned and interrelated by a single, master harmonic ratio. Once we
integrate our new quantum physics findings, we can indeed see the
completeness of the model as it now stands.
Furthermore, the utility of the 34560 ratio does not end with the remarkable
facts that we have just stated. Other forms of aether vibrations, such as
difference between the speed of light and other basic speeds of vibration /
pulsation, shows this master harmonic of 34560 as well. This evidence comes
from the work of Dan Winter, who went further into exploring the connections
discovered by Tomes. As one harmonic example from Winter’s work, the speed
of light in water is almost exactly ¾ of the speed of light in a vacuum, and
¾ is a standard musical relationship between two vibratory frequencies.
Even
more interestingly,
- Compress the speed of light by a factor of
34560 and we get the speed of
sound.
- Compress the speed of sound by a factor of 34560 and we get the speed of
heat.
This, of course, is our next exposure to a very simple concept: the
speed of
light is by no means the highest speed in the Universe – as we have already
said, it simply represents the highest speed that energy can travel through
the aether in our own area of density. Other areas of higher density would
allow a greater speed of light to occur, as Kozyrev observed with his
torsion-wave fields. In
The Shift of the Ages we detailed evidence from
Bruce Cathie that the speed of light is a perfect harmonic value. First,
Cathie used what he called the “grid second” for time, a unit that is
smaller than the second but closely related, built up from a system of 9
instead of a system of 8 (i.e. 8x3=24 hours, 9x3=27 “grid” hours.)
Cathie
showed how the Earth’s harmonic measurements, such as the nautical mile of
one minute of one degree at the Equator, represent a perfect harmonic
yardstick for understanding and measuring universal energy. (Remember that
the Earth must form according to harmonic principles, so this is no
accident.) And, when Cathie calculated the speed of light by the number of
nautical miles that it would pass through per grid second in a vacuum, he
came up with exactly 144,000! 144 is the square of twelve and an essential
number in the science of musical vibrations.
Furthermore, the work of Lambert Dolphin and Barry Setterfield proves
conclusively that the measured speed of light has been steadily decreasing
by a small amount since it was first calculated. This finding came from a
meta-analysis of literally every study on the speed of light that had
occurred in history prior to 1980. We believe that this measurable drop in
light-speed is due to an energetic boundary strength that we are now
encountering as we prepare to move into an area of higher aetheric density
in the galaxy, which is the central thesis of this book.
For now, we should
simply remember that the speed of light is directly related to that of sound
and heat by the same universal harmonic ratio of 34560.
If we want to explore the possibility of finding the 34560 ratio when we are
discussing the density of matter, then we would need to look at cubical
harmonics, i.e., harmonics of 34560 to the power of 3, since we are dealing
with three-dimensional structures instead of two-dimensional distances
between structures. When we consider the densities of the matter in the
Universe with this in mind, the following interesting relationships emerge:
- Compress the density of ordinary matter by a factor of 34560^3, and we
find the density of a neutron star, considered the densest object in the
Universe.
- Relax the density of ordinary matter by a factor of (34560^3)^2, and we
arrive at the density of the known Universe, which is predominantly what is
now called “empty” space.
All of these observations from Tomes and
Winter only reinforce the idea that
a central oscillator is creating pulsations throughout all the
aether in the
Universal Sphere. All of these pulsations are precise harmonic multiples of
the time interval of one second, either in larger or smaller time intervals,
and their primary harmonic wavelengths are all factors of the ratio of
34560.
Tomes demonstrated that other harmonic ratios besides 34560 can determine
the spacings between the stars and planets, but the 34560 ratio is certainly
the most predominant one. His studies include a complete determination that
all of our nearby stars are in precise harmonic relationships to each other
in terms of their relative distances.
The central oscillator concept also gives us an explanation for why we
observe aetheric waves as spiraling, such as in Kozyrev’s experiments. No
matter where we are in the sphere of the Universe, the aetheric energy is
constantly undergoing more than one type of movement: the out-going and
in-flowing pulsations of the central oscillator and the rotation of the
sphere itself. These movements are duplicated at all different size levels
throughout the Universe.
Thus, any time that you create a wave that passes
through the aetheric medium, the wave will always travel in a spiral,
according to the geometry of how the varying movements intersect.
7.9 COMPLETE EVIDENCE FOR THE CENTRAL OSCILLATOR SYSTEM
The next question, of course, is whether or not these basic notions are
provable. Is it possible to observe a truly complete and unified example of
the entire complex of “Central Oscillator” concepts that we have suggested
in the last chapter?
Our first choice for this task might be a galaxy. Most people still believe
that the center of a Galaxy is a black hole, even though we have never
photographed one in our own Galaxy or anywhere else, merely inferred its
existence theoretically. The black hole concept is an artifact of using
mathematics instead of physical concepts to try to understand the Universe,
and is no longer needed when we do away with the Big Bang. What we actually
do see in the photographic evidence from our own galaxy is simply a
compressed, bright cluster in Sagittarius A, as expected, and most
astrophysicists say that a black hole is “hiding just behind that bright
spot in the center.”
As seen above in Section 7.5, mainstream scientists are
now admitting that the black hole theory must be discarded, and
Dr. Paul La Violette, Dr. Halton Arp and others have long falsified the black hole
theory. We have not yet made detailed enough observations of the central
formation in our own galaxy to determine if it is, in fact, exhibiting a
pulsating motion.
However, with our own Solar System we have an excellent opportunity to study
this “Central Oscillator” system in completeness. The full mechanism was
inferred by Oliver Crane in his work, but is only truly solidified when we
bring in the work of Ray Tomes and especially that of J.B. Stoneking in his
“Stoneking Resonance Theory.” Our first glimpse at the mystery comes from a
discovery of J.D. Titius in 1766, published by J.E. Bode in 1772 and known
as “Bode’s Law.” This finding revealed that the planetary positions are
indeed spaced according to regular musical intervals.
Although this theory
was widely accepted for more than a century, showing over 95% accuracy out
to Uranus, it was eventually discarded after the discovery of Neptune, which
completely broke the simple pattern that Bode had set forth – and Percival
Lowell’s discovery of Pluto only made it worse. However, both
Tomes and J.B.
Stoneking found longer harmonic wavelengths that corrected the mistake and
showed that Neptune and Pluto were indeed in their proper “musical” places,
as seen in figures 7.6, 7.7 and 7.8.
Even more surprisingly, we now know that the Sun is indeed a
central
oscillator! In 1962, R. Leighton et al. found that the
Sun’s surface
pulsates regularly. In the early 1970’s, several groups from the U.S.,
Russia and Great Britain confirmed that the Sun did indeed oscillate in
steady pulses, its surface rising and falling by about 3 kilometers (1.86
miles.)
This pulsation occurs in various harmonic intervals of a basic unit
of time that was exactly five minutes, no more and no less, rising to a
maximum value of 160 minutes. (The fact that the sun has an exact
five-minute heartbeat shows that the Central Oscillator in the Universe is
pulsating in perfect multiples of one second. It is for this reason that we
refer to the second as the “Universal Time Quantum.”)
All doubts about this effect were eliminated when a team of French, Soviet
and U.S. scientists gathered in Antarctica to carefully observe and measure
the Sun for five straight days at the South Pole. Late in the month of
December, the South Pole is aimed at the sun for continuous 24-hour days; in
this environment, it never “sets.” With generally good weather and
round-the-clock shifts, they observed the 160-minute oscillation period as
well as the three-kilometer pulsation amplitude.
The next diagrams are from Stoneking’s work, showing the waves that are
created by the Sun’s pulsation and how these waves in turn position the
planets:
Figures 7.6 and 7.7 – Stoneking Resonance affecting inner and middle
planetary positions.
In his 1998 paper, J.B. Stoneking calculated the wavelengths that were
produced by each of the different harmonic intervals that the Sun produces,
such as a five-minute pulse, ten-minute pulse, 80-minute pulse, 160-minute
pulse, et cetera. These wavelengths would be measured as existing at a
certain distance away from the Sun. Calculating the wavelengths is a simple
mathematical problem that involves the distance that the Sun’s
surface moves
in each pulse, (2-3 km,) the time that it takes to move in each pulse
(intervals of five minutes,) and the speed that the wave travels, which is
the speed of light (186,000 miles per second.)
When Stoneking ran these calculations, which are published in his paper, he
found that there was a planet at the edge of each wavelength that he
discovered, as we can see in the images. These “nodes” in the wavelength
were the zones of least pressure, where all vibrations canceled out and
allowed the planets to form.
Furthermore, the entire heliosphere, formed by
the Sun’s magnetic field, is exactly five 160-minute pulses deep.
Figure 7.8 – Stoneking Resonance in the Outer Solar System.
Furthermore, Stoneking discovered that each planet was positioned at a
certain exact number of solar diameters away from the Sun.
Each planetary
orbit will fall perfectly in line with one of the “ripples” formed by the
Sun’s pulsation through the aether as it resonates like a giant drum. The
above diagram makes it appear that only the outer planets fit in with the
Sun’s diameter, but the diagram is not to scale – and the diameter of the Sun is actually much smaller than the 160-minute pulse. This harmonic
connection of the planetary positions gives the hard scientific data that
Oliver Crane inferred in his “Central Oscillator” paper.
Let us again think back to our original discussion of the Great Central Sun
and how it formed an “onion-like” formation of nested spherical energy
vibrations, caused by the spherical “ripples” of its pulsation interfering
with each other as they move out and are then reflected back towards the
center. Within our own Solar System, we must realize that these invisible
energetic spheres are holding the planets in their positions.
Normally we
visualize planetary orbits by simply drawing an elliptical line in the
direction of travel, but now we should equally see that they are held in
place by invisible spherical waveforms, and driven to rotate along the
ecliptic plane by the overall rotation of A1 and A2 as it forms the
Sun and heliosphere.
Some of the spheres are more “flattened out” than others,
forming elliptical instead of circular orbits, and this is mainly due to the
fact that the Solar System is also traversing and being affected by the
forces in the Galaxy.
[See the page of Robert Grace at
http://hometown.aol.com/MetPhys/97planetmusic.html for more information on
the harmonics of the Solar System. Many have independently stumbled across
these connections. The most complete harmonic analysis of the Solar System
that we have found is in the work of Dr. Sergey Smelyakov entitled “The Auric Time Scale and the Mayan Calendar,” which we will feature prominently
in later chapters.]
Thus, when we view the true energetic structure of our Solar System, we see
a series of nested spherical energy forms that are created by the Sun as it
pulsates.
Remember now, these are spheres that exist in three dimensions,
not just along the ecliptic plane – they completely surround the Sun in
wider and wider layers. Normally, they are completely invisible to us,
though in our previous volume we have documented extensive examples where
they were seen by initiates and mystics in out-of-body states. This dates
all the way back to the ancient vision of Thothermes Trismestigus, who was
visited by a dragon named Poimandres that symbolized Universal Mind in a
similar fashion as Oriental cultures equate the dragon with wisdom.
Two more revealing key points are made by Stoneking in his paper that are
worthy of verbatim repetition:
A report, published in the journal Science (March 27, 1998, pg. 2089) by
seismologist Mr. Naoki Suda et al, stated that he and his team had found
evidence that had showed Earth to be in a constant state of oscillation. He
reported that the frequencies involved were between 2-7 mhz. (.002 - .007
Hz.) If you convert this 2 mhz to a wavelength, it equals 93,141,000 miles,
which by coincidence is also close to the mean orbital radius of planet
Earth [i.e. Earth’s distance from the Sun.]
This spectrum of frequencies
also covers 2 of the Sun’s resonant pulse wavelengths. (Solar Dia. x 2^5 =
27,680,000 miles, 6.7 mhz and Solar Dia x 2^6 = 55,360,000 miles, 3.3 mhz.)
The same two frequencies are involved in the spacing of Earth from
Venus (.3
AU) and Earth from Mars (.6 AU.) [emphasis added]
Let’s take a leap here and suppose that one of a planet’s resonant
frequencies is equal to its mean orbital radius and that it radiates this
reflection wave into the interplanetary plasma. Could other evidence be
found that could support this idea?
If we look towards the largest planet in the solar system,
Jupiter, and its
orbit around the Sun, we see that it affects two groups of
asteroids known
as the Trojans. [These groups] are 60 degrees in front and [60 degrees]
behind [the orbital position of] Jupiter. (If you draw a straight line from
the Sun to Jupiter and go at a 60-degree angle from the Sun to the point
where it intersects with Jupiter’s orbit, [you find the Trojans on either
end.])
As we know, a triangle’s internal angles must equal 180 degrees. If
you draw a straight line from the Sun to [either of] the Trojans, then to
Jupiter and back to the Sun, it forms a perfect equilateral triangle with 3
internal angles of 60 degrees. This all means that the Trojans are as far
from Jupiter as Jupiter is from the Sun: 483.3 million miles. [emphasis
added]
The first point above shows us that the behavior of the
Earth, in terms of
its own rate of harmonic pulsation, is intimately connected with its
distance from the Sun. This can only be possible with a “quantum medium”
that exists between them in space.
Then, the “triangle formation” that Stoneking mentioned between Jupiter, the Sun and
the Trojan asteroids
suggests that geometric forces are at work in the energy fields we are
discussing, which falls in line holographically with what we have observed
at the quantum level, as seen in previous chapters.
7.10 CONNECTION BETWEEN SOLAR SYSTEM AND NEW QUANTUM PHYSICS
Another key discovery that connects the Solar System to our
quantum model
has been published by
Richard Hoagland and The Enterprise Mission, inspired
by the pioneering work of Lt. Col.
Tom Bearden. In Chapter 12 of the
previous volume, we went over the anomalies of the planets, and covered some
examples where the planets are seen to have a significantly greater degree
of heat energy in the infrared spectrum than they are capable of receiving
from the Sun.
Several different models have been proposed in the mainstream
for where this heat is coming from, and Bearden, Hoagland et al. have
presented evidence that rules out these models.
In the next figure, we see Bearden, Hoagland et al’s solution to the puzzle – namely that the amount of
heat energy that each planet radiates out into space is directly related to
how much movement is occurring in and around it.
Figure 7.9 – Solar System-wide relationships between heat emissions and
angular momentum.
This model has confused many participants who discuss it on
The Enterprise
Mission’s discussion board.
The key is in the fact that the amount of
angular momentum that is calculated involves the body plus the satellites.
The Earth rotates on its own axis, revolves around the Sun and also has the
Moon in orbit. So, the figure of slightly more than 10^16 for the
Earth on
the bottom axis of the graph is the combined total of all the momentum in
this system. Uranus, Neptune, Saturn and
Jupiter’s specific angular momentum
is also a function of the total amount of movement occurring within the
planet itself and within all of its moons.
It is clear from the graph that there is a very smooth relationship between
the amount of momentum surrounding an object and its total heat emissions.
Furthermore, it is clear that with the data we now have, the Sun appears not
to fit into place along the same line. This discrepancy suggests that there
must be at least one more planet in the Solar System that we have not yet
found. Once all orbiting objects in our Solar System are known and accounted
for, it is predicted that the Sun will also fit perfectly on this line.
So how does this relate to quantum physics? It is actually rather simple.
The more aetheric energy streams into an object or group of objects, the
more angular momentum will go into the system. This energy relationship can
be directly measured by the amount of light energy (luminosity) that the
object is giving off, either in the visible or infrared spectrum. Such a
relationship would be impossible if the planets were indeed separated from
each other by “empty” space. However, in this model, known as Schuster’s
Hypothesis, the more a planet or star moves through the aether, the more
aether it gathers into itself.
In our quantum model, we have the Biefield-Brown effect showing how negative
charge in the electron clouds flows into the positively-charged nucleus. On
a very tiny level, this atomic nucleus is actually a form of luminous
plasma, just as we see in the sonoluminescence experiment, in thermal
plasmas emanating from the Earth or in the Sun itself. The amount of
luminous energy in the atomic nucleus is a direct function of how much
aether is moving into it – and we can measure the amount of
aether going
into the nucleus as a function of angular momentum. So, this relationship
between the Sun and planets shows that the Sun’s total energy output is
directly related to the amount of movement in the surrounding planets,
moons, comets and other matter.
This movement represents how much of
A1 and
A2, the primary bodies of aetheric energy, is streaming into the object.
7.11 INDEPENDENT PROOF OUTSIDE OF OUR OWN SOLAR SYSTEM
If this aetheric model of the Solar System is indeed true, especially when
looking at the precise phenomenon of Stoneking Resonance, then a very
similar configuration would have to exist in all other planetary systems in
order to be valid. As we reported in
The Shift of the Ages, the very first
extra-planetary system that humanity found with more than two planets was
seen to have exactly the same characteristics as our own Solar System.
Israeli astrophysicists T. Mazeh and I. Goldman have observed that the
pulsar B1257+12 has at least three planets orbiting around it which have the
same relative size ratios to each other as do Mercury, Venus and
Earth. They
also have the same relative distances from each other as do Mercury, Venus
and Earth.
This story was very quickly forgotten, but not before being
reported by John Gribbin in The Guardian out of London, England:
PLANET SYSTEM DISCOVERY REVEALS STRIKING SIMILARITIES
By John Gribbin
LONDON, from THE GUARDIAN -- The discovery of three planets orbiting a pulsar known as PSR B1257+12 has revealed a system with properties that
almost exactly match those of the Inner Solar System, made up of Mercury,
Venus and Earth. The similarities are so striking that it seems there may be
a law of nature which ensures that planets always form in certain orbits and
always have certain sizes; and it leads credence to the significance of a
mathematical relationship [Bode’s Law] that relates the orbits of the
planets in our Solar System, which many astronomers have dismissed as mere
numerology.
PSR B1257+12 is a rapidly spinning neutron star, containing slightly more
matter than our Sun, packed into a sphere only about 10 kilometers across.
As the star spins, it flicks a beam of radio noise around, like the beam of
a lighthouse, producing regularly spaced pulses of radio noise detectable on
Earth…
The three planets cannot be seen directly, but are revealed by the way in
which they change the period of the pulsar’s pulses as they orbit around it.
There is enough information revealed in the changing pulses to show that the
three planets have masses roughly equal to 2.98 times the mass of the Earth,
3.4 times the mass of the Earth and 1.5 per cent of the mass of the Earth.
And they are spaced, respectively, at distances from the pulsar equivalent
to 47 per cent the distance from the Earth to the Sun, 36 per cent of the
Sun-Earth distance, and 19 per cent of the Sun-Earth distance.
The ratio of these distances [between the three observed planets,
1:0.77:0.4, is extremely close to the ratio of distances of the Earth, Venus
and Mercury, which is 1:0.72:0.39.
And the masses of the three inner planets of the Solar System are one Earth
mass, 82 per cent of the mass of the Earth, and 5.5 percent of the mass of
the Earth. In each case, two outer planets with roughly the same mass have
an inner companion with a much smaller mass…
The indications are that
there is a universal mechanism for the formation of
planets around stars. If it works for systems as diverse as a pulsar and our
Sun, the chances are that it works for all stars and that “Solar” Systems
very much like our own may be the rule, rather than the exception, among the
stars of the Milky Way. Reprinted from Astro Net.
Thus, as Gribbin said, it is easy to predict that all other multi-planetary
systems that are discovered will also be ultimately found to have similar
characteristics, since this is what was observed in B1257+12 on our very
first try. The underlying mechanisms of planetary formation will be the
same, regardless of where we look.
Let us also not forget that since
B1257+12 is a neutron star, it is exactly 34560 to the third power more
dense than the average density of the Universe.
7.12 RHYTHMIC OSCILLATIONS OF ALPHA CENTAURI A AND R SCUTI
We remember from earlier in this chapter that the Sun was determined to have
a pulsation of exactly five minutes in duration. Another interesting fact is
that Alpha Centauri A, the nearest bright star to our own Solar System, has
been measured as having a surface pulsation that is exactly seven minutes in
duration. This was discovered by F. Bouchy and F. Carrier at the European
Southern Observatory (ESO), using the Coralie spectrograph. This is the
first time that we have been able to detect such pulsations on a neighboring
star, and again perfectly in line with the harmonic second. As the July 2001
article from BBC News indicated,
It amounts to the star, 875,000 kilometers (544,000 miles) in radius,
“breathing” in and out by only 40 meters (131 feet).
To have the first extra-solar pulsation also be an even number of minutes in
length is very compelling. The “Central Oscillator” model also suggests that
multiple modes of vibration / pulsation will occur in certain stars
simultaneously. This was seen in the Sun with the various harmonic pulses
from 5 to 160 minutes in length, and has now been noted not just in Alpha
Centauri A, but with the brightness variations of the star R Scuti as well.
This next excerpt from Physics News says that R Scuti shows “chaotic,” or
fractal patterns of oscillation, suggesting two or more different vibrational modes that are occurring at the same time.
Here, we should
remember that the term “chaos” is synonymous with “hidden order” in the
language of Chaos theory:
http://newton.ex.ac.uk/aip/physnews.215.html#2
CHAOTIC PULSATING STAR: Detailed observations of the star R Scuti show that
its fluctuating light emissions conform to the mathematical definition of
chaos (J. Robert Buchler et al., Physical Review Letters, 6 February 1995).
According to Zoltan Kollath of the University of Florida, this is the first
strong evidence for chaotic emissions from a star. He and his colleagues
assembled data taken over 15 years by numerous astronomers. They deduce from
the star's light curve (emission as a function of time) the notion that the
complex pulsation variability might result from the overlap of as few as two
different vibrational modes in the star. (Science News, 18 February 1995.)
It appears very likely that further observations of this nature will
continue to reveal the importance of the second as a unit of time for
pulsation again and again.
7.13 PROOF FOR THE SECOND AS A UNIVERSAL TIME QUANTUM
And now, with the proper additional information in place, we return to the
proof for our argument that the unit of time we call the second is indeed a
universal standard of vibration. First of all, we know that our 24-hour day
/ 60-minute hour / 60-second minute system for measuring time came from
the
Sumerians. The work of
Zecharia Sitchin,
Lloyd Pye and others has brought
widespread awareness to the extra-terrestrial aid that was given to the
ancient Sumerian culture by the
Annunaki or
Nefilim, who are known as “Those
who from Heaven to Earth Came.”
In both of our previous works we have seen
that as a unit of time, the second “just so happens” to unify all movements
in the Cosmos. The three key points are:
-
The Constant of Nineveh was found on the
Sumerian clay tablets and decoded
by NASA astrophysicist Maurice Chatelain, who dealt with gigantic orbital
calculations for the Apollo missions. The Constant of Nineveh shows that
all
planetary orbits are perfect sub-divisions of one master cycle. This cycle
is expressed as a value of seconds that is exactly 70 multiplied seven times
by 60, or (70*60)^7. Every known body in our Solar System has a perfect
number of orbital cycles within this master number, right down to the
second! A simple analogy for each planet would be how twelve eggs fit
exactly into an egg carton; a certain number of each of the planetary
orbital cycles will fit perfectly into the Nineveh Constant, with not even
one second remaining. For example, Pluto has 25,000 cycles in the Nineveh
constant and Halley’s Comet has 81,000 cycles. The
Nineveh Constant is very
roughly around 6.2 million years in length. The Nineveh Constant is also a
sub-harmonic of even longer numbers recorded in the Mayan codices.
-
The Wilcock Constant harmonically interconnects all the
orbits of every
object in the entire Galaxy in precisely the same way that the Nineveh
Constant unifies the Solar System. This number is exactly 0.7 multiplied
nine times by 60, or (.7*60)^9. This number forms an exact figure, in
seconds, for the true time that it takes the Galaxy to spin once on its
axis, coming in just slightly under the commonly-cited value of 225 million
years at very roughly 223.5 million years. Furthermore, the Wilcock Constant
is exactly 36 times larger than the Constant of Nineveh. It is highly likely
that further discoveries will confirm that this Galactic Constant is the
master cycle for all planetary systems; these discoveries will be made by
super-light speed space-travel technology that is already available, and
whose theoretical basis is given in the previous volume.
-
The Universal Constant was first seen in the work of
Dr. Henry B. Myers,
whose detailed mathematical analyses suggest that the entire Universal
Sphere only makes one complete rotation during its entire life cycle.
Myers’
calculations, integrating scientific knowledge with that of the ancient
Hindu Vedas, show us that the true theoretical age cycle of the Universe is
extremely close to being exactly 120 Wilcock Constants in length, or very
roughly 26 billion, 820 million years. Myers estimates that we are only
about halfway through this cycle at the present time. Myers’ work also
demonstrates that the ancient Vedic astronomers were aware of this cycle as
well.
There is absolutely no possibility that any of these constants could be
‘accidental’, given their known precision; they are directly a function of
the perfect vibrations of the second from the “heartbeat” of
the Great
Central Sun.
We should never lose sight of the fact that all of these
master
constants are merely harmonic functions of 7 and 6 (i.e. 70 or 0.7 and 60)
vibrating against each other, using the second as their basic interval of
time. We will see the importance of the second when we study the vibrations
of music as well, which will be explored later. Dr. O. Crane has concluded
that the fastest speed for the Universal central oscillator is 10^23 cycles
per second, in order to account for our observations of the quantum realm.
As Crane says,
The frequency of 10^23 Hz yields the elementary length of 10^-13 cm, and
likewise we have the elementary time period of 10^-23 seconds.
What Crane apparently did not see is that the pulsations
must indeed be an
exact harmonic subdivision of the second.
7.14 PROOF OF “LOCAL” CHANGES
One of the predictions that can be made from this model is that when a
higher density of energy is fed into a spherical-vortex system, such as our
Solar System in this case, we would expect that system to absorb this energy
and undergo some very fundamental changes.
We briefly alluded to some of the
changes in our Solar System that have been observed in the introduction, but
in the next chapter we will cover them in specific detail, along with more
layers of proof to suggest that these changes must be caused by our movement
into an area of higher energetic density in the galaxy.
REFERENCES:
1. Chatelain, Maurice. Our Ancestors Came from Outer Space. Doubleday & Co.,
Garden City, New York: 1978. Translated by Orest Berlings.
2. Cowen, R. Our Milky Way’s Heart Gushes Antimatter. (1997) Science News
Online, May 3, 1997. URL:
http://www.sciencenews.org/sn_arc97/4_26_97/fob1.htm
3. Deen, Glen. The Physics of an Episodic Quantized Redshift. March 26,
2001. URL:
http://home1.gte.net/res00bfl/Redshift_Physics.htm
4. Hardy, Geoffrey. Genesis Continuous. URL:
http://www.crash.ihug.co.nz/~hardy/gconsyn.html
5. Kimball, S.N. The Symmetric Theory: An Alternative to Big-Bang Cosmology.
1997. URL:
http://www.polaris.net/~ksn/beta.htm
6. LaViolette, Paul. Earth Under Fire. URL:
http://members.macconnect.com/users/s/stargate/LaViolette/Disinformation.shtml
7. Myers, Henry B.
8. Nodland, Borge. A Glimpse of Cosmic Anisotropy. (1999) URL:
http://www.cc.rochester.edu/College/RTC/Borge/overview.html
9. Pasichnyk, Richard. The Living Cosmos Website. (2000) URL:
http://www.livingcosmos.com
10. Steer, William Andrew. Sonoluminescence. (Sphericity) (1998) [Note: Link
no longer operational 6.02] URL:
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucapwas/sl/sono.html
11. Stein, B. and Schewe, P.F. Is the Universe Birefringent? (1997) Physics
News Update,
The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News, Number 317,
April 17, 1997. URL:
http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/1997/physnews.317.htm
12. Stenger, Richard. Is black hole theory full of hot air? (2002)
CNN.com/SPACE, January 22, 2002. URL:
http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/01/22/gravastars/index.html
13. Stoneking, J.B. Stoneking Resonance. (1999) URL:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jbstoneking
14. Stoneking, J.B. Planetary Reflection Waves. (1999) URL:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jbstoneking/jbspage7.htm
15. Tomes, Ray. Harmonics, Pythagoras, Music and the Universe. (1996) URL:
http://homepages.kcbbs.gen.nz/rtomes/alex-ha.htm
16. Wesson, Paul S. Fundamental Unsolved Problems in Physics and
Astrophysics. (2000) Prepared for California Institute for Physics and
Astrophysics. E:
Wesson@astro.uwaterloo.ca
17. Whitehouse, David. First stellar “heartbeat” heard. BBC News, July 2,
2001. URL:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1418000/1418291.stm
18. Wilcock, David.
The Shift of the Ages. (2000)
19. Wilcock, David.
Convergence III. (2001)
Return to Contents |