by A Lily Bit

May 07, 2024
from ALilyBit Website

The notion of global centralization is a curious paradox that sends shivers down the spines of the discerning.

Why, you ask?

Because it is inherently intertwined with the specter of tyranny, a truth we all grasp, albeit reluctantly, in the depths of our consciousness.

The moment we entrust absolute power into the hands of a select few, we sign a Faustian pact, inviting catastrophe to our doorstep...

History, a relentless critic, bears witness to the fact that no elite cadre has ever demonstrated itself to be deserving of such unbridled authority.

Trustworthy?

 

Rational?

 

Empathetic?

 

Wise?

Hardly...

These virtues are as elusive to them as a needle in a haystack.

Instead, they invariably fumble, or worse, exploit their privileged positions, ramming their ideological agendas down our throats.

This heavy-handed approach breeds resistance, a natural response to such overreach.

And what follows is a chilling cycle of sociopolitical repression, where dissenters are silenced, incarcerated, or worse, eliminated.

This, in turn, fuels more resistance, escalating the situation until we find ourselves teetering on the precipice of chaos and revolution or staring into the abyss of totalitarianism and micro-managed collectivism.

There's no sidestepping this inevitable clash.

As long as the centralists remain hell-bent on amassing total power, the forces of resistance will rally and the situation will spiral out of control.

The only conceivable way to defuse this ticking time bomb is if these elites experience an epiphany, realizing the folly of their ways.

But let's not hold our breath for such an enlightenment.

Alternatively, if these power brokers were to suddenly vanish, their influence neutralized, the world might have a fighting chance to heal and evolve organically.

It's a curious phenomenon, the existence of individuals who remain steadfast in their refusal to acknowledge the inevitability of conflict.

They cling to the hope that there's another path, one that doesn't involve confrontation...

To justify this belief, they engage in a remarkable display of mental acrobatics, twisting and contorting reality to fit their narrative.

Let me set the record straight.

I've always maintained that the globalists, in their quest for absolute power, are destined for failure.

 

There seems to be a misconception that my analysis of their strategies equates to an endorsement of their success.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

I don't argue that the elites will emerge victorious; I argue that a fight is unavoidable...

The question that invariably arises is,

"How could the globalists possibly secure dominance over the entire world? Isn't that a Mission Impossible...?"

Indeed, it is an impossible task, but that won't deter the globalists from attempting it.

This is where the cynics miss the mark.

We're dealing with a cabal of narcissistic psychopaths, bound together by a cult-like ideology and armed with nearly limitless resources.

 

These individuals see themselves as ascendant demigods, akin to the ancient Egyptian pharaohs.

 

They are impervious to superior logic or emotional pleas.

 

Mass activism or peaceful protest won't deter them...

They understand only two things:

• the raw power of force

• the utility of deception...

The globalists' pursuit of power is a game of high stakes, played by individuals who are detached from reality.

They are not rational actors who can be reasoned with, but ideologues driven by a twisted vision of grandeur.

To assume otherwise is to underestimate the enormity of the challenge we face.

These individuals are notorious for their scorched-earth policy, willing to bring down entire civilizations rather than relinquish their iron grip. To devise a strategy against them based on the assumption that conflict can be avoided is the height of folly.

When I assert that the globalists are "destined to lose," it stems from my conviction that a segment of humanity inherently possesses the capacity to resist tyranny.

The globalists will meet their downfall because it's impossible to account for every potential threat to their utopian vision.

As long as individuals continue to challenge them, both physically and through the dissemination of information, their vulnerabilities will be exposed, leading to their inevitable demise.

However, this triumph will not be achieved without significant sacrifice.

When I discuss "collapse," I'm not referring to a singular event, but a process.

Collapse is an ongoing series of events...

Take the U.S., for instance.

It's been in the throes of collapse since 2008.

 

The end of this collapse will manifest when the final economic bubble sustaining our system bursts, paving the way for rebuilding.

The crucial question is,

Who will spearhead this rebuilding?

 

The globalists with their nefarious agenda, or the common people yearning for freedom and prosperity?

In numerous articles, I've highlighted the reality that the elites will exploit the ongoing destabilization of significant portions of the global economic framework to advocate for greater centralization...

This includes,

• global economic management through the IMF and BIS

• a global currency using the IMF's Special Drawing Rights as a bridge

• global governance through the United Nations or a similar yet-to-be-developed entity...

This plan, once a closely guarded secret, is now being openly discussed by globalists in the mainstream media.

Undoubtedly, many will support this centralization out of fear of instability.

However, there will also be those who vehemently oppose it.

Based on historical precedence and the globalists' own writings, I believe they will attempt to enforce compliance and assert global centralization post-collapse in the following ways...

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION

In past articles I already underscored the necessity for localism, the importance of,

self-sufficient food, water, and shelter supply by communities of like-minded individuals for mounting an effective resistance against centralizing forces.

If you cannot provide for your own logistics, the only alternative is to pilfer from the enemy, a decidedly riskier proposition.

In a post-collapse world where rule of law has crumbled and the safe transfer of resources between regions is no longer feasible, control over essential supplies and their producers becomes paramount.

This strategy is also employed by totalitarian regimes when faced with the threat of unrest.

A prime example of this tactic in action is the Stalinist consolidation of the Soviet Union.

Successful rebellions in occupied nations often find their roots in rural environments.

Cities, on the other hand, tend to serve as strongholds for totalitarian regimes due to their superior surveillance capabilities, a more docile population, and the relative ease of securing and defending them once under control.

 

I refer to this as the "green zone doctrine," where locked-down cities serve as launchpads for attacks on rural communities.

Stalin employed this very model, dispatching troops from controlled cities to pillage resources from surrounding farming communities.

These supplies were then stockpiled for "redistribution," with resources allocated to those deemed most useful to the regime.

Those viewed as non-essential or potential threats were left to starve. In the end, Stalin effectively eliminated many potential rebels by denying them access to food production and supplies.

The elites do not need to control every square inch of territory to launch an effective martial law campaign.

By maintaining a stranglehold on key cities through surveillance technology and troop presence, they can use these urban centers as staging grounds to confiscate resources from surrounding areas, selectively targeting those they deem undesirable.

If you harbor doubts about the government adopting such tactics in the U.S., I urge you to familiarize yourself with Executive Order 13603, signed by Barack Obama in 2012.

This order grants the president the authority to,

seize any private property or resources during a "national emergency" if deemed "necessary to national defense"...

It's worth noting that starvation as a weapon has served the elites well in the past.

THE MALAYSIAN MODEL OF CONTROL

The elites, if anything, are creatures of habit, consistently employing strategies that have yielded success in the past.

In my article "Decoding the Elite's War Strategy," I delve into the writings of Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) member Max Boot, examining methods for suppressing insurgencies.

In the U.S., post-collapse, an insurgency is all but inevitable.

 

The only uncertainty is whether it will be a large-scale uprising or a smaller one...

As for the rest of the world, I hold little hope for a significant rebellion.

Most citizens in Europe and Asia are unarmed and lack training. Any resistance in these regions will likely be small and cell-structured to ensure survival.

'Max Boot's methods' focus on larger threats to the establishment.

He cites the British success in Malaysia from 1948-1960 against highly effective communist guerillas and terrorists.

This triumph can be attributed to several key factors:

1. The British employed large-scale concentration camps to separate production centers from rebel influence.

    

   These camps, surrounded by barbed wire fences and guard towers, housed farmers, workers, and their families.

    

   This measure prevented guerillas from hiding among the working class and recruiting from their ranks, aligning with the "green zone doctrine" I previously mentioned.
   
    

2. The British implemented a sophisticated identification system for all Malaysian citizens, including fingerprinting.

    

   They established numerous checkpoints across the country where citizens were required to produce their paperwork. Anyone unable to provide identification was detained on suspicion of being an insurgent.

    

   In a digitized world where identification is achieved through advanced biometrics, the rebels' tactic of forcefully taking over busy buildings and buses to destroy IDs would be ineffective.
   
    

3. Instead of deploying large, unwieldy military brigades in a futile attempt to cover vast expanses of territory, the British utilized spies and informants to locate rebel strongholds.

    

   They then dispatched special forces units to neutralize these targets. The British didn't aim to control extensive ground; their objective was to eliminate rebels.

    

   Their tactics were marked by considerable brutality, including the use of a mobile gallows that traveled the country and the public display of decomposing corpses to instill fear in the insurgency.
   
    

4. The British political elites waged a psychological war by offering promises of peace and prosperity to the Malaysian commoners if they supported the effort against the insurgency.

    

   They didn't necessarily need to fulfill these promises; all they needed was to create a few examples of rewards for cooperation and sell this narrative to the public convincingly.

    

   Once a significant portion of the population was under British control, the insurgency lost supply resources and faced the added concern of informants in their midst.

TECHNOLOGY GRID FOR TYRANNY

Malaysia serves as an example of a well-executed strategy to quell insurgents, but it was not without its failures and shortcomings.

In an attempt to minimize future uncertainties when combating rebellions, the elites are turning to new technologies...

The successful implementation of the green zone doctrine in today's world would necessitate the use of biometric surveillance. While restricting movement could be achieved, it would be limited to cities with comprehensive surveillance networks.

In a post-collapse future, insurgents would face significant challenges infiltrating or exfiltrating from a green zone, given the current arsenal of facial recognition, gait and walk recognition, retina and thumbprint scanning, among other technologies.

Facial recognition capabilities have even advanced to thermal imaging, enabling cameras to identify individuals based on unique heat signatures from blood vessels within the human face, even from a distance.

Traditional countermeasures like makeup and prosthetics would prove ineffective; only thermal masking would offer a viable solution.

Moreover, an insurgency would need to be technologically adept.

Cyber warfare would have to be a crucial component of their strategy.

This is an unprecedented challenge, one that no other rebellion in history has had to contend with.

AN UNEDUCATED AND BUMBLING INSURGENCY

The globalists' strategy of inciting economic and social chaos, followed by the lockdown of certain regions and the promotion of centralization as a panacea, is significantly more feasible when their adversaries lack insight, patience, planning, and initiative.

The British achieved partial success in Malaysia because the guerillas underestimated the importance of public perception.

While they proved to be formidable and merciless fighters, their brutality resulted in a lack of public backing. Although widespread public support is not a prerequisite for victory, it is undoubtedly advantageous.

Numerous revolts against Stalin's regime, some of considerable size, were suppressed due to poor planning. Rebels amassed substantial forces in confined areas, such as a single mountain or mountain ranges.

 

Stalin simply deployed poisonous gasses on insurgents who had concentrated all their resources in one location and neglected to stockpile gas masks.

It is essential to recognize that in a post-collapse world, governments and elites may no longer be subject to public accountability, leaving them free to act with malice.

All contingencies must be considered...

Rebels in the Soviet Union also exhibited a tendency to disregard logistics. Many were armed with mismatched rifles and an assortment of ammunition instead of equipping all their forces with the same rifle and ammunition for redundancy.

Rebellions have been lost in the past solely because fighters, armed with an excessive array of weapons, ran out of sufficient ammunition to supply any of them.

Insurgents have historically struggled with the inability to target the leadership centers of the empires they opposed.

Primarily, this was because they were unaware of the true leadership's identity. Only in our modern era do we possess the information necessary to identify the elites and their organizations...

Today's globalists are often quite vocal in the media about their identities and objectives.

This is why the elites are determined to make the next insurgency the final insurgency.

 

Never before have they been so vulnerable.

In my assessment, the globalists will initially employ their tried-and-true tactics of disinformation and division to achieve centralization.

However, in time, they will likely resort to a Stalin/Malaysian model for on-the-ground control.

The crux of the matter, however, lies in the understanding that the globalists face a more daunting task than we do.

They bear the burden of controlling people, property, resources, and mass psychology, with countless variables and potential pitfalls to navigate...

In contrast, our focus is more streamlined.

We need only concern ourselves with local organization, maintaining our moral compass, ensuring our survival, among some other things.

This simplicity in objective gives us a distinct advantage.