|
by Jon Rappoport September 18, 2015 from JonRappoport Website
All Hands on Deck for Global, Economic, Corporate Dictatorship...
"The so-called 'migration' of populations into Europe and America is no accident. It's part and parcel of a Trilateral Commission plan to introduce a high degree of chaos - which of course will require a militarized police response, to 'restore order' and remove huge chunks of freedom in the process. All significant US policy decisions are initiated by Trilateral members working inside and outside of government." The Underground Jon Rappoport
There are dots to connect here. They're real, and they're spectacular...
Let me begin with a brief exchange from a 1978 interview, conducted by reporter Jeremiah Novak.
He was speaking with two American members of the Trilateral Commission (TC), a group founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and his intellectual flunkey, Zbigniew Brzezinski.
This through-the-looking-glass moment summed up the casual arrogance of Trilateral members: of course US government policy was in the hands of Trilateralists; what else would you expect?
US government policy most certainly covers the area of international trade - and Cooper and Kaiser were foreshadowing blockbuster trade treaties to come:
Here are two key Trilateral quotes that reflect this global outlook - by which I mean a world dominated by mega-corporations:
Brzezinski was Obama's foreign policy mentor after Obama won the Presidency in 2008.
Any doubt on the question of Trilateral Commission goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, the founder of the TC, in his Memoirs (2003):
"Integrated global political and economic structure" means:
Here is the payoff.
The current US Trade Representative (appointed by Obama in 2013), who is responsible for negotiating the TPP with 11 other nations, is Michael Froman, a former member of the Trilateral Commission.
Don't let the word "former" fool you...
TC members resign when they take positions in the Executive Branch of government. And when they serve in vital positions, such as US Trade Representative, they aren't there by accident. They're TC operatives with a specific agenda. The TPP IS a major item on the Trilateral to-do list. Make no mistake about it.
Let's move along to Monsanto, one of those mega-corporations the Trilateralists fervently favor.
From 2001 to 2008, a man named Islam Siddiqui was a staunch US lobbyist for, and vice president of, CropLife America.
Siddiqui represented,
...the biggest and most aggressive biotech GMO corporations in the world.
On October 21, 2011, Siddiqui's new appointment (by Obama) was confirmed. He became the federal government's Chief Agricultural Negotiator, and served in that position until he resigned on December 12, 2013.
During his tenure, Siddiqui, Monsanto's man, was up to his ears in negotiating the TPP.
On April 22, 2009, Siddiqui had addressed the press in a US State Dept. briefing disingenuously titled "Green Revolution":
Siddiqui is a disinformation pro.
For example, the most widely used pesticide in the world, deployed in conjunction with Monsanto's GMO crops, was tested so "thoroughly" for safety that it is now declared a probable carcinogen by the World Health Organization.
You may have heard of it: Roundup...
Siddiqui's tenure negotiating US interests in the TPP surely favored big biotech, and all the companies who make their living selling GMO crop-seeds and pesticides.
The predicted outcome of the TPP vis-à-vis GMOs? It's obvious. Nations who resist the importation of GMO food crops will be sued, in private tribunals, for interfering with "free trade."
This is the future writ large, unless the TPP is derailed.
Consider the local movement in Hawaii's Maui County, where in the last election, citizens voted to block long-standing Monsanto/Dow experimentation with GMOs and their attendant pesticides, until an independent investigation could assess the health effects of those reckless open-air activities.
Monsanto immediately sued to suspend the force of the vote, successfully obtained an injunction, and the case has been hung up in federal court ever since.
Under the TPP, all successful local community actions against GMOs and their pesticides, anywhere in the 12-member countries, would be viewed per se as obstructions to free trade; and instead of engaging in a public and messy court battle, corporations could simply sue (or threaten to sue) the offending member country in a private tribunal, automatically defeat the local communities, and win a cash judgment.
Attempts to label GMOs, and previous laws allowing labeling in various countries, could be arbitrarily canceled.
Consider the recent astounding action of US Trade Representatives in Europe.
Using yet another disastrous trade treaty under negotiation, the TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership), US Trade Reps pressured the European Union (EU) to modify its stance on pesticides.
The Guardian (May 22, 2015) headline and tag says it all:
Note: this repressive and criminal action didn't even involve a treaty that had been ratified. The pressure was all about the so-called positive economic impact the TTIP would have, when passed, for Europe. And in the face of that money benefit, and the threat of its removal (by ditching the TTIP negotiations), who would dare curb the import and use of chemicals that achieve something as "minor" as disrupting human endocrine systems and causing male infertility and cancer?
This is the sort of judgment we can look forward to, if and when the TTP and the TTIP are ratified.
This is the face of corporate Globalism. This is the face of the Globalist Trilateral Commission.
Recently, US Senator Jeff Sessions broke the code of silence on what is in the forbidden-to-be-disclosed TPP Treaty. His most pungent revelation concerned "living agreements."
Thus giving new meaning to the term bait-and-switch.
Living agreements are arbitrary changes that can be made to the treaty, by Presidential fiat, without consulting Congress, after the treaty has been ratified. That's right.
In other words, the treaty is the treaty until it isn't, until it's something more, something different, something worse, something that empowers mega-corporations to a greater degree than previously negotiated.
Because those corporations, those Monsantos and Dows and Syngentas, wouldn't want to miss a trick, wouldn't want to forego suddenly realizing how they can exert even more dominance, would they?
Barbara Chicherio offers a powerful clue about what's to come if the TPP is ratified (see "Trans-Pacific Partnership and Monsanto"):
It isn't just GMOs....
Suppose a US pharmaceutical company decides to export a new drug to Japan or Australia or Canada, all members of the TPP. And suppose the drug is highly toxic. And suppose the governments of those nations object. The US company could sue, win a huge $$ judgment, and force the export to go through anyway.
Read some articles about the details of the TPP negotiations and some texts of the TPP that were secret.
Government officials in the member nations are not allowed to know all the details of the treaty, nor are they permitted to reveal what they know to the public. This is an oligarchic dictatorship of corporations on a global scale.
Along with a purposeful dumb-show, played out by government officials:
So far, Senator Sessions is the only exception.
Those people who still believe that One World United, delivered to us by the powers-that-be, will lead to a better life for all, need to put that fairy tale away and see the underlying framework and the underlying betrayal.
The Globalist/Trilateral Community aims to destroy the rights and power of all communities, and ultimately, destroy all people who still have a grip on the word freedom.
This is the grinning nightmare descending in the long night, professing to help us all, claiming to know the details of better living through chemistry, asserting that trade treaties couldn't harm a flea… and television news assures us that, at worst, this is just another he-said he-said debate, nothing to worry about, be happy, march forward, eyes closed, mouths shut, mind quiet...
|
