Dear friends, this is an in more than one way
hopeful message.
It consists of three parts. There's another statement, which I
gave in court a few days ago, and of which we have an English
translation that's available for those of you who are
interested.
Together with the already now infamous secret
dossier written by the intelligence services and its English
translation, it provides both the official evidence and further
supporting facts that now prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
the criminal proceeding against me is nothing but a, I quote
from the dossier, "construct" to shut me up and put me behind
bars without any legal substance whatsoever.
So here's the deal.
Part one
As I already told you a few times, I have always been very, very
happy to receive your letters and postcards as they kept me
going and my head above water in this very frustrating
situation.
But what is happening now goes far beyond
this lifeboat effect.
I am absolutely convinced that the incredible
yet palpable enormous push of positive energy that is all of a
sudden reaching me is coming to me through your letters and
postcards but also through the vigils outside the prison and the
many of you who are supporting me by coming to the courtroom for
the hearings, plus your many other actions in my support.
Up until a few years ago, though, I, as a
rational attorney, would have probably thought that maybe I'm
just imagining things.
But I don't think that this is possible anymore. Never in my entire life have I been under
such enormous pressure.
Six months of preliminary detention in a
maximum security prison whose claim to fame, according to other
more experienced inmates, is that here they do everything to
break you, make you feel utterly powerless and helpless.
As an intended consequence of this detention, my capacity to
defend myself is reduced to maybe five percent. I have no access
to my files, no access to my computer, and I cannot talk to the
witnesses whom we want to hear.
However, as you already know, some crack
under pressure, but we don't.
And I say "we" for a reason. Despite this
predicament, I am always fully awake and focused when they take
me to the courtroom.
And believe it or not, it feels as though I
am protected and clad in an impenetrable armor of energy and as
though I carry an indestructible and invincible sword of energy.
There's no doubt in my mind that it is your positive energy that
does this. And I don't think it's fake. No money in the world
could buy me this, just like no money in the world can buy me
the love of my wife, of whom I'm immensely proud.
Enough of these strange emotional, spiritual
ramblings of an otherwise rational attorney.
But I hope that through my sharing these feelings with you, I am
giving you reason for hope and optimism too. In fact, I'm sure I
do because I know who I'm talking to.
Part two
Last week, I told you that the excellent German journalist
Paul Schreyer won a huge victory in court under the German
version of the Freedom of Information Act.
His court victory forced the German
equivalent of the CDC to make secret documents available, which
proved that the so-called pandemic was in reality
a
plandemic.
In light of the fact that the same thing
happened simultaneously all over the world, it is very likely -
I mean it was a lockstep thing - that this victory will have
massive implications and ramifications worldwide.
What's even more important is this, however. This very, very
important piece of news, this victory did not get stuck in the
alternative media alone.
Rather, it was impossible for the mainstream
media to ignore it because now many people, many of them
personally affected by the so-called measures, want to know the
truth about Corona.
And there will be more that they want to
know. And now there will be an official investigation here in
Germany. Well, that is exactly what I did for three years.
First with the
Corona Committee and then with
ICIC.
Part three
This development is especially helpful for my defense in this
staged criminal proceeding against me.
And that's because now, all of a sudden and
out of the blue, a secret dossier written up by the German
intelligence services, headed by the German version of the FBI,
whose current leader, ironically, was trained by my father,
landed in our laps.
This dossier explains everything and shows that the criminal
case against me is a staged construct.
In fact, a very famous and, of course, highly
esteemed German law professor, who for the time being wants to
remain anonymous, looked at the facts of my case and the charges
and provided us with a short legal analysis.
He comes to the conclusion that it is, of
course, no violation of a fiduciary duty if we took out the
loans in order to temporarily protect part of that money from
imminent attachment by the authorities. The very same
authorities, by the way, who were responsible for the dossier.
As long as we were both willing and capable of repaying the
loan, no problem, he says. And all the textbooks and all the
case books say the very same thing.
As an aside, and I don't want to blow my own
horn here, I might add that without my work, there probably
would not have been any donations.
An additional, very crucial piece of
information, I think I gave it to you before, makes the whole
dossier and everyone involved in its execution look even more
like a criminal conspiracy.
Indeed, it makes the whole thing look like food for a recall
case, the famous racketeer influenced corrupt organizations act
designed to go after mafia crimes.
And here's the thing.
Less than two years ago, all the facts that
are now relevant, including the loans, were brought to the
attention of the senior DA, an experienced senior DA, District
Attorney in Goettingen.
She looked at the evidence and decided that
there's no basis for a criminal investigation, let alone for an
indictment, and ordered the none case to be closed.
So how can it be that less than two years later, based on a
criminal complaint, which real lawyers regard as obviously
querulous and preposterous, another prosecutor, this time a very
young, inexperienced assistant DA, had me kidnapped in Mexico so
that I could be arrested at the Frankfurt Airport.
How can it be that this assistant DA never
even tried to check the obviously insane charges in that
criminal complaint?
For example, that I threatened the authors of the complaint with
a Winchester rifle.
How can it be that that assistant DA
refused to hear my side of the story while constantly
communicating with my accusers?
And why did he keep these many
conversations with my accusers' secrets, a grave violation
of his prosecutorial duty to include all the evidence,
including such phone conversations, in the files, and make
all of this available to the defense?
Does this man have any idea that what a
fair trial means?
Well, the dossier gives us all the answers.
Actually in a very positive way, it starts
explaining about how I had made a name for myself as an
international attorney who fought both in court, through public
interviews and speeches, and through many publications for
democracy, the rule of law and free speech, and the protection
of these values against attacks or overreach by private
corporations and organizations.
And it emphasizes that my international
connections and friends made it possible for me to connect with
an international community.
Despite of all this, they conclude that I present a danger to
democracy because some people didn't like what I was doing.
There's no explanation as to who these some
people are, and on what basis they think that I present a danger
for democracy.
So in order to stop me, and in particular to
make it impossible for me to run for public office, the dossier
advises that my immediate circle of people, those who I work
with, should be infiltrated by an informant.
We know that this is a former politician who befriended the
three Berlin attorneys, two of whom I had made the mistake of
allowing them to work with us in the Corona Committee.
The idea behind this infiltration was to
collect as much info about me as possible, and to then hire
another agent, a prosecutor, to start a criminal proceeding
against me.
The undercover informer who befriended the three attorneys
manipulated them with false information about me into writing
the above-mentioned, obviously idiotic, and as we know now,
totally false complaint.
But the fact that the legal quality of the complaint was beyond
the pale didn't matter, as according to the dossier, another
undercover agent, this time the assistant DA, would spring into
action and make sure that none of the real experienced DAs in
Goettingen would once again quash the case like the experienced
senior DA had done based on the very same facts less than two
years ago.
For this purpose, he was transferred from
Hanover to Goettingen, intercepted the idiotic criminal
complaint, and took charge of the matter.
He proceeded with an illegal and unconstitutional secret
investigation, which was actually limited to taking everything
in the complaint as factually true without even trying to check
either the allegations or the credibility of the three attorneys
who filed it.
After more than a year of this so-called
investigation, he made sure that none of his continuous
telephone conversations with my accusers would show up in the
file and have me kidnapped in Mexico.
He then proceeded to write an indictment that
matches the ineptitude of the three Berlin buffoons.
Had he conducted an actual investigation, informed me about the
charges, and given me an opportunity to respond, his case would
have collapsed then and there like a house of cards. Even if he
had at least questioned the now totally destroyed credibility of
my accusers, he would have immediately known that there was no
case, only false accusations.
Why do I say this?
Because on April 2nd and 3rd, when the court,
my attorneys, and I did what the assistant DA, who by the way
never asked a single question, had failed to do, that is when we
interrogated one of the three attorneys who filed the complaint,
she admitted that the two central pillars of this totally false
indictment on which it rests do not exist.
The first pillar is, in contrast to the indictment's false
central assumption, I, as the director of the corporation that
ran the Corona Committee, had the power to act completely
independent of the others and did not need their approval for
anything.
This is of course of special importance in
cases of emergency situations which we were facing back then.
And it is especially important when two of the four directors do
not participate in anything, and as the files show now, and my
former co-host has actually confirmed, do not respond to
anything.
Asked why they had falsely informed the assistant DA, the
witness shrugged and said,
"Oh well, looks like we made a mistake."
The second pillar on which the indictment
rests was its false assumption that I never intended to repay
the loan, even though it was transparently listed in the
corporation's books and even though I had been the international
face of the Corona Committee and relied on the Corona
Committee's financial security to continue with its work, and
then use the evidence it produced in international legal
proceedings.
Even the courts now admit that this is not
the case. That means that I was both willing and able to repay
the loan.
Asked if the accusers had any evidence for
this false allegation, she admitted that she had none except for
my former co-host's equally false assumptions that were based on
nothing but thin air.
In light of the dossier, we now believe she too was just another
one of the dossier's puppets. Now that the two cornerstones of
the indictment have come crashing down, it's clear that the
famous law professor's legal analysis is correct, of course.
Under the circumstances, the loan was not a
violation of a fiduciary duty to protect the donations - au
contraire, as my French friends would say, on the contrary.
Through this dossier, it has also become
clear why the assistant DA acted so utterly incompetent and
brazenly illegal, and why, despite the fact that there's clear
and convincing evidence that the three buffoons stole my money,
my client's money, he did nothing, didn't even attach the bank
account where the money is in order to secure whatever's left of
it, if there is anything left.
The female attorney whom we interrogated over the last couple of
days has literally admitted that the three attorneys have
threatened the buyer of my house and forced him to divert much
more than one million Euros of my purchase price into their
account.
After all this, it is next to impossible to escape the
conclusion that the deal between the three buffoons and the
assistant DA is that they helped him kidnap me and put me behind
bars, and in return, he would allow them to keep the stolen
money and help them get all the other assets of the Corona
committee, namely the gold.
And it is equally hard to escape the conclusion that the
assistant DA, whose ineptitude would have kept him from having a
real career in real life, was promised exactly that, a real
career based on the heroic ingenuity that led to my
incarceration.
There are many more instances of outright displays of insanity
by the actors in this evolving crime and spy show, but I'll save
this for another day.
One thing is certain, though:
The evil side that is the
not-so-very-intelligent intelligence services that set me up
with the help of their undercover buffoons never expected
that my work in the Corona Committee and then in ICIC would
be vindicated by the above-mentioned recent developments.
There will be an official investigation of
the
plandemic...
I'll close by hearkening back to the Winchester allegations.
Some of you may remember the TV show "The Rifleman" with Chuck
Connors.
Well, when I was a child and my father showed
me the police academy's rifle range, this was my favorite show.
Watch the opening credits on YouTube and you'll see Chuck
Connors fire his rifle to bring justice.
Well, that's how I saw my father as a little
boy. Now, of course, I'm a grown man and I'm an attorney, and
that's how I'll make sure that justice will be done, as an
attorney.
But I still love that show, and my father, of
course.
See you later.
