05 - How Aliens View Us

If you get nothing else out of this book, please, remember the following.

To extraterrestrials, who comprise the vast majority of intelligent life in this universe, you are an alien. Humans are but one kind in a huge catalogue of others. Some alien populations may have compiled catalogues of millions of intelligent species, conceivably more.


If and when aliens began to electronically/electrogravitically copy other aliens' catalogues of the sort, the number of entries would have increased exponentially.


Depending on the nature of the overlap between galaxies, there could be catalogues of trillions of species, or more. In more advanced (non-offending) circles, there could be a shared kind of Universal Report, a complex news briefing that spans incredible distances and puts our national broadcasts to shame. Rather than dwell on the affairs of one’s own small planet, such aliens can check on the science and doings of a diverse variety of systems.

Aliens have stated that faster-than-light communications are a given among advanced societies. Nearly instantaneous capacities may be possible, as one group of hyper-advanced aliens reportedly said, once electrogravity towers have been installed and correlated to form a widespread, inter-stellar network (Marrs 1997, p. 468).


Towers use the iron core of a planet as a capacitor, Tesla-style, to store up and release electrical charge (or electrogravity) without need for wires.


There may also be non-tower alternatives. Thus far, no aliens have reported the ability to "physically" travel great distances, i.e. hundreds of light years, instantaneously. The fastest published report on the subject was logged by Los Angeles Times journalist Phillip Krapf, who says that Verdants, a group of aliens with whom he has interacted, can travel at a rate that is one million times the speed of light, using what they call "flicker drive" (a kind of magnetogravity, apparently).


Readers may be encouraged to note that the aliens Krapf describes say they're only 229 million years more advanced, technologically, than are humans. Older, more advanced alien populations may be much more capable.

Although most of the aliens reportedly catalogued by human authorities stand upright and walk on two feet, some look very different than a human. Brain appears to have triumphed over brawn in every case. Cranial capacity has been expanded and body mass reduced, for ecological reasons. So, generally speaking, technologically advanced aliens will likely have large heads and relatively efficient bodies.


Such an appearance, along with different skin colors and body heights, can be startling to a human, initially. On bigger planets with stronger gravity, aliens’ bodies may be stocky, i.e. Stefan Denaerde’s remarkable report about Iarga - just 10 light years from Earth.

It helps to remember that we probably look as weird to them as they do to us - with one minor exception.


When they visit here, they know that our kind exists. They've studied humans and human history. So we're an open book, as far as they're concerned. Most of our data, all of our books going to press and all of our electronic communications, can be lifted, using gravitics, and recorded. Think in terms of Moore’s law (new computers double their capacity every 18-24 months).


By now, aliens are able to store the sum total of human electronic data, then file and correlate it compactly.

As other authors have suggested, we should be careful not to generalize about all aliens.

There is great diversity of off-world life forms. Some may be more advanced than others, yet humans (and aliens) must forever be studied and vigilant in our assessment of any given world, or combination of worlds. Aliens, too, make mistakes.

As one might expect, time and time again, aliens have proven vulnerable to psychological error. They make very human-seeming errors. Humans will be disappointed to learn about some off-world regimes that control their populations through fear and subtle intimidation. In some cases, specious impulses have been cultivated rather than corrected in a limited number of large alien populations, one of which (Verdants from another galaxy) literally describe themselves as "colonizers."


However, in each case of the sort, finer-minded independent civilizations grow up in surrounding systems and offer a critique of the offenders.

It helps to remember that in some multi-galaxy neighborhoods there may be a kind of bully, a population that's both feared and organized against because of its excess. Some populations of the sort may have developed in relative isolation or amid a heated galactic competition, a competition that, in the bully's case, results in a repressive bureaucracy - for defensive reasons.


Sadly enough, some bureaucracies of the sort have reportedly lingered, long after the perceived threat abated.


According to various aliens' reports the end result can be a subtly disguised bias against other species, a presumption of superiority; an epic kind of wastefulness. What began as a defensive mobilization ends up a self-serving apparatus intended to boost a given population's lifestyle above and beyond that of local competitors.

Sound familiar?
This puts the burden of correction on surrounding populations, who, in turn, must waste precious resources in a concerted effort to ward off or correct the burgeoning offender. Ultimately, inter-galactic agreements must arise in galaxy superclusters containing thousands of galaxies.


Even then, there can be obstacles: hyper-advanced regimes on a larger scale that sometimes try to repress individual sensitivities and seek to control populations of lesser duration. Among elderly aliens in such regimes’ security services (some of whom can be thousands of years old or older, hence extremely de-sensitized) the need to control others can be rigidly compulsive, if not destructive in character.


We must be careful with regimes that tend to run on autopilot due to advanced, albeit subtly-mechanized, idealization of thought. Sometimes, due to age and mind-numbing experience, they seem to run out of creative impulses then lapse into defensiveness, coupled with reflexive observation.

Based upon what we now know, we can expect to see neighborhoods that, at times, are stressed in ways that tax the human imagination. For example, the Milky Way lies just along the outer fringe of the Virgo supercluster of galaxies.


Virgo contains 150 large galaxies and nearly two thousand smaller galaxies, compared to the 3 large spiral galaxies plus 14 smaller irregulars and 17 yet smaller ellipticals in the Milky Way’s local group of galaxies.


Smack in the middle of the Virgo supercluster (not a large supercluster - as superclusters go) is the galaxy M87, a giant elliptical galaxy containing about 1.3 trillion suns worth of mass.


The Milky Way is less than one-fifth as big, in comparison. Over time, M87 gobbled up smaller galaxies, causing increasingly strong supermassive black hole polar jets whenever M87's massive central black hole swallowed a smaller galaxy's central black hole.


So, in the center of Virgo is a giant galaxy (M-87) that’s too hot and dangerous to support all of the populations of the galaxies that M87 ate, so to speak.


Surrounding galaxies would be expected to accommodate refugees in order to share the burden more widely. Imagine the complications that arise. Also in Virgo, running along what is called the Markarian Chain of galaxies are other large ellipticals that would, by now, have required similar cooperation.


As a result, we can predict that galaxy superclusters are:

  • either intense war zones, which would be dangerous and ecologically unsustainable - hence less likely over time

  • or galaxy superclusters begin to organize into a greater kind of commonality, which, although stressed at times, more accurately reflects the larger universal ecology for one obvious reason: most of the galaxies in our universe are found in galaxy superclusters.


Alien sources say that large-scale cooperation is the norm and that superclusters are carefully monitored as to ecological outcomes.


Given the prohibitive energy and environmental costs of war involving advanced alien technologies, unrestrained conflict is reportedly rare. However, disputes can arise, which presumably deepens the movement toward larger, collective alternatives and legal/trade conventions.

In the end, the social prism through which we view ourselves will affect how we judge and prepare to interact with off-world populations. But what about the more capable alien judgment of humans, in return?


If we try to weaponize interstellar space in order leap out and grab planets in neighboring star systems, we can expect to either suffer our own internal contradictions, or possibly perish prematurely due to elite-driven environmental failures, some of which could involve misuse of gravitics. In such a scenario, aliens might be less likely to advise on how to use gravitics correctly.

There is further danger in the secrecy of the US black budget regime.


By pretending that it can play both good cop (by interacting with aliens in exclusively military-industrial fashion) and bad cop (by shooting down numerous alien craft in order to scavenge them) it could endanger our survival as a planet.


When a relatively backward human structure of the sort gets its hands on technology that alien neighbors cannot trust will be used safely, a basic judgment is in order:

Should the planet be gently revolutionized or should it be “allowed” to perish - before it becomes too dangerous?

In later pages, the topic will be discussed in detail, including direct quotes by various aliens.

The main point to be conveyed at this juncture is that aliens are fallible; they make mistakes. Those who insist that every interaction with off-world visitors is a spiritual awakening, a kind of cosmic homecoming, will deny the fact. I've argued with otherwise intelligent adults who insist that those seemingly good "gray" aliens don't do harmful abductions, they don't collude with black budget elements in the USA, they aren't part of an attempt to play both sides of the human fence off of each other for their alignment’s political and resource purposes.


I've debated one well-educated researcher (R.B. - Richard Boylan?) who, despite noting missing time after which he found nasal implants and newly formed scoop marks in his flesh (the result of abduction), insists that gray-related "federation" aliens have nothing to do with harmful abductions and cattle mutilations.


He said that such aliens manipulated our genes in the past, so we “belong to” them and they have a right to manipulate us.

Meanwhile, a growing number of qualified researchers, including the late Dr. John Mack, professor of psychiatry at Harvard University, concluded that such aliens appear to be engaged in some sort of breeding program, an attempt to develop human-alien hybrids for yet-unspecified reasons.

* The statements above aren’t intended to demonize grays. Personally, I feel sympathy for them. The death of their original home planet may have occurred under circumstances that offer a vital lesson in off-world political ecology.


Back to Contents