by Brian Clowes, PhD
June 23, 2021
Henry A Kissinger,
Secretary of State 1973-1977
Henry Kissinger was a founding member of the elitist
Trilateral Commission that spawned today's drive toward
Technocracy, aka the UN's 'Sustainable Development.'
Kissinger also force-fed population control to the UN.
The infamous "Kissinger Report" in 1974 laid the
This is a must-read article for anyone pondering the
population control aspect of
modern genesis is almost 50 years old.
still alive at 97 years of age.
Population Control Agenda...
The Genesis of
U.S. Government Population Control
The United States National Security Council is the highest
decision-making body regarding foreign policy in the United States.
On December 10, 1974, it
completed a top-secret document entitled National Security Study
Memorandum or NSSM-200, also called The Kissinger Report,
Henry Kissinger was Secretary of State at the time it
The subject of
is "Implications of Worldwide Population
Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests."
This document, published
shortly after the first major international population conference in
Bucharest, was the result of collaboration among,
Intelligence Agency (CIA)
the United States
Agency for International Development (USAID)
of State, Defense and Agriculture
NSSM-200 was made public
when it was declassified and was transferred to the U.S. National
Archives in 1990.
Although the United States government has issued hundreds of policy
papers dealing with various aspects of American national security
since 1974, The Kissinger Report continues to be the foundational
document on U.S. government population control.
It therefore continues to
represent official United States policy on government population
control and, in fact, is still
posted on the USAID website.
NSSM-200 is critically important to pro-life workers all over the
world, because it completely exposes the unsavory and unethical
motivations and methods of the population control movement.
We can use this valuable
document to lay bare the strategies used by unscrupulous governments
and "aid" agencies that are used to bend developing nations to their
Their rote denials will
be useless in the face of this evidence.
The Purpose of
The Kissinger Report (NSSM-200)
The primary purpose of U.S. government population control efforts is
to maintain access to the mineral resources of less-developed
countries, or LDCs.
The Kissinger Report states:
The U.S. economy will
require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad,
especially from less developed countries.
That fact gives the
U.S. enhanced interest in the political, economic, and social
stability of the supplying countries.
Wherever a lessening
of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase
the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes
relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of
the United States.
In order to protect U.S.
commercial interests, NSSM-200 cited a number of factors that could
interrupt the smooth flow of materials from LDCs to the United
States, including a large population of anti-imperialist youth whose
numbers must be limited by population control.
The document identified
13 nations by name that would be the primary targets of U.S.
government population control efforts.
Under the heading "Concentration on key countries" we find:
population moderation should give primary emphasis to the
largest and fastest growing developing countries where there is
special U.S. political and strategic interest.
Those countries are:
At the same time, the
U.S. will look to the multilateral agencies, especially the U.N.
Fund for Population Activities which already has projects in
over 80 countries to increase population assistance on a broader
basis with increased U.S. contributions.
This is desirable in
terms of U.S. interests and necessary in political terms in
Countries targeted by NSSM-200
According to The Kissinger Report, elements of the
implementation of government population control programs could
abortion, financial incentives for countries to increase their
abortion, sterilization and contraception-use rates,
indoctrination of children, and mandatory population control and
coercion of other forms, such as withholding disaster and food
aid unless an LDC implements population control programs...
This last strategy -
force and coercion applied to developing countries - is currently
used by the population control cartel to push not only abortion,
sterilization and birth control, but other evils such as
homosexuality and transgenderism.
There are dozens of examples of this kind of blatant injustice,
including the following:
refused to legalize contraception and homosexuality, the
United States withdrew financial and military aid that would
allow it to combat the Islamic terror group Boko Harem,
which has murdered and kidnapped tens of thousands of people
in that nation. 1
declined to legalize abortion, the United Nations refused to
provide any aid for it to battle COVID-19, condemning many
more Ecuadorians to death. 2
pro-lifers collected irrefutable evidence that Marie Stopes
International (MSI), one of the largest abortionists in the
world, were committing illegal and dangerous abortions on a
vast scale, MSI demanded that they be either muzzled or
Nations Population Fund halted food and other aid to
millions of starving Yemenis because the nation
refused to legalize abortion. 4
refused to legalize sodomy, the United States withdrew
much-need foreign aid to help alleviate the 11% national HIV
infection rate and to care for 250,000 AIDS orphans. 5
The Joint United
Nations Program on AIDS [UNAIDS] threatened to withdraw all
of its aid from the Caribbean island of St. Lucia
unless it approved language supporting abortion and
homosexuality in a political declaration on HIV/AIDS. 6
The powerful population control cartel does not engage in charity at
all - instead, it freely employs thuggery and bullying to enforce
The Kissinger Report also specifically declared that the
United States must cover up its population control activities and
avoid charges of imperialism by inducing the United Nations and
various non-governmental organizations, specifically,
...to do its dirty work.
Dr. Alan Guttmacher, one of the most knowledgeable and active
population suppression experts of all time, described this strategy:
My own feeling is
that we've got to pull out all the stops and involve the United
If you're going to
curb population, it's extremely important not to have it done by
the "damned Yankee," but by the UN. Because the thing is, then
it's not considered genocide.
If the United States
goes to the black man or the yellow man and says "slow down your
reproductive rate," we're immediately suspected of having
ulterior motives to keep the white man dominant in the world.
If you can send in a
colorful UN force, you've got much better leverage." 7
has directly and inevitably encouraged atrocities on an
enormous scale in dozens of the world's nations.
Just four of countless
examples are shown below.
For many years,
the United States government funded the United Nations
Population Fund (UNFPA).
In April 2017,
the Trump Administration finally took the step of ending UNFPA
One of the main
targets of UNFPA money is the People's Republic of China (PRC).
Department grounded the change of policy the fact the agency
"supports, or participates in the management of, a program of
coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization" in China.
While the UNFPA
denies it, according to its own documents
the UNFPA has donated more than $100 million to China's
population control program, financed a $12 million computer
complex specifically to monitor the population program, provided
the technical expertise and personnel that trained thousands of
Chinese population control officials, and presented China with a
United Nations award for the "most outstanding population
unfamiliar with the countless abuses perpetrated under this
program might consider reading material from 2015-present at the
links for the
U.S. Congressional Hearing on China and Population
Research Institute (PRI) for evidence.
As the PRI article
"More children were aborted under the one-child policy
than the entire population of the United States."
years 1995 to 1997, over
a quarter of a million Peruvian women were sterilized as
part of a program to fulfill then-president Alberto Fujimori's
family planning goals.
Although this campaign was called the
"Voluntary Surgical Contraception Campaign," many of these
procedures were obviously coerced.
In fact, women whose
underweight children were on government food programs were
threatened with the withholding of this food if they refused to
be sterilized, and others were kidnapped from their families and
the first African country to roll back its adult HIV infection
rate, from 21% in 1991 to about 6% in 2004, a 70% decrease.
nation accomplished this amazing feat
by discouraging condom use and by changing the behavior of the
control groups could not allow this success to interfere with
their inflexible template because it emphasized virtuous
behavior, so they aggressively undermined President Yoweri
Timothy Wirth, President of the United
Nations Foundation, called this highly effective program,
negligence toward humanity."
The United States Agency for
International Development (USAID), Population Services
International, CARE International, and others have been pushing
condoms as hard as they can in Uganda.
Rates of HIV infection
rose over 7%, which Edward Greene, former senior research
scientist at the Harvard School of Public Health, ascribes
to riskier behavior and less fear of HIV as a death
Recently, Ugandan adult HIV
infection rates have declined to 6.2%.
Nevertheless, Uganda's initial success rate is perhaps the most
egregious example of population control ideology trumping the
science of proven HIV prevention programs.
In 2014 there
was renewed international attention on India's continuing forced
sterilization program after dozens
of women were killed and many more harmed due to the assembly
line procedures being done in grotesquely unsanitary conditions.
Josas Koninoor remarked:
95% of our
clients belong to the very poor class.
responsible for giving birth four or five times. Since they
cannot remember to take birth control pills every day,
long-acting contraceptives are much better for them...
In order to have a
good thing there is always a price to pay. If two or three
women die - what's the problem? The population will be
sterilization is still India's primary method of
According to The New York Times, as of
2016 four million tubal ligations are still done annually. This
program continues to be financed by the
US and other Western governments and foundations.
there are no plans to stop sterilizations, but the Indian
introducing free injectable contraceptives, which will also
have major negative health impacts on women.
Outline of the
Population Control Strategy in NSSM-200
lays out the detailed strategy by which the United States government
aggressively promotes population control in developing nations in
order to regulate (or have better access to) the natural resources
of these countries.
outline shows the elements of this plan, with actual supporting
quotes from NSSM-200:
States needs widespread access to the mineral resources of
less-developed nations (quote shown above).
flow of resources to the United States could be jeopardized
by lesser-developed country government action, labor
conflicts, sabotage, or civil disturbances, which are much
more likely if population pressure is a factor:
people are much more likely to challenge imperialism and the
world's power structures, so their numbers should be kept
down as much as possible:
"These young people can more
readily be persuaded to attack the legal institutions of the
government or real property of the 'establishment,'
'imperialists,' multinational corporations, or other - often
foreign - influences blamed for their troubles."
the United States must develop a commitment to government
population control among key LDC leaders, while bypassing
the will of their people:
critical elements of government population control
Identifying the primary targets:
"Those countries are:
India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia,
Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey,
Ethiopia and Colombia."
Enlisting the aid of as many multilateral population
control organizations as possible in this worldwide
project, in order to deflect criticism and charges of
Designing programs with financial incentives for
countries to increase their abortion, sterilization and
"Pay women in the LDCs to have
abortions as a method of family planning... Similarly,
there have been some controversial, but remarkably
successful, experiments in India in which financial
incentives, along with other motivational devices, were
used to get large numbers of men to accept vasectomies."
Concentrating on "indoctrinating" [NSSM-200's
language] the children of LDCs with anti-natalist
"Without diminishing in any way the effort
to reach these adults, the obvious increased focus of
attention should be to change the attitudes of the next
generation, those who are now in elementary school or
Designing and instigating propaganda programs and
sex-education curricula intended to convince couples to
have smaller families, regardless of social or cultural
Investigating the desirability of mandatory [NSSM-200's
language] population control programs:
Considering using coercion in other forms, such as
withholding disaster and food aid unless a targeted LDC
implements population control programs:
"On what basis
should such food resources then be provided? Would food
be considered an instrument of national power?
be forced to make choices as to whom we can reasonably
assist, and if so, should population efforts be a
criterion for such assistance?
implementation process, the United States must hide its tracks and
disguise its population control programs as altruistic, by using the
euphemisms so well-beloved by all elements of the culture of death:
There is also
the danger that some LDC leaders will see developed country
pressures for family planning as a form of economic or racial
imperialism; this could well create a serious backlash...
U.S. can help to minimize charges of an imperialist motivation
behind its support of population activities by repeatedly
asserting that such support derives from a concern with:
right of the individual couple to determine freely and
responsibly the number and spacing of children and to
have information, education, and means to do so
fundamental social and economic development of poor
countries in which rapid population growth is both a
contributing cause and a consequence of widespread
Is Government Population
There is growing
awareness that the world "population explosion" is over or,
indeed, that it never actually materialized in the first place.
When the population
scare began in the late 1960s, the world population was increasing
at a rate of more than 2% per year. It is now increasing at less
than 1% per year, and this rate
expected to continue to drop due to continuing population
Report predicted that the
population of the world would stabilize at about 10 to 13 billion,
with some demographers predicting that the world population would
balloon to as high as 22 billion people.
Now it is estimated that by
population will level out at around 11 billion, although many
dependable estimates put the peak population at a much lesser
application of the strategies recommended in The Kissinger Report
has resulted in regional population growth rates decelerating so
fast that they are already causing severe economic and social
the former Soviet Union
Many developing nations are now aging even more rapidly
than the developed world, which foretells even more severe problems
for their relatively underdeveloped economies.
The developed nations
had the opportunity to become rich before they became old; if a
nation becomes old first, it will never become rich.
From the very
beginning, the concept of a "population explosion" was an
ideologically motivated false alarm specifically designed to allow
rich nations to pillage the resources of the poorer nations.
resulting push for population control in developing nations has
borne absolutely no positive fruit in its decades of implementation.
In fact, population control ideologies and programs make it even
more difficult to respond to the impending grave crisis looming in
the form of a disastrous worldwide "population implosion."
time to begin
urging families to have more children, not fewer,
if we are to avoid a worldwide demographic catastrophe.
The first step in
such a massive change in policy is, of course, to change our vision
and our values. In order to do this, we must repudiate old ways of
thinking and outmoded ways of accomplishing our objectives.
represents the worst aspect of the "advanced" nations meddling in
the most intimate affairs of less-developed nations. It strongly
reinforces the image of the "ugly American."
It advocates violating
the most precious freedoms and autonomy of the individual through
coercive family planning programs.
Report purports to show
concern for the rights or welfare of individuals and of nations, but
it was conceived from the imperialistic concept that the United
States has the "right" to have unfettered access to the natural
resources of developing nations.
The United States and the other
nations of the developed world, as well as ideologically-motivated
population control NGOs, should be supporting and guiding authentic
economic development that allows the people of each nation to use
their resources for their own benefit, thereby leading to an
enhancement of human rights worldwide and healthier economies for
relationships are closer or more intimate than those found in the
Yet the "developed" world has spent more than 160 billion
dollars just since 1990 attempting to control the number of children
born to families in developing nations through the widespread
imposition of abortion, sterilization and birth control under the
deceptive umbrella terms "family planning services" and
All that the tens
of billions of dollars of government population control expenditures
have accomplished is to make hundreds of millions of large poor
families into small poor families.
It is unfortunately
left to our imagination to wonder what might have happened if these
resources had been invested in health and educational
infrastructure, and in research dedicated to finding peaceful
strategies to transition nations from corrupt governance to truly
representative and accountable courts and public service sectors.
Children are not an
obstacle to development, they are the hope for the future of any
People are not the
problem - they are the solution...
Montagna. "US Won't Help Fight Boko Haram Until Nigeria
Accepts Homosexuality, Birth Control, Bishop Says." Aleteia,
February 17, 2015.
Bilger. "UN Refuses to Send Coronavirus Funds to Pro-Life
Nation Unless It Legalizes Abortions." LifeNews.com,
May 18, 2020
Cummings McLean. "Global Abortion Business Wants Kenyan
Court to Ban Pro-Lifer from Mentioning Its Name."
LifeSite Daily News, March 17, 2021.
Bilger. "Feminists Block Program to Send Food to Starving
People Because Abortion Isn't Included." LifeNews.com,
July 13, 2020.
Gennarini, J.D. "US Ambassador Threatens to Pull Foreign Aid
Unless Zambia Embraces Sodomy." LifeSite Daily News,
December 13, 2019.
Baklinski. "UNAIDS Threatened to End Aid if We Fought
Abortion and Gay Language in Document: Former St. Lucia
Delegate." LifeSite Daily News, May 21, 2015.
Stump. "Dr. Guttmacher - Still Optimistic about the
Population Problem." Baltimore Magazine, February
1970 [Volume 63, Number. 2], pages 25 and 50 to 53.
Guttmacher speaking to a symposium at the University of
California Medical Center. "Doctor Blames His Profession for
Delays on Family Planning." The New York Times,
January 16, 1966.
gynecologist Josas Koninoor, M.D., quoted in "Norplant, The
Five-Year Needle." Issues in Reproductive Engineering,
Volume 3, Number 3, pages 221 to 228.