by Guy Hatchard
June 02, 2024
from
BrownStone Website
Guy Hatchard PhD,
is the author of
HatchardReport.com a
popular covid science information site in New Zealand
with a large following.
He also runs the campaign
for Global Legislation Outlawing Biotechnology
Experimentation (https://globe.global/).
He was formerly a senior
manager at Genetic ID a global food testing safety and
certification organization
(now known as
FoodChain ID).
He has written a book
'Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet' (available
from Amazon and the HatchardReport.com).
Dr Hatchard has advised
governments on natural food legislation and the risks of
GM Foods. He lives in New Zealand. |
Every so often you find a study that breaks new ground and advances
human understanding.
The journal Transplantology has published
a paper entitled "Personality
Changes Associated with Organ Transplants," which
documents the experiences of individuals who received a range of
donated organs including,
hearts, kidneys, liver, and lungs...
It is well known that,
heart transplant recipients can experience
consequent personality changes...!
Notably, this study shows that the same is true
for other types of organ transplants.
Here is a summary of the range of changes
observed in the 47 study subjects broken down by heart transplant
patients versus other organ recipients.
In all, 87% of subjects experienced marked
unusual changes that challenged their behavior, sense of
identity, and personal preferences.
First-person reports and evidence from donor
families confirm that some of these effects involve the transfer
of personality traits such as food or behavioral preferences
from the donor to the organ recipient.
For example, an avid meat eater might become
a vegetarian who cannot face meat on their plate.
This is an unexpected result that challenges
conventional ideas.
This study points to the distributed location of
memory throughout physiology and its close association with a
variety of organ systems. It amply illustrates how little the life
sciences understand about the interface between consciousness and
matter...
Prior speculations about the origins of these effects had centered
around three possible mechanisms:
-
psychological imprinting
-
cellular
biochemistry
-
electromagnetic fields
The study results clearly point to the importance
of biochemical mechanisms.
The psychological theories center around 'magical thinking.'
This is
the belief that certain words, thoughts, emotions, or ritual
behaviors imprint themselves on the world around us...
These explanations are vague from a conventional
scientific perspective and fail to identify why or how a full range
of organ systems might be involved in this process.
Nevertheless,
they point to the need to integrate
our understanding of biochemistry with consciousness...
The previous speculative electromagnetic field ideas about
transplant trait transfer have been closely related to the
electrical properties of the heart and fall over now that we know
the phenomenon extends to other organs.
The third type of explanation involves the possible storage of
memories in cells including their epigenetic, DNA, RNA, or protein
components.
This hypothesis is not invalidated by the
findings of the current study.
In fact
ScienceAlert offers the 'systemic
memory hypothesis' as a possible explanation of the new study's
findings.
This hypothesis suggests that all living cells contain
memory, meaning that history and hence future actions can be passed
from donor to transplant via tissue.
The study also points to the networked nature of
memory in our physiology.
Transferred memories appear to be able in
some cases to automatically integrate into the behavioral
preferences of the organ recipient.
Not to say actually take automated control of
these behaviors and preferences.
In other words,
it seems highly likely that
memories are stored in some way in cellular genetic/epigenetic
systems which can assume a measure of control over aspects of human
behavior and thinking.
If this is the case, there is a lot to
unpack.
Firstly it seems that cellular genetic systems
are far more complex and perform more functions than biotechnology
currently supposes.
Our current models are too crude to encompass
the transplant study findings.
Cellular genetic functions interact very closely
with consciousness. Mind and body are two sides of one coin in a
very deep and fully integrated sense.
This greatly reinforces the understanding we have
been reporting at the
Hatchard
Report and particularly at
GLOBE
that the simple current biotech models of intracellular functions
are extremely incomplete if not incorrect in some very critical
aspects.
The implication is obvious; biotech interventions
that cross the cell membrane and insert edited cellular genetic
material (gene therapies, DNA and
mRNA vaccines, gain-of-function
viral material, etc.) are even more risky than has been imagined by
anyone to date.
They could be editing what makes us human.
Secondly, and even more worrying, it appears that
genetic information or sequences have an inherent inbuilt capability
to seize control of human behavior.
Clearly our memories play a very
important role in formulating behavior; whatever has gone before has
an overwhelming influence on our future.
The article "Your
Grandparents' Diet could still be Affecting You, and Your Kids'
Health" explains how this even extends to genetic changes stored
in ancestral DNA and inherited by us.
The Transplant
article shows that Genetic Interventions cannot only influence our
Health but also 'What we Do and Think'
It is just a short step now to realize that gene
editing, including any sort of editing of the chain of genetic
functions within cells, could more or less automatically change our
behavior and psychological profile.
More importantly, since our knowledge of cellular
genetics now appears to be very incomplete, cellular genetic
editing, if carried out on a scale commensurate with organ size, can
scramble our behavior, thinking, and understanding.
It could do so effectively against our will...!
In other words,
It could greatly confuse and stress us or
even control us.
It won't have escaped your notice that an
engineered Covid virus and/or the mRNA vaccines fit the bill.
It is estimated that there are as many as
ten billion Covid virions present during peak Covid
infection.
Each
Covid shot contains trillions of
mRNA molecules which change the genetic operation of billions of
cells.
A human liver contains around 240 billion
cells and a kidney far fewer...
So both Covid infection and mRNA vaccine
technology are in the right ballpark,
to influence our psychological
and behavioral profile...
Even the New York Times has pointed out
the
widespread disruption of societal organization, high crime, and
conflict rates during the 'pandemic'.
It is just one more short step to realize that,
for a culture with more sophisticated scientific knowledge than we
have at present, it might be possible to genetically control the
consciousness and behavior of whole populations...!
A frightening thought.
We are not proposing anything illogical or
unscientific here.
There are parallels with early 20th-century
physics.
In the face of incontrovertible experimental
results, physicists had to incorporate the notion of a conscious
observer into the heart of
quantum mechanics.
Biotechnology is being irreversibly pushed
towards an admission that consciousness lies at the heart of biology
and the cutting edge of evolution.
This is not a radical idea, it is our simple
everyday experience as individuals that needs to take pride of place
in the life sciences.
In summary, let me make myself clear:
the new
transplant paper greatly strengthens GLOBE's call for global
legislation outlawing biotechnology experimentation.
Any steps in
the direction of editing the internal operation of cells are steps
in the wrong direction and a great risk for the entire human race...
In this article, we have come a long way from the
experience of a few transplant recipients, but the chain of
scientific logic is there.
Biotechnology experimentation should be outlawed.
It is a step too far and yet a step that
millions of workers funded by governments, mega-corporations,
and private investors are carelessly taking every day.
The risks are incalculable and negative outcomes
inevitable.
We can't leave you with this prospect without
referencing some positive steps that individuals can take to protect
their health.
In
a
recent video, we described intracellular transport and
information systems in terms of eight parameters:
-
chemistry
-
water-soluble processes
-
electricity
-
electromagnetic fields
-
molecular shape
-
molecular vibration
-
transcription regulation
-
genetic structure
All of these systems can be supported by simple
additions to our daily routines and lifestyle.
Chemistry:
The food that we eat needs to be free of
ultra-processed content, pesticides, etc., it should be lighter,
more varied, and based on unadulterated natural food sources
that contain DNA.
These measures will support cellular
chemistry.
Water and Electricity:
To improve hydration sip hot purified water
during the day. To make it easy, you can keep a thermos flask
nearby. This will also improve electrical conductivity in the
physiology.
Electric fields:
Take a walk in the morning sun every day. The
sun is a form of electromagnetic radiation that is healing.
Avoid overexposure to cell phone, electrical, and
Wi-Fi
radiation.
Shape:
Simple yoga exercises place the body in
shapes that stimulate health and renew energy.
The placement, proportions, orientation, and
materials of your home greatly influence your health (more on
this in a later release)
Vibration:
Uplifting music vibrates the physiology in
tune with Cosmic harmonies. Simple breathing exercises in clean
air clear the mind.
Transcription Regulation:
Speak the truth always. This ensures our
thinking is in harmony with natural law and protects our
intelligence along with the intelligence of our body.
Genetic Identity:
Meditate and honor your traditional cultural
wisdom, as it improves immunity, humanity, and the expression of
our individual and collective genetic heritage.
|