|
December
20, 2018
Generally, we understand the nature of feudalism and how various groups can be herded onto centralized plantations to be exploited for their labor.
Some people see this as a consequence of "capitalism," and others see it as an extension of socialism/communism.
Sadly, many people wrongly assume that one is a solution to the other, meaning they think that,
The reality is that this
is just another false paradigm.
Free markets have not existed within the global economy on a large scale for at least the past 100 years.
The rise of central banking has eroded all vestiges of freedom in production and trade.
Crony capitalism with its focus on corporate power and monopoly has nothing to do with free markets, despite the arguments of rather naive socialists who blame "free markets" for the problems of the world.
If you ever hear anyone
making this claim, I suggest you remind them that corporations and
their advantages are a creation of governments.
...are all generated by government.
Therefore, corporations and crony capitalism are much more a product of socialist-style systems, not free markets. In a true free market devoid of constant government interference and favoritism, corporations could not exist and would be obliterated over time by the competitive environment.
And without limited liability, business moguls that violate the rule of law and harm others would be subject to personal prosecution and jail time instead of simply paying a fine.
The cost/benefit ratio
for corrupt business would disappear and thus corrupt businesses
would flounder.
Central banks are the stewards of the various plantations (nations) and oversee the exploitation of these societies and their labor.
Major globalist constructs like the IMF or the Bank for International Settlements are the policy makers for the national central banks. They hand down the strategy, and the central banks implement that strategy in concert.
At the top of the pyramid
sit the round table groups and the international bankers themselves,
reaping the rewards of the cycle of theft.
This is an easy notion to understand, I think.
That is to say, the idea of oligarchs, the 1% if you will, controlling the other 99% through economic leverage is something that most people can agree exists, whether they identify with the political Right or the political Left.
They may only have a
vague notion of the facts behind this conspiracy, but they have seen
it in action in their daily lives and they know it is real. Here is
where most of them start to lose sight of the bigger picture,
though...
This reminds me of the most famous line from the movie The Usual Suspects:
All the evidence overwhelmingly assures us that the conspiracy is fully conscious, organized and deliberate.
It is not an ugly or random byproduct of "profit motive."
This is absurd when you consider the amount of coordination that is required or the number of think tanks and secretive conferences that occur yearly, from,
These are very real
centers of power that can have far reaching influence in our daily
lives.
Numerous liberty activists that have accepted the reality of institutionalized control of the economy still refuse to acknowledge another very real control mechanism:
I'm not sure why this idea is taken as farfetched by people who are already versed in the facts behind globalism.
Their biases just won't allow them to look
at the environment objectively and see the usefulness of collapse as
a tactic to gain more leverage and influence.
That is to say, the true
battlefield is the human mind; everything else is secondary.
To be more specific, the masses are constantly being pressured into more dependency, more fear, less self-sufficiency and less awareness of the grand scheme.
We are encouraged,
In essence, we are consistently being distracted or admonished from our natural inclination to establish free markets:
The globalists are even willing to collapse entire economic systems to prevent this outcome and to keep us trapped in centralization. This prison is a mental one, for the most part.
At any time, we could
walk away from the totalitarian model and build our own free market
systems. Getting to this point psychologically, getting people to
take the first steps, is the hard part, however.
What economics is really about is molding minds; it is about changing the psychology of millions of people. It is about erasing inborn conscience and moral compass. It is about destroying long held societal principles and heritage.
And sometimes, it is
about erasing history altogether, killing most of a generation, and
then writing a new history that is more suitable to the globalist
ideal, which is much easier when there are so few people who
remember the truth left to argue about it.
Narcissistic sociopaths are notorious for using crisis as a means to keep the people around them off balance and serving their interests. Their ultimate goal is rarely profit.
Instead, they seek power:
A modicum of power is not enough.
They want total
control, and they will use any means to get it, including
engineering threats and disasters to elicit compliance or to paint
themselves as a necessary hero or "protector."
One can only control people through debt and false rewards for so long before they start to recoil and revolt.
Economic collapse, on the
other hand, can change people fundamentally through persistent
terror and through tragedy. Through trauma, the globalists hope to
make men into monsters or robots.
They tell themselves that
this is because greed has led the money elite to self-sabotage, but
this is a fantasy. It is not just that the system is designed to
fail, but that it is designed to fail according to an organized
timetable.
It is no coincidence that we are now witnessing the beginning of a major financial crash in the last quarter of 2018.
This crash was engineered starting in 2008
by central banks first through the inflation of a historic bubble
encompassing almost all asset classes using stimulus measures and
near zero interest rates, and it is being imploded today by the same
central banks using tightening measures into economic weakness.
That is to say, the one world currency system predicted in The Economist is already here...
They are only waiting for
a crisis large enough to pressure society to accept total
global centralization as a solution.
The success of such a plan is not guaranteed.
In fact, I believe the globalists will ultimately fail in their endeavor as outlined in past articles. This does not mean though that they aren't going to try.
Liberty activists must accept the fact that the plan of the globalists involves the deliberate destruction of our current economy.
Those who refuse,
|
