by Cassandra Anderson
October 2, 2012

from MorphCity Website

 

 

 

Geo-engineering is an umbrella term for deliberate climate intervention that includes spraying the sky with aerosols to reflect solar radiation away from Earth in order to cool the planet and to save the environment and humanity from the effects of supposedly man-made global warming.

 

There is evidence that this program has already been implemented for many years using unidentified chemical aerosols, known as chemtrails. 

 

A geo-engineering/chemtrails experiment using a balloon to spray sulfur particles into the sky to reflect solar radiation back into space is planned for New Mexico within a year by scientist David Keith.

 

 

 

 

Keith manages a multimillion dollar research fund for Bill Gates.

 

Gates has also gathered a team of scientist lobbyists that have been asking governments for hand-outs to for their climate manipulation experiments with taxpayer money.

 

Geo-engineering is touted as a last-ditch effort to save people and the planet from global warming. But the truth is that geo-engineering can alter rain cycles leading to droughts and famine that could result in billions of deaths!

Therefore, Bill Gates appears to be using his concern over global warming to cloak his real intent of controlling weather and/or depopulation.

 

 

 

 

Mount Pinatubo Model for Geo-Engineering Drought, Famine & Death 

 

The Mount Pinatubo volcano in the Philippines erupted in 1991, spewing 22 million tons of sulfur dioxide (SO2) into the upper atmosphere/stratosphere.

 

A 2008 study from Rutgers University based a model on Mount Pinatubo sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and applied it to geo-engineering; the scientists said that they expected overall global cooling, but some regions would experience an increase in greenhouse gases and warming, as was recorded after Pinatubo erupted.

 

Based on the SO2 volcanic model, the scientists reported that geo-engineering aerosols sprayed in tropical or Arctic regions are likely to disrupt African and Asian/Indian summer monsoons, threatening the food and water supply for billions of people!

 

Additional negative consequences include ozone depletion, reduced strength of hydrological cycles resulting in decreased river flow and soil moisture.
 

While the scientists, led by Alan Robock, who performed the experiments appear to believe in 'man-made' global warming, they do have stern warnings against the dangers of geo-engineering.




 

2012 Geo-Engineering Study
 

The Max Planck Institute conducted a study of geo-engineering models based on volcanoes, but the study was unrealistic because it used climate models with 400% more carbon dioxide than the pre-industrial era.

 

However, their results showed that geo-engineering will cause a strong decrease in rainfall (a 15% loss in North America and Eurasia and a 20% decrease in South America).

 

Overall, global rainfall would be reduced by 5%.

Unless one considers the financial benefits (government and private grants), it is bewildering why the academia would support geo-engineering.

 

 

 

Geo-Engineering Can Cause Warming
 

Geo-engineering can actually cause global warming when tampering with clouds in the upper atmosphere/stratosphere.

 

The Gates-funded scientist lobbyists propose spraying sulfur dioxide 30 miles above Earth and the New Mexico experiment proposes spraying 15 miles above surface - both of these fall within the parameters of the upper atmosphere/stratosphere.
 

 

The troposphere is the lowest portion of the Earth's atmosphere, extending an average of 4 to 12 miles above surface.

 

Clouds that are in the lower troposphere are generally thick white clouds with a high rate of albedo or reflectivity of the sun's rays away from Earth that produce a cooling effect.

 

However, the experiments are to be conducted above this level in the upper atmosphere/stratosphere.


The upper atmosphere is called the stratosphere and extends as high as 31 miles above the Earth's surface. The clouds in the higher stratosphere are generally thin, have a lower albedo reflective rate and act like a blanket that traps heat.
 

Both experiments propose dumping  SO2 in the upper atmosphere/stratosphere, creating a heat-trapping blanket that would theoretically increase warming. This is the opposite of Gates' stated goal to cool the planet.

 

(Note: most long-distance planes fly at 6 miles above surface, in the lower atmosphere/troposphere)
 

 


 

What About the EPA?

Given that the EPA claims that sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions cause health problems and early death and that they are shuttering coal plants over emissions, you may be wondering why the EPA isn't screaming bloody murder over Gates' SO2 aerosol-spraying experiments.

The answer can be found on the EPA's own website where they promote giving regulatory power over geo-engineering/chemtrails to the United Nations and/or developed countries that fund the programs.

 

The EPA is abdicating power to international interests.

Bill Gates' failure to address the EPA's dire warnings of the dangers of SO2 is proof that he is aware that the EPA's claims are grossly overstated or that he doesn't really care about the environment and has ulterior motives.

 

 

 

Global Warming and UN Control

Global warming is a ruse that claims that life on planet Earth is in grave danger - this alarmism is used for political gain.

 

Global warming is a hoax based on manipulated science from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The UN currently is assuming control over geo-engineering through its Convention on Biological Diversity treaty that declared a moratorium on experiments, except in some cases.
 

 

 


 Conclusion

Geo-engineering is either a risky adventure to test ignorant theories or a scheme to control weather, water and food supplies.

Bill Gates' record as a depopulation enthusiast supports the argument that geo-engineering is a weather domination scheme that may be used as a weapon threatening the lives of billions of people.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Geoengineering

...Could Disrupt Rainfall Patterns

June 6, 2012

from EuropeanGeosciencesUnion Website

 

 

Volcanic eruptions, such as the one of the Karymsky volcano (Russia) in 2004,
release sulphur dioxide to the atmosphere, which has a cooling effect.
Geoengineering an ‘artificial volcano’ to mimic this release
has been proposed as a 'solution' to global warming.
(Credit: Alexander Belousov)
 

 

A geoengineering solution to climate change could lead to significant rainfall reduction in Europe and North America,

a team of European scientists concludes.

 

The researchers studied how models of the Earth in a warm, CO2-rich world respond to an artificial reduction in the amount of sunlight reaching the planet’s surface. The study is published today in Earth System Dynamics, an Open Access journal of the European Geosciences Union (EGU).
 

 

Tackling climate change by reducing the solar radiation reaching our planet using climate engineering, known also as geoengineering, could result in undesirable effects for the Earth and humankind.

 

In particular, the work by the team of German, Norwegian, French, and UK scientists shows that disruption of global and regional rainfall patterns is likely in a geoengineered climate.

“Climate engineering cannot be seen as a substitute for a policy pathway of mitigating climate change through the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions,” they conclude in the paper.

Geoengineering techniques to reduce the amount of solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface range from mimicking the effects of large volcanic eruptions by releasing sulphur dioxide into the atmosphere to deploying giant mirrors in space.

 

Scientists have proposed these sunlight-reflecting solutions as last-ditch attempts to halt global warming.
 
But what would such an engineered climate be like?
                   
To answer this question, the researchers studied how four Earth models respond to climate engineering under a specific scenario.

 

This hypothetical scenario assumes a world with a CO2 concentration that is four times higher than preindustrial levels, but where the extra heat caused by such an increase is balanced by a reduction of radiation we receive from the Sun.

“A quadrupling of CO2 is at the upper end, but still in the range of what is considered possible at the end of the 21st century,” says Hauke Schmidt, researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Germany and lead author of the paper.

Under the scenario studied, rainfall strongly decreases - by about 15 percent (some 100 millimeters of rain per year) of preindustrial precipitation values - in large areas of North America and northern Eurasia.

 

Over central South America, all models show a decrease in rainfall that reaches more than 20 percent in parts of the Amazon region. Other tropical regions see similar changes, both negative and positive.

 

Overall, global rainfall is reduced by about five percent on average in all four models studied.

“The impacts of these changes are yet to be addressed, but the main message is that the climate produced by geoengineering is different to any earlier climate even if the global mean temperature of an earlier climate might be reproduced,” says Schmidt.

The authors note that the scenario studied is not intended to be realistic for a potential future application of climate engineering.

 

But the experiment allows the researchers to clearly identify and compare basic responses of the Earth’s climate to geoengineering, laying the groundwork for more detailed future studies.

“This study is the first clean comparison of different models following a strict simulation protocol, allowing us to estimate the robustness of the results.

 

Additionally we are using the newest breed of climate models, the ones that will provide results for the Fifth IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] Report,” explains Schmidt.

The scientists used climate models developed by,

  • the UK Met Office’s Hadley Centre

  • the Institut Pierre Simon Laplace in France

  • the Max Planck Institute in Germany

Norwegian scientists developed the fourth Earth model used.



 

 

Information for editors

 

This research is presented in the paper ‘Solar irradiance reduction to counteract radiative forcing from a quadrupling of CO2 - Climate responses simulated by four Earth system models’ to appear in the EGU Open Access journal Earth System Dynamics on 06 June 2012.
 
The discussion paper (not peer-reviewed) and reviewers comments is available here.


The team is composed of,

  • H. Schmidt (Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany [MPIMet])

  • K. Alterskjær (University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway [UIO])

  • D. Bou Karam (Laboratoire des Sciences du Climate et l’Environnement, Gif-sur-Yvette, France)

  • O. Boucher (Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK [Met Office] and Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace/CNRS, Paris, France)

  • A. Jones (Met Office)

  • J.E. Kristjansson (UIO)

  • U. Niemeier (MPIMet)

  • M. Schulz (Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway)

  • A. Aaheim (Cicero, Oslo, Norway)

  • F. Benduhn (Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany [MPIC])

  • M. Lawrence (MPIC and Institute of Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam, Germany)

  • C. Timmreck (MPIMet)

The European Geosciences Union (EGU) is Europe’s premier geosciences union, dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the Earth, planetary, and space sciences for the benefit of humanity, worldwide. It is a non-profit interdisciplinary learned association of scientists founded in 2002.

 

The EGU has a current portfolio of 14 diverse scientific journals, which use an innovative open-access format, and organizes a number of topical meetings, and education and outreach activities.

 

Its annual General Assembly is the largest and most prominent European geosciences event, attracting over 10,000 scientists from all over the world.

 

The meeting’s sessions cover a wide range of topics, including volcanology, planetary exploration, the Earth’s internal structure and atmosphere, climate change, and renewable energies.
 

 

 

Contacts

  • Hauke Schmidt
    Max Planck Institute for Meteorology
    Hamburg, Germany
    Tel: +49-40-41173-405
    Email: hauke.schmidt@zmaw.de
     

  • Bárbara T. Ferreira
    EGU Media and Communications Officer
    Munich, Germany
    Tel: +49-89-2180-6703
    Email: media@egu.eu