by John W. Whitehead
October 22,
2019
from
RutherfordInstitute Website
Spanish version
The Pathocracy of the Deep State
- Tyranny at the Hands of a
Psychopathic Government
"Politicians
are more likely than people in the general population to be
sociopaths.
I think you would find no expert in the field of sociopathy/psychopathy/antisocial personality disorder who would
dispute this...
That a small
minority of human beings literally have no conscience was and is
a bitter pill for our society to swallow - but it does explain a
great many things, shamelessly deceitful political behavior
being one."
Dr.
Martha Stout
Clinical psychologist and former instructor
Harvard Medical
School
Source
Twenty years ago, a
newspaper headline asked
the question:
"What's
the difference between a politician and a psychopath?"
The answer, then
and now, remains the same:
None...
There is
no difference between psychopaths and politicians...
Nor is there much
of a difference between the havoc wreaked on innocent lives by,
uncaring, unfeeling, selfish, irresponsible, parasitic criminals and
elected officials who lie to their constituents, trade political
favors for campaign contributions, turn a blind eye to the wishes of
the electorate, cheat taxpayers out of hard-earned dollars, favor
the corporate elite, entrench the military industrial complex, and
spare little thought for the impact their thoughtless actions and
hastily passed legislation might have on defenseless citizens...
Psychopaths and
politicians both have a tendency
to be,
Charismatic
politicians, like criminal psychopaths,
It doesn't matter
whether you're talking about Democrats or Republicans (or
others, worldwide)...
Political
psychopaths are all largely cut from the same pathological cloth,
brimming with
seemingly easy charm and boasting calculating minds.
Such
leaders eventually create
pathocracies:
totalitarian societies bent
on power, control, and destruction of both freedom in general and
those who exercise their freedoms.
Once psychopaths
gain power, the result is usually some form of totalitarian
government or a pathocracy.
"At that point, the
government operates against the interests of its own people
except for favoring certain groups," author James G. Long
notes.
"We
are currently witnessing deliberate polarizations of American
citizens, illegal actions, and massive and needless acquisition of
debt.
This is
typical of psychopathic systems, and very similar things
happened in the Soviet Union as it overextended and collapsed."
In other words,
electing a psychopath to public office is tantamount to national
hara-kiri, the ritualized act of self-annihilation, self-destruction
and suicide.
It signals the demise of democratic government and lays
the groundwork for a totalitarian regime that is legalistic,
militaristic, inflexible, intolerant and inhuman.
Incredibly, despite
clear evidence of the damage that has already been inflicted on our
nation and its citizens by a psychopathic government, voters
continue to elect psychopaths to positions of power and influence.
According to
investigative journalist Zack Beauchamp,
"In 2012, a group of
psychologists evaluated every President from Washington to Bush II using,
'psychopathy
trait estimates derived from personality data completed by
historical experts on each president.'
They found that presidents
tended to have the psychopath's characteristic fearlessness and low
anxiety levels - traits that appear to help Presidents, but also might
cause them to make reckless decisions that hurt other people's
lives."
The willingness to
prioritize power above all else, including the welfare of their
fellow human beings, ruthlessness, callousness and an
utter lack of conscience are among the defining traits of the
sociopath.
When our own
government no longer sees us as human beings with dignity and worth
but as things to be,
manipulated, maneuvered, mined for data,
manhandled by police, conned into believing it has our best
interests at heart, mistreated, jailed if we dare step out of line,
and then punished unjustly without remorse,
...all the while refusing to
own up to its failings, then we are no longer operating under a
constitutional republic.
Instead, what we
are experiencing is a pathocracy:
tyranny at the hands of a
psychopathic government, which "operates
against the interests of its own people except for favoring certain
groups."
Source
Worse,
psychopathology is not confined to those in high positions of
government:
It can
spread like a virus among the populace...
As an academic study
into pathocracy
concluded,
"[T]yranny does not flourish because perpetuators are
helpless and ignorant of their actions. It flourishes because they
actively identify with those who promote vicious acts as virtuous."
People don't simply
line up and salute. It is through one's own personal identification
with a given leader, party or social order that they become agents
of good or evil.
Much depends on how
leaders,
"cultivate
a sense of identification with their followers,"
says Professor Alex Haslam.
"I mean one pretty obvious thing is that leaders talk
about 'we' rather than 'I,' and actually what leadership is about is
cultivating this sense of shared identity about 'we-ness' and then
getting people to want to act in terms of that 'we-ness,' to promote
our collective interests...
[We] is the single word that has
increased in the inaugural addresses over the last century... and
the other one is 'America' (aka United States)."
The goal of the
modern corporate state is obvious:
to promote, cultivate, and embed
a sense of shared identification among its citizens.
To this end,
"we the people" have become "we the police state"...
We are fast
becoming slaves in thrall to a faceless, nameless, bureaucratic
totalitarian government machine that relentlessly erodes our
freedoms through countless laws, statutes, and prohibitions.
Any resistance to
such regimes depends on the strength of opinions in the minds of
those who choose to fight back.
What this means is that we the
citizenry must be very careful that we are not manipulated into
marching in lockstep with an oppressive regime.
Writing for
ThinkProgress, Beauchamp
suggests that,
"one
of the best cures to bad leaders may very well be political
democracy."
But what does this
really mean in practical terms?
It means holding
politicians accountable for their actions and the actions of their
staff using every available means at our disposal:
-
through
investigative journalism (what used to be referred to as the
Fourth
Estate) that enlightens and informs
-
through whistleblower
complaints that expose corruption
-
through lawsuits that challenge
misconduct
-
through protests and mass political action that
remind
the powers-that-be that "we the people" are the ones that
call the shots...
Remember, education
precedes action.
Source
Citizens,
Need
to do the hard work of educating
themselves about what the government is doing and how to hold it
accountable.
Don't allow yourselves to exist exclusively in an echo
chamber that is restricted to views with which you agree.
Expose
yourself to multiple media sources, independent and mainstream, and
think for yourself.
For that matter, no
matter what your political leanings might be, don't allow your
partisan bias to trump the principles that serve as the basis for
our constitutional republic.
As Beauchamp notes,
"A system that
actually holds people accountable to the broader conscience of
society may be one of the best ways to keep conscienceless people in
check."
That said, if we
allow the ballot box to become our only means of pushing back
against the police state, the battle is already lost.
Resistance will
require a citizenry willing to be active at the local level.
Yet as I point out
in
Battlefield America - The War on the American People,
if
you wait to act until the SWAT team is crashing through your
door, until your name is placed on a terror watch list,
until you are reported for such outlawed activities as
collecting rainwater or letting your children play outside
unsupervised,
...then it will be too late.
This much I know:
We are not faceless numbers.
We are not cogs in the machine.
We are
not slaves...
We are human
beings, and for the moment, we have the opportunity to remain
free - that is, if we tirelessly advocate for our rights and resist at
every turn attempts by the government to place us in chains.
The Founders
understood that our freedoms do not flow from the government. They
were not given to us only to be taken away by the will of the State.
They are inherently ours.
In the same way, the government's
appointed purpose is not to threaten or undermine our freedoms, but
to safeguard them.
Until we can get
back to this way of thinking, until we can remind our fellow
Americans (and the rest of the world also...) what it really means to be free, and until we can
stand firm in the face of threats to our freedoms, we will continue
to be treated like slaves in thrall to a bureaucratic police state
run by political psychopaths.
|