The United Nations and its mostly autocratic member regimes have big plans for your life, your children, your country, and your world.
And those plans are not limited to the
coercive "climate" agreement recently concluded in Paris.
Top globalists such as former NATO chief
Javier Solana, a socialist, are celebrating the plan, which
the summit unanimously "approved," as the next "Great Leap Forward"
- yes, the old campaign slogan of the Chinese Communist Party.
But if you love liberty,
self-government, free markets, or the U.S. Constitution, you will
almost certainly be wishing that the UN would leave you behind.
It also dovetails nicely with the deeply controversial UN Agenda 21, even including much of the same rhetoric and agenda.
But the combined Agenda 2030 goals (The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development) for achieving what is euphemistically called "sustainable development" represent previous UN plans on steroids - deeper, more radical, more draconian, and more expensive.
Ironically, the preamble even claims the UN goals will,
Not-so-subtly purporting to usurp the role of God, the UN even claimed that the,
Speaking on September 25 at the opening ceremony of the confab that adopted Agenda 2030, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon hinted at just how far-reaching the plot really is.
The Agenda 2030 agreement makes the audacity of the scheme clear, too.
To begin with, consider the agenda's Goal 10, which calls on the UN, national governments, and every person on Earth to,
To do that, the agreement continues, will,
As the UN document also makes clear, national socialism to "combat inequality" domestically is not enough - international socialism is needed to battle inequality even "among" countries.
In simpler terms, Western taxpayers should prepare to be fleeced so that their wealth can be redistributed internationally as their own economies are cut down to size by Big Government.
Of course, as has been the case for
generations, most of the wealth extracted from the productive sector
will be redistributed (this
kind of "redistribution"?)
to the UN and Third World regimes - not the victims of those
regimes, impoverished largely through domestic
socialist/totalitarian policies imposed by the same corrupt regimes
to be propped up with more Western aid under Agenda 2030.
Governments must also seize control of the means of production - either directly or through fascist-style mandates.
It also says that,
In plain English, the Agenda 2030 document is claiming that today's "consumption and production" patterns are unsustainable, so we'll need to get by with less.
How much less?
It would be hard to find a more clear and concise assessment than that offered by the late Maurice Strong, the recently deceased Canadian billionaire and longtime UN environmental guru who led the 1992 Earth Summit, in a pre-Earth Summit document:
In truth, such "lifestyles and consumption patterns" are sustainable, so long as the freedom that makes prosperity possible is not destroyed in the name of achieving "sustainability."
The UN and the environmental lobby claim that we must get by with less because there are now too many people on the planet consuming too many resources.
But this rationale for accepting
is patently false.
One of the targets for Goal 3, ensuring "healthy lives" and "well-being," is:
Universal access to "mental health," along with "sexual and reproductive health-care services" - code words for abortion and contraception - are also included.
All governments are expected to integrate such services into their "national strategies and programs," the agreement demands. It is worth noting that mass-murdering Soviet dictator Vladimir Lenin made clear that controlled healthcare is the "keystone" of socialism.
The United Nations obviously agrees. And though he may not call it "socialism," Obama undoubtedly also views government control of healthcare as key.
Indeed, enactment of ObamaCare could be
viewed as a "great leap forward" by the United States toward
implementation of a key component of Agenda 2030, before Agenda 2030
was even "approved."
And so an entire goal of Agenda 2030 is devoted to ensuring that all children, everywhere, are transformed into what the UN calls "agents of change," ready to push forward the plan for the new global order.
The sort of activists that the UN hopes to make your children into is also explicitly defined in the agreement.
Considering what the UN means by "sustainable development",
...and more, the agenda for your
children takes on an even more sinister tone.
And throughout the agreement, the UN openly advocates the use of schools to indoctrinate all of humanity into a new set of values, attitudes, and beliefs in preparation for the new "green" and "sustainable" world order.
The UN's education agenda also puts sex "education" front and center.
How much will Agenda 2030 cost?
Various figures have been thrown around by UN bureaucrats regarding the monetary costs of the plan, generally ranging between $3 trillion and $5 trillion per year. Yes, trillions...
In the "From Billions to Trillions" report released by the World Bank in July 2015, the globalist outfit, a key player in Agenda 2030, conceded:
But the money needed to implement Agenda 2030 and other UN schemes is only part of the cost.
Other parts include the loss of our national independence and freedom that the rise of global governance and global socialism would surely entail. Revealingly, empowering dictators to help in global governance is openly touted by Agenda 2030.
The document states,
Every one of the 193 UN member
governments on the planet - from murderous communist and Islamist
dictatorships to those ruling what remains of the "Free World" -
vowed to help impose the UN's controversial goals on their subjects.
He also promised to vigorously impose the UN Agenda 2030 on the starving and impoverished victims his regime lords over with Agenda 2030-style policies.
The communist Castro regime vowed
to work with socialist Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro
and other tyrants to impose the UN goals on their victims,
too - all with financing from Western taxpayers.
The Chinese autocracy, infamous for forced abortions, censorship, religious and political persecution, the "one-child policy," terrible pollution, kangaroo courts, and of course, murdering more human beings than any other entity in all of human history, used its vast, global propaganda machine to celebrate Agenda 2030.
Among other "commitments," China promised to spend $2 billion in foreign countries to meet the UN goals in "education" and "health," with its funding increasing to $12 billion by 2030.
While only contributing a small piece of the pie, the fact that Beijing is so excited about the agenda is quite revealing.
Echoing Chairman Mao's rhetoric, EU and NATO globalist Javier Solana said,
The last "Great Leap Forward," presided
over by Chairman Mao Tse-tung between 1958 and 1963, resulted
in the murder of an estimated 45 million Chinese who were worked,
starved, or beaten to death.
Speaking to the UN General Assembly on September 27, 2015, after purporting to commit the United States to the global plot, Obama claimed the UN blueprint,
Even the world's leading religious figure, Pope Francis, addressed UN member governments with a plea to support the UN goals.
Beyond governments and religious figures, much of the private sector also enthusiastically backed the new goals.
Among the mega-corporations backing the scheme are the world's top three search engines:
It was not immediately clear whether
those corporations' support for the UN agenda would affect the
supposed impartiality of search results, but critics of the UN plan
expressed alarm nonetheless.
However, the U.S. Senate was not consulted, as the Constitution requires for all treaties. And even if the Senate were to ratify it, the federal government cannot grant itself new anti-constitutional powers merely by approving a treaty.
Therefore, the agreement has no force in the United States. But as UN Agenda 21 showed clearly, that does not mean that the Obama administration, and possibly future presidents, would not attempt to push it forward anyway.
The American people, therefore, must
demand through their elected representatives that the UN power grab