by William Hutton
by Gary D. Goodwin
While others limit their attention to earth impactors, it is wise to
remember that there are more things "in Heaven and Earth" to be
concerned about. No doubt that
asteroids and comets are a part of
the picture, they're just not the entire picture. In a single
movement of concern we can easily become blinded to a greater power.
It is well established that
Electromagnetic Forces control these threatening beasts that have so
often plagued our thoughts. However, like the little boy that is
afraid of the monster under his bed, he is very unaware of the many
beasts lurking out on the night time streets. We must remain
holistic in thought and attention.
While impactors are indeed a real and
sure threat, remember that there are many other forces to consider -
the solar environment, the galactic field and its constituents, and
even the earth beneath our feet. In addition to impactor studies,
TMG (The Millenium Group) has been the research group to bring many of these issues to
We encourage our readers to continue to be open and
And as William Hutton asks in this
timely article - are there even greater powers that are in control,
are we failing to look beyond the mark as a culture and society?
the final days of accomplishment of the human race, it will surely
be noted that it was ignorance that destroyed the world and its
And that Day is surely upon us.
Thomas Sugrue was the only author  who knew and
investigated America's best documented psychic,
Edgar Cayce, while Cayce was alive. In a talk
 that he gave in 1941, Sugrue touched upon the entanglement
of souls with the Earth.
When a soul took on the consciousness of a portion of creation it
separated itself temporarily from the consciousness of its own
individuality, and became thus further removed from the
consciousness of its spirit. Thus instead of helping to direct the
flow of creation, and contributing to it, it found itself in the
stream, drifting along with it.
The farther it went from shore, the
more it succumbed to the pull of the current, the more difficult was
the task of getting back.
Each of the systems of stars and planets represented, in this
manner, a temptation to the souls; each represented also an
opportunity for development, advancement, and growth toward the
ideal of complete companionship with God - the position of
co-creator in the vast and wonderful system of universal mind.
The solar system attracted souls, and since each system is a single
expression, with its planets as integral parts, the Earth came into
the path of souls.
It was an expression of God with its own laws, its own plan,
its own evolution. Souls, longing to feel the beauty of the seas,
the winds, the forests, the flowers, mixed with them and expressed
themselves through them. They also mingled with the animals and
made, in imitation of them, thought forms.
(This was the Age of Fable, when gods
and goddesses - the souls - roamed the Earth, turning into trees,
speaking from rocks, and inhabiting the bodies of Centaurs, Cyclops,
and other creatures which were half animal, half human).
But it was a playing, an imitating, that
interfered with what had been set in motion gradually entangling the
souls, so that they became trapped in the plane of Earth's
evolution, inside the bodies they had themselves created.
Many are the geophysical changes that we souls have experienced here
in the plane of our evolving planet. This article will focus on some
of the potential effects of the extraterrestrial environment on
Earth's evolution. The subject was inadequately treated in my book,
Coming Earth Changes (CEC).
I had merely noted (CEC, p. 249) that
five or more Earthly cataclysms had been caused by comet or
meteorite impacts within the last 600 million years.
The most severe of these had killed more
than 95 percent of all marine species.
Extraterrestrial Effects On The Earth
There has recently been an upsurge of
interest in extraterrestrial forces that may have influenced human
evolution. Examples are books with titles like Cataclysm! Compelling
Evidence of a Cosmic Catastrophe in 9500 B.C., and
Earth Under Fire, Humanity's Survival of the Apocalypse ,
These works allege that forces external
to Earth have altered it in profound ways within geologically recent
times. And Cayce reading 3976-10 seems to have a similar theme.
When in February 1932
Cayce was asked to forecast "the principal events
for the next fifty years affecting the welfare of the human race,"
This had best be cast after the
great catastrophe coming to the world in '36 (1936), in the form
of the breaking up of many POWERS that now exist in the world
The reading goes on to forecast several
political events whose changes "will make the different MAPS of the
world." But at the very end of the reading we find:
These will not come, as we find, as broken, before the catastrophes
of outside forces to the Earth in '36, which will come from the
shifting of the equilibrium of the Earth itself in space, with those
of the consequential effects on the various portions of the country
- or world - affected by same.
Then, in another reading five months later, Cayce was asked,
"What will be the type and extent of
the upheaval in '36?"
(5748-6, July 1, 1932).
The answer was,
"The wars, the upheavals in the
interior of the Earth, and the shifting of same by the
differentiation in the axis as respecting positions from the
In CEC (p. 29) , I
suggested that if there were a sudden shift in the axis of Earth's
independently-spinning inner core in 1936, it certainly could have
caused violent agitation in the ultra-hot fluids that surround the
solid iron core. And that turbulence could cause plumes of hot,
plastic rock to rise from the core-mantle boundary ("upheavals in
the interior of the Earth").
Some rising plumes could easily take as
long as 64 or more years (1936 to 2000) to ascend to a level where
they would start to affect Earth's surface.
But just what were the forces
that could have caused a shifting of the equilibrium of the
Earth in space?
And perhaps more to the point,
how would such forces relate to Earth's evolution?
Remember here that,
"...that which comes or begins is
first conceived in spirit, grows in the mental, [and then]
manifests in the material"
Did the outside forces that affected the
Earth in 1936 originate as spiritually dark forces? Or were they
forces of light from the Godhead?
One might lean to the former speculation
inasmuch as the wars - that were conceived in the minds of men -
were also mentioned in the reading to be a product of the
catastrophe-producing outside forces.
But one might lean to the latter explanation if the outside forces
were related to ongoing expansion of the universe, and simply an
expectable part of Earth's evolution. In this case, "the forces"
would have caused unenlightened, socially conditioned human beings
to start wars. Men would have "forgotten" who rules the "influences
of the stars, planets, Sun, and moon," or other elements of the
space environment for that matter.
As reading 2794-3 puts it,
"Do ye rule them, or do they rule
We can rule them if as individuals each
of us will,
....just adjust self, self's hopes,
self's desires. For it has been given from the beginning: subdue
the Earth and its influence; indicating that to be subdued by
tendencies is to become subject to those laws rather than to a
creative influence in a material, mental, and spiritual
understanding, controlling through the abilities of self
Just as we souls have become
entangled in Earth's evolution, so also do we have a way out.
Here in materiality we may realize that, ...[our] concept of the
Godhead is three-dimensional... the activity of the motivating
force is three-dimensional - time, space, and patience.
Passive patience, to be sure, has
its place; but consider patience rather from the precepts of
God's relationship to man: Love unbounded is patience. Love
manifested is patience. Endurance at times is patience,
consistence ever is patience...
Not in selfishness, not in grudge, not in wrath; not in any of
those things that make for the separation of the I AM from the
Creative Forces, or Energy, or God. But the simpleness, the
gentleness, the humbleness, the faithfulness, the
These be the attributes and those
things which the soul takes cognizance of in its walks and
activities before men. Not to be seen of men, but that the love
may be manifested as the Father has shown through the Son and in
the Earth day by day.
It would seem, then, that after 1936
souls on Earth became collectively overwhelmed by the influences of
And many may still be, perhaps even to
this day. For the world has experienced numerous brutal wars since
1936. It may seem banal to say so, but these wars occurred as a
result of men's individual and collective lack of patience.
From another perspective, within the catastrophe of outside forces
in 1936 may lie mankind's redemption.
Earth changes, traced back
to the upheavals in the interior of the Earth in 1936, may - at a
physical level - wipe away nations' modern war-making capabilities.
In his book, Earth Under Fire ,
concludes that explosive activity in the core of our galaxy, the
Milky Way, has resulted in past global catastrophes. He writes that
the galactic core periodically enters an explosive phase. It then
generates an intense wind of cosmic ray particles (electrons,
positrons, and protons).
These outbursts, which he calls "superwaves,"
may recur about every ten thousand years or more and last from
several hundred to several thousand years. The explosions generate
cosmic-rays that travel outward from the center, at close to the
speed of light, and pass through the entire galactic disk.
LaViolette believes that one such volley of cosmic rays passed
through the solar system around the end of the last ice age.
He writes that,
"for several thousand years [the
superwave] injected large amounts of cosmic dust into our
planetary system. This dust substantially altered the Earth's
climate through its effect on the Sun and sunlight transmission
Unaware of Cayce's reading on the 1936
outside forces, LaViolette had written that superwaves might have a
gravity-gradient component at their forefront.
This component, traveling along with a
superwave, could upon its arrival exert a significant tidal pull or
jerk, causing a slight reorientation of Earth's rotational axis.
"So this would be the 'outside
force' that Cayce speaks of. It would be of galactic origin."
(Quoted from LaViolette's letter
to me of 9/07/98).
Now Cayce reading 5748-6 above may be
implying that the axis that shifted was in fact the rotational axis
of the independently-spinning inner core, not Earth's overall
Supporting this view is a recent study
 of Earth's wobbling axis of rotation. It spans the years
1890-1997. The analysis shows no clear evidence for a shift in
Earth's primary axis of rotation in 1936, as I previously had
suggested might be the case (CEC, p. 28) from a study of the
International Latitude Service's observations for the period 1932 to
Thus, it seems that perhaps only the
axis of Earth's core moved in 1936.
Astronomers are becoming increasingly knowledgeable about massive
bursts of gamma-ray energy impinging on Earth from the depths of the
universe. On March 29, 1998, a gamma-ray burst (GRB) was detected
that was among the 4 percent brightest of all GRBs seen from Earth.
The GRB of April 25, 1998, appears to
have come from,
"an extremely energetic explosion of
a massive star... [and was]... ten times that of previously
(Nature, 10/15/98, p. 672).
And the burst of gamma and X-ray
radiation that struck Earth over the Pacific Ocean on the night of
August 27, 1998, was so powerful that it temporarily ionized the
upper atmosphere, just as the Sun does in daytime.
"The five-minute-long flash [from
this Milky Way source] saw as much energy as there will be
coming from the Sun for the next 300 years," said
K. Hurley, a
physicist at Cal Berkeley.
But it reached Earth's surface at a
strength equal only to a typical single dental X-ray. No blast so
powerful has ever been detected striking Earth - until now.
If only sensitive detectors like the
ones that picked up this star's radiation could have been pointed
heavenward in 1936! Now if such GRB energy could affect Earth from
just one exploding star, imagine what massive explosions at the
galactic core might do.
Perhaps LaViolette's ideas are worthy of
By "occult," I mean those energies or forces that are hidden, or
In contrast to the physical outside forces
discussed above, consider the occult forces referenced in reading
Q - Going back to the Atlantean
incarnation - what was the Tuaoi [pronounced "too-oye"] stone*?
Of what shape or form was it?
A - It was in the form of a six-sided figure, in which the light
appeared as the means of communication between infinity and the
finite; or the means whereby there were the communications with
those forces from the outside.
Later this came to mean that from
which the energies radiated, as of the center from which there
were radial activities guiding the various forms of transition
or travel through those periods of activity of the Atlanteans.
It was set as a crystal, though in quite a different form from
that used there. Do not confuse these two, then, for there were
many generations of difference. It was in those periods when
there was the directing of aeroplanes, or means of travel;
though these in that time would travel in the air, or on the
water, or under the water, just the same.
Yet the force from
which these were directed was in this central power station, or
Tuaoi stone; which was as the beam upon which it acted.
In the beginning it was the source from which there was the
spiritual and mental contact... First it was the means and
source or manner by which the powers that be made the
centralization for making known to the children of men, and
children of God, the directing forces or powers.
Man eventually turned this into that
channel for destructive forces - and it is growing towards this
in the present.
Here we have described certain occult
energies that are unmeasurable by today's technologies.
These energies were transformed into
destructive forces by
Atlanteans in a way that adversely affected
Earth's evolution. But did the energies or forces that affected the
Earth in 1936 have anything to do with the occult forces that
activated the Tuaoi Stone on Atlantis?
We'll return to this question at the
very end of this section.
THE MIGHTY ATLANTEAN CRYSTAL, OR TUAOI
The A.R.E. Journal for January 1974, carried an article entitled
"The Tuaoi Stone, An Enigma," by Dr. John Sutton, a NASA employee.
After an exhaustive study of all of the readings on the Tuaoi Stone,
Sutton drew the following picture of this power source. (Note
especially point 3).
became hot when used
it was large
it received its energy from the
Sun and from elements that are and are not found in the
it consisted of prisms or a
it employed induction methods
it employed a kind of wave
energy other than electromagnetic
the energy could be emitted in a
beam to which water and other matter is transparent
the beam was invisible
the beam transmitted enough
power for the needs of a city
it could be used to retard the
it consisted of two separate
pieces - a cylinder and a capstone
the energy produced was
concentrated between the two pieces
representations of it will be
found in Yucatan
the crystal was cylindrical,
six-sided, or was of hexagonal cross-section
light waves were used for
communications with extraterrestrial intelligence
misuse, accidental or otherwise,
of the Stone caused [two] geological upheavals
The Tuaoi Stone
Perhaps no single item is as symbolic of the
Edgar Cayce vision of Atlantis
as the tuaoi, referred to variously as the "fire
stone", "the great crystal ", and "the terrible, mighty
crystal". Ideas run the gamut from supernatural cosmic
energy source to a quasi-science fiction gravity wave
It was in the form" of a six-sided figure in which the
light appeared as the means of communication between
infinity and the finite; or the means whereby there were
communications with those forces from the outside. He
also states that "it was set as a crystal".
The fact that the initial form "six-sided" and (the
later power producing version was cylindrical) "set as a
crystal" suggests that it may have been of quartz. It is
possible that the "light" that appeared may have
indicated that it was asteriated quartz, though
something else such as a piezoelectric or pyroelectric
effect could also be .
The only device that actually amplifies light rays using
other energies is the laser, whose name means “light
amplification by the stimulated emission of radiation”.
Laser light is highly concentrated, packing far more
power in a smaller area than ordinary light. The word
condensed might refer to "condensing" the lights
frequency and is also a good alternative for the word
coherence, the unique property of laser light that
allows for holography.
If the tuaoi, or firestone, was a laser, what type was
it? Cayce said that the force which emanated from it
"arose in the form of rays that were invisible to the
eye". What form of light rays are "invisible to the
eye"? Two candidates present themselves: infrared and
ultraviolet. Infrared rays are basically heat rays and
have a number of unique uses. Ultraviolet rays can cause
chemical reactions, produce sunburn, and cause
They also have more energy or power than infrared rays
or visible light. This wider range of application for
the more energetic ultraviolet rays and its ability to
produce ionization seems more in line with some of the
properties and applications of the "fire stones" rays.
Ionization is the process whereby atoms gain or lose
electrons and the latter such process could certainly be
said to be a "disintegration" especially if it is
complete ionization, which could result in a plasma
state where only positive and negative charges would be
present without matter.
The tuaoi, or firestone, was of a particular
construction whose materials and design elements seem to
imply a highly advanced scaled up version of an
ultraviolet laser. Quartz is one of the few transparent
substances that will transmit both infrared and
ultraviolet rays. Quartz is optically clear, and is both
piezoelectric and pyroelectric. Quartz tubes are
currently used in some gaseous lasers precisely because
of these properties. Irradiated quartz has even been
used in a two-level maser.
The body of the firestone is described as "a large
cylindrical glass". If the word "glass" is used to imply
something resembling a drinking glass, then the cylinder
was hollow. The process going on within the crystal had
to do with the "breaking apart of atomic forces", and
mention is made of "gaseous forces". These terms seem to
support the idea of a hollow cylinder with gas or gases
inside. Presumably the capstone of the crystal was of
the same substance as the cylindrical body. The capstone
itself was cut with facets in such a way that they would
make for "centralizing the power or force that
concentrated between the end of the cylinder and the
Here we have a direct connection between the crystals
and gases. According to Cayce the crystal made use of
"the concentration of energies that emanate from bodies
that are on fire themselves (the stars), along with
elements that are found and not found in the earth's
What force do these two readings have in common that is
being used by the firestone? Heat! The sun's rays (and
other stars) and geothermal energy are apparently being
used to power the device. Photo-ionization, particle
collision, and thermal ionization can all serve as
"pumping" elements in a laser.
When we put the preceding readings information all
together we come up with the following scenario.
[highlight] We have a quartz housing for a gaseous
ultraviolet laser that receives its activity, or pumping
action, from the sun's heat (and light). The facets on
the capstone bring the sun's rays to an intensely sharp
focus in the center of the tube (cylinder). The gaseous
mixture ionizes with oppositely charged particles
collecting at the top (base of the capstone) of the
cylinder and at its base. This ionization brings up the
energy level of the gaseous mixture.
As in all lasers the energy can be released with an
incident signal from the equivalent of a "trigger:
electrode", something that gives it just the "extra
kick" that it needs. Electrical connections at the
bottom of the cylinder can act as the trigger electrode.
Upon a "signal" the energy is released as the atoms
return to a lower energy state (ground level) until the
process is repeated.
What elements might the gaseous mixture have contained?
Dr. John H. Sutton who wrote "The Tuaoi Stone - An
Enigma" suggests that "deuterium and/or hydrogen" may
have been used.
Cayce states that "the activity of the stone was
received from the sun's rays, or from the stars; the
concentrating of energies that emanate from bodies that
are on fire themselves with the elements that are found
and not found in the earth's atmosphere".
In other words, the thermal energy reacted with elements
within the crystal itself, the suggestion being that two
or more elements were used, and since the term
"atmosphere" is employed, at least one was a gas.
Helium, for example, was first discovered in the sun's
spectrum. It is also used in several gas lasers, usually
as a sort of carrier of the energy in combination with
other gases. The substances that will lase are quite
numerous, even oxygen will lase. One might wonder
whether ozone would also lase since it is a more
"energetic" form of oxygen and absorbs strongly in the
ultraviolet. Both hydrogen (found in the stars) and
argon lase in the ultraviolet region. Krypton fluoride
lases in the extreme ultraviolet. Metallic vapors have
even been made to lase (red Mercury?).
The housing of the firestone seems to suggest a device
that generates a considerable amount of heat in its
operation (just as laser's do). The center of the
building was said to be "lined with non-conductive stone
-something akin to asbestos, with the combined forces of
bakerite" or other non-conductors "that are now (1933)
being manufactured in England under a name that is well
known to many of those who deal in such things".
Serpentine is a form of asbestos (chrysotile), is a
thermal non-conductor, and is used as an ornamental (or
The uses of the crystals were myriad. "Q"-switching,
which would take advantage of the piezoelectric
qualities of the quartz, might even have been used to
enhance the output. "Induction methods" were used so
that the rays from the stone acted directly "upon the
motivating forces" in the various modes of travel. To
put it more simply, power was beamed to the vehicles. An
ultraviolet laser ionizes the air directly in front of
the beam, forming an electrically conducting pathway
through the air so that electricity can literally be
sent through the air from one point to another.
Cayce also stated that individuals bodies "were
regenerated, by the burning through application of the
rays from the stone, the influences that brought
destructive forces to an animal organism" (440-5).
Perhaps we are on the right track with the new process
whereby laser light is used in conjunction with fiber
optic tubes to "burn" away the excess plaque lining the
Cayce also mentioned "transmission of the body" as one
of the device's application. If such is the case then
Cayce may have been referring to that unique use of
coherent laser light, holography, the transmission of
three dimensional images.
The readings also contain information that may suggest a
geothermal connection with the crystals. Cayce stated
that the rays "were turned on crystals in the pits that
made connections with the internal influences of the
earth". Perhaps they were being used to regulate the
temperature of magma pools or of heating underground
water sources (or both). At any rate, when the sons of
Belial turned these rays on the crystals in the pits "a
volcanic upheaval" ensued.
Lasers are also
The Death Ray
Reading 262-39 (2/21/33) speaks of a "Death Ray" used by the
Atlanteans. This ray may have been produced by selective tuning of
the Tuaoi Stone. Or it may have been generated by a special crystal
device similar to the Stone.
Rays for killing, healing,
transportation, and the regeneration of one's physical body were
also used by the Atlanteans at various stages of their civilization.
The Death Ray used energies available in
Earth's stratosphere and from cosmic rays. In a meeting attended by
representatives from various countries of the world, some 52,787
years ago, it was decided to use this ray to kill the many beasts
then roaming various parts of the Earth.
This was to be done by sending out:
from various [ray-generating]
central plants that which is termed in the present the Death
Ray, or the super-cosmic ray, that which many are seeking into,
which will give their lives much, from the stratosphere, or
cosmic rays, that will be found in the next twenty-five years.
This particular ray seems to be the same
Death Ray that some 19,400 years ago was mistakenly tuned too high
...brought forth from the bowels of
the Earth itself - when turned into the sources of supply -
those destructions to portions of the [Atlantean] land.
And Solar Flares
Cosmic "rays" are composed of highly energetic particles - mostly
protons and atomic nuclei - that strike the Earth from space.
According to one expert,
"The simplest interpretation of
their origin is that the highest-energy cosmic rays come from
our galaxy, from sources in the large galactic halo." 
But others, studying the origin and
make-up of extremely high-energy cosmic rays think that such rays
are made up of a new, extra-galactic subatomic particle.
G. Farrar and P. Bierman
studied the five most energetic cosmic rays ever detected on Earth
and found that their origins were in five compact quasars, or
"quasi-stellar radio sources."
These quasars are among the most
powerful sources of energy in the universe. The nearest is four to
five billion light years away; the furthest is 13 to 16 billion
light years away.
Perhaps these are the same quasars that
emitted the cosmic rays that powered the Atlantean "super-cosmic
Recent evidence indicates that cosmic rays influence Earth's
H. Svensmark of the Danish Meteorological Institute has
found that during the most recent 11-year activity cycle of the Sun,
Earth's cloud cover was more closely correlated with the flux of
cosmic rays coming from our galaxy than with the Sun's radiance.
"Apparently, the solar magnetic
field interacts with the cosmic rays.
When strong, the
Sun's field blocks more cosmic rays, which ionize air molecules
in the lower atmosphere and in this way are thought to
contribute to cloud cover and other weather-related phenomena."
Cloud cover has been found to be 3 to 4
percent greater at sunspot minimum (cosmic ray maximum) than at
sunspot maximum . And an indirect mechanism for
cosmic ray effects on clouds has been elucidated by B. Tinsley
Finally, N. Calder, in his new book,
Manic Sun , claims that solar effects on global
warming are clear. They are caused by changes in the amount of
cosmic rays, and are large enough to invalidate the work of others,
who attribute most of the warming to human effects, such as
carbon-dioxide emissions to the atmosphere.
Now this work on cyclic changes in the flux of cosmic rays seems to
resonate with the following passage in 1602-3 where we read:
These [1998 Earth-change activities
coming about] are at the periods when the cycle of the solar
activity, or the years as related to the Sun's passage through
the various spheres of activity become paramount or Catamount
[12*] to the change between the Piscean and the Aquarian
age. This is a gradual, not a cataclysmic activity in the
experience of the Earth in this period.
Thus, it would appear that in 1998 we
entered what will become a "paramount" period of
activity. The word paramount implies "one superior to all others
with which we are familiar."
And indeed, scientists have concluded
that 1998 was the warmest year of not only the decade, but quite
possibly, of the millennium. The reading implies that the effects of
this paramount solar cycle are part of Earth's evolution, as our Sun
and planetary system moves into new spheres of galactic influence.
And we will all be affected by the new
Does this mean that Earth's
climate will begin to change greatly, or erratically?
Will climate changes cause food
And will increased cosmic rays -
known to produce slight genetic alterations - have a
significant effect on subsequent generations?
Visions of Phylos
Finally, we turn to Phylos's vision of "solar heats,"
predicted to occur about now, here at the end of the Piscean Age.
(See Phylos and his predictions, in
A Dweller On Two Planets - 1952).
Phylos describes the outbreak of a
worldwide conflict that:
Nature completing, will leave living
but one where now are many, for in that day none will pause to
bury the slain until the evil is wrought, nor then, for the dead
of the plagues will be as thousands for every one by violence.
And all this because the love that should grace and soften men's
hearts, each for all and all for each, dried up and became a
mockery in the close of the ended cycle, leaving but scattered
oases, few and far between.
Nature follows man.
Wherefore the waters of Earth will
dry out, rains be withheld, cyclones sweep, and earthquake come
such as was not since a man was on the earth; aye, I am mindful
of Poseidia. But all of this will occur through natural causes,
and in consonance with the selfishness, lust, greed, anger and
general depravity of the Type.
As these blaze in the human breast,
so shall the air, dry and vaporless under brazen skies, develop
solar heats [emphasis added] more fierce than history ever knew.
A parched earth, furnace-like, piling all flesh mountains high;
pestilences stalking unchecked. O ye! Blind to the Handwriting
on the wall, which flickers still, though writ for a spent
Turn now and read, while yet the
last midnight stroke reverberates.
But Phylos's vision may be mitigated!
Consider Cayce's response to a person's
question about whether Phylos's vision of the end of the Age was
"based on truth, especially in its forecast for the United States."
As viewed by an entity separated
from the whole, yes. As truth that may be implied by one who
looks only to the Lamb, to the Son as a leader, no. Choose thou.
The Fire Next Time
In 1944, Cayce gave reading 3653-1 for a woman who was said to have
been one of "the eight souls in the Ark - as the wife of a son of
Cayce's source asked rhetorically:
Will this entity see such [the
Deluge] again in the Earth? Will it be among those who may be
given those directions as to how, where, the elect may be
preserved for the replenishing again of the Earth? Remember, not
by water - for it is the mother of life in the Earth - but
rather by the elements, fire.
It is difficult to assign a date in the
future to this intimated burning of the Earth. Mentioned only a
single time in the readings, it seems not to fit with the many other
Earth-change readings that indicate catastrophic seismotectonic
events directly ahead.
That is why I suggested in CEC (pp.
42-45) that if such Earth fire is in the cards, it will probably be
brought about by excessive volcanic activity. But some say that this
reading does fit with the Sun's "paramount" activity mentioned in
reading 1602-3 above, which activity is to occur in the present
solar cycle that we entered in 1998.
Note that on September 24, 1998, a geomagnetic storm occurred that
measured 8.6 on a scale of 0 to 9. A storm of this intensity is seen
only a few times per decade.
The storm originated from an intense
solar flare, one so strong that it blew some of Earth's atmosphere
"This storm may be the harbinger of
the next solar maximum due in the year 2000," said Rice
University Professor, J. Freeman.
And C. Seife asks :
"Could the Sun send out a monstrous flare powerful enough to
melt the ice on Jupiter's moons, destroy much of the Earth's
ozone layer and obliterate all our satellites?"
It's possible, say astronomers who have
studied other Sun-like stars in our Galaxy, which seem to produce
enormous "superflares" about once a century.
They are baffled by the
fact that there are no historical records of similar explosions.
Roughly once or twice a decade, the eruption of [the Sun's] stellar
material is powerful enough to send huge electric currents racing
around the Earth's upper atmosphere, disrupting power grids and
In 1989, one such explosion knocked out a
power grid in Quebec...
A superflare on the Sun would be about
10,000 times as powerful as the explosion that caused the Canadian
blackout... Although life on Earth would survive, the atmosphere
would glow very brightly and half the ozone layer would be
As to why a superflare has not occurred on the Sun in recorded
history is unclear.
"I think a consensus is emerging
that our Sun is extraordinarily stable," suggests G. Gisler, an
astronomer at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. "We seem to
have found a star that is extremely stable and friendly to life
- or we are just on a star that happens to be stable right now
and will not always be so." 
Or perhaps we humans have been patient
just enough since the Flood to keep the Sun from burning us up.
Both Allen and DeLair , and LaViolette
 have brought together a wealth of geological and
anthropological information which they interpret to show that around
12,600 B.P. (years Before the Present), the Earth experienced
several catastrophic destructions.
The former authors conclude that the
destructions were due to a fragment of the
Vela Supernova, which
exploded around 13,000 B.P. They say that this fragment careened
through our solar system 400 years later, around 12,600 years ago,
disturbing various other planets as well as Earth.
LaViolette, however, believes that the evidence of catastrophic
alterations to Earth points to a "solar conflagration event."
He relates the strong global warming
that began around 14,650 B.P., and the evidence of wild swings in
Earth's geomagnetic field, to the arrival of a galactic superwave
that caused huge flares to erupt from the Sun. These flares may have
occurred off and on until about 12,700 B.P., after which the sun
quieted down until now.
The basis of LaViolett's hypothesis lies mainly in his working
backward from research by N. Mörner on magnetic signatures in dated
layers of a sediment core from Gothenberg, Sweden.
In 1977, Mörner
published a now famous paper in Quaternary Research entitled "The
Gothenburg Magnetic Excursion."
Mörner's core data record a 180š flip in
Earth's geomagnetic pole around 12,700 B. P. Such a flip could be
the product of extremely strong solar-flare activity. And this
suggested to LaViolette that solar flares were responsible for
burning the Earth and melting the ice sheets. But melting of the
continental glaciers actually began in the central U.S. around
18,500 years ago, some 6,000 years earlier (CEC, p. 34).
LaViolette says that the history of the global conflagration has
been passed down in the survival myths of many peoples.
He also provides evidence that the
intensity and direction of Earth's magnetic field,
"fluctuated irregularly from about
15,800 to 14,200 years ago. A particularly major geomagnetic
excursion occurred around 14,200 B. P., when the Earth's north
magnetic pole abruptly flipped southward to point to an
equatorial mid-Pacific location for around 10 to 50 years."
p. 187 in footnote 4).
But this excursion took place right in
the middle of the period between 19,400 and 11,900 B.P. when the
Cayce readings suggest that the Earth was undergoing a pole shift
(see CEC, pp. 252-256) or a "shifting of the activities of the Earth
This shift, whatever its nature, was
caused by the enormous man-induced eruption brought forth from the
bowels of the Earth itself (364-11). This man-induced eruption
caused a portion of Atlantis near the Sargasso Sea to go "into the
One might expect all sorts of unusual
geophysical phenomena to be taking place for thousands of years
during such a shift, including excursions of the geomagnetic field.
As for what the Sun was doing 12,000 years ago, recall that reading
5757-1 clearly states that humankind itself affects the Sun by the
nature of people's thoughts and actions (see the July 1998 issue).
This must have been the case in the
latter days of Atlantis some 15,000 to 11,900 years ago. Defiance of
God led to societal turmoils, misuse of the powerful crystals, and
volcanic eruptions and earthquakes. Nothing even remotely resembling
a super galactic wave was ever mentioned in the readings. Nor is
there anything about a wayward piece of a supernova or a solar
conflagration event, although who is to say that one did not occur?
Consider the climatic jolt just recently
documented from studies of ice cores.
It occurred 14,700 years ago.
"Temperatures in Greenland jumped
5°C in less than 10 years - twice the warming that greenhouse
gases are predicted to cause in the coming 100 years." 14
Was this due to a sudden, massive shift
in ocean circulation, or to a jerk in an otherwise smoothly
proceeding pole shift, or to a solar conflagration event? Research
Time will tell.
Now according to reading 884-1, the climate on Atlantis changed
significantly during the 19,400 to 11,940 B.P. period of progressive
Before that we find the entity was
in that land now known or spoken of as the Atlantean,
during those days when there were the attempts of those to bring
quiet, to bring order out of chaos by the destructive forces
that had made for the eruptions in the land that had divided the
lands and had changed not only the temperate but to a more
torrid region by the shifting of the activities of the Earth
I suggested on page 252 of CEC that this climatic change was due
to a gradual pole shift of perhaps 10°, as the North Pole moved
from a position in northern Greenland to its present position,
tracking - roughly - along the 37° W meridian. I thought that
such a pole shift could be the meaning of "the shifting of the
activities of the Earth itself."
But perhaps something else was meant.
The point here is that reading 884-1
does not suggest that solar flares were the cause of the changed
Atlantean climate. But the readings suggest that a pole shift
commenced in 19,400 B. P. and progressed over thousands of years.
And such a shift would provide the answer to a long-standing
question in the geosciences.
How do we explain the rapid onset of
melting of the ice sheets in Europe, Asia, and North America that
began around 19,000 B.P.?
The Cayce readings can be interpreted to suggest that the ice sheets
were moved into progressively warmer climatic zones by a gradual
pole shift that began with the accidental destruction of much of
Atlantis in 19,400 B.P.
As the poles continued to shift over the
next 7,500 years (until 11,900), many of the geophysical
catastrophes catalogued by Allen and Delair, and by LaViolette,
could have occurred.
This does not mean that superflares were
not produced on our Sun in those days. Indeed we might expect same,
in view of the readings' suggestion that rebellious humans can
produce disturbances on the Sun proportional to the degree of their
denial of the God force in man and Nature.
Consider, then this final reading (820-1) on the reason behind and
nature of the enormous eruptions on Atlantis, beginning around
19,400 years ago and extending until 11,900 B.P.
See if it doesn't give us a hint, also,
as to the possible origin of those "outside forces" that impacted
Earth in 1936.
Before that we find the entity was
in the Atlantean land, during those periods when there began to
be the rebellious forces that disputed those acts and laws
pertaining to the communications with what is termed in the
present as the unseen forces - or to those hierarchies that are
given rule over activities in the various forms in the Earth.
The entity then, in the name of Al-Aar, was the ruler of those
forces of the Law of One; and those activities that were raised
against the entity's activities by the Belzebubs (?) ....
lost in this direction,... the entity saw in those mighty
upheavals from the destructive forces used for the people from
the prisms' activities and from the fires that were started for
the fires of the deeper inferno that brought to the surface
those destructive forces as from nature's storehouse itself.
Do we have here the answer to
the meaning of "outside forces to the Earth in '36?"
Were they of the unseen forces
from those hierarchies of intelligences that have been given
"rule over activities in the various forms in the Earth?"
1 Sugrue, T., 1943, The Story of
Edgar Cayce (originally entitled There Is A River), A.R.E.
Press, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451.
2 Sugrue, T., June 21, 1941, "The Meaning of Edgar Cayce." See
CD-ROM Report of Reading 294-202.
3 Hutton, W., 1997, A.R.E. Press, Virginia Beach, Virginia
4 Allen, D. and J. Delair, 1997, Bear & Co., Santa Fe, NM.
5 LaViolette, P., 1997, Starlane Publications, Schenectady, New
6 Gilbert, G., and others, 1998, "Wavelet Analysis of the
Chandler Wobble," Jour. Geophysical Research, v. 103, no. B11,
7 Hillas, M., 1998, "Cosmic Rays Without End," Nature, v. 395,
Sep. 3,, p. 15.
8 "Super Cosmic Rays," Science Daily Internet posting of
9 Scientific American, Jan. 1999.
10 Svensmark, H., and E. Fris-Christensen, 1997, Jour.
Terrestrial Physics, v. 59, p. 1225.
11 Jour. Geophysical Research, 1996, v. 101, p. 29,701.
12 Calder, N., 1997, Pilkington Press, London.
* The word
"Catamount" seems wholly out of place. It's capitalization is
strange. The question mark indicates that the stenographer was
perplexed by its use. In the 1996 American edition of The Oxford
Dictionary,. catamount refers to any wild cat, and in British
usage can mean "a wild quarrelsome person."
13 "Thank Our Lucky Star," New Scientist, 1/06/99.
14 Kerr, R., 1999, Science, v. 283, p. 29.