from EuropeNews Website
While
the Pope is struggling hard with the problems of pedophilia in the
Catholic church, and is now quite forthcoming in facing it and taking
responsibility, pedophilia is still a minefield in Islam.
From FaithFreedom.org:
Fair enough. He's been in touch with Muslims, who wanted him to join their side, claiming their prophet was good. He checked the facts and found them lying. That happens.
As in Quran 5:101-102, checking the facts frequently make people want to leave.
These are decent sources! No second-hand interpretation here, just the originals.
Oops... Interestingly, non-Muslims who did the same tend to agree. At least he's frank about his conclusion.
This is one of the most troubling items in all of Islam.
Its founder Qutham (later named Muhammad - ”The praised one”) did marry a girl too young for a bra. It's in the scripture (the finest – Bukhari – and the others) and can't just be explained away.
As documented in Bukhari and other places in the Islamic scripture, this is
canonically correct. A summary with exact references is at
Faithfreedom.org.
The second is hardly an option, for having this opinion about Muhammad would lead to apostacy, and the believer would become an unbeliever. This, logically, leaves the believers to be stick with option (1), at least in principle.
That's a harsh statement. Muhammad is (implicitly) called a 'fool', and
'sick in the head'. But what differentiates Muhammad from others who have
sex with girls the age of 9? Would anyone argue against calling pedophiles
'sick' and 'fools'? Well, the great difference here is that Muhammad is
thought to be 'holy'.
Here's the chorus. Of course sensible humans don't follow the example of child molesters. That'd be rather sick.
The 'prophet pretender' bit may refer to the fact that Muhammad never gave a single prophecy, presented a miracle or in general came up with anything more religious than a collection of what he said was from Allah (the Quran) and what he said and did under his own responsibility. (the Sirat / hadith).
The claim to prophethood comes from his first wife Khadija, after Muhammad had an unpleasant encounter with... something in a cave.
It's quite bad so far.
And while it can be argued that this was common on the life of Muhammad, the problem is that his 'religious' example sanctions this as permissible behavior for time unlimited. How can a religion fix the problem of having a founder fond of little girls?
Through more than a millennium, this example of 'holy' behavior is fundamentally uncontested and still being used:
This just might be a reference to Khomeini, who is still considered a hero among Shia Muslims, and in his book Tahrirolvasyleh (Vol. 4) wrote:
This is sick.
He continues, and this bears relevance to practices today:
Not only does he openly advocate marrying away girls before they reach puberty. He even gives a free pass to heaven for what by sane people is considered deeply criminal.
An apt way of describing the problem of having a 'prophet' who plunders caravans, hates Jews with a vengeance and kills infidels and critics.
Jihadists today have a source of inspiration without parallel.
This is a problem we are facing very frequently when asking Islamic leaders to condemn crimes, terrorism and other barbaric behavior in the name of Islam.
This, unfortunately, is true. International Center for Research on Women estimates a whopping 51 million child brides on the planet today. That's a LOT! And Islamic states, unfortunately, lead the stats in this area. Read more in their report Too Young to Wed.
For Video 'click' below image:
It is. Fortunately, some get out of their situation.
A highly publicized
case is that of 8-year old
Nojoud being forced into marriage with a man 20
years her senior. Let down by her entire family and all people of informal
influence, she decided herself to walk up to the court house and demand a
divorce from her violent and raping husband. To the surprise of everyone,
she got it.
Not good, and goes to prove the point in the song, too.
Chorus repeat.
Islam sure didn't do anything constructive for under-age women yet.
Decent human beings should do.
Well, do we have a choice? Of course we do!
We can bang away at
our
PlayStation or other game machine, spend our time with the fantasy world of
Hollywood, or look for the highest profits to impress our neighbors or
women. All very fine, and short-sighted.
In the real world, where people live, breathe and – unfortunately – suffer.
Well, Islam sure didn't do very well, so far. There's one peculiar item that needs to be addressed too, the practice of stoning.
For Video, "click" below image: There are different ways to address this:
As above, the choice is open.
The practice of pedophilia is simply taken for granted in this ancient text.
Islam: How to Divorce Your Muslim Child Bride - The Rules
Again, probably a standard feature of the strongly male-dominated ancient
Arabia.
Some Islamic leaders, like in the
YouTube video on Sura 65:4 above, condemn pedophiles to burn in Hell. In
that interpretation. Muhammad would be burned in Hell for his acts against
Aisha. That leads to more trouble. Sura 33:21 recommends to follow the
example of Muhammad for anyone wanting to be with him and Allah on the Last
Day.
Condemning pedophiles to Hell
(which makes sense) would imply that, and it's corroborated by the fact that
Allah is never, ever in the Islamic scripture described as being in
Paradise. Several mentions of him in Hell can be found, in some cases even
feeding the fires of Hell with the bodies of those who do not believe in
him.
The logical problems
that Islam faces on this issue are significant, and a logical conclusion to
the dilemmas are hard to find, not least given the explicit nature of
Islamic scripture on the matter. Talking of Islamic scripture, it would seem
that Islam simply adopted the pre-Islamic practices in the area, thus
carving the tolerance of pedophilia that existed in ancient Arabia into
stone, forever.
I have no authority whatsoever to pass judgment on this.
But it would seem that fixing it would require a serious lobotomy of
the
scripture itself, thereby opening the floodgates of revisionism on all sorts
of difficult subjects, potentially even destroying the notion that anything
in these books is actually holy, in any meaningful understanding of the
word.
But I am open to be proven wrong.
|