1. THE
PRESSING NEED
a. The time is pressing.
The Club of Rome
was founded in 1968,
The Limits to Growth
was written in 1971,
Global 2000 was written in 1979, but insufficient progress
has been made in population reduction.
b. Given global instabilities, including
those in the former Soviet bloc, the need for firm control
of world technology, weaponry, and natural resources, is now
absolutely mandatory. The immediate reduction of world
population, according to the mid-1970s recommendation of the
Draper Fund, must be immediately affected.
c. The present vast overpopulation, now
far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered
by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception,
sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present
by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must
be done by whatever means necessary...
d. The issue is falsely debated between a
political and a cultural approach to population and
resources, when in fact, faced with stubborn obstruction and
day-to-day political expediency which make most of the
leaders of the most populous poor countries unreliable, the
issue is compulsory cooperation.
e. Compulsory cooperation is not
debatable with 166 nations, most of whose leaders are
irresolute, conditioned by localist "cultures," and lacking
appropriate notions of the New World Order. Debate means
delay and forfeiture of our goals and purpose.
CONFIDENTIAL
f. The UN action
against Iraq proves
conclusively that resolute action on our part can sway other
leaders to go along with the necessary program. The Iraq
action proves that the aura of power can be projected and
sustained and that the wave of history is sweeping forward.
2. PERILS TO BE HEEDED
There is a two-fold opposition which must
be eliminated by quick action.
There are rumblings among
some of the "South" regions, notably Brazil and Malaysia, to
thwart the aims of the UNCED Earth Charter and to thwart the
international gathering in Brazil in June 1992.
There is
also the unfortunate vacillation in our own ranks, an
argument that the UNCED leaders have made the agenda "too
political" and that the way must first be prepared on a less
abrasive cultural basis.
We present only the most recent evidence:
* Gilberto Melio Mourao, the
Brazilian writer, warned in the August 4 Folha de Sao
Paulo that in Munich in 1938,
"it won't against the current
type of ecological epidemic, unleashed against our
country, which threatens the structure of our
cultural, spiritual and political values, and
against our very national sovereignty...
Messrs.
Chamberlain and Daladier, heads of the governments
of England and France, calmly offered the Brazilian
Amazon to the Fuehrer."
Hitler reportedly observed that since
the Amazon was in South America, the United States would
cite the Monroe Doctrine and reject a German occupation
of Brazilian territory.
Chamberlain and Daladier responded
that the proposal had Washington's backing.
* The UN Conference on Trade and
Development (UNCTAD) issued its annual report September
16th, declaring, according to BBC, that the liberal free
market is not an appropriate model for developing
nations.
Finance should serve industry, not
the other way around, and government has a key role to
play in certain sectors of the economy.
3. WHAT THE WORLDWIDE FUND
FOR NATURE IS SAYING
* An official of the
World Wide Fund
for Nature (WWF) said September 10th that the Geneva UNCED results were,
"absolutely a serious setback."
There
will be no convention on forests by June 1992 for
Brazil. The situation has reached a deadlock. This is
the first casualty for the UNCED process.
* A senior advisor on ecological
affairs to Britain's Prince Philip said September 15th
that Eco-92 organizer
Maurice Strong had "over
politicized" the issue of environmentalism and had
raised "ridiculously messianic expectations."
CONFIDENTIAL
THEREFORE THE FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE
IMPLEMENTED:
A. The Security Council of
the UN led
by the Anglo-Saxon Major Nation Powers, will decree that
henceforth, the Security Council will inform all nations
that its sufferance on population has ended, that all
nations have quotas for population reduction on a yearly
basis, which will be enforced by the Security Council by
selective or total embargo of credit, items of trade
including food and medicine, or by military force, when
required.
B. The Security Council of the UN
will inform all nations that outmoded notions of
national sovereignty will be discarded and that the
Security Council has complete legal, military and
economic jurisdiction in any region in the world and
that this will be enforced by the Major Nations of the
Security Council.
C. The Security Council of the UN
will take possession of all natural resources, including
the watersheds and great forests, to be used and
preserved for the good of the Major Nations of the
Security Council.
D. The Security Council of the UN
will explain that not all races and peoples are equal,
nor should they be. Those races proven superior by
superior achievements ought to rule the lesser races,
caring for them on sufferance that they cooperate with
the Security Council. Decision making, including
banking, trade, currency rates and economic development
plans, will be made in stewardship by the Major Nations.
E. All of the above constitute the
New World Order, in which Order, all nations, regions,
and races will cooperate with the decisions of the Major
Nations of the Security Council.
The purpose of this document is to
demonstrate that action delayed could well be fatal.
All could be lost if mere opposition by
minor races is tolerated and the unfortunate vacillations of
our closest comrades is cause for our hesitations.
Open
declaration of intent followed by decisive force is the
final solution.
This must be done before any shock hits
our financial markets, tarnishing our credibility and
perhaps diminishing our force.
