|
by Kevin Scott King
December 02, 2015
from
TruthShock Website
...all very real illusions.
The purpose of this article is to break down false flag events into
their parts, deconstruct them. In so doing then create a template on
how to study an event and determine if it is a false flag. Normally
when one thinks or speaks of a false flag event they are referring
to the Main Event.
This presentation is about the entire
operation or plan of which the Main Event is but one part.
Note: What follows is but a brief or summary of a much larger
project. I am posting this to the community at large to inspire
others to turn this into a full fledged project which could include
a website, presentation (video), and book.
Further details can be found at the end
of this article.
What is a
False-Flag?
What exactly is a false flag, why is it called false flag?
The term false-flag is a naval term from
the age of sail that refers to a ship flying the colors (flag) of a
country other than the one the ship belonged. This was done for
multiple reasons but a common one was to lure an enemy vessel into
gun or boarding range and then at the last moment drop the false
flag and run up the true colors before attacking. It was fair sport
to use false flags but considered immoral/unethical to attack under
one.
To the point that it was never done.
But that was a different age…
The simplest definition of a false-flag is an event in which the
actual perpetrators and the reported or blamed perpetrators are
different. The classic use of a false-flag, and hence the military
origin of it's name, goes as follows.
Country A's King wants to conquer and
loot Country B's land to enrich himself. Of course if this is what
King A tells his army they may choose not to fight or revolt. Or
best case their effort will be lacking. In order to get the most out
of their soldiers, the commanders need them to be emotionally
involved… anger, hatred, revenge.
Now the skilled orator and manipulator
might be able to create this mood with just words. But not many have
this level of skill. It is much easier to motivate and/or raise an
army if one's country has been attacked, hence you are acting in
defense. And this is where the false flag comes in. Country A's King
and its top General(s) conspire to launch an attack against itself,
claiming that the attackers were from Country B.
The attack needs to be big enough to
create real panic and fear, and for maximum affect there needs to be
real deaths. The attackers need be convincing in their role as
soldiers of Country B, so clothes, uniform, weapons need to match
appropriately.
The likely hood of success of the attack
is high since it would be unexpected or a surprise attack. Even if
the attack were to technically fail, the fact alone of an attack
might be enough to manipulate a response. King A could use men from
within to execute the attack, or it might be better to use
mercenaries.
Regardless, a successful attack will
incense the populace against the 'evil' Country B, and therefore
justify an invasion.
The above is just one example, or a classic example of a false-flag.
However, it is very important to understand that the false-flag
event can take on countless forms. I recently read a comment where
the commentator stated that because actual people died it was not a
false-flag. The defining characteristic of a false-flag is not it's
specific type or whether or not non-actors died, or even if the
event occurred at all, meaning the entire reported event is a
fabrication.
One defining characteristic is that the
real perpetrator is never known or revealed. So the author or
director/producer of the 'production' is unknown. The audience's
attention is locked on the stage, the villain, clearly identified
through the official narrative, is known.
But who are behind the curtains? When a
staged play is sold as real then the actors become irrelevant, what
is important is who are the Producers! Who are the people that
wrote, directed, and funded the event? These are the real
perpetrators, not the actors on the stage.
Cui Bono?… Who Benefits?
The other defining characteristic is that the event is a catalyst
for the true objectives. Thus the false-flag uses the classic
Hegelian dialectic of 'Problem-Reaction-Solution'.
From the example
above, the surprise attack is the 'problem' (a threat to personal
safety), the population's anger, fear, concern is the desired
'reaction', and the 'solution' is to invade the offender to
eliminate the threat which is enabled by the populations reaction.
The false-flag then is a deliberately
created illusion whose purpose is create the environment in which
the objective or 'solution' will be accepted and thus implemented.
Why use
False-Flags?
As explained in the previous section the classic false-flag was used
to justify an invasion of another country.
But there are numerous motivations for
using false-flags. Thus the false-flag event has been used
throughout history to initiate change. Problem-Reaction-Solution.
If the change that the leader(s) want is
not going to be wanted or accepted by the population then the
false-flag is an excellent tool in order enact said change.
So the false-flag is a tool of
manipulation (deception) to direct the opinions and actions of the
populace. This problem-reaction-solution model of the false-flag is
but one tool of the social engineers who are directing the actors on
the world stage.
While the audience, the 99.9% of the
world, much more than just mere spectators, are directly affected by
these 'engineers' from the moment of their birth until the time of
their passing.
They (we) are actually
unknowing-unwilling participants in the
machinations of the 1%.
Göring: Why, of course, the people don't want war. Why would some
poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best
that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece?
Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor
in England, nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is
understood.
But, after all, it is the leaders of
the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple
matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a
fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship.
Gilbert: There is one difference. In a democracy the people have
some say in the matter through their elected representatives,
and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.
Göring: Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice,
the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.
That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being
attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger.
It works the same way in any
country.
From an interview between Gustave Gilbert, an American
psychologist, and Hermann Göring during the Nuremberg
Trials.
Found in the book, 'Nuremberg
Diary'
Reality-based Community
The source of the term is a quotation
in an October 17, 2004, The New York Times Magazine article by
writer Ron Suskind, "Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of
George W. Bush," quoting an unnamed aide to
George W. Bush
(later attributed to Karl Rove):
"The aide said that guys like me
were 'in what we call the reality-based community,' which he
defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from
your judicious study of discernible reality'."
"That's not the way the world
really works anymore," he continued.
"We're an empire now, and when
we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying
that reality - judiciously, as you will - we'll act again,
creating other new realities, which you can study too, and
that's how things will sort out.
We're history's actors… and you,
all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
On December 1st of 1941, 80+% of the US
population was against getting involved in the war in Europe.
FDR wanted the US to join the war, a now
well established fact. So how does FDR convince the US population to
participate in a war across the ocean that they do not want to be
in?
The US took 8 steps to incense the Japanese and encourage or
force them to attack. The US had broken the diplomatic and military
codes of the Japanese in the 30's.
The US knew what they were up to. The
Japanese diplomats were to declare war on the morning of Dec 7
before the attack, but this meeting was intentionally delayed. Thus
the claim of a 'surprise' attack could be maintained, and the
surprise, horror, shock of the attack was used to manipulate the
population into joining WWII.
The Army and Naval commanders (General
Walter Short and Admiral Husband Kimmel) at Pearl Harbor, who were
blamed for failing to be ready and immediately dismissed, were both
exonerated in '44.
Both the Navy Court and the Army Board
found Washington guilty, that officials within the US Govt knew
the attack was coming but failed to pass this information on to the
appropriate personnel.
Proven
False-Flags
So you're not convinced false-flags are
real.
Fair enough, nothing wrong with being
skeptical. Let's then look at events that have been 'officially'
exposed. One of the most significant is
Operation Gladio, for not only was it blown wide open,
but it clearly demonstrates state sponsored terrorism.
After WWII British MI6 and the CIA
created and supported right-wing terrorist groups throughout Europe
in which many innocents were killed. The purpose was to blame the
terrorism on left-wing groups, using a 'strategy of tension', and
thus gain support for more government powers.
This program went on for many decades,
and though officially Gladio may have shut down, it obviously
continues unabated:
Iran-Contra, thought technically not a false-flag event, is absolute
proof of US Government complicity in international arms sales and
regime change.
The Iran side involved US illegal arms sales to Iran,
using Israel as an intermediary to ship the arms to Iran, in
exchange for assistance in freeing of American hostages in Lebanon.
Important to note that at this time Iran
was considered an 'enemy' and officially designated a 'State Sponsor
of Terrorism', which is deliciously ironic considering what
Operation Gladio revealed. In fact the US was assisting Iraq in the
ongoing Iran-Iraq War. This was during an embargo of arms sales to
Iran.
Some of the funds generated from these
arms sales were then used to fund the Contras in Nicaragua which had
been strictly prohibited by the US Congress.
Failed
False-Flags
As with proven false-flags, failed attempts are just as valuable in
establishing the reality of these staged events.
The Reagan assassination attempt and
Ukraine coup are both excellent examples. The Ukraine attempt was a
failure as the primary objective was Eastern Ukraine (valuable
farmland), including Crimea (where Russia's largest Naval base is
located at Sevastopol).
The shoe bomber, and the underwear
bomber (in which we have an expert witness, attorney Kurt Haskell,
who exposed this fraud) are two other recent examples.
This is an area that needs some deeper
research. Failed attempts will be more easily forgotten, under
reported, or unreported.
Real Terrorism
/ Real Death
Some terrorism is organic, meaning not state sponsored or created
and controlled by the globalist.
Some false-flags have real victims.
Because some false-flags do not appear to have any real victims, by
definition meaning there is no direct verifiable evidence of actual
deaths. It is important to investigate those cases of real
terrorism, and real deaths to compare to the completely staged
false-flag events.
Thus providing a base line to compare
known verifiable events against suspected staged events.
An
excellent example is the Beslan School Massacre from 2004 in which
Chechnya terrorists took a elementary school hostage with 1000+
hostages, and 300+ deaths. Because this played out over 3 days
there is plenty of video and picture evidence as the tragedy
unfolded.
The short video below is ample evidence of what REAL
violence, heroism, blood, anguish, and death look like.
Anatomy of the
False-Flag
By breaking down the false-flag into into various components not
only can we better understand how they work but why they are used.
Also, by doing so it will be proven that
the fingerprint(s) of false-flags clearly demonstrate a larger plan.
The False-Flag uses a standard plan of action, similar to a business
plan or battle plan.
The purpose is to fully flesh out in
writing all elements of the event. The following is a list of the
different elements that make up the plan which will then be followed
by a breakdown for each section.
The Event Plan by sections:
-
Objective
-
Focus
-
Event Type
-
Main Event
-
Date/Time
-
Location
-
Participants
-
Perpetrator
-
Victim(s)
-
Event Execution
-
Back-up plans
-
Official Narrative
-
Cover-up
Objective
The false-flag begins with an objective, a purpose, a reason for
being.
Sometimes the purpose is singular,
but many times there are multiple purposes (which is a tell-tale
sign of advanced planning, and hence further proof that a
particular event is a false flag).
The primary objective; eliminate an
opponent, further a specific agenda (gun control), or justify
war. The more sophisticated events seem to always have multiple
objectives, or secondary objectives.
The secondary objectives tend to be
more psychological, more soft, subtle. These could include
creating specific emotional responses, such as fear, anger,
apathy. More specifically a public killing might be chosen in
order to send a message, a warning. Which was the case in the
60's with JFK, MLK, and RFK.
Another objective of these three
60's assassinations was the Vietnam war, which is one strong
thread that links the three murders together, and the
perpetrators.
Another sub-objective might be to
create an anger response, coupled with some patriotism to
manipulate the people into accepting war.
The very
recent Paris Friday 13th
event seems to have at least 5 objectives:
-
justify French
participating in the proxy war in Syria
-
strip privacy/freedom
rights of the French peoples
-
eventual shut-down of all European
borders
-
prevent any potential protests at the Climate Summit in
Paris at the end of the month
-
create anti-Muslim,
anti-immigrant sentiment
Long Term Planing...
Many of the recent mass shooting
events in the USA have at least 2 objectives:
Focus
The focus of an event is that which the designers want the
audiences attention focused on.
This is not necessarily the event
itself. It can be the victim, the perpetrator, or other
elements.
9/11 the focus of the event was terrorism, hence 'Osama bin
Laden'. He was the villain. He was the reason 'you're either
with us, or for the terrorist.'
He was the bogey man that had to
be found and killed. He is what justified invading Afghanistan,
and
getting those poppy fields producing again. Which then led to the next bogeyman
Saddam Hussein. And the invasion of Iraq.
In recent shootings in
America it has become painfully obviously that the focus of the
events is pushing the gun control agenda.
Another part of the focus is who is the primary or intended
audience? In the JFK assassination the primary audience was not
the American people per se, it was the politicians and those
directly involved in governance. Both at the National and
International level.
This was a message for the insiders…
'This is what we'll do to those
who oppose
us'.
9/11 the target audience was the
American people.
Event Type
The importance of the Event Type cannot be understated.
A the simplest level the Event Type
determines how the objective is achieved. If it is a killing,
then will it be an 'accident', suicide(ed), assassination, etc.
Another important decision is will
the operation piggy back onto a scheduled real event, or will
the operation be created from scratch? Another critical decision
is determining the 'level of involvement' for the Main Event.
The level of involvement defines who
are the actors and if there will be unknowing participants;
victims, persons thrust into the story due to the created
circumstances, and bystanders.
The level of involvement can be a
simple as the perpetrator and the victim, or one actor with the
rest unknowing participants, or the entire event being faked. So
the level of involvement is on a continuum from minimum (one
actor) to maximum (all actors).
From having the villain participate
(Hinkley, Sirhan Sirhan), to present (Oswald, James Holmes,
Tsarnaev's brothers), to non-existent (Adam Lanza).
From the victims being real (actual
deaths), to fake deaths (actors), to all fabricated. It is
important to avoid the stereotyping that a false-flag only
follows a specific format.
A good analogy would be types of movies, which are themselves
real illusions. Old school action movie where all stunts are
done with real people, in a real environment, with real props.
Then we have the now common scenario where it is a mix of
real/live action and CG. Then the movie where all special
affects and stunts are CG.
And finally the fully CG or
animation movie. All of these movie types are real. Each of them
required real people to work on them, create them, produced
them. And all of these movies are illusions.
They are works of fiction. They are
deliberate creations; produced, planned, directed, and acted to
be recorded (filmed) and distributed to be viewed. To entertain
and en-train (for movies are powerful tools for social control),
and of course to make money. I can't help but think of the movie
"Wag the Dog".
False-flags are fundamentally the same. Whether there is one
actor or many.
Whether there are real deaths or
fake. Or whether the entire false-flag is but the news report
itself (the official narrative). Each type of created illusion
is real. They also are absolutely used for social control, in
fact this really is their primary purpose.
Problem-Reaction-Solution. With the
goal being of manipulating the solution upon the greater
population, thus controlling the population. Like a movie, the
false-flag is a deliberately planned and executed production. It
is a real illusion.
A better comparison might be the
stage play, since the 'performance' is done live, on location,
with a real audience.
Eventually we come around to the question of "What is 'real'?"
It can be simply a matter of perspective.
Look at it from an
accident standpoint. The accident can be a mistake or it can
'deliberate'. A classic and shall we say harmless example is
from the iconic 'Christmas Story' movie. Where the wife
'accidentally' knocks over and breaks the sexy leg lamp.
Of course the father suspects it was
not an accident. But she feigns innocence. You could witness a
deliberate accident, and depending on the circumstances and the
skill of the perpetrator would swear it was a mistake.
Again, the event really occurred,
you were an eye witness. So it was 'real', but it was not a
mistake, it was a deliberate illusion. And in fact you might
have been selected specifically to witness the event as proof
that is was a mistake since most people trust your judgment and
opinion.
Which leads us the deeper issue of this project.
That many of the false-flags are
connected. That there is a very deep game of deception that we
live within. Perpetrated in large part by the myriad of secret
societies vying for power and control in the world. It is this
deep game of deception that makes it difficult to analyze
false-flags.
Confusion, misdirection,
misinformation all used to obfuscate what really happened.
Main Event
The focus of this article is on the overall plan of a false-flag
event.
From objective, to initial planning,
on through to the cover-up. But normally when someone refers to
a False-Flag they are referring to the Main Event; the hero
shot, Act three… the climax.
The crux of the planning will be
focused on the main event. Regardless of what theory you accept
as to how 9/11 was carried out, there is one absolute fact. A
tremendous amount of planning was required in order to pull it
off, years in advance.
It at this level that 'The Plan' coalesces into what exactly the
performance will be. This is where the actual 'script' is
created. The specific location is selected, the actors chosen,
the spoken lines created, and the props needed.
Time and date are decided. As well
as how much financing will be required for a successful
performance.
9/11 the main event was the falling of the twin towers. This was
the climax. This was the psychological 'shock and awe' on the
American people, which preceded the physical shock and awe that
fell upon the Afghani and Iraqi peoples. It is the image of the
falling tower(s) that is still used today to reinforce that fear
and anger.
JFK, RFK, MLK the main event was the
shooting, but the murder was but one objective.
Date/Time
The date and time are both crucial decisions. We know for
followers of the occult that dates are VERY important. See
Christine Lagarde's, IMF's Managing Director, Magic of
Number 7 speech for proof of the importance of numerology.
Jump to the :50 mark to here her talk about numerology.
The esoteric and exoteric significance of a date should be
closely examined.
Another important factor of date and
time is how they coincide with the news cycle. Date can also be
critical depending on how soon the Main Event is needed or
required to take place.
The date can be a deciding factor,
especially if time is short, on how/where the Main Event is
completed. The September 11th, 2001 attack, the date is normally
shortened to 9/11 and in the USA emergency services number is
9-1-1. Therefore every time 9-1-1 or 911 is
mentioned or seen it recalls 9/11, and the associated trauma.
The recent Paris attacks happening on 11/13/15, which just
happens to be Friday the 13th. But it appears this was predicted
from the January 2015 Economist magazine (Rothschild
co-owner) with two arrows with the numbers 11.5 and 11.3, the
same exact 6 numbers as the date.
These arrows (below image - bottom
right corner) are in front of the
picture 'La
belle ferronnière' by Leonardo da Vinci, which is
found at the Louvre Museum in Paris:
Location
Like date/time the location often is a critical part of the
event.
Signaling on both the esoteric and
exoteric levels. The name of the location and/or city as well
can also be of significant importance. Locating a shooting in a
Gun Free zone, and at schools to maximize the emotional impact.
The geographic location in relation
to the event to send a signal. Like the
Oklahoma City bombing,
the center or heart of the nation, signaling the 'heartland' is
not safe from terror.
Other important factors in location
is how much control can be exerted at the place, in particular
control of movement of non-participants, and ingress/egress to
location.
It goes without saying that
in 9/11 you could consider
the location as the event, it certainly was the 'star' of the
event. Both the Twin Towers and NYC...
Participants
Participants can be classified into 4 groups:
-
Knowing-Willing
-
Knowing-Unwilling
-
Unknowing-Willing
-
Unknowing-Unwilling
The knowing-willing are the actors,
the knowing participants.
The knowing-unwilling are persons
who are aware of the event before it takes place and are
participating against their will. So they've either been
tricked, blackmailed, or coerced into it. The unknowing-willing
are participants thrust into the main event at the time of it's
execution and decide to fully participate, most likely unaware
they are in the midst of a false-flag event.
The unknowing-unwilling are
participants thrust into the main event who have no idea it is
staged and do not want to participate. They may simply be
bystanders, they may be victims, or they may actually
participate against their will.
I think an interesting study of this
is Wayne Carver of Sandy Hook fame. My intuition is that he was
a knowing-willing participant of what he was told was a crisis
training drill. At some point the drill/event went 'live' and he
was thrust into the middle of it.
At that point you could classify him
as a unknowing-unwilling participant who then gives his infamous
press conference and says the following:
"I hope, uhh, I hope they
(referencing his medical team) and I hope uhh the people of
Newtown, uhh don't have it crash on their head later but…"
Jump to the 4:40 mark to here the
above sentence.
I suspect there are much more unknowing-unwilling participants
who are 'forced' into the drama than one would first think.
Afraid to speak out, play along to
get along, don't rock the boat all factors in their complicity
of silence… but Fear being the strongest motivator.
Perpetrator
First is the perpetrator(s) to be known or unknown?
If the perpetrator is to be known
then he/she becomes the villain of the narrative. The lone crazy
gunman or Terrorist! Focus the attention on the targeted patsy.
Is the perpetrator to be feared,
loathed, or possibly sympathetic? All these are taken into
account based on the objective of the operation. If the
perpetrator is to be unknown then do they simply not exist (as
in the case of suicide by murder), or is the case that it is
known there is a perpetrator but the identity is to remain
secret?
In some cases the psychological
affect of the unknown/at large perpetrator is greater than the
event(s) themselves. Such as the case with serial killers.
As previously mentioned another very
important aspect of the overall plan is determining what role
the perpetrator (patsy) is to play in the actual main event.
Is the perpetrator to play a
critical role in the event execution, as in the case of Sirhan
Sirhan in RFK's assassination? Or is the patsy planted there
under false pretenses; such as playing a part in a drill, or
surveillance work?
Oswald knew he was set-up, and it is an established fact he was
involved with intelligence services. What if the planners were
hoping he would keep mum? He could claim innocence and not
implicate others.
But he had multiple undocumented
conversations with Dallas Police Cpt Will Fritz, and two FBI
agents. (Note: original notes were either destroyed or created
after the interviews)
So then the perpetrators knew he was going
to 'sing', hence the need for Ruby.
I'm unconvinced that Oswald played
no role. Oswald fled the scene, so he knew immediately he was in
possible trouble.
But if his hands were clean, why
flee the scene? Was he a bag man?, the person who delivered the
weapon to the site? Or maybe he thought there was only one
shooter, and deliberately sabotaged the event to prevent it's
success? In which case he would be very surprised that Kennedy
was shot. Or possibly he was instructed to leave?
Whatever his role, leaving the scene
was his death knell.
Victim
Depending on the objective the victim might be the sole purpose
or target of the event, or the victim(s) might just play a minor
part.
How the victims are treated can be
critical to ascertaining if an event is a false flag. The type
of victim (age, race, sex, socio-economic level) all important
factors to consider, and to a large degree determined by the
objective, as well as the number of victims.
Will the victims be real? Or will
the victims be actors? Knowing-willing fake deaths, or
unknowing-unwilling real deaths? Why choose one over the other?
Real deaths because of the requisite shock upon the population
as a whole, and in particular as a message (warning) to
opponents 'in-the-know'.
Why fake deaths? Because the fake dead don't have any
real family demanding answers!
The reason the 9/11 Commission
Report was created was because of persistent family members
demanding an investigation, in particular the four 'Jersey
Girls'.
If real children had died at Sandy
Hook you would have seen numerous hysterical parents, instead we
get Robbie Parker's infamous performance. If you have never
watched the below video you need only watch the first 40
seconds, pay close attention to his behavior.
Instead of angry, incensed, emotional parents who as 9/11 proved
can be quite a problem.
The worse the real perpetrators have
to deal with is persistent investigators. On which they can hang
the label 'conspiracy theorist' and thus the public has been
conditioned to ignore, discount, or ridicule.
Therefore much easier to handle the
cover-up with fake deaths.
Preparation
The date/time, participants, and location have been set.
Now it's time to prepare the
participants and the location for the Main Event. Is the villain
a MKUltra mind controlled
individual? Then it needs to be determined that the appropriate
level of control can be achieved and on a consistent basis.
If it is to be a well scripted/acted
event then the participants must practice their roles in as much
of a realistic setting as possible. As for the location itself,
how much preparation is needed?
In the case of 9/11 a tremendous
amount of preparation was required, in fact an unprecedented
level of preparation.
If the location needs preparation, how
much can be done before the event? In particular how much can/needs to
be done days/weeks/months before, and how much just prior
minutes/hours. Just like a professional sporting event, or a
concert, or play.
The better the preparation the
better the chance of success during the actual 'performance'.
Event Execution
Putting the plan in action. Or more precisely… Showtime!
This is it, all the planning and
preparation come to head as the Main Event is performed.
Everything is in place and simply awaits the go/no-go sign. In
fact this is the most critical decision at this moment.
There are multiple reasons to give
the no-go signal. Non-actors in the wrong position, weather (it
was raining the morning of Nov 22, 1963 in Dallas, TX. Hence the
occasional umbrellas and why Jean Hill was wearing her red
raincoat. If the rain had persisted a little
longer, the top would have stayed on the car), equipment
failure, target unavailable.
It makes one wonder how many
planned false-flags were given the no-go signal?
A common trait of more recent events
is some kind of 'drill(s)' occurring at the exact same time and
place as the false-flag. The drill provides excellent cover to
stage the event without raising suspicion. And if they don't
'go-live', so a no-go, then it's simply another preparation
drill.
And for those unknowing participants
none the wiser as to how close they came to being thrust into a
false-flag performance.
Back-up
"No battle plan survives contact
with the enemy."
German military
strategist Helmuth von Moltke
And thus is the case with any plan,
especially the more complex.
And thus all good planners therefore
have back-up or contingency plans. Plan B, or C.
It seems logical to assume that the
more control over the participants, the less likely to have the
event not go to plan. Which is a strong argument for having the
100% staged event. The classic example of the use of back-up is
the JFK assassination.
The plan was a single head shot from
the rear, the frontal kill shot was the 'if all else fails'
option.
Official Narrative
As much planning will go into the creation of the narrative, the
'official story', as the rest of the plan combined.
Not only into the narrative itself
but the control of the dissemination of the narrative.
The
narrative can include:
...and others.
The narrative is as important as the
Main Event itself. And in some cases more important. In
particular if the event is rushed then the narrative may have to
carry the operation. The narrative is what sets the tone,
identifies the villain, the victim(s), creates the mood, and
pushes the propaganda message for the event.
The Official Narrative IS
the event for most people, but especially consumers of the news.
So it is well planned and crafted. The narrative can also be a
tell-tale sign of a false-flag event.
The official narrative is much easier to push and control when
the media is controlled, such as
90% of media in the US is
controlled by 6 companies.
And when there is no legitimate
investigative journalism happening from news sources, like what
is happening now in the USA.
Cover-up
A successful event does not guarantee overall success.
Loose ends must be taken care of.
Evidence destroyed, which many times is very important.
Witnesses silenced (mysterious/untimely deaths). Investigators
discouraged.
Keeping the official narrative
secure and defended can be as much work and take much more time
then the entire operation up to that point. JFK and 9/11 are
both excellent examples of Cover-up in action. The commitment,
number of persons involved, time, media used. In JFK's event the
kill shot was suppose to be from the rear.
The frontal shot created the need to
suppress/cover multiple items:
-
people hearing gun shots from the
grassy knoll
-
the total number of shots
-
suppression and
manipulation of
the Zapruder film
-
use of
Officer Tippit as a
body double (he looked so much like JFK he was regularly teased
about it)
Personally I'm still amazed at the
level of commitment for the JFK narrative… 50+ years later.
Which also proves that there are long term plans involved and
groups whose participatory members have long since died since
the event(s).
It is my opinion that numerous
mysterious deaths post Main Event are those of
unknowing-unwilling participants, who figured out enough to know
that the official narrative was impossible and whose opinion or
testimony would be dangerous.
Mistakes
Some mistakes can be covered with back-up plans, others cannot.
Mistakes can blow the entire event. It
is probably safe to assume that due to mistakes or poor execution of
the plan, that some events are NOT taken live. That they stay just a
drill event at the local level, with disappointed knowing-willing
participants, and unknowing participants none the wiser as they are
told it was just a practice drill.
Lets consider
Flight 93 of 9/11 fame.
I first considered this a back-up plane,
that if one of the other three failed it would fill in the gap. But
it's long and erratic flight path from NYC to the field in
Pennsylvania, and the ridiculously small hole they claimed it
crashed into indicate to me that something went wrong with this
plane. It was to have taken off at 8:01 from Newark, but was delayed
41 minutes.
Many have speculated this plane was
meant to hit
Building 7. Whether you believe that the 4 commercial
jets were real or did not exist, or whether you believe specially
prepared planes were used, regardless something went wrong with
Flight 93.
Another mistake was the Oklahoma City
bombing, not all of the charges were detonated and explosives were
found mounted on columns in the building, thus debunking the truck
bomb myth. Which of course had to be buried and concealed.
Watch 'A Noble Lie' documentary about
the OKC bombing for much more.
Effects
Post-event reactions.
One sure way to identify a false-flag
but also it's objectives is to wait and observe the 'Solutions' or
responses to the event… the 'effects'. Again, Cui Bono? Who
benefits?
Taking
the Paris Friday 13th event.
-
Does ISIS, ISIL, IS, Daesh (the
use of multiple names is done to deliberately confuse)
benefit from this supposed attack?
-
The prior 6 weeks Russia has
been bombing the shit out of ISIS, and their response is we
can't get enough of our brothers deaths, so let's piss off
another military power who can increase the number of bombs
being rained upon our heads??
-
Maybe they confused Paris with
Moscow?…
Commonalities
By identifying and listing the commonalities among false-flag events
we will be able to link together the events, and show too many
'coincidences' to be mathematically possible and therefore this
indicates planning by same/similar groups.
Commonalities include:
-
lone gunman
-
mental instability
-
SSRI's
-
multiple shooters reported become one
-
lack of evidence (no proof of victims)
-
destruction of evidence
-
crisis actors
-
training drills at the same time/location of the
event
-
victim memorial foundations
created immediately after event… or before
Certainly an excellent example of Commonalities is 'training
drills', happening weeks, days, the morning of or during the event
itself, and either at the exact location or close by.
A partial list of events in which drills
were taking place before or during the event:
Connections
In Connections we take the evidence and known participants of the
various false-flags and link them together.
To demonstrated not only that these are
events carried out by the same individuals and groups, but to prove
how they are connected. What organizations, what specific peoples.
To prove that there are larger agendas at play of which each
false-flag plays a part. Also proving that long term planning is
required.
In Connections what will be created is a
series of threads that connect individual events together and then
connect the treads themselves together to show the tapestry of
false-flag events.
As a little more obscure example of a thread running through
multiple events we have,
The Tucson shooting, reported 6 killed
and 12 injured, which has gotten lost somewhat in the cavalcade of
deliberate events, is interesting for several reasons but in
particular for the victims.
Victim Judge John Roll, a US
Federal Judge, who stated that the Brady Bill was unconstitutional,
treading on the 5th and violating the 10th Amendment. The Brady
Handgun Violence Prevention Act mandated federal background checks
for gun purchases.
The Act was named after James Brady, who
was shot by John Hinckley, Jr. during an attempted assassination of
President Ronald Reagan on March 30, 1981.
U.S. Representative
Gabrielle Giffords, who did survive a serious head wound, has gone
one to create her own gun control initiative. Her husband is Mark Kelley, an
astronaut.
Finally victim Christina Taylor Green, the 9 years whose
birthday was… wait for it… September 11, 2001. President Obama
brought the 9/11 'Remembrance Flag' to Tucson to spread out over the
memorial sight. Many commonalities and connections here.
9/11, terrorism, lone gunmen, mental
health, gun control, Reagan assassination, 'conspiracy theorist' (Loughner
was identified as such).
In this section we will be identifying specific groups,
I believe it is important to delineate
that this does not mean that every member of said organization is in
on the take.
The reason for this is some people when
they hear the CIA was involved in…, maybe it would be easier to list
what they weren't involved in??…
I digress. When some hear the CIA was
involved in the assassination of JFK they immediately discount it
because they can't believe the 'entire' CIA organization was in on
the plot. This is valid reasoning.
Thus the need to explain that no the
entire XYZ organization was not involved. Really in any event, only
a handful from any one organization would be the norm. Classic
compartmentalization. Key individuals.
Also these organizations will
deliberately have personnel who are the 'good' guys, thus are not
'in-the-know'. Like Freemasonry, the average low-level Freemason has
no idea what is happening at the higher levels.
It's just a fraternal lodge, provides
some charity for the community, good for camaraderie and business
connections… maybe influence a local election… for a fellow mason.
Untimely/Convenient/Suspicious (Suicided) Deaths
Outside of the Cover-up deaths.
Though not necessarily false-flag per
se, the untimely or suicided deaths show the same pattern and many
times are linked to false-flag events and/or groups involved in
creating false-flags.
Suspicious or convenient deaths of which
these are but a few of many:
-
Danny Casalaro - investigative journalist working
on a book involving the CIA, PROMIS software, drug running,
BCCI… called 'The Octopus'
-
Gary Webb - Dark Alliance newspaper series
exposing the CIA's drug running involving LA gangs (Bloods,
Crips), and Honduras Contras
-
Michael Hastings - investigating the CIA's Director
John Brennan's witch-hunt of investigative journalist
See the CIA trend there?
These just happen to be the first three
that popped in my mind. And coming back around to false-flag
objectives. Certainly one objective of Hastings death was sending a
very clear 'warning' to other investigative journalists.
Sacrificial
Killing(s)
False-flags are normally the operations
of secret societies, whether
they be,
-
private (Freemasons, Milner
Round Table, CFR, RIIA,
Trilateral)
-
religious based (Rosicrucian,
Society of Jesus aka
Jesuits, Zionist)
-
state sponsored (CIA, MI6,
Mossad)
And hence by their very nature deeply
involved in the occult.
For many serious practitioners of the
occult a 'sacrifice' is necessary in order to ensure the success of
a plan… or event. We know that in some events the 'sacrifice' itself
is the event. Such as JFK or 9/11.
It is my contention
therefore that at least one living human must pay with their life in
order to ensure success. As an example in Sandy Hook, it's my theory
that
Nancy Lanza was the sacrificial killing.
For historical context:
In Homer's
Iliad, Agamemnon the Greek King sacrificed his daughter Iphigenia in
order to ensure success in his war against Troy to recapture Helen,
the wife of his brother the King of Sparta, from Paris, the son of
the King and Queen of Troy.
Not sure if that's a good example as it
reads like a bloody soap opera.
Regardless history, especially ancient
and more primitive, is replete with human sacrifice being used in
order to appease the God(s)… 'Lucifer'
***
Authors Note:
I recently heard of several books that focus on a specific
false-flag event but get into the bigger issue of false flags being
used to shape public opinion, and act as catalysts for change.
Because of the sheer number of
false-flags events that are occurring today and the amount of good
research and books done by numerous persons it seems that what needs
to be done is a presentation or book whose focus is on the broader
issue of false-flags themselves.
While working on a basic outline, which really is what this article
is, I was struck where the real meat of this project would be. The
piecing together of these various false flags to show how numerous
false flags are related.
By doing so, it is my opinion, that the
community at large can prove that the events are not 'isolated'
incidents. But are part of a much larger plan.
That the commonalities of many false
flags are too numerous to ignore or dismiss as mere 'coincidences',
and that there are numerous direct connections of specific
individuals, corporations, and organizations among false flag
events.
By creating such a project we can awaken
more that there is a larger agenda afoot. That is being carried out
over decades and even centuries.
That this can only be done at the
very highest levels of government and business. And that because if
these plans were publicly known the populace would resist and/or
revolt, therefore they must be kept secret and hence the need for
secret societies to carry out these plans over long periods of time.
So I am putting this Anatomy of False-Flags outline out into the
Internet ether. Hoping that it will cross the conscious and
sub-conscious void and inspire someone(s) to create such a report,
presentation, book.
If I were to do it I would make a point
to contact the leading researchers on specific false flag events to
get their insight and input on what commonalities and connections
they found. So I see it as very much a collaborative project.
By being able to source info from
specific events from others should then allow the researcher to
focus on the bigger picture and identify the commonalities and make
the connections across time, places, and people.
For the real meat and power of this
project is the Commonalities and Connections information.
Some ideas I had while working the outline; it would probably be
helpful to create a simple database to track the data and form it
into useful information. For instance linking single individuals to
multiple events.
In the Commonalities section a table
listing False-flags on one axis and Commonalities on the other with
each intersection checked if a commonality exist would be a powerful
visual. Each Chapter could highlight a particular false flag to
illustrate the focus of the chapter.
This does not mean that other events
cannot be mentioned, but that one event in particular is used to
support the focus of the chapter. Another idea after each section of
the 'Event Plan' has been covered take a single event and break it
down using 'The Plan'.
Explaining the event section by section,
Objective through Cover-up.
From a book standpoint each of the
bolded titles and accompanying text would correspond to a book
chapter.
Why am I not doing this project? Good and fair question. I've been
wrestling for awhile with exactly where my focus should fall. And
have concluded that False Flags is not where my focus is to be.
My focus has fallen on that of Social
Control, or the manipulation of populations attitudes, beliefs,
opinions, and ultimately therefore their actions. Also called social
engineering, opinion formation, engineering consent, or more bluntly
but quite accurately
mind control.
Of which the false-flag is but one tool
of the social engineers...
|
