War with
Nature
Nature has a sense to it, cultivated
over billions of years of evolution.
The complexity of botanical systems,
the relationship to pests, soil, and the elements sustains
optimal diversity and reproduction. It was only when we began to
industrialize the process, hijack growth with an eye toward
yield, and allow chemical companies to attempt to regulate
variables of perceived adversity that we ended up in the mess
that GMO crops are in today.
Now we have randomly spliced animal
DNA with bacterial vectors inserting into plant genomes,
disrupting the natural functioning of the plant, and allowing
for supersaturation with the toxic, endocrine-disrupting and gut
bug slaughtering
herbicide, Roundup.
Pharmaceutical companies and
doctors think they can outsmart immune systems that have evolved
to coexist with microbes, to be primed and educated by them.
We are at war with infectious
disease, and as a consequence, our fear and malice toward
bacteria and viruses have lead us to compromise and alter our
immune systems with pathogens entering our bodies through our
muscles, accompanied by toxic additives that cripple our natural
immune function and cause
chronic inflammation.
The notion of improving upon our
human capacities, as we understand them is discussed "Vaccination
Agenda - An Implicit Transhumanism/Dehumanism."
We cannot outsmart nature, we are
only just beginning to appreciate her infinite sophistication.
Lack of
Pre-marketing Safety Study
Monsanto claims that GMOs are
simultaneously equivalent to existing foods (relieving them of
any real duty to demonstrate safety), and novel enough that they
can be patented.
Despite the Frankensteinian effects
of genetic manipulation on proteins and gene expression, these
foods have never been studied in a human population, let alone
assessing for long-term effects.
What happens as a result of this
fast-track-to-market process is that slow-emerging trends of
harm at the population level begin to emerge.
Differing patterns of chronic
disease in Europe and America at this point may have some
relation to limitations of GMO products in Europe. There is
inherent difficulty in associating cause to effect in chronic
disease; however, arguing for the importance of long-term
premarketing trials.
Vaccines have similarly, never been
studied against an unvaccinated control group, allegedly because
they are assumed to be so vital to our health that it would be
unethical to withhold them even though basic epidemiology
demonstrates that hygiene and nutrition have played the most
significant role in elimination of infectious disease.
They have never been studied in
their current schedule, nor have the additives (adjuvants)
which include,
-
known body toxins
-
aluminum
-
mercury
-
formaldehyde
-
polysorbate 80
Signal of
Harm
Despite this lack of effort
and incentive to support safety data in these two arenas, both
have suffered a signal of harm that should have activated the
precautionary principal.
Monsanto monitored GM and non-GM fed
rats for 90 days, and declared that changes in liver and kidney
function were not clinically significant.
Seralini et
al, copied this design, but extended the observation period
to years.
Take a
gander (below image) at what happened to these animals.
The first tumor
sprouted at the 4 month mark. Multiple animal studies
have emerged mirroring this study's provocative findings.
Glyphosate, the herbicide that
has been sprayed in escalating quantities, is an
endocrine-disruptor that has been linked to obesity, liver
disease, birth defects, autism, and cancer. "Glyphosate’s
Suppression of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Amino Acid
Biosynthesis by the Gut Microbiome: Pathways to Modern Diseases" is the most enlightening exploration of its toxic
mechanisms.
Bt-toxin in GMO corn has been found to
puncture intestinal cells and
circulate into fetal tissue.
Whether in the realm of
neurodevelopment,
death,
autoimmunity, or even
susceptibility to the disease intended to provide protection
from, vaccines have been demonstrated to harm and several
billion dollars of taxpayer money have been paid out to victims
through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
Patterns of chronic illness such as
atopy and
autism have been demonstrated to correlate with vaccine
uptake and prospective
study of neurodevelopment in monkey's has demonstrated
injury.
Suppression
of Investigation
Seralini was silenced.
His work was
roundly attacked, censored from the media, and demands from
industry ties for the paper to be retracted from its journal of
publication. Several months after Seralini's paper, Richard
Goodman, a former Monsanto employee was fast-tracked to the
position of Associate Editor for Biotechnology.
With Monsanto
now at the helm of influential medical journals, the
prospects for publication of independent research are
diminishing.
The now infamous
Andrew Wakefield,
who published a paper on the presence of vaccine-strain measles
in the guts of autistic children was stripped of his license and
maligned for fraud in a witch-hunt intended to suppress any
further investigation into this connection.
Fortunately, at
least
28 independent studies from around the world have confirmed
his findings.
Protection
of Corporate Profits
The "Monsanto Protection Act" was
designed to provide legal immunity to GM technology so that
citizens could never litigate on the grounds of harm secondary
to GM food exposure. In this way, corporations would be
protected above farmers and citizens.
The National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program was established in 1986 to assume liability
from corporations so that any incentive to police the safety of
their product was roundly eliminated and civilians could only
engage in a non-jury-mediated "trial" of red-tape and rejection
as a means of seeking justice for injury.
Revolving
Door Conflicts of Interest
This is where the rubber meets the
road on these issues, and, truly the source of all corruption.
When those regulating a system in need of checks and balances
are the same people who have profited or are profiting from its
protection and success, we have a critical breakdown in
protection of the interests of consumers and patience.
The
revolving door of Monsanto and government ranges from
Michael
Taylor, FDA Deputy Commissioner for Foods and former Monsanto
Vice President of Public Policy to Supreme Court Justice
Clarence Thomas, former Monsanto attorney.
Enjoy this
pictoral...
The list of interchangeable figures
between the CDC, pharmaceutical industry and Vaccine Advisory
Committee features more conflicts than exceptions.
Notably, in
January 2010, Julie Gerberding, former director of the CDC,
became the President of Merck's vaccine unit.
In January 2011,
Elias Zerhouni, former director of the NIH became President of
Sanofi-Aventis' research labs. These relationships are known to
be kindled far in advance of the job acceptance.
The most
outspoken mouthpiece of today's vaccine schedule is Paul Offit
MD, Merck employee and Rotavirus vaccine patent holder. The
paper "Conflicts
of Interest in Vaccine Safety Research" details the
many layers of profit-motivation that cloud regulators'
judgment.
Here's
a little video if you'd rather not read:
It is an impossible expectation that
objectivity in research support or information dissemination
could be exercised under these circumstances.
These conflicts of
interest undermine any and all safety claims, and leave those
engaging with these technologies to look to research that has
not been funded by corporate agendas to help navigate true
concerns about risk.
These are multibillion-dollar corporate
giants with dollars to spare when it comes to influencing
legislators and regulators.
