|
by Gaius Baltar
August 02, 2023
from
GaiusBaltar Website
The Role of Human Capital
and Western Education...
It is becoming increasingly clear to more and more people in the
West that something has gone terribly wrong with
the Ukraine project.
Predictions and projections
didn't pan out and the West doesn't seem to know what to do.
The Russian economy wasn't a house of cards
as predicted, Russian weapons weren't inferior as predicted,
Russian soldiers and commanders weren't incompetent as
predicted, and Russian technology wasn't inferior as predicted.
In some respects the Russians even seem to be
superior to the West.
Their weapons are effective and in many cases
outright technologically superior, as clearly demonstrated by
their hypersonic missiles, SAM systems and electronic warfare
systems.
Their economy appears to be surprisingly
advanced and diversified and based on real wealth creation
rather than financialization and debt like the West's.
Their strategic and tactical thinking also
seems to work, while the West's clearly doesn't.
The whole mess is often explained as a result of
a miscalculation by
the western elites:
they underestimated Russia
and overestimated the West...
The situation, however, is far worse than that.
Every day that passes reveals the impotence of
the West more and more and the situation is becoming outright
humiliating.
At this point the rest of the world either shakes
their heads or simply laughs at the West and its politicians and
diplomats - not to mention its crazed populations.
The dysfunction of the West is far deeper than just the
situation around the Ukraine project.
It's absolutely everywhere.
The West can't do diplomacy in general, it
can't run its cities or countries except into the ground, its
high-tech projects fail almost as a rule, its infrastructure is
crumbling, its economies are crumbling, and all public policies
seem to have a
civilizational suicide as a final goal...
The West's control mechanisms over the rest of
the world are also crumbling, including,
the dollar, sanctions, color revolutions,
military interventions and threats.
Nothing seems to work and everything the West
does seems to make things worse.
Any rational person upon hearing a western leader, diplomat or
"expert" speak, asks himself this question:
"Are they just lying or are they really this
incompetent and delusional?"
The answer is "both" but the incompetence
factor is far greater than most people can imagine.
Why has this happened?
It's clear that the cause is far deeper than the
deindustrialization of the West or economic problems in general. The
economy doesn't explain the incredible incompetence shown by the
West before and during the war in Ukraine.
I suggest that the cause of this unfolding disaster is a serious
structural problem in the West - which Russia seems to have largely
avoided.
This structural problem is a necessary condition
for the current western system and has been purposely created to
bring it about and maintain it.
This problem is the subject of this article - as
well as the "mechanism" behind it...
This is unfortunately a long article, but the
subject matter demands it.
Human capital and its properties
The current ideologically-based power structure of the West outright
requires that certain types of people be in positions of influence
and certain types of people be sidelined.
This applies to all steps of the social ladder:
from kindergarten teachers to university
teachers and corporate executives, and all the way up to the
leaders of society itself...
This has been progressing steadily for the last
five decades or so, and has resulted in a major structural problem
for the West.
That problem is the obvious and massive
degradation and misallocation of human capital in the West.
Human capital can be described as the quality of a company's or
nation's workforce, or more specifically how competent the employee
pool is - how well they are trained, how quickly they can be
trained, how they are educated in general, and how they make
decisions.
In order to understand what competence
really means, let's define it further.
Competence can be described as specific or
general.
This distinction is extremely important and must
be understood by anyone who attempts to manage human capital on a
small or large scale.
Specific competence is the
ability to do a certain type of work. This can be carpentry,
coding, chemistry, medicine, piloting an airliner, and so on and
so forth.
Some of these types of jobs may require a lot
of competence, training and intelligence, but what they have in
common is that their scope is limited and clearly defined.
They exist within clear boundaries, separate
from the complexities and vagueness of the world in general.
Each type of work requires certain abilities innate in the
person, as well as varying degrees of training.
People, of course, differ a lot in their
level of specific competence within each field.
General or high-level competence is the ability to
do work that is beyond clearly defined boundaries. The subject
matter of those types of work exists in a complex "variable
universe" and can be exceedingly vague and confusing.
It requires the ability to be adaptive and be
able to transfer skills between different types of work.
This also applies to expertise in one field
being applied to a completely different field - such as applying
psychology to economics or astrophysics to climate science.
Examples of positions requiring general or
high-level competence people are,
corporate executives, all kinds of planners
and administrators, product developers, inventors, high-level
consultants and analysts, military leaders and planners,
diplomats, judges, political leaders, and high-level scientists
and theoreticians, to name a few...
Specific and general competence types of work are
not two separate things.
Types of work or "jobs" can be said to range from
almost completely specific up to almost completely general. Almost
all types of work have elements of both but in varying proportions.
To illustrate this I will take an example from a
company I'm personally familiar with.
This is a software company with several
owners, most of whom work at the company. One of the owners is
an exceptionally competent database specialist.
However, when he contributes to decision
making for the company as a whole, he becomes an outright
problem.
The management structure of the company had
to be "modified" to neutralize him in that role, as well as a
few others. This employee has exceptional specific competence
but very poor general competence.
He cannot "transfer" his specific database
competence over to competence in moving the company into the
future.
He simply cannot operate objectively or
sensibly outside his database job.
So what makes this employee have such poor
general competence - or more specifically - what is general
competence?
General competence requires three
necessary conditions:
-
high general intelligence or IQ
-
the ability to be objective, even in
situations where the result of your conclusions may not be
to your liking
-
the ability to reach conclusions without
being influenced by others (i.e. independent thinking)
The latter two conditions are a direct result of
how the human brain interacts with the environment.
The mechanism behind it is too complicated to
describe here, but in simplistic terms it can be said that humans
range in their relationship with reality from the
emotional-outward/subjective to the introspective/objective.
This variable, like all evolutionary traits,
including IQ, is normally distributed. This has rather disturbing
implications which may be difficult for some people to understand.
Let's first look at IQ, or general intelligence.
In order to be able to deal with seriously
complicated work or get through a real university program, an IQ
of about 125 is necessary.
Only about 5% of the population in the West
has this IQ or higher.
This means that the pool of potentially
high-level competence people is very small to begin with.
Even if we use a cut-off of an IQ of 115, which
is sufficient for most semi-complicated work, the potential pool
only goes up to 16% of the population.
Now let's take a look at the other variables, i.e. objectivity
and independent thinking.
Those two are correlated and we will, for the
sale of convenience, handle them as the same variable or trait,
even though they aren't.
They are normally distributed, much like IQ,
with most in the middle and fewer toward the extremes in both
directions.
On one side of the distribution are people
who, to state it bluntly, are incapable of thinking objectively
about any issues that may interact with their personal views
about anything at all.
They can be competent in a limited field
which is "neutral" to them (such as databases), but not
involving anything else.
They can't run a company in a competitive
environment, except into the ground.
They can't run a city, a country, a
military campaign, an economy, or anything requiring general
competence, except into the ground, regardless of their
intelligence.
These people are clearly not suitable for
general/high-level competence jobs.
So,
what is the proportion of the population that
is objective enough and independent thinkers enough to be
suitable for those jobs?
That's difficult to determine but it's clear that
it is maximum 50% of the population.
In reality it's far less but let's be
generous and say it's 30%...
What does that mean?
IQ and objectivity/independent thinking are somewhat correlated but
let's assume they are not. Let's say that we have a pool of
potentially objective and rational people that is 30% and a pool of
people with IQ of 125 that is 5%.
That means that the pool of high-level general
competence people is 5% of 30%, or 1.5% of the population.
If we are really generous and assume that 50% of the population is
objective and rational and an IQ of 115 is sufficient for those
jobs, then we have 16% of 50%, which is a pool of 8% of the
population.
The importance of this cannot be overstated.
This group, whether we define it as
1.5%
of the population or 8% of the population,
is extremely valuable.
This is essentially the only group in society
that can reliably evaluate complex situations and make
subsequent rational decisions.
Without it, modern technological society
simply cannot be built or maintained - let alone advanced.
Let me rephrase this:
if we do not identify and utilize this group,
we cannot run our complicated societies except into the ground.
The western purging of competence
Modern western society is from a governance standpoint ideologically
motivated and ideologically controlled.
It is being pushed in a very clearly defined
ideological direction, led by
the European Union and
the current US administration. This
ideology is not the subject matter of this article, but it can be
seen everywhere by any rational and independent-thinking person.
For the uninformed-curious a good place to start
is the website of the EU's policy-making body:
the World Economic Forum (WEF)...!
In order to achieve these ideological goals for
the West, two things must happen:
-
The right people must be put into power
at all levels of society
-
Any disruptive elements must be
eliminated or suppressed
Since all ideological goals tend to be
more or less in conflict with reality, there is no
group more disruptive to them than the one who operates objectively
and independently.
People like that simply cannot be allowed into
positions of power, and if they must be, they must be kept quiet
and/or forced to toe the line.
The objective/rational/general competence group, whether it is 1.5%
or 8% of the population, therefore becomes a problem rather than a
resource.
This is exactly the situation in the West
today...!
Many people have noticed that meritocracy has been
systematically abandoned in the West and the relationship between
competence and reward severed in giant swaths of the economy - and
almost completely in government.
What few people seem to realize is that this is a
necessity for the West's ideological goals to be reached.
High-level competence cannot be promoted
because it is a threat.
It cannot therefore be rewarded...
In order to illustrate this, let's take a look at
what happens when a member of the 1.5% is allowed to gain
significant power.
Elon Musk is a smart man, probably with an
IQ of 150 or more.
He is also quite objective and realistic in
his assessments, and an independent thinker.
His ownership and governance of Twitter/X is
a major problem for western ideological goals.
Free speech is an obvious
threat to any ideology and, to rub salt in the
wounds, Musk belittled the guardians of the Ideology at Twitter by
making fun of them, then by firing them all and only keeping the
competent ones.
This cannot be allowed to stand and we can
already see the response. The EU is planning to use force to stop
this affront to the Ideology and may actually block Twitter in
Europe.
Ideological champion (and suspected lizard
robot...)
Mark Zuckerberg was even
instructed to cook up an ideologically pure Twitter copy in
response - but seems to have failed...
We eagerly await further responses, which may
range from lawfare up to more "direct" actions, and will most likely
be directed at Musk personally.
The reconfiguring of western
education
As previously noted, two things must happen for the ideological
goals to become reality:
The right people must be promoted and the
wrong people must be suppressed.
This process of elevation/suppression has become
the main goal of the western education system - all the way from
kindergarten up to university.
If we look at what
the education system has been
doing, this becomes extremely obvious.
Here are a few examples:
-
Evaluation of competence is being
systematically degraded to avoid comparison between the
competent and the incompetent.
Exams are being discarded in favor of
constant "projects" and students work in groups so the
incompetent may hide. Schools avoid testing the individual
directly as much as they can - and thereby comparing him to
others.
The competent ones must not be
encouraged, and if at all possible, they themselves must not
realize that they are above others.
-
Universities are increasingly basing
admittance on other criteria than competence, including
quotas based on non-competence variables.
The most insidious selection method is
the "personal essay" which applicants must submit - and is
sometimes even more important than grades.
All applicants know that the more they
signal virtue in the essay, the more likely they are to be
admitted.
On the basis of the essay, the
universities can pick the ideologically pure - which is the
only purpose of the essay requirement to begin with.
-
Almost every academic subject is being
turned from the objective to the subjective to assist the
irrational-incompetent student.
This even applies to hard subjects such
as mathematics - where nowadays 2+2 doesn't necessarily
equal 4.
Even intelligence is now subjective and
the stupid can be as smart as the intelligent - it's just a
question of perspective, the right measuring tools, and
idiotic inventions such as "emotional intelligence."
-
Almost every subject has been made easier
than before to help the incompetent students and even
critical fields such as medicine are now graduating people
who are utterly incompetent and clueless - on a large scale.
This systematic lowering of standards
also has the added benefit of creating disinterest in smart
and rational students.
A smart student performs better and
better relative to others as the subject gets harder.
If the subject is easy or made
uninteresting, he will sink down to mediocracy - which is a
part of the purpose of lowering the standards to begin with.
-
Disciplines which may be a threat to the
irrationality of the Ideology have been massively subverted
and corrupted.
This applies to several fields, but
particularly to psychology and history, which in their
proper forms would be a massive threat to western
ideological goals.
Psychology has been twisted into an
almost unrecognizable abomination, and history is mostly
just lies these days.
-
Fake disciplines have been invented from
the ground up for the purpose of training the ideologically
pure without the need for competence or intelligence or any
connection to reality.
These disciplines can be found in lists
of "most useless university degrees" all over the internet,
but that is a misunderstanding.
Those degrees are not useless at all -
they elevate the ideologically pure in society by awarding
them university "certification."
This certification justifies giving them
important positions in society.
I could go on but you get the picture...
What we are looking at here is not the failure of
the western education system, but a very carefully planned
"pivoting" toward new objectives.
The primary purpose of the education system
is no longer education.
The entire education system of the West has
been reconfigured to carry out a "filtration" process.
The purpose of this process is to identify,
instruct and elevate the ideologically pure while suppressing
the dangerous
1.5/8
group.
The education system, particularly the
universities, has largely abandoned real education and is almost
solely focused on this mission.
This mission is not just carried out by the
education system, but by all institutions of governments and a
large part of the corporate sector.
A side-result of this filtration process is the
degradation of all education in the West, and subsequently,
degradation of its human capital in general.
Western society, in general, has abandoned rationality and replaced
it with subjectivism (formally designated as "post-modernism").
The purpose of that is not just to train and
advance the ideologically pure, but to use subjectivism as an
oppression tool against the 1.5/8 group and the rational part of the
population outside of it.
The best way to suppress a rational person is to
subject him to an existence of total and constant irrationality. It
is essentially
gaslighting on a civilizational
scale, directed at the dangerous rational group.
While the dangerous rational group is being suppressed and
subverted, the ideologically pure "leaders of tomorrow" are
indoctrinated rather than educated, given university certifications
rather than real degrees, and finally provided with an unending
amount of fake and well paid jobs in both the private and public
sector.
This well-paid ideologically pure group then
becomes the power base of the new ideological system.
The upward migration of the
incompetent
The goal of this deliberate intervention into the educational system
is to create what you might call a "migration pattern" in society
based on (lack of) competence and ideological purity.
The right people need to be put into the right
positions and the right jobs, and since they are incompetent, this
needs to be managed for them.
After they leave school with their
certifications, government and the private sector take over and
actively push them upward, while pushing the dreaded 1.5/8 group
away from influence and well-paid jobs.
Two developments in the West have been godsends for these efforts:
the outsourcing of western manufacturing to Asia and the virtual
abolition of competition in the corporate sector.
This massively decreased the complexity level of
the western economy and subsequently the need for the 1.5/8 group.
When most companies operate services in a
protected environment, there is far less need for
high-level/rational people - while in a "real economy" these people
simply cannot be sidelined.
Also, when you can get away with operating a fake
economy based on the dollar reserve status, you can also operate a
fake society run by incompetents.
Let's take a closer look at how this upward migration of the
ideologically pure is managed after they receive their university
certifications - and how the 1.5/8 group is systematically blocked.
There are five main methods being employed -
which together form a long-term takeover process of society.
These methods are the following:
-
Public sector
filtering
This describes the job selection process
in the public sector. Initially the "foot-in-the-door"
method is used.
A few ideologically pure politicians and
bureaucrats position themselves within the system and start
controlling who is hired.
This increases exponentially over the
decades as more and more purists gain access to the levers
of power.
Currently the process is so overt that it
is starting to become expressed in recruitment policy papers
- such as the recent example of the British government
excluding "white men" from becoming fighter pilots.
The West has almost completely been able
to exclude the 1.5/8 group from public-sector positions
using this method - including its armed forces.
-
Public sector
stuffing
As the public sector filtering process
advances, the purists inside the system start creating more
and more positions for their purist brethren.
New departments are created, work groups
and committees appear, and the public sector expands.
Publicly owned companies, such utility
companies, hospitals and schools are also often used as
storage units for large numbers of the ideologically pure.
This is extremely obvious in the West.
Every unnecessary law or initiative
requires more and more people - and these people are all
carefully selected.
-
Job-creation
by decree
This method is directed at the private
sector, as well as the semi-public sector.
Government purists start creating new
laws and standards which all companies must fulfill. Those
are justified on the basis of "goodness" and usually involve
the environment, equality, safety and such things.
This creates a large number of positions
within private companies which are tailored for the
ideologically pure - particularly in support functions such
as human resources, compliance functions and others.
This enables a "foot-in-the-door"
situation in the private sector and gives the purists access
to the levers of powers there - much like they already have
in the public sector.
-
Private sector
filtering
As the purists have gained access to the
private sector - particularly human resources (which is the
standard purist Trojan horse in private companies) - they
start filtering new recruits exactly the same way the public
sector does.
As in the public sector, this filtering
process is becoming more obvious. A significant number of
companies are now specifying which groups will not be hired
in their job advertisements.
Since they can't overtly say "we don't
hire smart, independent thinkers" they usually use "white
men" as a proxy for that group for some reason.
That group is considered to be a
particular threat, although you can be sure that anyone who
doesn't follow the program will be fired, regardless of
their gender or the color of their skin.
-
Private sector
stuffing
Shortly after Elon Musk bought Twitter he
fired something like 80% of its employees.
That 80% was the company's private sector
stuffing ratio - quite high.
Companies, particularly in sectors which
can influence public opinion - but not solely - are
increasingly creating a large number of positions which are
either totally superfluous or intended for influence
operations against the public.
Those filtering and stuffing methods are the primary mechanisms that
have been used for the takeover of western societies by the
ideologically pure.
There are other mechanisms, such as ESG,
filtering by certain banks and investment funds regarding who gets
financing and who doesn't - and the uncontrolled immigration
engineered by the ideologically pure which is seen by them as a
continuation of the internal migration process.
However, all that is beyond the scope of this
article.
The ideologically pure have systematically been moved into almost
all positions of power in the public sector and a large part of the
private sector - and the situation in the private sector is
increasingly mirroring the public sector in hiring practices and
employee stuffing.
The 'dangerous' 1.5/8 group is
being kept away by all means, and with great success. The power base
of the Ideology is firmly in place.
This job migration program hasn't been cheap.
Millions of unnecessary jobs cost money and it is
clear that a significant part of western public debt can be
attributed to this program, a fact which doesn't seem to have been
noticed by many people.
The consequences
The main thing to understand is that western societies and economies
have been put on an ideological footing.
Productivity, competitiveness, technology and
science are simply not priorities anymore in the West...
Explaining the consequences of this process for
the West would take many articles, or a book of several hundred
pages.
Still, let's mention a few examples:
-
The inverse
competence crisis
The goal of this entire project has been
to place the ideologically pure in all positions of power at
all levels of society. These positions are, in a normal and
competitive society, occupied by the highly competent 1.5/8
group.
The process has now reached
near-completion with most positions of power occupied by the
ideologically pure. Some of those people have high IQs but
they are neither objective nor independent thinkers.
The Ideology they must subscribe to is
simply incompatible with those qualities. This has some
serious consequences.
Remember that positions of power and influence are more
likely to demand general competence than other positions (as
opposed to specific competence).
The greater the power, the more the
position demands general competence.
The people in these positions now are
selected by ideological fervor and reliability - so the
higher you go, the more ideologically enthusiastic the
people who hold them.
This means that the least objective and
independent thinking people hold the positions which require
the greatest objectivity and independent thinking.
Therefore, in the West incompetence
becomes greater and more common the higher you go. As
someone said - "a general is an incompetent colonel." This
can be seen absolutely everywhere except in some holdout
private companies.
Those exceptions are of course being
addressed as we speak.
The second problem is that many of the irrational/subjective
people holding all the power have reasonably high IQs. That
may seem to be a positive thing but it has a major
disadvantage.
Moderate to high IQ irrational/subjective
people are the easiest to brainwash of all people.
The reasons for that are complicated and
need to be addressed in another article - but what this
means is that the top tier in the West is not only the most
incompetent it can possibly be in comparison to what their
jobs require - but are also the most malleable and
delusional.
-
The cost and
debt crisis
The migration of the ideologically pure
into the ideological power base and positions of influence
has created millions of jobs in western societies which
create no value.
These jobs are much more numerous and
more widespread than most people realize, and I wouldn't be
surprised if something like 20%-30% of the entire labor
force of the West could be fired without any adverse effect.
In fact, the effect would be positive,
especially if those people could be made to work the (mostly
menial) real-economy jobs they are suitable for.
Deindustrialization has been blamed for the extreme debt
levels and tax burdens of the West.
That is, as far as it goes, true - but
maintaining this giant group of incompetents in their fake
jobs is also placing an extreme burden on the West.
Western societies are now completely
unsustainable and cannot be run without constant debt
increase.
-
The
competition crisis
This crisis can be explained by the
following example:
Let's say there are three companies
with combined 100% market share in some sector.
There is no real competition between them
and everybody can just relax because the customers can't go
anywhere else.
These companies can get away with
absolute incompetence on most levels, including in
management.
They don't need to think about
efficiency, safety, productivity or costs, except on their
websites and in annual reports.
However, if a competitor with competent
employees manages to infiltrate the sector, those three
companies will hit a wall.
There will be an enormous crisis and one
or more of them will most likely go under.
This is exactly the situation in the western economies now.
Monopoly and oligopoly is the rule
and the main objective of most large western companies
is to prevent anyone from infiltrating their sector -
usually by bribing regulators or by buying the
competition.
This is a necessity because a huge number
of western companies are now run by incompetent management
and staffed by incompetent people, particularly in support
and management functions.
The immortal words of the nameless Boeing
employee about the 737 MAX apply to most large western
companies;
"this airplane is designed by clowns
who in turn are supervised by monkeys"...
Western companies are no longer
competitive.
They cannot compete with Chinese
companies now and soon they won't be able to compete with
companies in general outside the West.
They simply can't function except inside
an economic safe-space.
In fact, the situation is such that the
Chinese already do the real work for many of them and
reshoring the work is problematic because of (surprise!) the
human capital degradation in the West caused by the
repurposing of its education system.
This also applies to western societies as a whole.
The entire leadership and diplomatic
classes of the West are no longer competitive against the
rest of the world for exactly these reasons.
They are being outmaneuvered by the
Chinese, the Russians, the Indians, and everybody else
at every turn...
Even African leaders are now more
competent than western leaders.
They have consistently made decisions
that are better for their people than leaders in the West -
for the last few years anyway.
-
The complexity
crisis
Earlier in this article I stated that
the 1.5/8 group is
extremely valuable for modern societies and without it
complicated modern societies cannot be managed.
In the West this group has been
successfully sidelined to a great degree and a good part of
it doesn't even bother with university education anymore.
The situation, however, is even worse
than that.
The reconfiguration of the education
system and the break between competence and reward in the
job market has fundamentally changed the decision making
process behind the selection of university education.
Why study engineering (which is hard)
when you can get an even better paying job with a degree in
psychology (which is easy nowadays)?
The reconfiguration of the western
education system has changed the reward structure,
encouraging young people to pursue easy and useless
education - simply because the "system" will provide them
with jobs.
This has already caused a major crisis in western societies,
particularly in the US. The "maintenance" of complex aspects
of US society needs a large group of engineers and people
with related education.
This maintenance is faltering now, and
significantly relies on foreign engineers educated in US
universities.
You see, why would Americans study
engineering in a system which doesn't reward it?
If China and India could somehow recall
their engineers and others with hard education from the US,
the US system could probably not be maintained, let alone
advanced.
This will get progressively worse and we
will soon reach a point where complex systems which underpin
society cannot be kept running.
That will require some kind of "reset" to
a less complex society, with less prosperity of course.
There are far more crises than those four, but I
wouldn't want to sound like a doomsayer by listing more.
Russia and the future
So, what about Russia...?
Firstly, there are clear signs that
the Russians have figured out what is happening in the West and
are learning from it.
Recently they left the "Bologna process"
which is a European education standardization system.
The Bologna system has the express
purpose of diluting education in member states, implementing
certifications rather than real degrees, and filling European
societies with badly educated and generally incompetent
"experts" who follow the consensus, no matter what.
The Russians saw this system as a threat to
their country, which it is, and have, at least partly, reverted
to the older and more hardcore Soviet system.
Secondly, the Russians seem to be carrying out purges of
the incompetent and corrupt within state structures, including
the military.
Meritocracy seems to be on the agenda,
a radical concept these days.
The Russians most likely see these efforts as
critical to the continuation of their state and nation - and
they would be right.
The situation in China is much the same and there
are indications that the rest of the non-western world is catching
on.
Remember that one of the results of the recent
Russia-Africa summit was a Russian-organized education effort in
Africa. I doubt that women's studies will be a part of that
curriculum.
The current clash between the West and Russia - and increasingly
between the West and the rest of the world - is becoming a clash
between the incompetent and irrational and the competent and
rational.
The result is obvious,
but what happens when an irrational person
who is backed into a corner has access to nuclear weapons...?
That's anybody's guess.
By putting its societies on an ideological footing the western elite
has backed itself into a corner.
They can't compete.
They can't develop their economies or
societies.
They can't go back...
Fixing the problems of the West will require an
economic revival, where a real economy will replace the current fake
financialized service economy.
This cannot be done without putting the hated
1.5/8 group into positions of power...!
Therefore,
it will not be done as long as the current
western ruling class is in power...
Western societies will not survive an economic
revival in their current ideological configuration.
Conflict is therefore the only
remaining option,
for
the ruling class to hang on to
power...!
|
