from JonRappoport Website
Why is the Government
so Maniacal about Injecting Vaccines?
The reference is the New York Times, 3/15/15, "Protection Without a Vaccine."
It describes the frontier of research. Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of synthetic genes to "protect against disease," while changing the genetic makeup of humans.
This is not science fiction:
Here is the punchline:
Read that again:
Alteration of the human genetic makeup. Not just a "visit."
The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:
Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.
Let's take this further. Under the cover of preventing disease (and all good covert ops float a laudatory goal to conceal their true intent), vaccines are ideal carriers for all sorts of genes that would be permanently incorporated into the human structure.
The enormous tonnage of propaganda about vaccines, and the resultant mandatory laws that enforce vaccination (without fear of liability), create a powerful channel along which re-engineering is eminently possible.
Synthetic genes injected into billions of humans would form a grand experiment to create an altered species. Some of this is happening already, but the Times article presents a much fuller picture of what is approaching on the immediate horizon.
This grand experiment will be compartmentalized. For example, secretly, genes 1-6 will be injected into Group A in geo-location I. Genes 7-12 will be injected into Group B in location II. And so on.
Vaccine recipients will be subjected to ongoing surveillance to gauge the results.
On various pretexts, members of these groups will be brought into clinics for exams and tests, to discover markers that purportedly reveal their bodies' responses to the genetic alterations.
Through surveillance and testing, all sorts of information can be compiled.
Of course, there is no informed consent. The human guinea pigs have no knowledge of what is being done to them.
And what would be the objectives of this lunatic research program? They would vary.
On a simplified level, there would be two. Create weaker and more docile and more obedient and more dependent humans. On the other side, create stronger and healthier and more intelligent and more talented humans.
Obviously, the results of the latter experiments would be applied to the "chosen few." And clearly, some of this research will be carried on inside the military. Secrecy is easier to maintain, and the aim to produce "better soldiers" is a long-standing goal of the Pentagon and its research arm, DARPA.
A global vaccine experiment of the type I'm describing here has another bonus for the planners: those people who fall ill or die can be written off as having suffered from various diseases and disorders which "have nothing to do with vaccines."
This is already SOP for the medical cartel...
The numbers of casualties, in this grand experiment, would be of no concern to the Brave New World shapers. As I've documented extensively, the US medical system is already killing 2.25 million people per decade (a conservative estimate), as a result of FDA-approved drugs and mistreatment in hospitals. Major media and government leaders, aware of this fact, have done nothing about it.
Here is a quote from Princeton molecular biologist, Lee Silver, the author of Remaking Eden.
It gives you a window into how important geneticists are thinking about an engineered future:
Here is another gem, from Gregory Stock, former director of the program in Medicine, Technology, and Society at the UCLA School of Medicine:
Notice that these two well-known scientists are speaking about "ethics."
With vaccines that permanently alter human genetic makeup on the horizon, and given the corporate and government-agency penchant for secrecy, we are already inhabiting the Brave New World. It's not a distant prospect.
Every genetic innovation is aimed at bringing us closer to a stimulus-response world, and further away from freedom. Which is why the defense of freedom becomes ever more vital.
That struggle comes down to who controls, yes, the philosophy, not the science.
Is each human merely and only a system waiting to be re-engineered (below video), or is he something far, far more, inhabiting a physical form?
Social Engineering In The 20th Century
We already know what the vast majority of brain researchers and geneticists believe, as well as the governments and corporations and universities and foundations that make important decisions.
Of course, these days, the college faculty department considered to be the least important, the most useless, a mere appendage waiting for those with wisdom to put it out of its misery and kill it off… is the philosophy department.
That leaves us to take up the argument and the resistance.