|
That is the summary of our scientific knowledge.
This text was written more than seventy years ago. But in this long period of time the state of scientific knowledge about our origins has progressed little. Sooner or later, a theory that does not work must be abandoned. This is a scientific law as well as a bloody evidence.
I
mean if you care about efficiency, which does seem to be the case
for followers of Darwin... who doubted the validity of his own
theory!
Some snipers, challenging Darwin and his theory of evolution, think that Hominidae are posterior to 'modern' man. To them, our origin is way older. We keep on going further.
Two centuries later, Homo sapiens sapiens' age jumped from
7000 to 150,000 years.
La Bruyere on the heath
But because of the cult of Darwin, as age of those fossils went against the dogma, they have been lost or given to collectors. David Childress cites fossils of modern man 300 000 years of age, 500 000 years and even one million years.
Other authors as,
…talk about
five million years and more.
Fossil of modern sole, 200 million years old...
The fossil shows the sole of a modern shoe. We can distinctly see the deeper mark of the heel. Those amazing imprints are still visible at Paluxy River's site, Texas, USA.
In 1988, Dr Hans Zillmer cites some disconcerting discoveries of the same type, so did Michael Cremo in his book Forbidden Archeology.
Guess what anthropologists said about
these books? Nothing...
Not only did Darwin make a mistake on our origins, which are much older than he thought, but we are even more amazed to see history repeating itself:
Darwin couldn't have made mistakes everywhere, neither could his paleo-anthropologist fans for 150 years now.
Dates of other Hominidae's apparition may be right. In which case, neither Homo erectus nor Homo faber would be our ancestors, those are distinct species that appeared much later than us.
Was it at a time of highly developed science?
The shock we feel at the sight of those modern
shoe soles with distinct mark of the heel seriously incite us to
review the old clichés about prehistory.
the footprint of a man the one of a dinosaur clearly show that they were contemporaries
They needed hard workers in fields and mines, says the Sumerian genesis.
The 'gods' (the Anunnaki) created a variety of lower beings to serve them. According to Sumer's tradition, we are those flunkeys. If there is a real danger in taking for granted theories and beliefs of science, the danger is bigger to follow any myth literally.
The understanding of any
particular myth supposes a vast experience and a real knowledge of
hundreds of extremely ancient - and odd - mythologies.
worn by a creationist scientist
These amazing stories question us concerning our origin, the presence of giant hominidae, and of course the real age of man.
Of course science remains totally silent on these topics, because the only valid theory, i.e. Darwin's evolution, grew with many contradictions and creeds, in a similar and equally ridiculous process as creationist's theories.
Remember You Are God Inside
And you are, I am, we all are part of the creating spirit.
Remember you are god, you are the
same nature as gods, and by you everything was created.
He gave a date of ten million five hundred thousands years to this first incarnation.
So
where do these 200 million years old footsteps come from? How could
we trust these dates? Let's explore these tracks in the next pages,
be patient, answers will come soon. From yourself.
But another method has been existing for millennia.
From the time this text was written, the status of the mythologist, alas, has not improved. Worse, the all-powerful neo-Darwinians violently criticize mythologists.
Fantasy and bias would be mythologists' dogmas, they say.
Sure to be
more scientific than these new priests, mythologists will therefore
stick to their specialty.
Pass for an
idiot auteur dramatique français 1858-1929
|
