by Alastair Crooke
March 02, 2025
from ZeroHedge Website








The bits are falling

into a distinct pattern

- a pre-prepared pattern...

Defence Secretary Hegseth at the Munich Security Conference gave us four 'noes':

• No to Ukraine in NATO

• No to a return to pre-2014 borders

• No to 'Article 5' peacekeeper backstops

• 'No' to U.S. troops in Ukraine...

And in a final flourish, he added that,

U.S. troops in Europe are not 'forever' - and even placed a question mark over the continuity of NATO...

Pretty plain speaking!

The U.S. clearly is cutting away from Ukraine.

 

And they intend to normalize relations with Russia.

Then, Vice-President Vance threw his fire cracker amongst the gathered Euro-élites.

He said that the élites had retreated from "shared" democratic values; they were overly reliant on repressing and censoring their peoples (prone to locking them up), and, above all,

he excoriated the European Cordon Sanitaire ('firewall') by which European parties outside the Centre-Left are deemed non-grata politically:

It's a fake 'threat', he suggested.

 

Of what are you really so frightened?

 

Have you so little confidence in your 'democracy'?

The U.S., he implied, will no longer support Europe if it continues to suppress political constituencies, arrest citizens for speech offenses, and particularly cancel elections as was done recently in Romania.

"If you're running in fear of your own voters", Vance said, "there is nothing America can do for you".

Ouch...! Vance had hit them where it hurts.

It is difficult to say what specifically most triggered the catatonic European breakdown:

Was it the fear of the U.S. and Russia joining together as a major power nexus, thus stripping Europe from ever again being able glide along on the back of American power, through the specious notion that any European state must have exceptional access to the Washington 'ear'?

Or was it the ending of the Ukraine/Zelensky cult which was so prized amongst the Euro-élite as the 'glue' around which a faux European unity and identity could be enforced?

Both probably contributed to the fury.

That the U.S. would in essence leave Europe to their own delusions would be a calamitous event for the Brussels technocracy.

Many may lazily assume that the U.S. double act at Munich was just another example of the well-known Trumpian fondness for dropping 'wacky' initiatives intended to both shock and kickover frozen paradigms.

The Munich speeches did exactly that all right! Yet that does not make them accidental; but rather parts that fit into a bigger picture.

It is clear now that the Trump blitzkrieg across the American Administrative State could not have been mounted unless carefully pre-planned and prepared over the last four years.

Trump's flurry of Presidential Executive Orders at the outset of his Presidency were not whimsical.

Leading U.S. constitutional lawyer, Johnathan Turley, and other lawyers say that,

the Orders were well drafted legally and with the clear understanding that legal challenges would ensue...

What's more,

that Trump Team welcome those challenges...

What is going on?

The newly confirmed head of the Office of Budget Management (OBM), Russ Vought, says his Office will become the "on/off switch" for all Executive expenditure under the new Executive Orders.

Vought calls the resulting whirlpool, the application of Constitutional radicalism. And Trump has now issued the Executive Order that reinstates the primacy of the Executive as the controlling mechanism of government.

Vaught, who was in OBM in Trump 01, is carefully selecting the ground for all-out financial war on the Deep State.

It will be fought out firstly at the Supreme Court - which the Trump Team expect confidently to win (Trump has the 6-3 conservative majority).

The new régime will then be applied across all agencies and departments of state.

 

Expect shrieks of pain...

The point here is that the Administrative State - aloof from executive control - has taken to itself prerogatives such as immunity to dismissal and the self-awarded authority to shape policy - creating a dual state system, run by unelected technocrats, which, when implanted in departments such as Justice and the Pentagon, have evolved into the American Deep State.

Article Two of the Constitution however, says very bluntly:

Executive power shall be vested in the U.S. President (with no ifs or buts at all.)

Trump intends for his Administration to recover that lost Executive power. It was, in fact, lost long ago...

Trump is re-claiming too,

the Executive's right to dismiss 'servants of the State', and to 'switch off' wasteful expenditure at his discretion, as part of a unitary executive prerequisite.

Of course, the Administrative State is fighting back.

Turley's article is headlined:

They are Taking Away Everything We Have - Democrats and Unions Launch Existential Fight.

Their aim has been to cripple the Trump initiative through using politicized judges to issue restraint orders.

Many mainstream lawyers believe Trump's Unitary Executive claim to be illegal.

The question is whether Congress can stand up Agencies designed to act independently of the President; and how does that square with the separation of powers and Article Two that vests unqualified executive power with one sole elected official - the U.S. President.

How did the Democrats not see this coming?

Lawyer Robert Barnes essentially says that the 'blitzkrieg' was "exceptionally well-planned" and had been discussed in Trump circles since late 2020.

The latter team had emerged from within a generational and cultural shift in the U.S..

This latter had given rise to a Libertarian/Populist wing with working class roots who often had served in the military, yet had come to despise the Neo-con lies (especially those of 9/11) that brought endless wars.

They were animated more by the old John Adams adage that,

'America should not go abroad in search of monsters to slay'.

In short, they were not part of the WASP 'Anglo' world; they came from a different Culture that harked back to the theme of America as Republic, not as Empire...!

This is what you see with Vance and Hegseth:

a reversion to the Republican precept that the U.S. should not become involved in European wars.

Ukraine is not America's war.

The Deep State, it seems, were not paying attention to what a posse of 'populist' outliers, tucked away from the rarefied Beltway talking shop, were up to:

They (the outliers) were planning a concerted attack on the Federal expenditure spigot - identified as the weak spot about which a Constitutional challenge could be mounted that would derail - in its entirety - the expenditures of the Deep State.

It seems that one aspect to the surprise has been the Trump Team's discipline:

'no leaks'...

And secondly,

that those involved in the planning are not drawn from the preeminent Anglo-sphere, but rather from a strand of society that was offended by the Iraq war and which blames the 'Anglo-sphere' for 'ruining' America.

So Vance's speech at Munich was not disruptive - merely for the sake of being disruptive:

he was, in fact, encouraging the audience to recall early Republican Values...

This was what is meant by his complaint that Europe had turned away from "our shared values" - i.e. the values that animated Americans seeking escape from the tyranny, prejudices and corruption of the Old World.

Vance was (quite politely) chiding the Euro-élites for backsliding to old European vices.

Vance implicitly was hinting too, that European conservative libertarians should emulate Trump and act to slough-off their 'Administrative States', and recover control over executive power.

Tear down the firewalls, he advised...

Why...?

Because he likely views the 'Brussels' Technocratic State as nothing other than a pure offshoot to the American Deep State - and therefore very likely to try to torpedo and sink Trump's initiative to normalize relations with Moscow.

If these were Vance's instincts, he was right...

Macron almost immediately summoned an 'emergency meeting' of 'the war party' in Paris to consider how to frustrate the American initiative.

 

It failed however, descending reportedly into quarrelling and acrimony.

It transpired that Europe,

could not gather a 'sharp-end' military force greater than 20,000-30,000 men.

 

Scholtz objected in principle to their involvement.

 

Poland demurred as a close neighbor of Ukraine.

 

And Italy stayed silent...

 

Starmer, however, after Munich, immediately rang Zelensky to say that Britain saw Ukraine to be on an irrevocable path to NATO membership - thus directly contradicting U.S. policy and with no support from other states.

Trump will not forget this, nor will he forget Britain's former role in supporting the Russiagate slur during his first term in office.

The meeting did however, underline Europe's divisions and impotence.

Europe has been sidelined and their self-esteem is badly bruised.

 

The U.S. would in essence leave Europe to their own delusions, which would be calamitous for the Brussels autocracy.

Yet, far more consequential than most of the happenings of the past few days was when Trump, speaking with Fox News, after attending Daytona,

dismissed Zelensky's canard of Russia wanting to invade NATO countries.

"I don't agree with that; not even a little bit", Trump retorted.

Trump does not buy into the primary lie intended as the glue which holds this entire EU geo-political structure together.

For, without the 'Russia threat', without the U.S. believing in the globalist linchpin lie,

there can be no pretence of Europe needing to prepare for war with Russia...

Europe ultimately will have to come to 'reconcile its future as a periphery in Eurasia'...