by William Hamilton
Revised October 25, 2005
from
AstroSciences Website
Revision Notice
The book on
Project
Aquarius will be published in November 2005.
I have decided to
reinstate this webpage for a number of reasons. There are a number
of individuals who have mounted a
concerted attack on the case of Dr. Dan Burisch just as there have been a number of other
individuals who have attacked the authenticity of the Bob Lazar
story.
One of the individuals is newscaster
George Knapp of Las Vegas television station KLAS.
In addition a
cadre of U.S. government agents or ex-agents such as Rick Doty (AFOSI),
Gene Loscowski (pseudo last name DIA), and Paul McGovern (DIA) have,
on various tours of duty served at
Area 51 and purport to know the
truth about extraterrestrial visitation and reverse engineering
projects conducted on the Nevada Test Site at S-4 and who were
friends of Retired Major Tom Mack who said he had known Dan Crain,
refute Dan Burisch’s claim that he worked at S-4 or that there was a J-Rod that had a degenerating condition as peripheral neuropathy.
Since several witnesses have now
signed notarized affidavits, including Dr. Dan Burisch,
attesting to the truth of his claim, I am herewith posting these
affidavits at the end of this page.
Since Dan is receiving the
full support of those he has worked for and is engaged in a full
debrief of his 19 years of service to the members of Majestic
which will be made known in 2006, the truth will emerge and
until then, it is up to the student and reader to determine
whether we are being enlightened or disinformed.
- William Hamilton
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
- Lord Acton (1887)
"Liberty is not the power of doing what we like, but the right
of being able to do what we ought."
- Lord Acton
We all remember the saga of Robert
Lazar. He was the young man who stepped forward courageously stating
that he worked on a very top secret reverse engineering project at a
super secret underground facility near Groom Lake and closer to
Papoose Lake known as S-4.
Robert
Scott Lazar
(1)
According to Bob Lazar the noted scientist Dr. Edward Teller (now
deceased) was impressed with Bob and sent him to be interviewed at EG&G. As a result of this interview, he was hired by
EG&G to work at
the super secret
Area 51.
According to Gene Huff, Lazar’s friend and supporter:
“Bob reported to the EG&G building at McCarran airport, which had
runway access, where he was met by Dennis Mariani. Mariani was a
security man of medium build and height, about 35 to 40 years old,
blonde hair and a tightly cropped blonde mustache. Mariani had a
military look and manner, but he didn’t wear a uniform.
With Mariani
as his escort, Bob was flown out to area 51 at Groom Lake.
At area 51, Bob had to sign a secrecy agreement and an agreement to
waive his constitutional rights, which is illegal but was made
possible by an executive order with Ronald Reagan’s signature on it.
He also had to sign an agreement which allowed them to monitor his
phone line. Bob already had "Q" clearance, which is top secret
civilian clearance, at Los Alamos but he had never gone through
anything like this.
The clearance he was now attaining would require
perpetual monitoring of his activities and would never simply be
attained and forgotten about until the next review date. After some
abrupt suggestions that he honor his secrecy agreement and watch his
general conduct, he and Mariani boarded a bus with blacked out
windows and took a 20 to 30 minute ride down a bumpy dirt/gravel
road.
They arrived at a base near Papoose dry lake bed known as S4.
S-4 Badge #
E-6722MAJ 1
Tom Mahood conducted an open minded investigation of Lazar and
posted a timeline beginning with his birth in Florida January 26,
1959 and continuing through his problems with pandering charges,
bankruptcy, etc.
Once it was a hot story and now many think Lazar’s
story was either a fabrication or deliberate disinformation. Rarely
are such pronouncements the last word. A critical issue was his
claimed education at M.I.T. as a physicist.
While there were records
found at Pierce Junior College in Woodland Hills, a search of all M.I.T. records and publications found no trace of
Lazar. Records of
his attendance at Cal Tech and Cal State Northridge were also not
found. Did he lie? That is the common conclusion.
But, the story of his working on the “Sports Model” would not die
and other test site workers affirm that Bob worked at the Nevada
Test Site. Other sources have said that the S-4 facility is just as
Bob describes it to be and that reverse engineering is conducted
there in secret.
I have even met a computer engineer who works on contract for the
Navy at Area 51 who has reverse engineered an alien device. He is
quite credible and is still on contract from time to time. Oh yes,
he has a genuine Area 51 badge, not the fun badges sold at UFO
conferences.
Now the friends of another scientist who worked at
S-4 have stepped
forward and I have taken this new case bearing in mind all those
nasty critics out there. Why? Because it may be the key to the alien
presence and mission on earth.
This is the saga of a man held in
captivity by his employers and who is now retired (as of March 2005)
and his name is Dr. Dan Burisch.
Dr. Dan C. Burisch (Dr. Dan Crain, Capt USN)
S-4 Badge # H-6196MAJ
I am telling this man’s story because I am researching various
specific references I have in my possession suffice to say he was
trained as a microbiologist and worked on a project involving a live EBE and because Dan is one of the sincerest men I have met who has
an encyclopedic mind, a good sense of humor and wit, and little
motive to fabricate information.
J-ROD was not allowed to leave by the Majestic group and thus
considers himself captive.
The commentary that follows is from my source:
“I was going through my files to find out about Dan’s badge, but I
don’t have any copies. I remember him telling me that he never got
to take his badge home at all.
For what it’s worth, I can tell you
what it looked like, based on his descriptions: it was a white badge
with two blue hash marks across the upper left side. Below these
hash marks was his designated area (S4). Directly above the S4 was a
star shaped punch. On his old badge, there were three letters
underneath S4; they were ETL for extraterrestrial laboratory. In his
later badges they changed the ETL to EBL for Extraterrestrial
Biological Laboratory.
On the right hand side of the badge was
MAJ spelled vertically. The
badges also displayed the photo of the scientist, and below this
photo was his name, assignment and badge number (the H-number).
Along the very bottom was either a DX (standing for departmental
transfer) or WX (standing for engineering transfer) code which would
allow the person access to different parts of the project, or
pavilions as they call them. The reverse of this badge had a black
mag-strip. When Dan got his badge, it was usually paired up with an
orange badge that gave his # for logging into that facility
(Papoose) for the day. Dan would receive a separate badge if he
needed to go to Floor 2, which if I correctly remember him saying
were LG and SideKick.
But badging got a little more complicated as you got lower down into
the labs. You see, nobody was supposed to know who you were as you
got lower down into the Aquarius project area.
When Dan got to
the
Aquarius level, he was required to place his badge into a plastic
bag-like container before he went into decontamination. When he came
out of there, the badge was returned to him but it was laminated in
a plastic pouch (I guess it had to be decontaminated too).
Once that
was collected by Dan, he carried it over to a badge wall, and put it
on a hook (usually he was told to turn it over so the front was
facing the wall and nobody could read it) in an open numbered spot.
Any spot would do so long as nobody else’s badge was hanging there.
Then Dan would take a blue numbered badge that corresponded to the
spot and put his original badge on.
This blue badge only had a
number on it. He was then "Scientist #5" for example for the
remainder of his time down there. Bottle washers and support
personnel were similarly numbered. So Bottle Washer #3 might be
called over by Scientist #9 etc...
This served to completely isolate the different levels of workers
from one another, and help maintain compartmentalization. Nobody was
supposed to use proper names at that level.”
Dan Burisch (Crain) is a microbiologist receiving his PhD in 1989 in
New York. NYU is already starting to deny a record of this, but
documents exist showing his educational record.
He first graduated
with a BA from UNLV in 1986 when he was first approached as a
candidate for working on a project for the government. From the time
period 1982-85 he is listed as a biologist and owner of Crain
Environment Research in Las Vegas.
He submitted a proposal to NASA
entitled,
“ON THE TRANSPLANTATION OF PROTOZOA AND THE EXPLOITATION
OF MARTIAN EXOBIOLOGY: THE CASE FOR EUGLENA VIRIDIS IN THE AUTOMATED
BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY.”
Dan has an intense interest in Mars, its
anomalies, and potentials for life. NASA replied,
“Your project has
been found to contain sufficient intrinsic merit as to enable
integration into NSCORT Bioregenerative Life Support Division, a
sub-directorate of the Controlled Ecological Life Support Systems (CELSS)
Program of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.”
He was eventually assigned to be the Working Group Leader in
Project
Aquarius, R-4800, Papoose Site-4 on the Nevada Test Site at the same
location as Robert Lazar, only briefly when Lazar was there, but
assigned to a leadership position sometime around 1994. He worked in
the underground biological lab that had been installed on Level 4.
The security procedures for entering the area included
optical
retinal scan and voice print identification. Showering, shaving,
decontamination, and change of clothing was required before entering
the lab as they had classified at a bio safety level of 5 which is
not listed in the OSU manuals.
Here is a description of Bio safety level 4:
Bio-safety Level 4:
Practices, safety equipment, and facilities are applicable to work
with dangerous and exotic agents which pose a high individual risk
of life threatening disease.
All manipulations of potentially
infectious diagnostic materials, isolates, and naturally or
experimentally infected animals pose a high risk of exposure and
infection to laboratory personnel. Lassa fever virus is
representative of the microorganisms assigned to Level 4.
I guess coming into contact with extraterrestrial life forms is an
additional level of hazard. Unknown microbes could be transferred
from the host to the workers.
Project Aquarius was only one of 5 compartmentalized projects
conducted at the S-4 facility. More detail will be supplied as we
progress with the story of S-4, but here is a brief listing:
Project Sigma:
(TS/ORCON) PROJECT SIGMA
(PROWORD): AQUARIUS
Originally established as part of Project XXXXXX in 1954.
Became a
separate project in 1976. It’s mission was to establish communication with Aliens. This Project met with positive success
(sic) when in 1959, the United States established primitive
communications with the Aliens. On April 25, 1964, a USAF
intelligence officer met two aliens at a pre-arranged location in
the desert in New Mexico.
The contact lasted for approximately three
hours. XXX(for over half a line)XXX the Air Force officer managed to
exchange basic information with the two Aliens (Atch 7). This
project is continuing at an Air Force base in New Mexico. (OPR):
XXXXXX
(From the Aquarius document).
Project Sigma at S-4 was associated with satellites and satellite
surveillance.
Project Galileo:
Dealt with the Propulsion System and was the main
area of study for Lazar. He was taken to the briefing room and told
to study reports about propulsion and the role of gravity as the
propulsion medium. Harnessing, amplifying and lensing the basic
gravity A wave has many other possibilities.
Project Sidekick:
Dealt with A Beam Weapon potential of the craft
and the attempt to prototype one. Somehow using gravity and lensing
it in order to collimate the beam. Once the beam is focused in a
triangulated manner on a specific point, the options of destructions
are endless.
Project Looking Glass:
Dealt with the Physics of Seeing the effects
of an artificially produced gravity wave on time. This as with the
other projects all embraced gravity and the control of it, and
therefore the control of Space/Time as the key element
Project Looking Glass
The Commentary that follows is from my source that linked with
inside sources and took notes on Project Looking Glass (LG) and
Time
Travel experiments:
“With regard to LG: As I understand it, this device (at least 3 to 4
years ago) could not focus on a detailed sequence of activities in
the future. In other words, you could not see exactly what would
happen, like a series of events.
I was told to consider the
multiverse
(5) idea combined with work by
Richard Gott on
cosmic
strings (6). The multiverse apparently is accessed when the forward
mode is set. I was also told to consider the views provided by LG as
one of many potential realities (at least in the future view mode).
I have also been told that recently there has been an effort made to
outfit videotape recorders to be sent forward through the apparatus,
thereby allowing the dark project people to gain some insight into
what may take place.
When I heard about this several questions came to my mind. The most
pressing of which was: if a camera were sent forward in time/space,
would it be able to record anything other than what was immediately
in front of its lens? I mean, what if LG were located in the middle
of the Groom Lake facility, and the operators wanted to gain insight
into the outcome of a conflict, say in the Middle East.
How could a
videotape recorder, set to record what was right in front of its
lens at that location gather any data on the Middle East if it were
still stuck in the middle of the Mojave desert when it got to the
future??? Hell, something important could be happening right behind
the camera and it would miss it - a couple of degrees change in
camera direction allows one set of events to be seen while another
set is completely overlooked, much less events half a world away.
To answer this question, my contact was not specific, saying only
that cameras did not move, as mass does not change in its
perspective to space time. However, such an item placed into the
injected atmosphere, might experience a different time, if only
briefly. And cameras could film within the gas or see images in the
injected atmosphere as though it were a lens reflecting events in
and around the column. I was given to understand that the tilt or
positioning of the electromagnets would allow different views or
positions in the environment to be reflected in the gas column.
(I feel confident that at least two rings of electromagnets are
employed and that the rest of the device is composed of a barrel and
the gas injected into the barrel - Two different sources have
indicated that these are the basic components - These magnets spin
in different directions, creating a charge of some kind.
Then the
gas is injected into the barrel. Depending on the direction of the
spin - I am sure speed and tilt and a bunch of other factors must
also have an effect - time space can be warped forward or backwards
by long or short distances relative to the present. I have reason to
believe that the scientists have completed a map of the exact
positions and speeds of the magnets necessary to reach targeted
times both forward and back.)
Apparently, images of the events at
different places, relative to the location of the device can be
picked up and in essence reflected off the gas, causing it to behave
like a teleprompter or crystal ball, for lack of a better example.
But I am not entirely sure that mass does not move, or that mass is
not affected.
Since I was also told many years ago about an
experiment that went very wrong in the early years of the LG
project, involving a test subject of some kind. As I understand it
there was significant movement of mass during that experiment, and
it ended up with a rather gruesome death for the poor test subject.
(I originally thought it was a monkey, but I found out that there
were many test subjects that got sent through, so I am not certain
what kind was involved in the experiment that went bad. However, in
my typical reverse-logic search for corollaries, this tells me that
there must have been many test subjects that made it through just
fine. So I am certain that any errors that were made or any
miscalculations have long since been corrected).
I wish I could offer you more information. For what its worth, my
sources have confirmed the presence of electromagnets and a
barrel-like device which is injected with some kind of gas....these
components seem necessary for LG to function as a viewing device.
And as for any changes in mass, or movement within time-space.... I
really don’t know since my information sources would only tell me
’so much’ about what they saw or experienced at the time they were
involved.
But it can be reasoned, based upon what they did say that
there were significant experiments in the movement of mass back and
forward through time, many of which were successful. I am sure much
has been discovered and/or refined in the process since then.”
The following images were created and supplied by Dan Burisch
from
ProjectCamelot Website
Back to Time Travel
Project Aquarius
-
An Umbrella project with a focus on the study of
the EBEs
All these projects were known by Dan but further expansion on their
descriptions and relationships will be investigated further.
There is also something explained in the briefing documents as a
Convergent Time Line and the document seems to explain a
relationship that could explain why they are here, what they are
doing, and why sampling of the population and life forms on this
planet are being conducted.
I have and am submitting documents and background on this man to
experts who can help, but giving him the benefit of the doubt, and
after hearing similar tales from others who work in the Black World,
if nothing else we want this man alive and free in the future along
with other scientists and technicians who are working for the
greater good.
Whether you believe these stories or not, there is a
reason to take them seriously as there is already sufficient
evidence of a cover-up. Maybe Majestic and the Committee are acting
in the greater interest of humanity, but an uninformed public cannot
make a determination. Without solid proof, these stories remain
entertaining, but nothing that should detract from our interests in
sports or fashion.
According to Dan, the officer he reported to was then Vice Adm. J.M.
McConnell who was recently the Director of NSA. He is now retired
into civilian life.
Mr. McConnell joined Booz·Allen in March 1996 after serving as
Director, National Security Agency (NSA), the agency responsible for
Signals Intelligence and for all Classified Information Security for
the U.S. Government.
In addition to serving as Director of NSA, a
position he held from 1992 to 1996, Mr. McConnell served as the
Intelligence Officer for the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
(JCS-J2) during the dissolution of the Soviet Union and Operation
DESERT STORM.
While serving on the Joint Staff, Mr. McConnell
regularly briefed the President and his Cabinet Officers,
international leaders, and the Senate and House of the U.S.
Congress. He also appeared regularly on international television as
the U.S. Intelligence Spokesman during the Gulf War. He achieved the
rank of Vice Admiral in the U.S. Navy, where he spent more than 25
years as an Operational Intelligence Officer.
This is not something that is proven but is included here as an item
for further research. Below is a recreation of the draft of the
first page of the Aquarius document written by Dan which mentions
McConnell.
Letters from USAF
Major (ret) Tom Mack to Robert Collins
...regarding J-rod and Dr. Danny
Crain
Please see below email/letter written to me by a Thomas Mack on
February 18th, 1999: Tom Mack was only 51 years old when he died of
a stroke last month or in September 2000.
Up to February of 1999 I’d
never heard of a Thomas Mack, and unfortunately, did I ever get the
chance to meet him: But, all my other contacts who did know him said
he was a great guy !
Also, Tom never knew that I already knew some
of the people he referred me to: So, with permission from my sources
I’m releasing this letter/email to the public: May Tom Mack rest in
peace.........Rmc
Subject: Re: Groom Lake Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 16:38:54 -0800 (PST) From:
THOMAS MACK <bbsnowman50@yahoo.com> To: Lemis@sprintmail.com
Mr. Collins, I understand you are interested in the Air Force’s Investigation of
UFOs. I have read you web site and was very impressed with the
postings.
I am a retired AF Major. I served from 1972 to 1994. My entire AF
career was spent in AF Intelligence. I served with the Air Force
Scientific Advisory Group, Groom Lake, NV, from Jun 75 to Apr 83 and
from Mar 88 to Oct 94, my retirement date from the AF. I worked on
numerous special projects. All involved the reverse engineering of
captured UFOs. Yes, I was intimately involved in this operation.
I worked with JAROD. We called him the "Puppet Master." The most
perfect non-human being in the Universe. He actually had a good
sense of humor. He could imitate anyone’s voice. A very clever
creature. Comment: See bottom of EBEs 1, 2 ,3 and Jarod
I worked on various other projects that involved the collection of
UFO related intelligence. I worked with a
Special Agent Richard
Doty. Agent Doty was our counterintelligence agent. He would conduct
operations to prevent the disclosure of our project. A very nifty
guy. Very knowledgeable of the subject of UFOs. He was briefed into
the program sometime in 1980.
The entire program was classified above
Top Secret. A classification
of COSMIC-MAJIC. The program was called, Majestic-12. We operated
under the control of this group.
I wish I could go public, I could embarrass the Government. I can
prove to the world, that the UFO Subject is real.
I just wanted you to know you are on the right track. Keep it up.
Find Agent Doty and he’ll should assist you in finding the truth.
The last location of Agent Doty was in Albuquerque, NM. He was
working for the Highway Patrol or maybe the State Patrol, whatever
they call it in New Mexico.
Good Hunting.
BBSnow
***
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fish Face ? Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 18:12:39 -0800 (PST) From:
THOMAS MACK <bbsnowman50@yahoo.com> To: TOPPAN166@aol.com
Rick,
STAAR was a special response team formed in the middle 50s. It consisted of experts in several different fields. Their main objective was to counter any Alien threat or attack. I heard about
it and read some information on their activities, however, I was not involved with the team. I don’t recall whether the team was still in existence in the 70s.
I only knew JAROD by that name or by Puppet Master. Never heard of him being referred to as Smiling Eyes. That could have been EBE-1, who lived from 1947 to 1952. Of course, that was before my time.
As for Q-94-109A or the other documents you mentioned. I left in
1994 and was not privy to all the information that was being published. The format seems to be correct, however, I don’t recall the
particular documents. Cosmic-Magic was a caveat for our program. Majestic 12 was the category of classification.
As for the Cellular Subfraction analysis, Ambient Biochemistry and Subfraction biochemistry, I didn’t have a need to know that type of information. Although I had the special clearance for scientific intelligence, I probably didn’t think it was worth reading.
I knew Captain Danny Crain. However, I think he was in
DIA. Project Aquarius, R-4800, was the specific program we operated under. Papoose Site 4 was the location.
Hope this helps.
Tom
Tom Mack on right and Paul McGovern on left. Groom Lake Nevada circa
1970s.
There is now a Fire Station sitting where they are walking.
Picture sent by Tom Mack’s son.
Project Star Flower
Dan has been working on a project once dubbed
“Lotus” now coded as Star Flower 1. This project deals with the
original seeding of the earth that started all forms of life.
Panspermia holds that life on Earth was seeded from space, and that
life’s evolution to higher forms depends on genetic programs that
come from space.
It is a wholly scientific, testable theory for
which evidence is accumulating. (3)
I met Dan one day for coffee and asked him if he believed in the
Panspermia hypothesis, that earth was seeded by viruses, viroids, or
bacteria from space. He said he did, but had a better explanation
for the seeding of earth, an insight gained from his Lotus Project.
This was a surprise, but as he talked about it, the possibilities
became most interesting in multiple ways.
The following note is taken from the
Lotus Protocols and is a little
heavy on scientific terms, but should convey a great dealing of
meaning to an educated reader. There will be a glossary at the end
of this work that will clarify some of the special terms that Dan
uses frequently.
As a matter of REQUIRED reference,
-
the origins of life in the form
of bacterial cells (publicly) currently dates to a little prior to
3.9 Billion Years Ago (BYA), quite an event for the early Archaean
Eon
-
with promitochondrial endosymbionts seemingly entrenching to
become mitochondria (proper) by 2 BYA
-
terrestrial cyanobacteria
appearing near 1.4 BYA
-
and a significant taxa diversification of
photosynthetic protoctists close to 1.3 BYA (correlated to the
acquisition of symbiotic photosynthetic plastids)
(Annotation from
Reference, and used to follow: See - Margulis, Lynn, "Symbiotic
Planet" [2000] and "Five Kingdoms-..." [1988]).
Is it not
interesting that the issue of the possible polyphyletic origins of
those plastids remains open, yet dogma is pronouncing near certainty
for the predecessor of mitochondria, or is it, really? Let’s take a
close look at the contentions of Dr. Margulis.
In the search for
mitochondrial origins, the varieties to look toward for guidance
(according to Margulis, "Symbiotic...") would be either bdellovibrio
(a small 0.3 micrometer pseudomonad that is aggressive to larger
bacteria and even burrows into them, which respires its food sources
and releases carbon dioxide) or paracoccus (an oxygen respiring
micrococcus of diameter 1 micrometer [individual sphere]).
The
problem, here, is this:
As late as 1981, citations of Margulis’ work carried statements that
a likely category of mitochondrial precursor was an anaerobic
phototrophic bacterium (purple nonsulfur bacteria, that synthesize
organic compounds by direct incorporation of carbon dioxide).
A big
difference? You bet your life! A crack in her theory? It is
certainly a problem.
The crack is not found in the relevance of the
new biochemical findings, alone. In the time from 1981 (really
somewhere before and it was then cited in texts such as by Wallace, King, and Sanders in "Biology: the Science of Life", before fourth
edition) until now, research has been progressing on the contents of
mitochondria, and a striking resemblance has been found between
those contents and those of bdellovibrio.
So, it appears that Margulis has moved her "chip of support" from the basic biochemistry
of the purple nonsulfurs to the pseudomonads.
This is the mistake!
(Not that the purple nonsulfurs were the end-all in the debate! You
will soon see, quite the contrary!) Under the current line of
thinking, as the mutualistic symbiosis progressed between endosymbiont and host, redundancy was screened out of the
endosymbiont.
The endosymbiont no longer used a large portion of its
biochemistry (and conversely its genomic components), as independent
existence allegedly became a thing of the past.
-
Does this mean,
necessarily, that the remaining "left over" biochemistry
correlations (no matter how integral to the functioning of both the
mitochondrion and that of the counterpart under question) must posit
a singular direct taxonomic linkage between the two? Nope, not under
serial endosymbiotic theory.
-
Can this be akin to "cell apoptosis"
for the theory? No. Not just yet.
-
Is the correlation between the two
(that is diminution of redundancy) correct? Probably so.
-
The
complementary behavior between mitochondrion and nucleus would infer
as much. Is the origin of the relationship, a macroevolution from a
pair of independent organisms necessitated for us to now see the
refinement from redundancy? No.
-
What say you of evolution?
-
Are the
first acts of progressing organismic metabolism (a shared dance of
catabolism and anabolism) one imbued with a negotiated hyperbolic
peace between predator and prey (see: Margulis, Lynn, "Microcosmos",
1997) or does life follow the apparent path of the Universe, a
series of transparently stoic acts of Cosmos from Chaos? (Pick up a
text of a creation myth.)
In defense of one or the other, I would
reference to
"http//unisci.com/stories/19992/0621995.htm” for
hierarchy through "productivity" (Drossel, Barbara, University of
Manchester in England), conservation of gene clusters (Andersson,
Siv G.E. and
Eriksson, Kimmo "Dynamics of Gene Order Structures and
Genomic Architectures", Department of Molecular Evolution,
Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden; as
published on the internet, and a refutation to the Dawkin’s "Selfish Gene
Theory" as published by
Unisci "Daily University Science News"
Efros,
David R., [New England Complex Systems Institute], with an opinion
defense by Dr. Bar-Yam, Yaneer, 04/25/2000).
I remain prepared (and
would encourage) to debate the issuance of my opinions, relative the
relevance between the aforementioned orders of magnitude."
A little further on, he has further reflections on the
endosymbiotic
theory proposed by Margulis...
"I believe that the scientists, including
Margulis (but no mistake I
have great admiration for her work), are too busy focusing on the
newer biochemistry, then jumping from one foot to another in the
search for the closest present biochemical counterpart, all the
while praying that Gregor Mendel will justify their beliefs with
results of Polymerase Chain Reaction. I have been guilty of the
same.
Photomicrographs taken by Dan of Ganesh particle
Neo-Darwinism is an attempt to reconcile
Mendelian genetics, which
says that organisms do not change with time, with Darwinism, which
claims they do.
— Lynn Margulis
-
Artificial selection never produces wholly new characteristics.
There is no evidence that natural selection without the input of new
genes does either.
-
The notion that mutation and recombination can compose new genes
is implausible.
-
There is scant evidence that mutation and recombination can
compose functional new genes that differ from any known predecessor
by more than, say, a dozen essential nucleotides.
-
The evolution of antifreeze
glycoproteins in Antarctic cod
presents problems for both programs.
-
Evolution does not appear to be gradual, contrary to Darwin’s firm
prediction.
-
The standard theory cannot explain why the coordinating genes that
control the development of embryos and major features are often very
similar across totally different species.
-
Convergent evolution is a surprise not well-explained by
neo-Darwinism.
-
Macroevolutionary progress is not accounted for by neo-Darwinian
microevolution.(3)
In accordance with new ideas on evolutionary biology beyond the
neo-Darwinistic
approach Dan finds that,
1) life comes from space
2) the
genesis seed has evidence of intelligent design and operation (not
alien intelligence, but a cosmic creator intelligence).
Here is what he has to say about it:
“ Since my beginning within M_-# I
have had the distinct honor of having been assigned to some of
the most interesting projects known to humankind. From the work
of Project Aquarius to the sands of the Iraq desert, I have
attempted to (Com1: Block text set...) ...serve my country with the
greatest effort and efficiency.
I deeply hope that my latest
assignment, in Africa, has served the interests of the United States
of America. For the past decade, I have been slowly formulating a
thesis, bringing together the research of the greatest minds of
humanity to attempt an answer to the ages old question of our
origins. That formulation culminated in the L Project, later named
Project S Fl.
In a nutshell, we have found the key elements to put
together an ancient virus that not only once seeded our beautiful
planet, but whose integral parts still play an act of continuous
creation within the intricate web of life. That play, we believe,
pushes forward the complexity found within the biosphere, to
perfectly match species diversity to the other elements of our
living world.
This sounds wonderful, however, just as there exists
subtle behavioral cues within child’s play, so to we believe that
such also resides, hidden within the conjoined L. Being armed with
the most ancient DNA codes, having the power to manipulate the dance
of the L; does not give us sufficient knowledge, the authority of
its maker, or the right itself to conjoin, synthesize, or otherwise
taunt it or its awesome powers.
Our span of control exists within
the narrow range of careful study. To do more, we risk humanity..."
Much of what Dan describes is very technical and deals with protocols and procedures.
I am currently contacting friendly
scientists to help decipher some of this. There is more to all of
this which has been added from other confidential sources. It is
always easy to dismiss these extraordinary claims, but I believe in
going beyond skepticism and investigating every nuance. There is
much going on here that will finally make sense to those with keen
intuition.
We discussed DNA, but it is not just the structure of the molecules
in DNA, but the resonances and vibrations that relate to
extraordinary mathematical harmonies.
If DNA is seeded on planets,
as Dan believes through a virus that split into two components, then
cosmic seeding of planets is the norm and those planets which have
developed the right conditions (geological intelligent design or the gaia hypothesis) where atmosphere, lithosphere, and magnetic field
parameters are all fine-tuned for the development and flourishing of
life by life itself.
Gaia Hypothesis
’...the physical and chemical condition of the surface of the
Earth, of the atmosphere, and of the oceans has been and is actively
made fit and comfortable by the presence of life itself. This is in
contrast to the conventional wisdom which held that life adapted to
the planetary conditions as it and they evolved their separate
ways.’’
Elsewhere, in relation to the definition of Gaia we find the
following:
"The entire range of living matter on Earth from whales to viruses
and from oaks to algae could be regarded as constituting a single
living entity capable of maintaining the Earth’s atmosphere to suit
its overall needs and endowed with faculties and powers far beyond
those of its constituent parts..
[Gaia can be defined] as a complex
entity involving the Earth’s biosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and
soil; the totality constituting a feedback of cybernetic systems
which seeks an optimal physical and chemical environment for life on
this planet."
And in another section we find speculative thoughts concerning
Gaia,
and one’s which probably appealed to many of the readers who
supported the various environmental groups, but at the same time
provoked the hard-lined scientific critics of the Gaia Hypothesis:
"To what extent is our collective intelligence also a part of
Gaia? Do we as a species constitute a Gaian nervous system and a
brain which can consciously anticipate environmental changes?"
[p147]
The Gaia Hypothesis has often been described by commentators as one
of the most provoking singular ideas to have been put forward in the
second half of this century, and while it struggled to be formally
accepted in the fields of the traditional sciences in the 1970’s and
early 1980’s, it certainly managed to provoke its share of debate.
During this period, Lovelock prepared for a second publication.
Another theory discussed by Dan is that of endosymbiosis. This
theory is propounded by Lynn Margulis and goes hand-in-hand with the
Gaia Hypothesis.
“Effectively, Lynn Margulis contended that symbiosis,
not chance
mutation, was the driving force behind evolution and that the
cooperation between organisms and the environment are the chief
agents of natural selection -- not competition among individuals.
She says that,
"Darwin’s grand vision was not wrong, only
incomplete.
This was a little much to handle for some of her critics, and at
first her theory was not accepted, especially in its original
appearance alongside that of the
Gaia Hypothesis:
There were two fundamental components of Lovelock and Margulis’s
Gaia theory:
-
The planet is, in Margulis’s words, a "super organismic system"
-
Evolution is the result of
cooperative not competitive processes.
At that time in 1969, her paper was rejected by over a dozen
scientific journals because no one knew how to evaluate it.
Finally,
after a long and hard struggle against peer-reviewed resistance, she
prevailed. The extent of vision and perseverance with her emerging
theory is often measured by the reviews of critics.
It is therefore
quite rewarding to find that one of the leading critics of the Gaia
Hypothesis, Richard Dawkins, in reference to the separately
contrived theory by Margulis states the following:
"I greatly admire Lynn Margulis’ sheer courage and stamina in
sticking by the endosymbiosis theory, and carrying it through from
being an unorthodoxy to an orthodoxy. This is one of the great
achievements of twentieth-century evolutionary biology, and I
greatly admire her for it."
At the present time in contemporary scientific circles, what was
once regarded as an absurd speculation is now taken as self-evident
truth.
Most recent biology textbooks include reference to Lynn Margulis’ theory of endosymbiosis, the majority of them put it
forward as the most likely explanation of the origin and evolution
of life on the planet we know as Earth.”
(4)
AFFIDAVITS
Falsehood is easy,
truth so difficult.
George Eliot
Sincerely,
Bill Hamilton
Executive Director Astrosciences Network
References
(1)
http://www.serve.com/mahood/lazar/timeline.htm
(2)
http://www.eaglesdisobey.com/timeline1.htm
(3)
http://www.panspermia.org/
(4)
http://mountainman.com.au/gaia_lyn.html
(5)
Multiverse
(6)
How Time Travel Will Work
(7)
http://www.danburisch.info/
|