Saeed Qureshi, Ph.D.
The following is a brief scientific explanation of mRNA
gene therapy), often presented as
something new, advanced, or novel...
The literature described it (mRNA, messenger ribonucleic acid) as a
chemical compound (a shorter version of nucleic acid or RNA), like a
peptide molecule, compared to protein, the larger (chain or
It may be impressive and overwhelming for medical professionals
because of limited learning and understanding of science/chemistry;
otherwise, nothing is unique or novel about its nature and
characteristics as a chemical molecule/compound.
The promoted novelty aspect of "mRNA technology" is based on the
chemistry narrative as it would occur in the body, as described in
the literature, such as in a report from
the FDA for vaccine approval (BNT162b2
Vaccine Candidate against COVID-19).
The description is that,
once mRNA is
administered, it will then supposedly get involved with the
body's chemistry (or chemical processes/synthesis) to produce a
specific protein (called spike or s-protein) associated with the
Once that protein is
produced in the body, the body's immune system will be triggered to
produce defense (antibodies/immunity) against the protein
(considered as a foreign body) capable of killing the future attack
from the virus, which is supposed to have the specific spike
It is the chemistry aspects at both levels, i.e., in (synthesizing
of spike protein and developing immunity) and outside (synthesis of
mRNA in the lab) of the body.
In short, the narrative
is based on chemistry (science) and its reaction/processes at its
The process described above could be divided into five steps (with
their respective missing scientific basis):
The mRNA has been
synthesized and characterized in a laboratory or
the literature does not provide relevant and essential
details about this part, such as mRNA's identity, purity,
So, it is an
unknown item to anyone outside the pharmaceutical company
which makes it.
Therefore, any claim made about the mRNA technology, its
benefit, and its relevance by anyone, including medical
professionals (supporters or non-supporters) not associated
with the company, has to be speculative (fictional) -
not factual or scientific.
(shot or jab) into the body, the mRNA is claimed to produce
'spike protein,' the same, or similar, to what the
SARS-COV-2 virus is believed to have...
There is no
evidence provided or available to show that, indeed,
the mRNA produces the specific spike protein. The
existence or production of the spike protein can only be
detected or monitored by a test.
test can only be developed by having a physically purified
spike protein sample (reference), unavailable from
Spike protein is
unavailable because the virus specimens are
unavailable from which the spike protein is to be
Therefore, detecting or making valid claims of its existence
Hence, any claim
spike protein is 'produced'
and its presence is detected or monitored should be
considered invalid and fictional.
It is claimed
that the spike-protein triggers the body's immune response,
i.e., the body produces specific antibodies.
How has this been
It cannot be
because showing spike-protein and antibodies interaction
require a pure isolated specimen of the spike protein, which
is not available, as noted above.
Hence, one cannot
establish the production of specific antibodies.
Moreover, detecting and monitoring antibodies requires a
test for the specific antibodies.
The test cannot
be developed without the pure isolated sample of antibodies,
which is not available either. Therefore, the claim
that antibodies are produced or will be produced by spike
protein cannot be true.
Hence, such a
claim has to be false and fictional, not
The next claim in
the novel mRNA technology narrative is that the produced
antibodies will have and provide a protective shield against
the virus attack.
This claim has to
be false because it requires the specimen of the
virus to test the claim, which is now very well established
that the virus specimen is not available anywhere in
Hence the immunity/efficacy of antibodies through mRNA
cannot be verified. It is as simple as that...
So all claims
about mRNA have to be imaginary and presumptuous - not
factual or scientific.
safety claim of the
mRNA vaccine, this is
probably the most straightforward step which could be
All one requires
is to dose cells, tissue, animals, or humans and observe any
potential adverse effects. Such studies are lacking.
This creates a valid concern about the mRNA, i.e., why such
studies have not been conducted or reported. Hence, the
claim that the 'safety' of the mRNA has been tested remains
weak or false.
mentioned above are not only a scientific requirement but
logical; they are missing.
Therefore, if one sees it
from the chemistry (science) aspect, the mRNA scenario is without
facts and scientific support, more like a fantastic fairy tale...!
The only reason
reality is hidden is because the claims and assessments
about mRNA have been reported by medical professionals, not by
scientific experts, in particular chemistry related.
an urgent evaluation
by an independent third party is needed to address the current
'pandemic' will continue with recommendations of an ever-increasing
number of fictional and irrelevant vaccines or mRNA
vaccines or their repeats (aka boosters)...