This is
radical.
The essay is
based on my May 17, 2023
testimony for the National Citizens
Inquiry (NCI) in Ottawa, Canada, my
894-page book of exhibits in
support of that testimony, and our continued research.
I am an
accomplished interdisciplinary scientist and physicist, and a
former tenured Full Professor of physics and lead scientist,
originally at the University of Ottawa.
I have written
over 30 scientific reports relevant
to COVID, starting April 18,
2020 for the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (ocla.ca/covid),
and recently for a new non-profit corporation (correlation‑canada.org/research).
Presently, all
my work and interviews about COVID are documented on my website
created to circumvent the barrage of censorship (denisrancourt.ca).
In addition to
critical reviews of published science, the main data that my
collaborators and I analyse is all‑cause mortality.
All-cause
mortality by time (day, week, month, year, period), by
jurisdiction (country, state, province, county), and by
individual characteristics of the deceased (age, sex, race,
living accommodations) is the most reliable data for detecting
and epidemiologically characterizing events causing death, and
for gauging the population-level impact of any surge or collapse
in deaths from any cause.
Such data is
not susceptible to reporting bias or to any bias in attributing
causes of death.
We have used it to detect and characterize
seasonality, heat waves, earthquakes, economic collapses, wars,
population aging, long-term societal development, and societal
assaults such as those occurring in the COVID period, in many
countries around the world, and over recent history,
1900-present.
Interestingly,
none of the post-second-world-war
Centers-for-Disease-Control-and-Prevention-promoted
(CDC‑promoted) viral respiratory disease 'pandemic's (1957-58,
"H2N2"; 1968, "H3N2"; 2009, "H1N1 again") can be detected in the
all‑cause mortality of any country.
Unlike all the
other causes of death that are known to affect mortality, these
so‑called 'pandemic's did not cause any detectable increase in
mortality, anywhere.
The large 1918
mortality event, which was recruited to be a textbook viral
respiratory disease 'pandemic' ("H1N1"), occurred prior to the
inventions of antibiotics and the electron microscope, under
horrific post-war public-sanitation and economic-stress
conditions.
The 1918 deaths
have been proven by histopathology of preserved lung tissue to
have been caused by bacterial pneumonia.
This is shown
in several independent and non-contested published studies.
My first report
analyzing all-cause mortality was published on June 2, 2020, at
censorship-prone Research Gate, and was entitled "All-cause
mortality during COVID-19 - No plague and a likely signature of
mass homicide by government response".
It showed that
hot spots of sudden surges in all‑cause mortality occurred only
in specific locations in the Northern-hemisphere Western World,
which were synchronous with the March 11, 2020 declaration of a
'pandemic'.
Such
synchronicity is impossible within the presumed framework of a
spreading viral respiratory disease, with or without airplanes,
because the calculated time from seeding to mortality surge is
highly dependent on local societal circumstances, by several
months to years.
I attributed
the excess deaths to aggressive measures and hospital treatment
protocols known to have been applied suddenly at that time in
those localities.
The work was
pursued in greater depth with collaborators for several years
and continues.
We have shown
repeatedly that excess mortality most often refused to cross
national borders and inter-state lines. The invisible virus
targets the poor and disabled and carries a passport.
It also never
kills until governments impose socio-economic and care-structure
transformations on vulnerable groups within the domestic
population.
Here are my
conclusions, from our detailed studies of all-cause mortality in
the COVID period, in combination with socio-economic and
vaccine-rollout data:
-
If
there had been no 'pandemic' propaganda or coercion, and
governments and the medical establishment had simply
gone on with business as usual, then there would not
have been any excess mortality
-
There
was no 'pandemic' causing excess mortality
-
Measures caused excess mortality
-
COVID-19 vaccination caused excess mortality...
Regarding the
vaccines, we quantified many instances in which a rapid rollout
of a dose in the imposed vaccine schedule was synchronous with
an otherwise unexpected peak in all-cause mortality, at times in
the seasonal cycle and of magnitudes that have not previously
been seen in the historic record of mortality.
In this way, we
showed that,
the vaccination campaign in India caused the deaths
of 3.7 million fragile residents...
In Western
countries, we quantified the average all-ages rate of death to
be,
1 death for every 2000 injections, to increase exponentially
with age (doubling every additional 5 years of age), and to be
as large as 1 death for every 100 injections for those 80 years
and older...
We estimated
that the vaccines had killed 13 million worldwide.
If one accepts
my above-numbered conclusions, and the analyses that we have
performed, then there are several implications about how one
perceives reality regarding what actually did and did not occur.
- First,
whereas epidemics of fatal infections are very real in care
homes, in hospitals, and with degenerate living conditions,
the viral respiratory 'pandemic' risk promoted by the USA‑led
"pandemic response" industry is not a thing.
It is most
likely fabricated and maintained for ulterior motives, other
than saving humanity.
- Second,
in addition to natural events (heat waves, earthquakes,
extended large-scale droughts), significant events that
negatively affect mortality are large assaults against
domestic populations, affecting vulnerable residents, such
as:
-
sudden
devastating economic deterioration (the Great
Depression, the dust bowl, the dissolution of the Soviet
Union)
-
war
(including social-class restructuring)
-
imperial or economic occupation and exploitation
(including large-scale exploitative land use)
-
the
well-documented measures and destruction applied during
the COVID period
Otherwise,
in a stable society, mortality is extremely robust and is
not subject to large rapid changes.
There is no
empirical evidence that large changes in mortality can be
induced by sudden appearances of new pathogens.
In the
contemporary era of the dominant human species, humanity is
its worst enemy, not nature.
-
Third,
coercive measures imposed to reduce the risk of transmission
(such as distancing, direction arrows, lockdown, isolation,
quarantine, Plexiglas barriers, face shields and face masks,
elbow bumps, etc.) are palpably unscientific.
The
underlying concern itself regarding "spread" was not ever
warranted and is irrational, since there is no evidence in
reliable mortality data that there ever was a particularly
virulent pathogen.
In fact,
the very notion of "spread" during the COVID period is
rigorously disproved by the temporal and spatial variations
of excess all-cause mortality, everywhere that it is
sufficiently quantified, worldwide.
For
example, the presumed virus that killed 1.3 million poor and
disabled residents of the USA did not cross the
more-than-thousand-kilometer land border with Canada,
despite continuous and intense economic exchanges.
Likewise,
the presumed virus that caused synchronous mortality
hotspots in March-April-May 2020, such as in,
New
York, Madrid region, London, Stockholm, and northern
Italy,
...did
not spread beyond those hotspots.
Interestingly, in this regard, the historical seasonal
variations (12 month period) in all-cause mortality, known
for more than 100 years, are inverted in the northern and
southern global hemispheres, and show no evidence of
"spread" whatsoever.
Instead,
these patterns, in a given hemisphere, show synchronous
increases and decreases of mortality across the entire
hemisphere.
Would the
"spreading" causal agent(s) always take exactly 6 months to
cross into the other hemisphere, where it again causes
mortality changes that are synchronous across the
hemisphere?
Many
epidemiologists have long-ago concluded that
person-to-person "contact" spreading of respiratory diseases
cannot explain and is disproved by the seasonal patterns of
all-cause mortality.
Why the CDC
et al. are not systematically ridiculed in this
regard is beyond this scientist's comprehension.
Instead,
outside of extremely poor living conditions, we should look
to the body of work produced by Professor Sheldon Cohen
and co‑authors (USA) who established that two dominant
factors control whether intentionally challenged college
students become infected and the severity of the respiratory
illness when they are infected:
The
negative impact of experienced psychological stress on the
immune system is a large current and established area of
scientific study, dutifully ignored by vaccine interests,
and we now know that the said impact is dramatically larger
in elderly individuals, where nutrition (gut biome ecology)
is an important co-factor.
Of course,
I do not mean that causal agents do not exist, such as
bacteria, which can cause pneumonia; nor that there are not
dangerous environmental concentrations of such causal agents
in proximity to fragile individuals, such as in hospitals
and on clinicians' hands, notoriously.
-
Fourth,
since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there
was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess
mortality, the debate about gain-of-function research and an
escaped bioweapon is irrelevant.
-
I do
not mean that the Department of Defence (DoD) does not
fund gain-of-function and bioweapon research (abroad, in
particular)
-
I do
not mean that there are not many US patents for
genetically modified microbial organisms having
potential military applications
-
I do
not mean that there have not previously been impactful
escapes or releases of bioweapon vectors and
pathogens...
For
example, the Lyme disease controversy in the USA may be an
example of a bioweapon leak (see Kris Newby's 2019
book "Bitten
- The Secret History of Lyme Disease and
Biological Weapons").
Generally,
for obvious reasons, any pathogen that is extremely virulent
will not also be extremely contagious.
There are
billions of years of cumulative evolutionary pressures
against the existence of any such pathogen, and that result
will be deeply encoded into all lifeforms.
Furthermore, it would be suicidal for any regime to
vehemently seek to create such a pathogen.
Bioweapons
are intended to be delivered to specific target areas,
except in the science fiction wherein immunity from a
bioweapon that is both extremely virulent and extremely
contagious can be reliably delivered to one's own population
and soldiers.
In my view,
if anything COVID is close to being a bioweapon, it
is the military capacity to massively, and repeatedly,
rollout individual injections, which are physical vectors
for whichever substances the regime wishes to selectively
inject into chosen populations, while imposing complete
compliance down to one's own body, under the cover of
protecting public health.
This is the
same regime that practices wars of complete nation
destruction and societal annihilation, under the cover of
spreading democracy and women's rights.
And I do
not mean China...
-
Fifth,
again, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence
that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing
excess mortality, there was no need for any special
treatment protocols, beyond the usual thoughtful,
case-by-case, diagnostics followed by the clinician's chosen
best approach.
Instead,
vicious new protocols killed patients in hotspots that
applied those protocols in the first months of the declared
'pandemic'.
This was
followed in many states by imposed coercive societal
measures, which were contrary to individual health:
fear,
panic, paranoia, induced psychological stress, social
isolation, self-victimization, loss of work and
volunteer activity, loss of social status, loss of
employment, business bankruptcy, loss of usefulness,
loss of caretakers, loss of venues and mobility,
suppression of freedom of expression, etc.
Only the
professional class did better, comfortably working from
home, close to family, while being catered to by an army of
specialized home-delivery services.
Unfortunately, the medical establishment did not limit
itself to assaulting and isolating vulnerable patients in
hospitals and care facilities. It also systematically
withdrew normal care, and attacked physicians who refused to
do so.
In
virtually the entire Western World,
antibiotic
prescriptions
were cut and maintained low by approximately 50% of the pre-COVID
rates...
This would
have had devastating effects in the USA, in particular,
where:
-
the
CDC's own statistics, based on death certificates, has
approximately 50% of the million or so deaths associated
with COVID having bacterial pneumonia as a listed
comorbidity (there was a massive epidemic of bacterial
pneumonia in the USA, which no one talked about)
-
the
Southern poor states historically have much higher
antibiotic prescription rates (this implies high
susceptibility to bacterial pneumonia)
-
excess
mortality during the COVID period is very strongly
correlated (r = +0.86) — in fact proportional
to — state-wise poverty
-
Sixth,
since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there
was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess
mortality, there was no public-health reason to develop and
deploy vaccines; not even if one accepted the tenuous
proposition that any vaccine has ever been effective against
a presumed viral respiratory disease.
Add to this
that
all vaccines are intrinsically dangerous and our
above-described vaccine-dose fatality rate quantifications,
and we must recognize that the vaccines contributed
significantly to excess mortality everywhere that they were
imposed.
