by Brandon Smith

December 20, 2018
from Alt-Market Website

Spanish version

 

 

 

 

 

 


The concept of using the economy as a weapon is not an alien one to most people.

 

Generally, we understand the nature of feudalism and how various groups can be herded onto centralized plantations to be exploited for their labor.

 

Some people see this as a consequence of "capitalism," and others see it as an extension of socialism/communism.

 

Sadly, many people wrongly assume that one is a solution to the other, meaning they think that,

crony capitalism is a solution to communist centralization or that communism is a solution to the corruption of crony capitalism.

The reality is that this is just another false paradigm.

What is most disturbing is that the majority of the public have no grasp whatsoever of the true solution to the problem of corrupt or totalitarian economies:

free markets.

Free markets have not existed within the global economy on a large scale for at least the past 100 years.

 

The rise of central banking has eroded all vestiges of freedom in production and trade.

 

Crony capitalism with its focus on corporate power and monopoly has nothing to do with free markets, despite the arguments of rather naive socialists who blame "free markets" for the problems of the world.

 

If you ever hear anyone making this claim, I suggest you remind them that corporations and their advantages are a creation of governments.

The,

  • protections of corporate personhood

  • limited liability

  • unfair taxation of small business competition

  • legislation shielding corporations from civil lawsuits,

...are all generated by government.

 

Therefore, corporations and crony capitalism are much more a product of socialist-style systems, not free markets. In a true free market devoid of constant government interference and favoritism, corporations could not exist and would be obliterated over time by the competitive environment.

 

And without limited liability, business moguls that violate the rule of law and harm others would be subject to personal prosecution and jail time instead of simply paying a fine.

 

The cost/benefit ratio for corrupt business would disappear and thus corrupt businesses would flounder.

At the very core of the combination of corporate power and government protection (what some might say is the classical definition of fascism), rest the central banks, globalist institutions and the banking elites behind them.

 

Central banks are the stewards of the various plantations (nations) and oversee the exploitation of these societies and their labor.

 

Major globalist constructs like the IMF or the Bank for International Settlements are the policy makers for the national central banks. They hand down the strategy, and the central banks implement that strategy in concert.

 

At the top of the pyramid sit the round table groups and the international bankers themselves, reaping the rewards of the cycle of theft.

As noted scholar, globalist insider and mentor to Bill Clinton, Carroll Quigley wrote in his book Tragedy And Hope:

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.

 

This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.

 

The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations.

 

Each central bank… sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."

This is an easy notion to understand, I think.

 

That is to say, the idea of oligarchs, the 1% if you will, controlling the other 99% through economic leverage is something that most people can agree exists, whether they identify with the political Right or the political Left.

 

They may only have a vague notion of the facts behind this conspiracy, but they have seen it in action in their daily lives and they know it is real. Here is where most of them start to lose sight of the bigger picture, though...

Many see the conspiracy as merely a product of profit motive. That is to say, they don't see it as a conscious and organized effort so much as unconsciously motivated greed.

 

This reminds me of the most famous line from the movie The Usual Suspects:

"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn't exist."

All the evidence overwhelmingly assures us that the conspiracy is fully conscious, organized and deliberate.

 

It is not an ugly or random byproduct of "profit motive."

 

This is absurd when you consider the amount of coordination that is required or the number of think tanks and secretive conferences that occur yearly, from,

These are very real centers of power that can have far reaching influence in our daily lives.

To ignore this and reduce it all down to a "natural" extension of greed is to stupidly rest one's soft spongy head in the jaws of organized 'evil' while pretending you can't smell the stench of its gingivitis.

The control mechanisms of the globalists are far more complex though than simply exploiting the flow of money or the accumulation of debt.

 

Numerous liberty activists that have accepted the reality of institutionalized control of the economy still refuse to acknowledge another very real control mechanism:

the use of economic collapse.

I'm not sure why this idea is taken as farfetched by people who are already versed in the facts behind globalism.

 

Their biases just won't allow them to look at the environment objectively and see the usefulness of collapse as a tactic to gain more leverage and influence.

I believe the key to understanding economics and the world at large is to embrace the truth that almost everything that is done in the world of politics and finance is done to manipulate public psychology toward certain ends.

 

That is to say, the true battlefield is the human mind; everything else is secondary.

But what ends am I referring to?

 

To be more specific, the masses are constantly being pressured into more dependency, more fear, less self-sufficiency and less awareness of the grand scheme.

 

We are encouraged,

  • to box with our own shadows

  • to produce for the system but not for ourselves

  • to struggle for minimal gains spent haphazardly on meaningless objectives

  • to fight with each other for scraps while remaining blind to the enormous parasites attached to our backs

  • to affiliate with pointless causes led by puppet politicians and controlled opposition

  • to never build anything ourselves, always waiting for some hero on a white horse to come and save us...

In essence, we are consistently being distracted or admonished from our natural inclination to establish free markets:

free markets in thought, in trade, in information, in government, etc.

The globalists are even willing to collapse entire economic systems to prevent this outcome and to keep us trapped in centralization. This prison is a mental one, for the most part.

 

At any time, we could walk away from the totalitarian model and build our own free market systems. Getting to this point psychologically, getting people to take the first steps, is the hard part, however.

Economics as the globalists implement it is not about profit. It is sometimes about milking the population for labor or hard assets, but this is a side benefit.

 

What economics is really about is molding minds; it is about changing the psychology of millions of people. It is about erasing inborn conscience and moral compass. It is about destroying long held societal principles and heritage.

 

And sometimes, it is about erasing history altogether, killing most of a generation, and then writing a new history that is more suitable to the globalist ideal, which is much easier when there are so few people who remember the truth left to argue about it.

Globalists exhibit most, if not all, the traits of narcissistic sociopaths, who sometimes organize into cooperative groups as long as there is a promise of mutual gain and a structure of top down dominance.

 

Narcissistic sociopaths are notorious for using crisis as a means to keep the people around them off balance and serving their interests. Their ultimate goal is rarely profit.

 

Instead, they seek power:

power over every aspect of every life of every person around them.

A modicum of power is not enough.

 

They want total control, and they will use any means to get it, including engineering threats and disasters to elicit compliance or to paint themselves as a necessary hero or "protector."

A sociopath is not content to control people through fear or violence alone. They want their victims to love them; to view them as saviors instead of tyrants.

To reiterate, the goal of economic subversion is to break down the human mind and change it into something else; something less human or, at the very least, something less rebellious.

 

One can only control people through debt and false rewards for so long before they start to recoil and revolt.

 

Economic collapse, on the other hand, can change people fundamentally through persistent terror and through tragedy. Through trauma, the globalists hope to make men into monsters or robots.

The current system was never built to last. Our economy is designed to fail, yet few people seem to question, why that is?

 

They tell themselves that this is because greed has led the money elite to self-sabotage, but this is a fantasy. It is not just that the system is designed to fail, but that it is designed to fail according to an organized timetable.

The globalist magazine The Economist announced in 1988 the coming of a one-world currency system, one that would be launched in 2018 and that would require,

  • the decline of the U.S. economy

  • the dollar to open the door to the reset

It is no coincidence that we are now witnessing the beginning of a major financial crash in the last quarter of 2018.

 

This crash was engineered starting in 2008 by central banks first through the inflation of a historic bubble encompassing almost all asset classes using stimulus measures and near zero interest rates, and it is being imploded today by the same central banks using tightening measures into economic weakness.

It is also no coincidence that the globalists have announced in 2018 that their intention is to adapt to a digital monetary system using blockchain technology and cryptocurrency.

 

That is to say, the one world currency system predicted in The Economist is already here...

 

They are only waiting for a crisis large enough to pressure society to accept total global centralization as a solution.

Forcing the public to embrace worldwide centralization would require several measures.

  1. First, the current system, which as stated is designed to fail, would have to be allowed to crash.

     

  2. Second, the crash would have to be blamed on someone other than the globalists and their ideology of globalism.

     

  3. Third, philosophical opponents of globalism (i.e., conservatives, nationalists and decentralization activists) would have to be demonized or eliminated so that the globalists can build their new world order without opposition.

     

  4. Fourth, the population would need to be sufficiently traumatized to the point of psychological submission and desperation, so that when the new system is introduced, they will be grateful for it, thus preventing future rebellion by making the public a willing cooperator in their own enslavement.

The success of such a plan is not guaranteed.

 

In fact, I believe the globalists will ultimately fail in their endeavor as outlined in past articles. This does not mean though that they aren't going to try.

 

Liberty activists must accept the fact that the plan of the globalists involves the deliberate destruction of our current economy.

 

Those who refuse,

  • will find themselves bewildered by the outcome of future financial developments, instead of being prepared

  • they will find themselves easily subdued, instead of ready to rebel

  • they will wonder after it's all over why they didn't see it coming when the end game was so obvious...