|
10 -
A Mega-Population Problem Case
A Verdant told Krapf that the reversion to sexuality cost
them a significant part of their intellectual ability. If such is
the case, then why did they do it? For some strange reason, no
single Verdant explained their reasoning. The omission speaks
volumes about the larger Verdant outlook.
The beautiful, star-studded swirl that we call the Milky Way is part of a group of some 40 galaxies in the local group, which features our galaxy at one end, and the equally inspiring spirals Andromeda and M-33 at the other end. The two Magellenic Clouds and numerous smaller elliptical or irregular galaxies complete the picture.
Moving counter clockwise as seen from
above, the nearest galaxy groups (all similar in size to our group)
are: Sculptor, Maffei, M-81, and the Canes I group - which billows
out into the Virgo supercluster, a relatively modest-sized
supercluster, as the universe goes.
If, as Krapf reports, the Verdant home galaxy is 14 million light years away, then its most likely location in terms of size and habitability would be the large spiral galaxy M-83 (in the Centaurus A group).
Competing aliens have repeatedly suggested that M-83 (image left) is the Verdant home galaxy. While interacting with the pre-noted human telepathic community, one advanced alien communicated an explicit map in such regard. Another advanced alien remarked that Verdants have prematurely cooked M83 by overusing gravitic technologies on a massive scale.
He suggested that, by doing so, Verdants may have caused certain supernovas in M83 to explode
prematurely, thus decimating biological planets. When that last
remark was stated, there was a brief exchange between a Verdant and
the alleging alien. The allegation stood unchallenged. Again, this
was observed by a number of different humans.
To even be here, in our vicinity tending to such matters from a distance can be risky. No alien wants to be responsible for a Verdant seizure of their technologies, which Verdants reportedly study and sometimes try to copy. For example, a few years ago, a hyper-advanced alien reported a previous Verdant seizure of a Haven alien craft, the hull of which was made of hybridized living materials that allowed it to reconfigure in cold, empty space.
According to astronomers’ data, Centaurus A is the product of a merger between two large galaxies that was completed some 10 million years ago - before the present view, that is. Centaurus A is some 12.4 million light years away from us. Astronomers say the merger may have begun as much as 500 million years ago.
Some suggest that Centaurus A is now a large elliptical galaxy with a dust lane around
its perimeter because it absorbed a modest-sized spiral galaxy about
the size of our close neighbor galaxy, M33.
Since other advanced populations probably
existed near M83 at the time, Verdants could have copied other
aliens’ technology, much as humans copied downed gray alien
technology more recently. Their planet’s heavy gravity virtually
assured an alien crash, early.
That, in turn,
may be why Verdants ended their non-sexual status in order to
out-populate competitors.
Some residents of the soon-to-merge galaxies would have scouted M83's stars for future homes because their soon-to-form large elliptical galaxy would be hot and dangerous. Beginning as much as 200 million years ago, an incursion into M83 by refugees fleeing the merger would have alarmed Verdants.
Had encroaching aliens taken unoccupied systems in M83, Verdants would have wondered whether Verdants would control their own fate or face early depletion of their galaxy due to Bearden's Δt, the speeding of time caused by the use of electrogravity (gravitics).
Acting out of fear, Verdants may have
been motivated to overpopulate and expand their domain in order to
ward off further incursions. Perhaps they saw that Centaurus A
refugees might gain footholds in other spirals of the vicinity: the
galaxies NGC4945 and E274-01.
The merger of two super-massive black holes during a galaxy merger could be one of the most explosive events yet observed in the universe (no human has observed such an event).
The two black holes that merged in Centaurus A more than 10 million years ago probably contained millions of solar masses, so the event was a life-changer.
The central black hole in Centaurus A now contains 55 million solar masses (more than the Milky Way’s central black hole). Given that galaxies deform as they merge, causing some stars to plunge toward hot central regions of the new galaxy, some planets might have been ruined by the supermassive black hole’s polar jets.
If left unshielded, thousands or millions of potentially habitable planets would have been made unlivable. In fact, the Centaurus A merger suggests what may happen on a lesser scale during a future merger of black holes in galaxy M83's double center. *M83 is considered an "active galaxy" because it emits much radio and infrared energy from its central region, perhaps due to its double center.
M83 is known for an unusually high number of supernova
explosions.
Given that the vast majority of visible stars are in galaxy superclusters, it's logical to assume that supercluster social forms
and limits on overpopulation should, in theory, prevail across the
universe. In the same way that New York and the world's major cities
figure in comparison to Waco, Texas, for example, superclusters
should be more challenging yet
more integrated and urbane than are outlying areas like the Verdant
galaxy group.
Suffice it to say, Verdants may be an oversized yet relatively backward population (socially, albeit not necessarily technologically - Verdants are highly intelligent).
It’s possible that in some respects, the Verdants failed to accord with Virgo supercluster ecology because they didn't organize collective accommodation of Centaurus A refugees in their galaxy group. Instead, Verdants may have over bred in order to outnumber competitors in M83 and minimize Centaurus A incursions.
* Alternatively, it’s possible that Verdants were used to force some
accommodation. However, that seems unlikely, given the greed and
arrogance we’ve seen among Verdants, to date.
In late 2004, hyper-advanced (“hyperversal”) aliens stated that Verdants embarked on a population blitz due to a struggle for control of the original Verdant galaxy. For example, according to Krapf’s figures quoted by Verdants, Verdants take 9.1 planets for themselves for every 1 occupied by another species in the IFSP.
Worse yet, on average, Verdants are 90,000 times more numerous than the IFSP’s other individual populations, a dangerously unbalanced ratio. It appears that a more advanced population decided to steer Verdants outward as part of a strategy of eco-tensions - in part to give eco offenders reason to moderate, in part to showcase the Verdants as an example of a distorted ecology.
There have been
specific remarks to this effect by more advanced “hyperversal”
aliens (see later chapter about hyperversals). In a critique of
Verdants, a hyperversal alien said that a Verdant-abetting
hyperversal alien faction has gone out of its way to find and
identify emerging planets for Verdants to target in search of
conscripts. After learning of this, I and other humans probed and
queried the Verdant-abetting hyperversal aliens, who monitor
Verdants closely. They eventually admitted that Verdants have, in
fact, been steered toward planets like Earth.
Apparently, Verdants
are also expected to learn by their encounter with humans, a lesson
that seems to proceed but one world (or galaxy) at a time. Suffice
it to say, manipulated planet kills can have long-term political and
other consequences.
The Verdant strategy in the struggle was to expand outward, and, at the same time, do genetic infiltration and takeover/hegemony schemes targeting other populations. In order to do so, Verdants had to develop a large library of genetic and biological trade specimens, which proved useful in approaching, copying, infiltrating and managing various populations.
The same hyper-advanced alien said (re Verdants),
In other words,
if that’s true, Verdants worked on two other mega-populations, plus
a number of smaller target planets as part of their outward move.
By provoking conflicts in order to weaken other societies, Verdants perpetuate their crisis regime and extend it into places where it probably isn’t warranted. This suggests that Verdant/IFSP expansion strategy was founded on conflict, excess, and specious rationalization. Regimes of the sort are rarely democratic, nor do they allow freedom of information.
Instead, they tend to be predatory and opportunistic.
Nonetheless, we can
assume that some in the Verdant bureaucracy suffer neurotic pitfalls
that surround the circus-like manipulation of other, off-world
peoples. Due to the internal preoccupations of their far-flung
government, in times of crisis Verdant crews will be pressured to
conform to a colonial paradigm. As sometimes hap-pens in intelligent
sub-cultures, the sexually-related weaknesses of the Verdant elite
can be flipped, in a sense, and regarded as positive attributes,
rather than impulsive failings.
After
all, Verdants engage in a vastly larger endeavor. Judging by many
human reports, Verdant IFSP propaganda says that humans need to be
“saved” from the ravages of our lesser nature before planet Earth is
ruined. However, few Verdants will confess that part of the breeding
program seeks to infiltrate and gain control over vital human
sectors. In Krapf’s books, Verdants admit having done that to other
planets, and competing aliens allege that Verdants are doing it
here, also.
Without realizing it, Verdants sometimes communicate their internal assumptions about their qualification to administer others' affairs, along with messages about a culture of fear surrounding their bureaucracy’s challenges to any Verdant's competency.
Within their vast colonial hierarchy, such challenges are de rigueur because Verdants often supervise younger, less technologically advanced aliens from non-Verdant planets. To stay on top, Verdants must be coldly manipulative, especially during an intervention. In numerous disputes with Verdants, I've noted this pattern repeatedly. For example, when intruded upon personally or when I note that humans are being violated, I sometimes probe and remotely test an entire Verdant crew for details of their past and present intentions here.
This is done in flash-like bursts across a larger configuration
space (not in the sense of visible bursts) because it's a
hyper-dynamic involving the negative cycle outlined in previous
pages.
Sometimes I encounter non-sexual aliens whose intermediaries verge on masculinized characterizations.
* More about the “three ellipticals” subculture
and other “hyperversal” aliens in a following chapter.
However, some of it has been threatening and, at times, has been tangentially framed in terms of a Verdant connection to one leading US military-industrial family (formerly French monarchists named Biderman and Du Pont) in part known for its ties to organized crime plus a previous family affinity for fascism.
The family has a leading role in what is known as the anti-alien black budget "Cabal," ironically - which suggests an attempt to play both sides of the fence off of each other for advantage. Other hyper-advanced aliens have repeatedly pointed out that part of the family (the formerly Swiss branch: Biderman) was "direct" Verdant operative, possibly a result of the breeding program.
The news caused quite a
stir, here, among the human community because it corroborated a
long-running pattern of thinly veiled verbal threats to humans, a
strategy of tensions that such aliens have pursued for years to the
chagrin of a growing host of humans. As a result, there have been
sustained, finely networked efforts to probe the suspects in such
regard. The results have been disturbing, frankly.
Another, perhaps more important
reported “direct operative” is a noted French financier named
“Rothschild,” whose family first appeared on a major scale by
funding both Napoleon’s adventures and his British opponents.
Greer writes:
Soon, Greer got “an invitation from a group of rogue insiders” to meet with them in the Wrigley (chewing gum) mansion in Phoenix.
While there, a man in the control group
took Greer out onto a balcony and told him, “You know, we understand
you’ve had this meeting with the CIA Director and are providing
information to the President (Clinton), but you need to know that
those people don’t know anything, and they’re never going to know
anything.”
When Greer said he was going to Europe to meet with people connected to the British royal family, the man said,
The man said that Max Rabb, a leader of the Rockefeller-dominated Council on Foreign Relations, was working with him, as was Mr. Peterson, the head of the CFR, and Peterson’s wife who headed the Rockefeller-dominated Trilateral Commission.
Greer describes the Phoenix contact group as,
A senior Science Applications International Corporation executive told Dr. Greer that in order to support alien-related projects and black budget programs,
At first glance, reports about “direct operatives” of the IFSP high in the human economy may sound strange, yet given the IFSP’s larger long-term strategy, we should expect to see highly-placed direct human operatives.
From the Verdant perspective they would be useful and could help to assure that long-term IFSP mobilizations (and abductions for breeding purposes) achieve a desired goal. Earth wouldn’t be the first case of the sort.
One Verdant told Krapf that the Verdant IFSP
inserted direct operatives high into the social line-up on at least
two other planets.
The subject was later probed by a broad but discreet network of humans, with deeply disturbing results. I’ll explain how this is done, in later pages. Having done graduate study in US history, and having worked as an investigative reporter, I wouldn’t report the quotes unless they were: a) repeated numerous times so that a variety of humans could pick up on them, and b) were later investigated to check for direct personal indications letslip by Bush Sr., himself (this was done through careful setup of circumstances that apparently came to his attention, which allowed for such to be teased out).
Bush reportedly said,
It helps to remember that Bush’s father Prescott was instrumental in the finance of Fritz Thyssen, who gave Hitler’s Nazis their biggest donations from the 1920’s onward. In other words, Bush has a racist family background.
Bush reportedly spoke glowingly of his teacher, Alan Sides PhD, who used to lecture Bush’s prep school class about the virtues of fascism.
Cathy O’Brien also reports that while discussing genetic engineering, human cloning, and the ruin of earth’s resources for profit with Bush, Dick Cheney said no one would be able to think to stop technology’s plan.
Bush replied,
That could be a first-of-a-kind threat against this planet by a reported IFSP direct operative.
The same advanced aliens also mentioned an IFSP direct operative named “Gold” (or Gold-something), apparently a Jewish financial figure in New York City. Later indications were that it’s Goldman (owner of Goldman Sachs).
The following persons were also reported to be IFSP “direct operatives”:
If those quotes are correct, it would appear that Verdants have a multi-fold strategy for manipulating the human situation, at present.
They may be more ruthless than we might
expect. That attitude may be important to remember when we discuss
how the grays’ original planet was ruined.
Some Verdants seem to have been spoiled by the luxury of distant travels,
the option to live and work on thousands of planets, plus the chance
to study and manipulate lesser populations up-close. I've detected a
subdued but droning kind of lust for sexual adventure among the most
coldly dysfunctional old stalwarts. It’s possible that some of the
worst cases of the sort are sent to work on the most distant,
primitive planets targeted for colonization - like Earth, for
example.
Wars are influenced toward an eventually pro-IFSP outcome. IFSP operatives must be positioned to gain influence over organized crime structures on the target planet, and breeding program operatives must be placed so that they control the maximum amount of money and resources without being exposed for their loyalty to a Verdant colonial scheme. To some readers this surely sounds strange: corrupt aliens. To those who know the history of colonialism, it should come as no surprise.
Humans aren’t the
only kind who can do wrong.
To publish ugly details about
their most aggressive foreign policy failures would loosen the
cohesion of the larger empire. So, presumably, they glaze the
cake - they overwhelm the Verdant citizenry with more positive news
and scientific reports about their many planets.
At one time, pre-emptive impulses of the sort might have helped Verdants maintain their independence in the face of a challenge. However, that was during a relatively primitive age, compared to the current inter-alien context. In a sense, humans are lucky to have developed under safer circumstances.
Worse yet, in order to maintain their hold on non-Verdant conscript planets, Verdants would have to surround such planets with an overbearing trade and techno-defense structure in order to cut them off from neighbors with whom they might otherwise affiliate, then stray. That may be why Verdants and grays have reportedly developed limited human-hybrid offshoot colonies on several planets near our solar system.
Ultimately, to proceed with such efforts would be costly and
would tempt Verdants to mine the vicinity’s
resources in order to profit by the interaction. Of course, that may
be their prime intention.
What single voice, what given Verdant planet would be sufficient to change the expansionist policy of so large and unwieldy a population?
There are more advanced possibilities,
including a largely veiled intervention of hyper-advanced
populations who greatly exceed Verdants.
Nonetheless, in a lighter moment, one hyper-advanced (non-IFSP)
alien remarked that Verdant females are characterized by an unusual
"presence" of mind - a tongue-in-cheek criticism of the more
immediate, stimulus-seeking awareness that sexuality engenders.
Instead, it has been cited as a security
risk to this galaxy, which brings us back to planet Earth, where
abductions continue.
Assuming such numbers (essentially the only ones that we have, to date), the largest reported mega-population in the Milky Way would occupy some ten or thirteen thousand planets, if the Verdants’ ratio of aliens per planet holds true here, also. In addition, we can assume that at least some more advanced “hyperversal” aliens (part of a universal network of various hyperversals) reside in or near the Milky Way.
They may interact with, and at least partly constitute, every major galaxy’s largest coalitions. As such, the Milky Way would more closely approximate a desired universal ecology.
The Kepler satellite find of a probable tens of billions of Earth-size
planets in the Milky Way poses the near certainty that there are
numerous, different varieties of aliens in this galaxy and in
neighboring galaxies who are older, more evolved and less invasive
than are Verdants (which is probably why they aren’t here, trying to
colonize us, being more civilized).
In late May 2004, one hyper-advanced alien mentioned that a neighboring population of hyperversal aliens (referred to herein as the “three ellipticals” faction) is either a 1.3 factor as numerous as the Verdants, or 1.3 x 10n times the number of Verdants (could be less than the Verdants) - -the quote was so fleeting, although resonated variously later, that it should be regarded as tenuous.
Judging by the character of the “three ellipticals” hyperversals we’ve seen, they would probably pose the highest number they can rationalize and might act as though some non-affiliated hyperversals are part of their number. In other words, there may be more to the story.
* A
later chapter discusses the “three ellipticals” faction and other
“hyperversals.”
Worse yet, Verdants may want to speed the Δt energy clock on other galaxies and shorten their duration rather than deplete the Verdant galaxy’s energy lifetime.
Phillip Krapf quotes one Verdant who said Verdants have tentatively occupied at least one planet in the Milky Way.
He later quoted a human “ambassador” who says Verdants occupy at least two Milky Way planets, which suggests that, in part, Verdants seek human affiliation in order to rubber stamp their expansionist policy. Human capitulation to such a scheme could put us at odds with native Milky Way and neighboring aliens, if not cut us off altogether.
Why is that?
|
