by Emanuel Pastreich
April 06,
2023
from
EmanuelPastreich Website
Also
HERE
Emanuel Pastreich served as the president of the Asia
Institute, a think tank with offices in Washington DC,
Seoul, Tokyo and Hanoi. Pastreich also serves as
director general of the Institute for Future Urban
Environments. Pastreich declared his candidacy for
president of the United States as an independent in
February, 2020. |
Electronics Factory in Shenzhen
The entire Earth is haunted by a specter, the specter of the
complete possession of the human and the natural worlds by a band of
unaccountable overlords.
Those self-appointed
global rulers, the billionaires, supported by the politicians
and public intellectuals that they play with for sport, have carved
out for themselves a separate reality where within they make up new
rules for governance, local, national, and global, and then pass
those rules down to us.
Central to this project is the radical alteration of the concept of
possession.
Their
audacious claim of possession of
everything has been successful because it appears to be
supported by all institutions of government, by universities and
newspapers of repute, and other prominent international
organizations which previously had legitimacy.
The billionaires have systematically laid down the foundations for
this claim of ownership, using diverse tools, whether it be,
-
the control of
our minds through constant bombardment with advertisements
-
the launch of
natural assets companies (NAC) on Wall Street that claim
private ownership of the oceans and the land, of the water
and the air, of every aspect of the natural world
-
the ownership of
our bodies through the patenting of DNA and the claim of the
right to force citizens to accept injections of
privately-patented substances that alter the physical,
genetic, and psychological state of the individual...
Through some magic
process at the World Economic Forum (WEF)
the imperative to become modern and to be competitive as part of
some imagined fourth industrial revolution gives these unaccountable
authorities complete possession of all aspects of our existence.
Such a claim to unlimited possession of everything only works if the
concepts of possession that we have relied on from the distant past
are erased and the citizen loses all sense of affiliation with local
or national, ethnic or spiritual, roots that might offer an
alternative concept of ownership.
The billionaires, above all, do not want any concept of ownership
that is linked to a sense of belonging, or of participation.
The concept that we own
the land, the waters and the myriad plants and animals only in that
we belong to that land and to those waters, and we are responsible
to them, is a vision of our world with ancient roots which cannot be
tolerated by the 'high priests' of the World Economic Forum.
Unlimited possession by multinational corporations, and by the
governments that they have taken over, can only be achieved if all
sense of belonging for people is torn to shreds, leaving behind no
organizations of substance that can oppose this takeover except for
the toothless controlled opposition that the global elite have
prepared for us in advance... the
Jeffery Sachs
and Warren Buffets of the world...
Belonging, after all, is the central concept of the United States
Constitution.
Without the imperative
that the citizen must belong to the republic, the property rights
defined by that document are reduced to a travesty.
Such was the intended
consequence of corporations replacing the citizen with the consumer
and the Constitution with markets over the past four decades.
Ultimately, the claim by the individual, the family, or the
community to possess a house, a river, or a mountain, to be entitled
to clean air or to healthy food that does not destroy the body, has
been undermined by multinational interests who isolate individual
from friends and family, from community members and like-minded
people, thereby destroying any trace of belonging and encouraging a
one-way hypnotic relationship with far off celebrities, cute
pictures of fat cats, and glimpses of fashion and food, pornography
and violence.
Fashion magazines, TV dramas, movies, cartoon characters, and video
games induce an indulgent narcissistic cult of the self within which
the individual competes against everyone.
Personal possessions, not
community solidarity, become the primary goal in life.
Source
The ability of unaccountable multinational corporations
to own everything, from farmland to houses, from transportation and
phone lines, to the internet and media, is rarely questioned, and an
alternative system is never suggested by any public intellectual.
Gone from our society is sharing and cooperation, serving those less
fortunate, or for standing together for the common good against the
greedy few.
The battle ground was well prepared by the corporate consulting
firms before the first shot was fired, so as to facilitate this
horrific final takeover.
The disenfranchisement of entire populations is not new in human
history, but the current project is unprecedented in its scale and
in its speed.
If we were to look for a
parallel, the destruction of the civilizations of North and South
America by the Spanish, the Portuguese, the French, and the English
from the 16th century to the 19th century is
most apposite.
Just as was true then, this time a handful of private interests
(like
Blackrock, the modern equivalent of
the British East India Company) have set out to destroy all customs,
learning, institutions, values, and concepts in the nations
targeted.
But this time it is not
the Aztecs and the Iroquois who are being targeted.
This time, all
civilizations on the Earth are fair game in the radical shift of
ownership being planned by supercomputers.
The wild bid of the billionaires to buy up all farmland in the
United States, Ukraine, Russia, and most every country, using the
fake money cooked up by multinational investors using the cover of
the Federal Reserve, and other
central banks,
resembles the process
by which England and Spain claimed ownership of the "New World"
by magic, introducing the alien, and completely artificial,
concept of real estate...
They made up their own
maps back in London or Madrid, just as billionaires make up
cryptocurrency and derivatives in London and New York, and then used
those maps to claim ownership of vast swaths of forest and plains,
mountains and bays.
The key to their success
was the use of false authority, backed by pay-to-play public
intellectuals, to define who owned what.
It was a financial operation, and it was often a military operation
when force was needed to assure acceptance of the new order.
But above all, then and
now, the takeover was an ideological operation, an epistemological
move whereby the concept of ownership, and of nationhood, were
violently, but silently, remade by the imperialists sitting in their
lavish parlors.
The first step toward taking possession of everything today was for
the billionaires to take control of money, and of the
institutions that defined its value:
-
the Federal
Reserve
-
the Department of
Treasury
-
departments of
economics and business at universities
-
economic experts
-
the newspapers of
repute that report on the economy...
Once the institutions
that define value were taken over, corporations could then employ
authority figures in those institutions to convince the people that,
the stock market had
a relationship to the economy, that the efforts of corporations
benefited the citizen...
Image source
We were told that we must, following some obscure law of nature,
invest our savings in the stock market, and that the "innovative"
geniuses of Wall Street like
Bill Gates and Elon Musk
are entitled, because of their claims to be working for the good
of humanity, to take over everything in the human realm.
The current project
was greatly facilitated by the destruction of the humanities in
education in the 1980s.
Our children ceased
to receive education in the fundamentals of metaphysics,
aesthetics, morality and epistemology - and in art, literature
and history.
My high school had a philosophy club back in the 1980s.
Such extracurricular
activities for high school students are rare today.
Instead,
mass-produced images are put out by multinational corporations
like Apple and branded as, somehow, related to the humanities.
In reality, the images of
people engaged in artistic expression that are broadcast in IPhone
commercials are simply a bid of corporations to lay claim to
possession of individual expression of emotions and sentiments - to
make creative acts a product that must be downloaded.
How did we get here?
When global capital shook off the chains that had been wound around
its neck in the 1930s (and that required tremendous effort back
then) it was able to bribe and to seduce intellectuals and policy
makers so as to,
create an educational
system that was engineered to destroy the capacity of the
individual to understand how society functions, and to undermine
the ability of the student for himself or herself...
In the place of the
temple education they erected a false palace of mirrors, filled with
practical studies like economics, engineering, and public relations
that are presented as more realistic than those fluffy humanities
courses.
But these new "practical"
studies form a Trojan horse that is filled with an
ideological soup mixing narcissism, consumption culture, short-term
thinking, and scientism (the religion holding that science is an
oracle presented by select authorities at blue chip institutions
that cannot be questioned from below).
Economics and business administration, marketing and public
relations are the new fields promoted by the rich that hold that
growth and consumption are positives without a scrap of proof, and
they create a mythical set of metrics for success in business that
are less scientific than bloodletting techniques of the 18th
century.
Four decades of our
country stewing in this ungodly soup has produced a generation
of highly-educated citizens who are good at taking tests and at
following directions, but who are incapable of perceiving the
manner in which society is manipulated in an ideological and
aesthetic sense.
Unlike the intellectuals
of the 1930s, the last time we ran into a crisis on this scale,
current intellectuals are blind to ultimate causes, incapable of
grasping class conflict, or ideological indoctrination, or the
manipulation of the people by technology.
In fact,
AI, the primary weapon used to
degrade the capacity of citizens to think independently, is promoted
as a positive for society by treasonous intellectuals.
For pay-to-play intellectuals, scholarship means that facts are
piled up in meaningless piles and then exchanged for grants from
foundations.
Distinguished scholars
whose chairs are endowed by wealthy patrons with agendas to alter
the nature of possession, gather at Princeton University or
Brookings Institution to congratulate each other on their latest
books.
The purpose of their research is,
to give legitimacy to
the
take over of everything by
the few and thus rise in
their careers, obtaining the public recognition in the
corporate-controlled media that soothes their egos...
They are not
interested in understanding how the world works...
They do not feel any
moral responsibility beyond lining their own nests...
This criminal operation,
reinforced by subliminal messages in advertising, in posters, and
billboards, in TV commercials, or in television dramas and movies,
tells us from childhood how we should define possession and
belonging.
We are told that wealth
rightfully belongs to people who demonstrate no moral responsibility
and live glamorous lives, consuming grotesque amounts of resources.
They are to be envied
and admired, we are told.
These images of consumerist possession possess us in the manner
that one is possessed by an evil spirit.
There are no longer regulators or independent intellectuals out
there to step forward to declare that manipulative advertising,
deceptive education, is an assault on the ability of citizens to
think for themselves.
Few citizens are
confident enough in their understanding of the world to recognize
that this harmless advertising we see around us is, in fact, a war
waged on our souls.
Possession has ceased
to be defined by ancient customs and habits, by obligations and
moral imperatives, or even by laws and regulations.
Rather possession has
become a magical state which is determined by those with the
ability to alter perceptions.
If Twitter, the New York
Times, and Google announce that someone owns something, it becomes
the truth:
It becomes theirs...
In this new culture, one
can possess objects instantaneously by ordering them over the
internet.
Just a few dollars of
digital currency and it is yours.
You are encouraged to
possess things that are insubstantial, like castles in
Mine-craft.
For many, the objects
possessed virtually seems more substantial than any real object.
But such possessions can
be taken away just as easily by unaccountable forces.
And there is no rule,
no means to appeal, in the digital transactions that
increasingly define possession...
Just miss a few payments
for your mortgage, or fall behind on your bill for internet service,
and suddenly you are homeless and cut off from the world.
Faceless and
unaccountable powers are empowered to determine what you can and
cannot do.
In effect the house, the computer, the internet service and
everything else you supposedly possess is ultimately owned by the
banks and you have only conditional rights to use them as long as
you conform to certain conventions.
Possession has become radically tangential, unbearably contingent,
and tantalizingly ephemeral.
Now that possession only exists for the citizen in an abstract
manner, while all the tools that define possession are controlled by
private IT firms that determine our online communication, and
increasingly control local and central government as well, we have
been primed for the final stage of disenfranchisement:
the
introduction of digital currencies
that will allow hidden powers to stop possession with the flip
of a switch.
A brief
history of possession
Let us consider the transformation of possession that took place
over the last three hundred years.
Ancient peoples lived
in small groups and the land was common to them.
The home was private
property in the sense that it had belonged to the family for
generations, but no individual was free to do whatever he
pleased with the land he or she inhabited.
The individual was
part of a family and the family, as part of the community, was
but custodian of the land for future generations.
Possession could not be separated from belonging.
You belonged to the
land, to the mountains and the rivers, as much as, or more than,
you possessed them.
A drawing depicting a 17th-century trade scene
between Dutch merchants and Native Americans.
Common trading items were beaver pelts,
Dutch tools, and wampum beads used as currency.
(IMAGE COURTESY NORTH WIND PICTURE ARCHIVES)
The growth of international trade in the seventeenth century, the
concentration of wealth in the hands of bankers and merchants in the
18th century, the displacement of farmers from their
lands through the enclosure acts in Britain and elsewhere from that
time, and the emergence of workers dependent on paid work in
factories in the 19th and 20th centuries who
did not own anything, could not produce their own food, and did not
belong to any social institution or organization, revolutionized the
concept of possession.
New technologies undid, or undermined, the ancient technologies for
growing crops, forging iron, blowing glass, weaving clothes,
cobbling shoes, and generating energy by wind, water, or horse.
All around the Earth, land that had belonged to the people, who also
belonged to it, became the property of strangers, of far off
nations, and of "corporations" and "trusts" - opaque organizations
that protected owners from any personal responsibility.
Along the way, the pseudo-scientific discipline of geography took
hold in the universities of London and Paris, Berlin and Boston, an
academic field wherein powerful people in cities made up maps with
pretty colors that define where nations start and end, which
corporation, or which individual, owned enormous swaths of Africa,
the Americas, Asia, and Oceania.
Those empowered by this seizure, were refined and educated men,
wearing three-piece suits when they gathered at the club for gin and
tonics, surrounded by scholarly books and exquisite paintings.
They then had their
classmates from Oxford and Princeton pass laws in their national
assemblies, that made the mountains and rivers, the fields and bays,
the islands and peninsulas of far off lands suddenly theirs.
It was a ridiculous magic
trick that was justified by using the cloak of science and the fairy
tale of civilization.
The destruction of traditional concepts of possession by a tiny
handful of colonialists between the seventeenth century and the
nineteenth century, is immediately relevant to us because the
current push to disenfranchise and destroy the mass of humanity
today follows virtually that same game plan.
The cult of the new made long-term relations with places and things
less important, even a burden to those who wished to be "modern," to
be fashionable.
Suddenly, a two-hundred year old house in one’s native village is
worth less than a tiny apartment in the city with which one has no
connection at all.
This new apartment offers a television and air conditioning, but it
could be easily taken away through the use of eminent domain,
rigged-up bankruptcy, or any number of tricks.
The shift in the nature of possession is also a product of the
promotion of trade.
The growth of global
trade routes and supply chains, invisible to all but the
specialists, has created a real economy, following strict rules that
is never described in any newspaper.
Corporations outsource manufacturing to the far corners of the Earth
not simply so as to take advantage of low labor costs, but also so
as to take complete control of how things are made, distributed, and
sold.
There is no recourse the
citizen can take in response to the horrific economic implications
of how products are produced before they arrive at Walmart.
And in this new economy there is no space for a craftsman, a farmer,
or a carpenter - none of the profits find their way back to the
community.
Almost all profits go to
the billionaires hiding behind the corporations.
Mass production is held up, without a scrap of scientific data, as a
sign of human progress. A society in which the necessities of
daily life are produced by strangers, often offshore, through
unaccountable corporations, is presented to our children as an
ideal.
The makers of things and the users of things have been separated by
an unbridgeable chasm.
To put it simply,
the means of
production, distribution, advertising, and consumption have been
completely possessed by the billionaires.
This possession takes
the form of invisible network of global manufacturing,
logistics, distribution, and retail sales, that is supported by
the private banks that underwrite the entire game.
No political candidate of
the left or the right will even mention this possession of the
entire system when running for office.
Money, not the ancestors, nor the traditions of the village, nor
ethical imperatives to be a good son, mother, or neighbor, has
become the only determinant of ownership - and that money is itself
a chimera cooked up by the central banks.
When philosophy was murdered in the educational system and
extirpated from intellectual discourse, when citizens were torn away
from nature, from agriculture, and from communities violently as
part of a new culture of modernity that glorified the radical
dependence of the individual on systems of production that were
controlled by corporations, on money controlled by banks, they
wandered out into the swamp of slavery.
But the posters around them, the popular Hollywood movies they
watch, suggest that personal freedom, and true self-expression, can
only be achieved by becoming dependent on a money economy.
As a result, most of us pass our days without asking ourselves what
possession means.
Of course, you might answer,
we possess our
clothes, our furniture, the computers and the software that we
use at work, the house in which we live, and that ownership is
protected by laws.
Our bodies are ours
and we are free to choose what we buy and where we live.
That form of possession
is fool’s gold.
Merely default on a
loan, even though the money that the bank loaned you was made up
from thin air by that bank, and you will find that you do not
own anything.
Debt is roped to possession.
Everything you might
desire to possess, and the commercial media from morning to
evening is set on brainwashing you into believing that you must
possess, requires that you borrow money to obtain it.
You have no choice but to
take that loan in order to get the education necessary to find
employment, or to buy the automobile you need to go to work.
The banks and the corporations are authorized to penalize you for
nonpayment of these loans, and to fine you as they see fit for late
payments.
You have no right to
demand anything in the "contracts" you must sign to get the loans
required.
They can easily force us to sell all your possessions so as to avoid
homelessness and destitution. In many cases, the banks are
authorized to take those items from us using the police.
And the police are
authorized to seize your possessions on the flimsiest excuse.
Your right of possession as a citizen is radically tangential, but
the possession of banks and multinational corporations is assumed to
be legitimate even when it is obtained using dubious assets like
stocks, derivatives and stocks.
These mythical creatures
create value by employing authority, media coverage and on occasion,
the threat of force.
Yet, as unreal as these products may be, the system is set up so
that they can be used by institutional investors as collateral to
buy up the land that we use to grow food, to control the energy that
we need to move, or to heat our homes, and to monopolize everything
of value in the world through acts of black magic.
Armies of economics professors and business journalists line up to
give this occult form of trans-substantiation a veneer of
legitimacy.
The primary job of
experts in economics is to convince us that the stock market, Wall
Street, represents the economy, and that the rise and fall of those
stocks reflects our well being - not the profits of the rich.
But this Wall Street magic is not magic at all.
They create inflation
for the rest of us by devaluing the money in our bank accounts.
They set up a series
of financial crises for ordinary people that allows the rich to
use the funny money pumped into the stock market by the Federal
Reserve to buy up stock, or to buy up the real estate that the
little people are forced to sell.
The trillions of dollars
that the billionaires created in this massive Ponzi scheme
called the stock market, along with trillions of dollars
more produced by money laundering through the military, allows them,
using their various holding companies, not only to take possession
of real things like land and water, food and mineral resources,
housing and transportation systems.
It also allows them to hire advertising firms, consulting groups,
and politicians to redefine the nature of possession so that their
power will be unlimited and we will be slowly reduced to slavery.
Possession is the true name of the game...
Our last stand
Sadly, the more brazen the grab for possession of everything grows,
the more passive and confused the population becomes. The shifts are
so dramatic, so overwhelming, that most are lost in the mad rush
forward.
Following the fictions fed to them in the media, many see
Bill Gates, Warren Buffett
or Elon Musk, not as criminals trying to destroy humanity,
but as models of how one can grow wealthy and independent by being
innovative.
The enemy of humanity are
painted as a concerned friends...
We have entered the critical period when the last traces of freedom
and belonging are being swept into the ash bin of history.
All that will be left
will be possession by the few and the resulting slavery for the
many...
Will we have the
self-awareness and bravery
to make a stand...?
|