|
June 19, 2020 from Technocracy Website
Then certain other scientists and engineers rose up and made a discovery of their own.
If true science was ever-so-slightly skewed and engineering disciplines were applied to society at large, then they could indeed use their "knowledge" to dominate and control other people, groups, entire societies or even, heaven forbid, the entire planet.
Merriam-Webster defines pseudo-science as,
The Oxford dictionary clarifies by stating,
Pseudo-science quickly emerged as the principal domain of Technocrats, but they soon found that,
The solution was simple:
In the context of pseudo-science, this report will examine the three primary tools of fighting COVID-19:
But, what about surgical masks?
OHSA is clear here also that they,
But then right under these statements, OSHA furiously backpedaled by adding an FAQ section on COVID-19 directly underneath and stated,
So,
OSHA is speaking out of both sides of its mouth.
What it calls "source control" likely puts the real motive out in the open:
There is no true scientific rationale for anyone but the sick and medical workers to wear masks. The truly healthy have no business wearing a mask, period...!
But, what about asymptomatic carriers?
On June 8, 2020, Maria Van Herkhove, PhD., head of the World Health Organization's (WHO) emerging diseases and zoonosis unit released a compilation of a number of contact tracing programs from various nations and plainly stated,
This writer hates to think what happened to Dr. Herkhove overnight at the hands of her WHO handlers, because the next day she also furiously backpedaled and stated,
It is clear that Dr. Herkhove's first statement that naively repeated the clear facts of the matter did not follow the WHO's justification for non-infectious people to wear masks.
In fact, the entire mask wearing narrative hangs on the single pseudo-scientific idea that asymptomatic people can spread the virus...
In a recent Technocracy News article authored by highly-respected neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD titled Face Masks pose Serious Risks to the Healthy, he concluded,
Nevertheless, in the face of clear evidence of the worthlessness of face masks for preventing disease,
Breath Is Vital To Life
Many people believe that face masks lower the percentage of oxygen available for inhaling because you rebreathe much of your exhausted breath.
However, a face mask itself does not retain a significant amount of your exhaled breath since most of it is exhaled through the mask into the open atmosphere.
Furthermore, when you inhale, most of the air delivered to your lungs comes from outside the mask.
The real problem with breathing through a mask is that the lungs and chest muscles must exert a lot of extra energy to inhale and exhale.
For this reason, those who already have impaired lung functions, minor as they may be, should never wear a mask unless it is for a specific purpose for a very short period of time.
The older you are, especially those over 70, lung capacity and muscle strength decline rapidly.
This writer has already encountered several retail store employees, forced by their employers to wear a face mask during work hours, who exhibit symptoms like,
When asked if they relate their symptoms to wearing the mask, every single one has emphatically said "Yes!".
Workers with the most physically demanding jobs are the most likely to exhibit these kind of symptoms.
Other considerations are,
Actually, any debilitating health condition should be a red flag. In other words, those who are prone to get winded without a face mask will immediately be at a disadvantage when wearing a mask.
The net effect is that the lungs receive less fresh air with vital oxygen even as the body is under more physical stress.
Every employer and government entity that mandates the wearing of face masks should be required to do two things:
Many state-level politicians are now mandating the wearing of face masks for all citizens in public places.
They have fallen prey to pseudo-science and are now putting entire populations at risk for physical harm that has nothing to do with the COVID-19 virus.
In sum,
A blanket statement that all employees or all citizens should wear face masks it wholly inappropriate.
Social Distancing
Adding to the fear of contagion, people across the nation are driven to practice social distancing, or staying 6 feet apart at all times.
This is practiced to excess in almost every commercial establishment with markers taped or painted on the floor and shopping isles converted into one-way travel only.
Yet, two real scientists at the University of Oxford in Britain, Professors Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson, wrote in The Telegraph recently and reported also in the Daily Mail (both in UK) that,
Their article was titled 'There is no scientific evidence to support the disastrous two-meter rule'...
According to these scientists,
Heneghan and Jefferson further noted,
This is the hallmark of modern pseudo-science:
What is the real purpose of social distancing?
Humans are social beings, after all, and lack of close proximity leads to depression, anxiety and even serious health consequences.
Contact Tracing
Contact tracing is an established practice in modern medicine.
It is useful for the early stages of serious infectious diseases like Ebola, tuberculosis and sexually transmitted diseases like chlamydia.
Every credible expert on contact tracing says that it is effective only up to the point of mass distribution. In other words, during the early stages of a contagion or a slow moving or very serious disease.
Except to harass people, there is nothing useful that contact tracing can accomplish.
Yet, almost every state in America is implementing a wide-ranging contact tracing program that may ultimately employ some 300,000 tracers.
The Center for Disease Control (CDC) website states that,
Furthermore, CDC complete definition of "close contact" is,
If you are "exposed" to such a person, your personal information will be collected and you will be contacted by the "tracer" to be instructed to quarantine for up to two weeks.
The infected person could have been mistaken about having contact with you. They could be someone who just wants to get you in trouble.
If you live in Washington state, where all restaurants are now required to record the contact information of every patron, you might not have a clue who was infected, but you will be quarantined anyway.
Now, the CDC's declaration of "6 feet" above takes us back to social distancing, where we just learned above that there is "no effect of distance on contracting COVID" in the first place.
Thus, find that contact tracing misses the mark on two main points:
So,
Again, pursuing a path of pseudo-science, the intended outcome is control over people...
Conclusion
The American public is being spoon-fed a steady diet of pseudo-science in order to justify the wearing of face masks, social distancing and contact tracing.
Instead, these are the ones who should be exposed, shamed and ridiculed.
In sum, these dangerous and destructive policies are designed to curtail economic activity, break down social cohesion and control people.
Moreover, they fit the original mission statement of Technocracy as far back as 1938:
It is highly doubtful that most state and local leaders understand the lack of real and verified science behind their actions and mandates.
Nevertheless, they are implementing policies that are,
This writer suggests that you print multiple copies of this report and deliver it to every political leader, every commercial establishment, all family and friends, etc.
|
