| 
			  
			  
			  
			
			
  
			
			by Richard SmoleyNew Dawn 142
 January-February 2014
 from 
			NewDawnMagazine Website
 Spanish 
			version
 
			  
			  
			  
			  
			
			 
			  
			  
			It is one of the most familiar and reassuring lines in scripture:
 
				
				"The Lord is my 
				shepherd"... 
			But when you think about 
			it, the metaphor is a disturbing one.
 It's true that a shepherd looks after his sheep. But he also shears 
			them and kills them and eats them. Does the God we adore act totally 
			with our best interests at heart, or are we a species of livestock 
			that he uses for his own ends?
 
 Voices have occasionally uttered doubt, not about the existence of 
			the gods, but about their beneficence. The ancient Gnostics said 
			that the real god of this world was the Demiurge, a second-order 
			being who mistook himself for the true God.
 
			  
			The spiritual teacher G.I. 
			Gurdjieff told a parable about a lazy shepherd who got tired of 
			having his sheep run off, so he hypnotized them into thinking they 
			were men or lions. Then they no longer ran off but stayed around so 
			that he could shear or kill them as he liked. (Again we encounter a 
			shepherd, this one more explicitly malevolent.)
 Gurdjieff does not say who this shepherd is.
 
			  
			His main point is that 
			man, in his state of waking sleep, is at the mercy of forces that 
			may well not have his best interests at heart - forces that will 
			extract energy from him regardless of his wishes.
 This parable is from an early period of Gurdjieff's teaching; in his 
			later period, epitomized in his magnum opus 
			
			
			Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson, he portrayed the universe in a 
			more beneficent light. But there are plenty of others who have cast 
			doubts on the motives of the spiritual powers that control our 
			lives.
 
 One of the weirdest is found in a book called 
			
			War in Heaven by Kyle 
			Griffith.
 
			  
			Originally it appeared in 
			1988. It has never been published in a conventional sense; I first 
			read it years ago when I was editor of the esoteric journal 
			Gnosis and there was a spiral-bound copy lying around the 
			office.  
			
			Comparatively little is known about Griffith himself. From my 
			sources, I gather that he lived in the San Francisco Bay Area in the 
			1980s, the time when he put his book together.
 
			  
			He has been featured 
			
			in an Internet interview, 
			and there is a discussion group devoted to his ideas at revolutionaryspiritualism.yuku.com.
 From a certain point of view, War in Heaven may look mad; from 
			another, it is strangely compelling. I have read it three times over 
			the years. While I'm not prepared to take its claims at face value, 
			I find them both haunting and disturbing.
 
 Griffith's vision allegedly derives from his telepathic 
			communication with some spirits who say they are associated with 
			
			the 
			Invisible College.
 
			  
			This was the name of a seventeenth century 
			English coterie that was devoted to esotericism, philosophy, and the 
			nascent discipline of science; it is usually seen as a precursor to 
			the Royal Society.  
			  
			Unlike the scientifically minded gentlemen of 
			Britain, the Invisible College of Griffith's vision consists of 
			disembodied spirits who claim to have inspired the Rosicrucian and 
			Freemasonic movements of the early modern era; more recently, they 
			were behind the civil-rights movement in America and the psychedelic 
			revolution of the same period.
 All of these movements were designed with one end in mind:
 
				
				to break 
			the hold of the Theocrats. 
			
			
			The Theocrats, in the cosmology of 
			War in Heaven, are parasitic 
			
			astral entities who devour the souls of the recently deceased.  
			  
			The 
			normal course of the soul's evolution involves repeated 
			reincarnations on earth. But these incarnations, as we well know, 
			can be extremely unpleasant at times. The Theocrats have avoided 
			this disagreeable option by maintaining a semi-perpetual existence on 
			the astral plane, fed by the souls they eat.  
			  
			Their strategy is 
			simple. When a naïve soul has died, 
			
			they greet it on the other side 
			by proffering illusory welcomes into a fake heaven, populated with 
			familiar religious figures and loved ones. When the soul has strayed 
			into their trap, it is devoured.
 To make this vision even more disturbing, Griffith (or his guides 
			from the Invisible College) contends that practically all of what we 
			think of as religion is nothing more than a Theocratic ruse.
 
 The stages of this religious development, as portrayed in War in 
			Heaven, bear some examination.
 
			  
				
				1 - The first stage was essentially 
			shamanism.    
				This is a crude and primitive form of religion - from the 
			Theocrats' point of view, that is, not from ours.
 Shamanism, we are told, fosters individual psychic development, and 
			as such, it is of limited value to the predatory Theocrats, who 
			benefit much more from the collective trance that conventional 
			religious worship produces.
   
				As a result, the Theocrats had to refine 
			and update their methods of mind control.
 
				2 -
			Second-stage religion was a dead end. It involved large-scale human 
			sacrifice.
   
				And history shows that 
				civilizations that had such 
			practices came to a bad end soon. Ancient Carthage, the great rival 
			of Rome for domination of the Mediterranean, was one example. 
				   
				When 
			the Romans decisively defeated Carthage, they razed the city and 
			sowed the ground with salt.    
				Salt is traditionally a substance used 
			for purification, and some have said the Romans did this to cleanse 
			the land from all the human sacrifice that had taken place there.
				   
				Aztec civilization, which in many ways was superior to its European 
			contemporary, was another example:  
					
					for all its might, it was 
			destroyed by a few hundred Spanish adventurers on horseback. 
				3 -
			"The third stage of Theocratic religion," Griffith writes, "involves 
			mass animal sacrifices. Although they prefer human souls, Theocratic 
				
				spirits can nourish themselves off the astral souls of lower animals 
			to some extent."
 
 If this were true, it would cast a weird but revealing light on what 
			I have characterized in the accompanying article as the religions of 
			the Age of Aries.
   
				They were so obsessed with animal sacrifice - 
			which otherwise seems to be rather a pointless activity - because 
			the Theocrats wanted it. 
					
					"However," Griffith adds, "the astral tissues of animal souls aren't 
			very compatible with the astral souls of the Theocrats, so they are 
			not a good food source."    
				4 - To solve this problem, the Theocrats 
			invented fourth-stage religion - the religions that most of the 
			world knows today.    
				Here, 
					
					"Theocrats use religious mind control to 
			delude souls into deliberately putting themselves under Theocratic 
			control after death, thinking they are entering 'eternal bliss in 
			Heaven' or 'union with the Godhead'."  
				These religions are 
			essentially those of what in the accompanying article I have called 
			the Age of Pisces.
 By this view, the gods people worship - whether they are called 
				Christ or Allah or Krishna - are nothing more than 
				parasites on the 
			astral plane who keep themselves nourished by souls of the innocents 
			they prey on.
   
				Originally the Buddha was different; he experienced a 
			genuine awakening and thus showed little respect for the traditional 
			Vedic gods of his culture. But his later followers, who distorted 
			his teaching into a religion based on faith in Buddha, became 
			subservient to the Theocrats.
 Oh, and by the way:
 
					
					"The Theocrats want religious believers to feel 
			guilty every time they feel sexual desire or enjoy any 'pleasures of 
			the flesh'. The guilt literally addicts them to attending church 
			services that subject them to religious mind control." 
				There have been few more disturbing portraits of the religious 
			history of humanity than this.
 To deliver the hapless beings of the human race from this dire 
			situation, certain advanced souls from other planets came to the 
			astral atmosphere of Earth a few centuries ago.
   
				They, along with 
			some enlightened human souls who have managed to avoid the 
			Theocrats, constitute the Invisible College.    
				While the Theocrats 
			have been sending telepathic suggestions to their unsuspecting 
			followers on this plane, saying that all you have to do is believe 
			in the Theocratic gods and trust them, the Invisible College has 
			been transmitting the opposite message:  
					
					to avoid worship and above 
			all to think for yourself.  
				They inspired the Rosicrucian and 
				
				Masonic 
			movements of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as well as 
			the accompanying impulses toward, 
					
						
						
						democracy
						
						freedom of thought
						
						even atheism... 
				After all, it is better to 
				believe in no God at all than to open yourself up to a 
				parasitic astral deity.
 According to Griffith, much of the 1960s counterculture was 
			stimulated by the Invisible College.
 
					
					LSD, rock concerts, and similar 
			gatherings were designed to create a different kind of trance - one 
			that would telepathically open people to the idea they should think 
			for themselves. 
				But the story does not stop there. 
				     
				5 - This effort has led to a reaction 
			by the adversary - "fifth-stage Theocracy," which, 
					
					"employs 
			electronic 
					mind control instead of religious mind control, and… can 
			enslave people who subscribe to belief systems other than those of 
					organized religion."  
				Some groups originally inspired by the 
			Invisible College are co-opted by the adversary.    
				Griffith writes, 
				 
					
					"Every new rock group starts out with a few normal protest or love 
			songs.    
					Then they get swallowed by a group mind controlled by 
			fifth-stage Theocrats, and from that point on all their songs sound 
			as if they were written by the same person." 
			  
			It's not possible here to go further into Griffith's bizarre but 
			fascinating vision.  
			  
			But there are some things that keep me from 
			dismissing it entirely. The first is the collective madness of the 
			human race - its pathological desire to rage and destroy, its hatred 
			of its benefactors and its insane worship of its most vicious 
			victimizers.  
			  
			There is a point beyond which we cannot explain this by 
			mere mammalian aggression - which, as a matter of fact, does not 
			have such destructive properties in other mammals. 
			  
			Psychology and 
			sociology have no explanations for this mass insanity and show 
			little interest in finding them. If there were such entities on the 
			astral plane trying to control and manipulate us as Griffith says 
			they are, this behavior would at least be comprehensible.
 Another is the powerful collective urge toward what Gurdjieff called 
			the "waking sleep" of man.
 
			  
			It is true that, in the West at any rate, 
			mass hypnosis by low-grade religion is losing its hold. But no 
			sooner has this happened than we see a whole new series of 
			mechanisms for putting people back to sleep - the "electronic mind 
			control" that Griffith mentions.  
			  
			It is very hard to go into a public 
			place and see people bewitched by their laptops and smartphones 
			without wondering if something like this is going on.
 I don't think War in Heaven offers a total explanation for the human 
			condition, but I suspect that it has a measure of truth. There do 
			seem to be invisible forces that, for reasons that are difficult to 
			determine, benefit from the collective waking trance of humanity.
 
 Griffith concludes his work with a quasi-apocalyptic 
			
			vision of the End Times.
 
			  
			It is close enough to the 
			End Times as portrayed 
			
			by 
			Christianity that I have trouble taking it at face value. And while 
			I suspect there are low-grade spiritual entities that very much 
			resemble the Theocrats described here, I am not so convinced that 
			they explain everything about human religious aspiration.
 In any case, Griffith and his invisible mentors have some advice for 
			keeping out of Theocratic control.
 
				
				In the first place, make a 
			conscious effort to develop your own psychic powers during this 
			life.    
				In the second place, 
					
					"read accounts of 
					point-of-death 
			experiences and learn to recognize the common tricks that the 
			Theocrats use to enslave the unwary after death."  
			In other words, 
			those accounts of 
			
			near-death experiences are true - but they're not 
			to be taken at face value.  
			  
			That's probably a sound rule of thumb for 
			all spiritual experiences... no matter how good or bad they seem...
 
 
			 
			
			 |