|

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
November 16, 2024
from
PeterMcCulloughMD Website
|
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Epidemiologist and
Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation,
www.mcculloughfnd.org |

Criminal referrals,
allegations of false testimony,
and recent court victories
signal a turning tide
in the pursuit of justice...
A few days ago,
Elon Musk
commented on
an X post featuring himself (stating, "My pronouns
are still prosecute/Fauci") alongside the newly nominated U.S.
Attorney General,
Matt Gaetz.
Musk declared,
"The Hammer of Justice is coming"...
A few months ago, we
received confirmation by Lawrence Tabak, the Principal
Deputy Director of the National Institutes of Health, that,
Anthony Fauci committed a federal
crime by providing false testimony to Congress under oath.
On May 11th, 2021, Fauci stated under oath that,
"the NIH has
not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the
Wuhan Institute of Virology"...
Three years later, Tabak contradicted Fauci's
fraudulent statement under oath, stating,
"It
depends on your definition of gain-of-function research... If
you're speaking about the generic term, yes we did"...

|
For video click
HERE |
For video click
HERE |
Under
18 U.S.C. § 1001, it is a federal crime to knowingly
and willfully make false statements to Congress.
The penalties for
such an offense can include up to
five years in prison.
In June of this year,
criminal referral requests against
Anthony Fauci and other public health officials were submitted to
District Attorneys in Louisiana.
These requests sought investigations and charges
on behalf of the next-of-kin relatives of nine victims in Louisiana,
who have requested assistance in investigating the deaths of their
loved ones due to,
-
alleged COVID-19 hospital protocols
-
intentional
mismanagement of COVID-19 infections
-
the suppression or denial
of life-saving treatments,
...in Louisiana hospitals, nursing homes, and
other facilities:
The criminal referrals accuse Dr. Fauci,
current and former federal officers, and hospital systems
providing care within Louisiana of committing crimes per
Louisiana criminal code, including:
-
Terrorism, by Causing Intentional
Killing or Infliction of Serious Bodily Injury, La. R.S.
14:128.1(A)
-
First Degree Murder, La. R.S. 14:30
-
Second Degree Murder, La. R.S. 14:30.1
-
Manslaughter, La. R.S. 14:31(A)(3)
-
Human Trafficking, La. R.S. 14:46.2 2
-
Prohibited Racketeering Acts, La. R.S.
15:1353
-
Cruelty to Persons with Infirmities, La.
R.S. 14:93.3
-
False Imprisonment, La. R.S. 14:46
-
Second Degree Kidnapping, La. R.S.
14:44.1
-
Battery, La. R.S. 14:33
-
Simple Battery of Persons with
Infirmities, La. R.S. 14:35.2

This indicates that the
Trump Administration will
likely have no issue identifying federal crimes committed during the
COVID-19 'pandemic'.
As we await Musk's "Hammer of Justice", some
courts have already taken positive action.
Last week, a Michigan jury
awarded $12 Million to a Blue Cross Blue Shield employee
fired after refusing the COVID-19 'vaccine':
Much of the award - $10 million - is for
punitive damages against
Blue Cross Blue Shield of
Michigan, according to the verdict form.
Lisa Domski, who worked at Blue Cross
for more than 30 years, said she was a victim of religious
discrimination.
The company in 2021 did not grant an
exemption from its vaccine policy, despite her insistence that
it clashed with her Catholic beliefs.

Another employee from Blue Cross Blue Shield
that was fired for refusing to take a COVID-19 mRNA injection was
awarded almost $700k by a federal jury.
This was followed by a court ordering San
Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) to
pay $7.8 Million to 6 Workers fired for refusing COVID-19 mRNA
injections:

The jury awarded over $1 million to each of six
former BART employees who were fired for seeking religious
exemptions from the COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
The court rejected BART's claim of undue
hardship, ruling the firings violated their religious rights.
This
landmark decision came after nearly three years of struggle.
With a
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.-led,
restructuring of public health agencies and a revamped Department of
Justice, the scales of justice are expected to tip in favor of
medical freedom and democracy as public and expert opinion continues
to shift.

|