by Amaterasu Solar
April 05, 2023
from
AmaterasuSolar Website
A look at the pitfalls of money
use,
and societies that had none,
and why...
So Many believe that societies all have used some
form of money - whether trade/barter, shells, beads, sticks notched
and split, metals, paper, or electronic bits.
But in fact, where societies arose in abundance -
where everything They needed was there for the taking - no money
arose.
Why?
Because money, at the foundation, is used as
proof of energy input into a community/system in times when all
hands were needed to get necessary things done so as to survive,
in times of scarcity, and no "skaters" were welcome.
If You wanted something, You needed something to
offer in return - goods or services...
"I raised these pigs and would love some of
Your butter. Can We arrange a swap?"
Not,
"I raised these pigs and I'm very proud of My
work. I would be honored if You had one."
But in the places of abundance - virtually all
being "island paradises" - no need to prove One's energy input
existed.
You did not prove that You added energy.
You proved that You cared for Others.
In big ways and small...
So, rather than People seeking ways to plug Their
energy in, being chained and controllable (e.g., "No jab, no
job..."), They did things for the social currencies They received.
The thanks, love, appreciation, admiration,
reputation, respect, lauds, fame, adoration, bragging rights,
and other such positive social currencies.
Their caring was nurtured and was valued, unlike
the effects of money on a society, where One's value was measured
merely in what One had to sell.
They learned to express Their Humanity...
They learned not to do things that would earn
Them negative social currencies - disgust, ridicule, avoidance,
bad reputation, and so on.
Rather than psychopaths, who will be promoted to
power, to the top, to controlling positions (as We have today) in
all money systems,
They had the caring Ones taking care of
things.
They had no poverty.
They enjoyed being creative, cooperating with
One anOther, and were overall very happy People.
Sadly, in the early 1900's, the "western world"
swooped in, usurped the land, and forced the accounting for energy
(money) onto Them.
The societies fell apart...
Today, though We have an abundance available (or did before the
psychopaths began Their ghastly "great"
reset), We still account for Our energy added - and it is
slaves who must account for Their energy in abundance - because
the psychopaths in control (by
virtue of money) maintain the energy accounting so as to retain
control.
80% of "jobs" do nothing, overall, but move wealth upwards to
the psychopaths in control, and would not be jobs We would
see if (when?) the SHTF (for Ones not familiar, that's an acronym
for "shit hits the fan," meaning the world as We know it falls apart
catastrophically).
Which is to say, survival does not depend on
these "jobs."
And most of these "jobs" are ones that Few love to do.
They are not what One thinks of when One
ponders what One might want to be when One grows up.
Cashiers, sales, tax collecting, accounting,
advertising, marketing, casinos, bill collections, insurance,
Wall Street, and banking are the greatest number of these jobs.
Yes,
the psychopaths in control maintain
a plantation of slaves moving wealth to Them.
And They hide the tech that would make
accounting for Our energy added pointless...
Free energy technologies do
exist, and I personally know of one, tucked into black
projects in 1959.
The psychopaths in control have poo-pooed the
idea in public - but of course They will.
They don't want You to know You can be free
of the chains They bind You with, the chains called "money"...!
100% of the cost of everything is energy - the
resources sit here freely, but it takes energy to put them into
useful configuration.
Add free energy tech and, as the cost of energy
is removed, things will become cheaper and cheaper until one day
everything is free, with the People who love to do the needed work -
food production, infrastructure, education, and such - will do the
work, and if We do not have enough of Us who love to do a needed
job, We will solve the problem by adding robots.
And there surely are plenty of People who would love to gain
reputation by creating a robot that solves a problem!
Without money We can co-create a free and happy society, a society
of Ethical sovereigns, with the caring Ones taking care of things,
where problems are solved Ethically rather than giving
Some "authority" over Others, passing legalates and then enFORCING
them on Others who do not have "authority."
Where We all may live richly, as We should,
on Our planet.
Where We can be creative, cooperative, upholding the Betterment
Ethic - the goal of making things better for Those around You in
ways, big and small.
From a smile to cheer anOther up, to inventing a
solution to a major problem.
We will be happy, free, comfortable, able to
fulfill Our potential, follow Our bliss, make Our dreams come true -
without worrying about how to afford it.
An island paradise on Our planet - a planet paradise!
So to answer the question,
Money, do We need it?
I can say most assuredly, No...!
Signature
My father taught Me never to believe anything.
He told Me to place probabilities and adjust
them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that
explain what I see?," when evaluating data; He was an aerospace
engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid
on YouToilet).
From a very early age I was concerned that
the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and
social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few
decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the
headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately
familiar with the flow of money, and economics.
I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I
learned much that explained what I saw, but the only
explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and
barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not
answer the WHY.
Then, I came upon the explanation that these
were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to
ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment,
in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy
input into things. And that We needed to do this because the
Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be
produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned"
by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too.
And studied it deeply, being fascinated by
psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had
discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable
of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others - primary
psychopaths...
Seeing that the wealth was so
disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred,
what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to
retain that psychopathic gene.
Given that the wealth could feed, clothe,
house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times
over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give
probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that
explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the
way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked...
If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth
to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money
= power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek),
would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the
masses and thereby manipulate Them?
I think You can figure out what answer I came
up with.
And would that explain what I see?
Absolutely...
Now, given that money is merely the
accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would
follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for
Our energy.
If I was a psychopath, with enough money to
buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc.,
would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both
gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic
field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black
projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I
see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard,"
but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst.
And given this analysis, knowing that
conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just
stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound.
That explains perfectly what I see.
|