|
by Makia Freeman
January 28,
2021
from
TheFreedomArticles Website
Lots of A, T, C and G:
SARS-CoV-2 fueled the COVID scamdemic,
yet to this day has never been isolated,
remaining a digital, in silico, imaginary
and theoretical virus.
AT A
GLANCE...
THE
STORY:
No record found: the SARS-CoV-2 virus that allegedly
causes COVID has still, to this date, never been
isolated. Countless governments and organizations
worldwide have failed to produce evidence of its
existence when challenged.
THE
IMPLICATIONS:
The world has been shut down and people's lives have
been decimated over a lie and a superstition that could
well be the biggest fraud ever perpetuated on humanity
as a whole.
The Imaginary and
Theoretical Virus known as SARS-CoV-2, a concept which has been used
by
the NWO (New World Order) controllers to shut down the world, is
becoming more and more exposed as the months go by.
Although those who
believe in
the COVID cult - both those orchestrating the scamdemic
and those blindly following along - will insist the virus is real,
the truth is that there has still been no compelling or conclusive
evidence that a real SARS-CoV-2 virus exists.
Admissions by
governmental scientists and organizations worldwide, as well as
omissions and obfuscations by those same people and agencies, reveal
the shocking truth.
As hard as it may be for
the COVID cultists to admit, the emperor truly has no clothes.
There
is no virus, other than a digital, theoretical abstraction made on a
computer from a genomic database.
The virus has never been
isolated, purified, sequenced, characterized and proven 100% to
exist.
Don't believe it? That's okay; it's good to be skeptical.
See
the evidence below for yourself and make up your own mind...
#1 SARS-CoV-2
the Theoretical Virus - The Virus Has Never Been Isolated According
to Koch's Postulates or River's Postulates
We'll start with this, because this is the cornerstone of the whole
scam.
All the following
information and evidence below stems from the fact the so-called
experts have never isolated and purified the virus according to the
gold standard of
Koch's postulates, or even the modified River's Postulates.
Koch's postulates are:
-
The
microorganism must be identified in all individuals affected
by the disease, but not in healthy individuals.
-
The
microorganism can be isolated from the diseased individual
and grown in culture.
-
When
introduced into a healthy individual, the cultured
microorganism must cause disease.
-
The
microorganism must then be re-isolated from the experimental
host, and found to be identical to the original
microorganism.
River's postulates
were proposed by Thomas M. River in 1973 to establish the role of a
specific virus as the cause of a specific disease.
They are
modifications of Koch's postulates.
They are as follows:
-
The viral
agent must be found either in the host's (animal or plant)
body fluids at the time of disease or in cells showing
lesions specific to that disease.
-
The host
material with the viral agent used to inoculate the healthy
host (test organism) must be free of any other
microorganism.
-
The viral
agent obtained from the infected host must produce the
specific disease in a suitable healthy host, and/or provide
evidence of infection by inducing the formation of
antibodies specific to that agent.
-
Similar
material (viral particle) from the newly infected host (test
organism) must be isolated and capable of transmitting the
specific disease to other healthy hosts.
Whichever set of
postulates is used, SARS-CoV-2 fails the test.
Dr. Andrew Kaufman
does a great job explaining why in this
video:
The coronavirus
SARS-CoV-2 (allegedly causing the disease
COVID-19) has not been
shown to be present only in sick people and not in healthy ones.
The virus has
never
been isolated, which must be done with proper equipment such as
electron microscopes and which cannot be achieved through CT scans
(as the Chinese were using) and
the flawed PCR test.
The January 24th
2020 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine
entitled
A Novel
Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019
describes how the scientists arrived at the idea of COVID-19:
they took lung
fluid samples and extracted RNA from them using the PCR test. It
admits that the coronavirus failed Koch's postulates:
"Further development of
accurate and rapid methods to identify unknown respiratory
pathogens is still needed... our study does not fulfill
Koch's postulates."
#2 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical
Virus - Top Chinese Scientist Admitted They Never Isolated the Virus
All claims that the
SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated have turned out to be
unsubstantiated.
Meanwhile, there have been actual admissions by
officials that they haven't isolated it.
The chief
epidemiologist of the Chinese CDC (Center for Disease Control)
admitted "they didn't isolate the
virus" in this
below video clip:
Source...
#3 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical
Virus: CDC Stated No Quantified Isolate Was Available
The US CDC (Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention) in its July 2020 report
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus
(2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel admits that,
it had been running PCR tests based not on an actual viral isolate
(an actual sample or specimen taken from an infected human), but
rather "stocks" of
"transcribed RNA" taken from a
gene bank to "mimic clinical
specimen":
"Since no quantified virus
isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time
the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed
for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with
characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N
gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL)
spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549
cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical
specimen." (pg.43)
#4 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus
- CDC Admitted They Made a
Digital Virus of 30,000 Base Pairs Using 37 Actual Sample Base Pairs
As covered in my
previous article
'SARS-CoV-2
- The Stitched Together,
Frankenstein Virus,' the CDC has already admitted that
SARS-CoV-2 is a computer-generated digital virus, not a real living
virus...
As I wrote:
"In other words, it is a
Frankenstein virus which has been concocted and stitched
together using genomic database sequences (some viral, some
not).
It has never been properly
purified and isolated so that it could be sequenced from
end-to-end once derived from living tissue; instead, it's just
digitally assembled from a computer database.
In this paper, the CDC scientists
state they took just 37 base pairs from a genome of 30,000 base
pairs which means that about 0.001% of the viral sequence is
derived from actual living samples or real bodily tissue.
In other words, they took these 37
segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in
the rest of the base pairs.
This computer-generation step
constitutes scientific fraud."
In this article
'In June Study CDC Scientists Make 2
COVID Admissions that Destroy Official Narrative' I reveal
how
the CDC admitted in
their paper that they extrapolated their make-believe virus.
Here is
the quote:
"Whole-Genome Sequencing
We designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs
spanning the genome on the basis of
the coronavirus reference sequence
(GenBank accession no. NC045512).
We extracted nucleic acid from
isolates
and amplified by using
the 37 individual nested PCRs."
Another way to say
this is that,
the "virus" has been constructed using a technique
called de novo assembly
which is a method for constructing genomes from a large number of
(short or long) DNA fragments, with no
a priori knowledge of the
correct sequence or order of those fragments.
You can read more
about it
here.
#5 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus
- European Corman-Drosten Paper
Used an "In Silico" Genome of an "In Silico" Virus
The original
Corman-Drosten paper admits they used a theoretical virus
sequence for all their work and calculations.
They, like the CDC and
every government and agency, claim this is only because no isolate
was ever available.
I wonder if any of these scientists every asked
WHY the isolate has never been available?
"In the present case of 2019-nCoV,
virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not
become available to the international public health community."
A subsequent study
highlighting fatal flaws in the Corman-Drosten paper was published
entitled
'External peer review of the RTPCR
test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the
molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive
results.'
It highlights how the authors used
'in silico' or 'theoretical'
sequences from computer banks, not real isolated samples from
infected people.
"In silico" is pseudo-Latin for
"theoretical"; in
plain English, synonyms for theoretical are "imaginary" and "make-believe."
"The first and major issue is that
the novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2
(in the publication named 2019-nCoV and in
February 2020 named SARS-CoV-2 by an international consortium of
virus experts) is based on
in silico
(theoretical) sequences, supplied by a laboratory in China,
because at the time neither control material of infectious
("live") or inactivated SARS-CoV-2
nor isolated genomic RNA of the virus was
available to the authors.
To date no validation has been
performed by the authorship based on isolated SARS-CoV-2 viruses
or full length RNA thereof.
…
Nevertheless these
in silico
sequences were used to
develop a
RT-PCR test methodology to identify the aforesaid
virus.
This model was based on the assumption that the
novel virus is very similar to
SARS-CoV from 2003 (Hereafter named SARS-CoV-1)
as both are
beta-coronaviruses... in short, a design relying
merely on close genetic relatives does not fulfill the aim for a
"robust diagnostic test" as cross reactivity
and therefore false-positive results will inevitably
occur.
Validation was only done in regards to
in silico
(theoretical) sequences and within the
laboratory-setting, and not as required for in-vitro diagnostics
with isolated genomic viral RNA.
This very
fact hasn't changed even after 10 months of introduction of the
test into routine diagnostics."
#6 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus
- UK Government Couldn't Produce
Evidence
The governments of
many nations around the world couldn't seem to come up with a real
virus either when challenged to do so.
More evidence proving the
"virus" is constructed on a computer database from a digital gene
bank comes from
Frances Leader, who questioned the UK MHRA (Medicines and
Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) whether a real isolated virus
was used to make the COVID vax
(read more about the
'COVID vaccine which is not a vaccine here').
Leader found that
the WHO protocols that
Pfizer used to produce the mRNA do not appear
to identify any nucleotide sequences that are unique to the
SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Leader asked if the
"virus" was actually a
computer generated genomic sequence, and ultimately the MHRA
confirmed they had no real specimen:
"The DNA template does not come
directly from an isolated virus from an infected person."
In July 2020, a
group of concerned academics
wrote a letter to the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson in which
they asked him to produce independently peer reviewed scientific
evidence proving that the SARS-CoV-2 "virus" has been isolated.
To
date they have not received a reply...
Similarly, UK researcher
Andrew Johnson made a Freedom of Information Request to
Public
Health England (PHE).
He asked them to provide him with their
records describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus to which
they responded:
"PHE can confirm it does not hold
information in the way suggested by your request."
#7 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus
- Australian Government Couldn't
Produce Evidence
In other
Commonwealth nations it's the exact same story.
In Australia
scientists from the Doherty
Institute falsely announced that they had isolated the
SARS-CoV-2 virus...
When asked to clarify the scientists said:
"We have short (RNA) sequences
from the diagnostic test that can be used in the diagnostic
tests."
Perhaps this is the
reason for this disclaimer by the
Australian Government:
"The reliability of COVID-19 tests
is uncertain due to the limited evidence base…
There is limited evidence
available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of
available COVID-19 tests."
#8 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus
- Canadian Government Couldn't
Produce Evidence
Researcher
Christine Massey made a similar Freedom of Information request in
Canada, to which the
Canadian Government replied:
"Having completed a thorough
search, we regret to inform you that we were unable to locate
any records responsive to your request."
#9 SARS-Cov-2 the Theoretical Virus
- Over 40 Institutions Worldwide
Can't Answer the Basic Question
In fact, Massey and
her colleague in New Zealand,
"have been submitting Freedom of
Information requests to various institutions in,
Canada, NZ,
Australia, Germany, the U.K., the U.S. etc.,
...seeking any records
that describe the isolation of a "COVID-19 virus" (aka "SARS-COV-2")
from an unadulterated sample taken from a diseased human...
As of
December 16, 2020, 40 institutions in,
Canada, U.S., New Zealand,
Australia, U.K., England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Denmark, and the
European CDC,
...have provided their responses, and none could locate
any record describing the isolation of any "COVID-19 virus" aka "SARS-COV-2"
directly from a diseased patient."
Massey posts their
replies
here and
here.
#10 SARS-Cov-2 the Theoretical Virus
- Previous Coronaviruses Have
Not Been Isolated
The Spanish health
journal Salud published a great
article in November 2020 entitled "The
Scam has been Confirmed - PCR does Not detect SARS-CoV-2" in the
medical field" (unofficial translation) where it exposes the lack of evidence not only for
the isolation of SARS-CoV-2, but also for the isolation of other
past coronaviruses.
The scam runs deep...
Jon Rappoport has done great work
exposing how the exact same scam blueprint was played out in the
1980s (with Fauci in charge, leading the fraud) when scientists
asserted there was a new virus called HIV, and it was causing AIDS.
The COVID scamdemic greatly mimics other historical fake pandemics
such as the
1976 swine flu pandemic.
The article in
Salud states:
"The genetic sequences used in
PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 and to diagnose cases of
illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens
of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a
hundred microbes.
And that includes the initiators or primers,
the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed
"genome" and even the so-called "target genes" allegedly
specific to the "new coronavirus".
The test is worthless and all "positive" results obtained so far should be scientifically
invalidated and communicated to those affected; and if they are
deceased, to their relatives.
Stephen Bustin, one of the world's
leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain
conditions anyone can test positive!
...
We have been warning you since
March [2020 - Ed.]:
you cannot have specific tests for a virus
without knowing the components of the virus you are trying to
detect.
And the components cannot be known without having
previously isolated/purified that virus. Since then we continue
to accumulate evidence that no one has isolated SARS-CoV-2 and,
more importantly, that it can never be isolated...
In this report
we are going to add the results of a particular research we have
done from the data published on the alleged SARS-CoV-2 and on
the protocols endorsed by the WHO for the use of RT-PCR as well
as the data corresponding to the rest of the "human
coronaviruses".
And the conclusions are extremely serious:
none
of the seven "human coronaviruses" have actually been isolated
and all the sequences of the primers of their respective PCRs as
well as those of a large number of fragments of their supposed
genomes are found in different areas of the human genome and in
genomes of bacteria and archaea..."
Their report
analyzed human coronaviruses,
And just to repeat in case you missed
it:
they discovered the
alleged
sequences of SARS-CoV-2 are found in both humans and bacteria!
This means all the various
in silico models of SARS-CoV-2,
contain
existing human genetic sequences,
...so it is little wonder that people
test positive when the primer or standard being tested against
contains human sequences.
Conclusion - The COVID Cult is a Colossal Fraud and Superstition
How did this all
start?
Chinese scientists took lung fluid samples and claimed they
had discovered a novel or new virus. The
Gates-Rockefeller
WHO
backed them up.
In the WHO's Novel
Coronavirus 2019-nCov Situation Report 1, they state:
"The Chinese authorities
identified a new type of coronavirus, which was isolated on 7
January 2020...
On 12 January 2020, China shared
the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus for countries to
use in developing specific diagnostic kits."
With the evidence
presented above,
the WHO's assertions and claims are utterly
baseless.
They constitute outright fraud.
The world has been shut
down over a lie - a coldly calculated, carefully curated lie - that
was simulated and war-gamed for decades in advance.
The COVID cult
is,
an irrational superstition based on nothing but
in silico,
theoretical, make-believe viral sequences...
Yet, the real-world
consequences for millions who have been thrown into stress, despair,
poverty, joblessness, alcoholism and suicide is anything but
theoretical...
Sources
| 
