by Alfred Lambremont Webre

Exopolitics Examiner

from Examiner Website

Part I

February 24, 2010

In an early extraterrestrial discovery of 2010, more than 40 years after the July 20, 1969 Apollo 11 lunar landing, NASA Earthrise photos taken on the Moon by Apollo 11 U.S. astronauts and enhanced by the Advanced Photo Extraction Process (APEP) have disclosed striking images of an apparent extraterrestrial base and 3 extraterrestrial UFO spacecraft idling above the extraterrestrial base, just a few miles from the alleged Apollo 11 landing site,

“in the southern Sea of Tranquility (Mare Tranquillitatis) about 20 kilometers (12 mi) southwest of the crater Sabine D (0.67408N, 23.47297E).”

These APEP enhanced images of Earthrise photos taken by the Apollo 11 astronauts were made available for this exclusive Examiner article by this reporter.

FIG. 1:

APEP: Spacecraft in Apollo 11 Earthrise photo, seen by astronauts

Ron Stewart, developer of the APEP process, confirmed in an exclusive interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre that the three extraterrestrial UFO spacecraft identified in the 2010 APEP report (Fig. 1 above) were most probably the same extraterrestrial UFO spacecraft that Apollo 11 astronauts reported to NASA in July 1969 were watching them on the Moon.

One source has reported,

“According to a former NASA employee Otto Binder, unnamed radio hams with their own VHF receiving facilities that bypassed NASA's broadcasting outlets picked up the following exchange:

“NASA: What's there? Mission Control calling Apollo 11...

“Apollo: These ‘Babies’ are huge, Sir! Enormous! OH MY GOD! You wouldn't believe it! I'm telling you there are other spacecraft out there, lined up on the far side of the crater edge! They're on the Moon watching us!”

Ron Stewart, developer of the APEP process for the Ron Stewart/Ron Nussbeck firm, has reported these new Apollo 11 extraterrestrial disclosures in an exclusive 27 page APEP report entitled, “Apollo11 - What was discovered? The untold story!” containing the enhanced images that may be accessed below along with an exclusive slide show of images.

In his Exopolitics Radio interview, Mr. Stewart was of the opinion that the NASA Apollo 11 photographs he examined were not produced by a front screen (“green screen”) projection process as some Apollo 11 hoax analysts have claimed.

The 2010 APEP enhanced images of the Earthrise taken by Apollo 11 may be an evidentiary smoking gun that confirms both the Apollo astronauts recorded statements of seeing extraterrestrial UFO spacecraft on the Moon, and ultimately the reality of the Apollo 11 moon landing itself.

As discussed later in this article, the APEP enhanced images of the 1969 Apollo 11 Earthrise photos showing an extraterrestrial base and three extraterrestrial base on the Moon hovering just a few miles adjacent to the Apollo 11 astronauts may be corroborative evidence of an elaborate psychological deception operation ("psyops) by a combined Earthling black ops and extraterrestrial presence on the Moon against NASA's Apollo 11 astronauts.

The APEP enhancement of the Apollo 11 July 1969 Earthrise photos may provide vivid first-hand evidence of what historian Richard M. Dolan calls "the breakaway civilization" and what researcher Richard Hoagland calls a Moon-based:

"A terrestrially-derived, post-World War II Nazi colony civilization... attempting to 'go home' to the Original".

Apollo 11 - What was discovered? The untold story!
 

The APEP report on Apollo 11 sets out to address several issues:

“Did man land on the moon? Did the NASA astronauts find more? Could there be a 40 year old mystery hidden in the Apollo 11 moon photos?”

According to Mr. Stewart, The Advanced Photo Extraction Process (APEP) is proprietary process employing successive image enhancements that may exceed even NASA’s own imaging capacity.

Thus the APEP report consists of images of an apparent extraterrestrial landmark (or signpost), an extraterrestrial base, and three (3) possible extraterrestrial spacecraft hovering above the Moon’s surface adjacent to the base.

The images in the APEP report are chosen for illustrative purposes from hundreds of successive enhancement images in the APEP process.

 

Video of APEP Apollo 11 extraterrestrial base and UFO spacecraft

 

APEP Apollo 11 Exopolitics Radio interview

APEP Slide show
 

Click in below media control to listen to Exopolitics Radio interview with Ron Stewart and Alfred Lambremont Webre on the Apollo 11 Moon landing and extraterrestrial base and spacecraft:

"Apollo11: What was discovered? The untold story!"

This exclusive radio interview contains the analysis and background to the APEP Apollo 11 report on the possible extraterrestrial base and spacecraft within a few miles of the Apollo11 landing site.

 

The second possible extraterrestrial UFO spacecraft

Fig. 1 (above) is the image of a second of three possible extraterrestrial UFO spacecraft hovering adjacent to the extraterrestrial base, identified by APEP to be just a few miles from the Apollo 11 lunar landing site.

It is contained in APEP report, Part 1. The image of this extraterrestrial spacecraft is the result of successive enhancements from Fig. 2, an APEP enhanced Earthrise photo taken by NASA astronauts during Apollo 11. A sample of the successive enhancements can be viewed in the APEP report itself.

According to Mr. Stewart, this extraterrestrial spacecraft and two others hovered above the Moon’s surface within several miles of the Apollo 11 landing site and would have been visible to the Apollo 11 astronauts.

Images in the APEP report Part 1 of the other extraterrestrial spacecraft hovering next to this spacecraft include enhancement of the apparent cockpit of the spacecraft, and of the possible crew of the extraterrestrial spacecraft.
 

Location of the possible extraterrestrial base

Fig. 2 (below) is an Earthrise image taken by Apollo 11 astronauts enhanced by the APEP process.

By identifying an apparently lighted area on the Moon’s horizon under the Earthrise that successive enhancements using the APEP process showed were intentional structures and buildings, Mr. Stewart was able to locate and zero in on the apparent extraterrestrial landmark and base.

FIG. 2:

APEP enhancement of July 1969 Apollo 11 Earthrise photo

Apollo 11 astronauts and extraterrestrial UFO spacecraft

In the Exopolitics Radio interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre (above media controls), Mr. Stewart states that there is a sound evidentiary basis to conclude that the three extraterrestrial spacecraft (which the APEP process has now documented from NASA photos) were hovering within a few miles from the Apollo 11 landing site, and were hence visible to the Apollo 11 astronauts in July 1969.

It is reasonable from available evidence to conclude that the extraterrestrial craft set out in Fig. 1, and photographed by Apollo 11 astronauts in the Earthrise in Fig. 2 are, more probably than not, the extraterrestrial UFO spacecraft the NASA Apollo 11 astronauts saw and have documented and reported.
 

U.S. Apollo 11 astronauts, NASA employees, and Soviet scientists,

confirm a UFO presence watching Apollo 11 on the moon

There are confirmed reports of an extraterrestrial presence watching Apollo 11 astronauts on the moon, both from U.S. Apollo 11 astronauts themselves, from NASA employees, and from Soviet scientists and observers of the NASA Apollo 11 moon mission.

One report states that,

“In a 2006 television documentary, ‘Apollo 11 - The Untold Story,’ Buzz Aldrin admitted for the first time publicly that the astronauts saw UFOs on their trip to the Moon, but they were not allowed to discuss this information on the live audio feed to NASA. He stated that he felt it would have caused a ‘panic.’”

Other research on witnessed corroboration of U.S. Apollo11 astronaut sightings of an extraterrestrial spacecraft presence adjacent to the Apollo 11 landing site on the Moon states,

“According to hitherto unconfirmed reports, both Neil Armstrong and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin saw UFOs shortly after their historic landing on the Moon in Apollo 11 on 21 July 1969. I remember hearing one of the astronauts refer to a "light" in or on a crater during the television transmission, followed by a request from mission control for further information. Nothing more was heard.”

Other research concludes,

“According to a former NASA employee Otto Binder, unnamed radio hams with their own VHF receiving facilities that bypassed NASA's broadcasting outlets picked up the following exchange:

“NASA: What's there? Mission Control calling Apollo 11...

“Apollo: These ‘Babies’ are huge, Sir! Enormous! OH MY GOD! You wouldn't believe it! I'm telling you there are other spacecraft out there, lined up on the far side of the crater edge! They're on the Moon watching us!

“In 1979, Maurice Chatelain, former chief of NASA Communications Systems confirmed that Armstrong had indeed reported seeing two UFOs on the rim of a crater.

‘The encounter was common knowledge in NASA,’ he revealed, ‘but nobody has talked about it until now.’

“Soviet scientists were allegedly the first to confirm the incident.

‘According to our information, the encounter was reported immediately after the landing of the module,’ said Dr. Vladimir Azhazha, a physicist and Professor of Mathematics at Moscow University. ‘Neil Armstrong relayed the message to Mission Control that two large, mysterious objects were watching them after having landed near the moon module. But his message was never heard by the public-because NASA censored it.’

“According to another Soviet scientist, Dr. Aleksandr Kazantsev, Buzz Aldrin took color movie film of the UFOs from inside the module, and continued filming them after he and Armstrong went outside. Dr. Azhazha claims that the UFOs departed minutes after the astronauts came out on to the lunar surface.

“Maurice Chatelain also confirmed that Apollo 11's radio transmissions were interrupted on several occasions in order to hide the news from the public. Before dismissing Chatelain's sensational claims, it is worth noting his impressive background in the aerospace industry and space program.

 

His first job after moving from France was as an electronics engineer with Convair, specializing in telecommunications, telemetry, and radar. In 1959 he was in charge of an electromagnetic research group, developing new radar and telecommunications systems for Ryan.

 

One of his eleven patents was on automatic flights to the Moon. Later, at North American Aviation, Chatelain was offered the job of designing and building the Apollo communications and data-processing systems.

“Chatelain claims that,

‘all Apollo and Gemini flights were followed, both at a distance and sometimes also quite closely, by space vehicles of extraterrestrial origin-flying saucers, or UFOs, if you want to call them by that name. Every time it occurred, the astronauts informed Mission Control, who then ordered absolute silence.’”

NASA: Alleged Apollo 11 July 20, 1969 landing site Mare Tranquilitatis

Implications of the APEP discoveries in NASA Apollo 11 photos

of an extraterrestrial base and three hovering extraterrestrial spacecraft within a few miles from the Apollo 11 landing site

1. The Moon landing hoax issue

   Mr. Ron Stewart has stated that the NASA Apollo 11 Earthrise photos reportedly taken by the Apollo 11 astronauts that the APEP process has enhanced are not the Front Screen (“green screen”) Projection Process.

    

   The enhanced APEP images identifying the extraterrestrial base and three extraterrestrial craft within a few miles of the alleged Apollo 11 Moon landing site substantiate that the NASA Earthrise photos are not the product of a “green screen” hoax process.

    

   For the NASA Apollo 11 Earthrise photos to have been a hoaxed “green screen” photo, the photo of the Moon’s surface would have to have been taken by a black ops Earthling spacecraft and clandestinely transferred to NASA for “green screening”.
   
    

2. The Moon is inhabited and visited by extraterrestrial civilizations or an Earthling black ops fleet

   As stated by the Examiner landmark article entitled “NASA moon bombing violates space law & may cause conflict with lunar ET/UFO civilizations,” the APEP report establishes by the rules of evidence that the Moon is, more probably than not, inhabited by extraterrestrial civilizations or an Earthling black ops fleet.
   
    

3. Extraterrestrial or Eathling black ops UFO craft were monitoring the Apollo 11 astronauts in July 1969

   The APEP report establishes by the rules of evidence that the Apollo 11 astronauts, more probably than not, were monitored by extraterrestrial UFO spacecraft hovering over an extraterrestrial base within a few miles of the Apollo 11 landing site.
   
    

4. NASA has known that the Moon is inhabited by extraterrestrial civilizations and/or a Earthling black ops UFO fleet for more than 40 years

   The APEP report establishes by the rules of evidence that NASA has more probably than not known for more than 40 years that the moon is inhabited by extraterrestrial civilizations (or by an Earthling black ops fleet), and has deliberately withheld that information from the U.S. and world public, contrary to the terms of the 1958 National Aeronautic and Space Act.
   
    

5. Why is NASA is intentionally withholding documented evidence of extraterrestrial (and/or Earthling black ops) monitoring of Apollo11 and Moon extraterrestrial habitation?

   The APEP report demonstrates that NASA has been intentionally withholding evidence of the extraterrestrial monitoring of the Apollo 11 mission and of extraterrestrial (and/or Earthling black ops) habitation of the Moon for at least 40 years.

    

   The operant question is why is NASA withholding information about the Moon’s extraterrestrial habitation from the public? Certainly it cannot be to prevent public panic that NASA has withheld this information from two generations of humanity.
   
   The 2002 Roper Poll on North American Beliefs on UFOs and Extraterrestrial Life found that,

    

   • “Moreover, nearly half (45 percent) of adults believe intelligent life from other worlds has monitored life on earth. This belief is again held by a significantly higher percentage of males (50 percent vs. 40 percent of females) and of adults ages 64 or younger (49 percent vs. 28 percent of those over 65 years old). The belief is especially strong among 18-to-24-year-olds (59 percent).”

    

   This is hardly a population that will panic at the announcement that Apollo 11 astronauts saw extraterrestrial or UFO spacecraft on the Moon.
   
    

6. The Moon Treaty was made to be a failed treaty to hide the extraterrestrial and/or Earthling black ops presence on the Moon

   The APEP confirmation of extraterrestrial civilizations (and/or Earthling black ops) on the Moon may help explain why the U.S. government has failed to sign the Moon Treaty, and has taken a course of action to ensure that the Moon Treaty is a failed Treaty.

    

   The Moon Treaty (1979),

    

   • “is a failed treaty since it has not been ratified by any nation which engages in self-launched manned space exploration or has plans to do so (e.g. the United States, European Union, Russian Federation, People's Republic of China, Japan, and India) since its creation in 1979”.

    

   The reason the Moon Treaty is a failed treaty is that it establishes safeguards that would prohibit exploitative corporate mining and military strike forces and bases on the Moon.
   
   Moreover, the Moon Treaty was to have applied to all celestial bodies in our solar system, thereby protecting all solar system resources against undue exploitation and all solar system populations against colonization by Earth’s military-industrial complex. By causing the Moon Treaty to fail, the military-industrial complex and the permanent war economy has essentially declared open season on the planets, moons, resources, eco-systems, and peoples of the solar system.
   
   The Moon Treaty, which the military-industrial complex and its banker-corporate rulers have defeated, provides the following safeguards for all celestial bodies in our solar system:

    

   1. Bans any military use of celestial bodies, including weapon testing or as military bases.

   2. Bans all exploration and uses of celestial bodies without the approval or benefit of other states under the common heritage of mankind principle (article 11).

   3. Requires that the Secretary-General must be notified of all celestial activities (and discoveries developed thanks to those activities).

   4. Declares all states have an equal right to conduct research on celestial bodies.

   5. Declares that for any samples obtained during research activities, the state that obtained them must consider making part of it available to all countries/scientific communities for research.

   6. Bans altering the environment of celestial bodies and requires that states must take measures to prevent accidental contamination.

   7. Bans any state from claiming sovereignty over any territory of celestial bodies.

   8. Bans any ownership of any extraterrestrial property by any organization or person, unless that organization is international and governmental.

   9. Requires all resource extraction and allocation be made by an international regime.”
      
       

7. There is an Earthling black ops and/or extraterrestrial base and corporate mining on the moon
   Let us examine some of the publicly available evidence that there are large-scale bases and mining activity taking place on Earth’s moon.

    

   For example, Sgt. Karl Wolfe (below video), a Disclosure Project witness, testified as to being informally briefed in 1965 at NSA and seeing NSA photographs of a large base on the far side of the moon.

    

    

   However, what if Sgt. Wolfe or the NSA official were mistaken or the briefing of Sgt Wolfe by an NSA official was in fact a psyops to implant a false public story that the NSA-photographed bases on the far side of the moon were extraterrestrial and not “shadow government-corporate.”

    

   These alternatives are certainly within the realm of possibility.
   
   Independent military witnesses like,

    

   • “Milton Cooper, a Naval Intelligence Officer tells us that not only does the Alien Moon Base exist but the U.S. Naval Intelligence Community refers to the Alien Moon Base as ‘Luna,’ that there is a huge mining operation going on there, and that is where the aliens keep their huge mother ships while the trips to Earth are made in smaller ‘flying saucers’. LUNA: The Alien base on the far side of the Moon.

      

     It was seen and filmed by the Apollo astronauts. A base, a mining operation using very large machines, and the very large alien craft described in sighting reports as mother ships exist there. -Milton Cooper.”

    

   This evidence was originally interpreted as signifying that the bases, UFO craft, and mining activity were “extraterrestrial” in origin.

    

   However those interpretations did not take into account ET/UFO researcher Gary McKinnon’s findings that the U.S. operates a “non-terrestrial” fleet.

    

   Hence it is plausible that the bases, mining operations, and spacecraft shuttling back and forth between the earth and its moon are in fact part of a secret military-industrial complex moon settlement and mining operation.
   
    

8. There is a possibility that the extraterrestrial UFO spacecraft sighted by Apollo 11 astronauts were part of a deliberate psyops undertaken by these extraterrestrials and the Earthling black budget presence on the Moon.

    

   The purpose of this psyops was to do a surveillance maneuver known as “La China” on the Apollo 11 astronauts, where the Apollo 11 astronauts realize they are being watched by extraterrestrial craft and relay this information to NASA home base. This alarm by the Apollo 11 astronauts initiates a 40-year extraterrestrial cover-up meme inside NASA, and in the public.

    

   Meanwhile, the co-initiators of the “La China” maneuver – the black-budget U.S. corporate presence on the Moon and the cooperating extraterrestrial civilizations – can continue their corporate mining regime on the Moon undisturbed having stumped the civilian Earthling human population for another several generations.
   
    

9. The Moon as an Earthling black ops and/or extraterrestrial base

   The APEP enhancement images of the Apollo 11 July 1969 Earthrise photos may provide vivid first-hand evidence of what historian Richard M. Dolan calls, "the breakaway civilization" and what researcher Richard Hoagland calls a Moon-based,

    

   • "terrestrially-derived, post-World War II Nazi colony civilization... attempting to "go home" to the Original".

Part II

March 8, 2010

APEP - 2009 Photos of Apollo 11-17 Moon Sites

Show ET Pictographs, UFOs, not NASA Lunar Landers
 

Figure 1 - from below Video 1

NASA

2009 LRO photos of Apollo 11. 14. 15, 16, 17 "landing sites"

Satellite photos taken in 2009 (Figure 1 above) by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) of the alleged landing sites of Apollo 11, 14, 15, 16, and 17, which NASA released with white arrows pointing to purported lunar landing modules and other scientific equipment, have failed to confirm the presence of NASA lunar landers or other NASA equipment at each Apollo landing site, according to Ron Stewart, inventor of the Advanced Photographic Extraction Process (APEP).

Using APEP, Mr. Stewart revealed, in an exclusive ExopoliticsRadio interview (below media controls) with Alfred Lambremont Webre, that APEP appears to confirm that each of the alleged NASA Apollo landing sites contains, not NASA landers, but highly organized structures and equipment, some of which contain pictograms depicting classes of extraterrestrial civilizations.

Mr. Stewart indicated that his APEP investigation also detected UFO spacecraft in two of the Apollo landing site photographs taken in 2009 by the LRO. When asked, Mr. Stewart stated that the UFO spacecraft appeared identical to each other at each of the 2 sites, in photos taken days apart.

He stated the craft could be earthling black budget spacecraft of the secret space program, or extraterrestrial in origin.

In a previous above Examiner article by this reporter, “2010 APEP imaging of Apollo 11 Moon photos discloses possible 1969 ET UFOs Buzz Aldrin says he saw”, the Apollo 11 Earthrise photos take in July 1969 revealed a moon base approximately 12 km NW of the Apollo 11 landing site, and appeared to confirm Apollo 11’s landing on the moon.

The enhanced APEP images of the 2009 LRO photos of the Apollo landing sites showing structures, equipment, pictographs and UFO spacecraft are set out in a series of videos in the article below.

Figure 2 - from below Video 2

NASA

Moon with Apollo 11, 14, 15, 16, 17 "landing sites"

Listen to ExopoliticsRadio interview with Ron Stewart
Click in below media controls to listen to a 60 minute exclusive ExopoliticsRadio interview between APEP inventor Ron Stewart and Alfred Lambremont Webre on the APEP analysis of 2009 LRO photos of Apollo mission lunar landing sites.
 

The 2009 LRO photos of Apollo lunar landing sites

According to NASA, NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter pictures (Figure 1 far above) show the Apollo missions' lunar module descent stages sitting on the moon's surface, as long shadows from a low sun angle make the modules' locations evident.

“The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera, or LROC, was able to image five of the six Apollo sites... The satellite reached lunar orbit June 23, 2009 and captured the Apollo sites between July 11 and 15, 2009. Though it had been expected that LRO would be able to resolve the remnants of the Apollo mission, these first images came before the spacecraft reached its final mapping orbit. Future LROC images from these sites will have two to three times greater resolution.

"Although these pictures provide a reminder of past NASA exploration, LRO's primary focus is on paving the way for the future. By returning detailed lunar data, the mission will help NASA identify safe landing sites for future explorers, locate potential resources, describe the moon's radiation environment and demonstrate new technologies.

"'Not only do these images reveal the great accomplishments of Apollo, they also show us that lunar exploration continues,' said LRO project scientist Richard Vondrak of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. 'They demonstrate how LRO will be used to identify the best destinations for the next journeys to the moon.'"

"The LRO's spacecraft's current elliptical orbit resulted in image resolutions that were slightly different for each site but were all around four feet per pixel. Because the deck of the descent stage is about 12 feet in diameter, the Apollo relics themselves fill an area of about nine pixels. However, because the sun was low to the horizon when the images were made, even subtle variations in topography create long shadows. Standing slightly more than ten feet above the surface, each Apollo descent stage creates a distinct shadow that fills roughly 20 pixels.

"The image of the Apollo 14 landing site had a particularly desirable lighting condition that allowed visibility of additional details. The Apollo Lunar Surface Experiment Package, a set of scientific instruments placed by the astronauts at the landing site, is discernable, as are the faint trails between the module and instrument package left by the astronauts' footprints.

"Launched on June 18, 2009, LRO carried seven scientific instruments, all of which are currently undergoing calibration and testing prior to the spacecraft reaching its primary mission orbit. The LROC instrument comprises three cameras - two high-resolution Narrow Angle Cameras and one lower resolution Wide Angle Camera. LRO will be directed into its primary mission orbit in August, a nearly-circular orbit about 31 miles above the lunar surface."

"Goddard built and manages LRO, a NASA mission with international participation from the Institute for Space Research in Moscow. Russia provided the neutron detector aboard the spacecraft."

APEP examination of the 2009 LRO Apollo landing site photos

...says it found “alien artifacts” instead of lunar landers

Figure 3 - from below Video 3

APEP enhancement of 2009 LRO Apollo 11 site - LRRR or monolith & UFO?

Videos

The APEP examination of the 2009 LRO photos each of the Apollo 11, 14, 15, 16, and 17 landing sites

Video 1

APEP Examination of 2009 LRO Verification of Apollo 11-17 landing sites

 

Video 1 introduces the five LRO photos of Apollo missions (11, 14, 15, 16, and 17) APEP intends to analyze.

At (1:12) Video 1 sets out the visual criteria for identifying an Apollo lunar descent module at each of the landing sites NASA LRO photos had identified.

At (1:36) APEP shows an initial enhancement of what appears to be the top of a lunar descent module.

At (1:54) a series of successive enhancements of the purported Apollo 11 landing site commences.

At (2:22) APEP questions whether this successive enhancement is in fact a lunar descent module.

At (2:46) the APEP enhancements suggest they may be showing “alien artifacts,” not the Apollo 11 lunar descent module.

A similar sequence of enhancements occurs for Apollo 14 (3:00), Apollo 15 (4:10), Apollo 16 (6:22), and Apollo 17, starting at 8:00.

An APEP case study of 2009 LRO photos of Apollo 11 landing site
 

Video 2

sets out a case study of the 2009 LRO photos of Apollo 11 landing site

 

Video 2 starts out by showing where the Apollo 11 descent stage and LRRR are thought to be, in the 2009 LRO photos.

At (0:35) a series of APEP enhancements start.

At (1:30) APEP notes that the enhancements begin to resemble ‘alien artifacts.’

At (1:44) APEP queries whether some sort of an underground complex or colony has been identified and goes on to successive enhacements.

At (2:45) APEP zooms down into the double crater at the landing site.

At (3:37) APEP begins with an identification of what is supposed to be the Apollo 11 LRRR and enhances it successively to state it may be the top of an “alien complex.”

At (5:05) APEP enhances what is supposed to be the Eagle Descent Stage to identify the area as a possible complex with a possible UFO spacecraft.

At (5:39) another possible UFO spacecraft is identified.

At (6:57), APEP confirms that NASA’s Apollo 16 EVA arm was not a UFO, and that Apollo 16 may have been followed by other true UFO spacecraft.

APEP, the 2009 LRO photos and Apollo 11 continues
 

Video 3

continues the case study of 2009 LRO’s photos of Apollo 11 landing site

 

At (5:18) Video 3, after a review with an intensive enhancement into the LRO photos of Apollo 11 landing site, to show pictographs and not the lunar descent module (8:18), ending with close-up of pictographs (9:10).

What are the implications

...of the APEP analysis of the 2009 LRO photos of the alleged landing sites of Apollo 11, 14, 15, 16, and 17?

1. APEP Process

   The results of the Advanced Photographic Extraction Process (APEP) appear to be so extraordinary that an independent scientific/technical assessment of the APEP process should be undertaken. The inventor Ron Stewart and partner Ron Nussbeck have stated they welcome an independent assessment.
   
    

2. NASA 2009 LRO photo-analysis may be flawed

   If the APEP analysis of the 2009 LRO photos of Apollo mission landing sites is correct, then the conclusions of NASA’s 2009 LRO photo analysis are deeply flawed. It is beyond coincidence that, if APEP is correct, none of the five (Apollo 11, 14, 15, 16, and 17) purported Apollo landing sites the 2009 LRO verified as containing a lunar descent module in fact contain a module. It is even more beyond coincidence, if APEP is correct, that each of the five Apollo landing sites as photographed by APEP in fact may contain intelligently designed complexes and pictographs.
   
    

3. APEP claims UFO spacecraft appear in the 2009 LRO photos of Apollo landing sites

   Ron Stewart claims to have identified at least two similar UFO spacecraft in different LRO photos of Apollo landing sites, taken by the LRO in 2009 on separate days.

    

   According to Mr. Stewart, these UFO spacecraft could be either extraterrestrial or Earthling black budget craft. If these UFO spacecraft were photographed by the LRO adjacent to Apollo landing sites in 2009, were they doing so with NASA’s knowledge or without NASA’s knowledge? What does NASA know about a secret Earthling space program occupation of the moon?

    

   How could NASA have erred five times and shown purported Apollo landing sites with alien pictographs instead of lunar modules, assuming APEP is correct about the 2009 LRO photos of Apollo landing sites
   
    

4. What is the connection between the 2009 LRO photos of Apollo 11 landing sites and the Obama administration’s proposed abandonment of the NASA’s manned moon program?

    

   The APEP analysis of 2009 LRO photos of Apollo mission landing sites show almost identical UFO spacecraft in a number of the LRO photos of different Apollo mission landing sites. If these UFO craft in fact belong to an Earthling black budget fleet occupying the moon, is there any connection between the presence UFO spacecraft on the moon, and the Obama administration’s proposed decision to cancel NASA’s manned moon program?

The full data and analytical content of this article include:

(1) the APEP Videos 1, 2, and 3

(2) ExopoliticsRadio interview with Ron Stewart.

Readers are encouraged to review all components in order to obtain the full impact of the possible APEP discoveries.
 

Editorial caveat: In undertaking the evaluations necessary for this Examiner article, this reporter had access to the APEP Videos 1, 2, and 3, and interviewed inventor Ron Stewart on Monday March 8, 2010.

This reporter is not responsible for errors of analysis, grammar and syntax in the APEP materials and has no organizational connection to the Stewart/Nussbeck firm.

Mr. Stewart’s contact information is available in APEP materials.

Mr. Stewart stated he welcomes queries about the APEP imaging technology and findings.