| 
			 
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			
			  
			
			by Robert W Malone MD, MS 
			July 26, 2023 
			from 
			RWMaloneMd Website 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			
			  
			
			
			Photo by Gleilson Miranda  
			
			
			Wikipedia 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			The world is getting much greener, and fast.  
			
				
				Much of it because of 
				the atmospheric gas that so many are afraid of 
			 
			
			Here we present a global, 
			measurement-based estimate of GPP growth during the twentieth 
			century that is based on long-term atmospheric carbonyl sulfide 
			(COS) records, derived from ice-core, firn and ambient air samples.
			
			
			5 
  
			
			  
			
			
			
			  
			
			
			
			Source 
			
			
			and  
			
			
			'Large 
			Historical Growth in Global Terrestrial gross Primary Production' 
			
			  
			
			 
			We interpret these records using a model that simulates changes in 
			COS concentration according to changes in its sources and sinks - 
			including a large sink that is related to GPP. 
			 
			We find that the observation-based COS record is most consistent 
			with simulations of climate and the carbon cycle that assume large 
			GPP growth during the twentieth century (31 percent ± five percent 
			growth; mean ± 95 percent confidence interval). 
			 
  
			
			In particular, 
			semi-arid areas are getting greener and some deserts,
			like the sub-Saharan are actually
			
			changing their eco-system 
			significantly. 
			
			
			
			
			
			
			  
			
			
			
			Nature Communications 
			
			
			Volume 9, Article number: 2272 (2018) 
			  
			
			  
			
			The full abstract 
			reads: 
			
				
				While global 
				deforestation induced by human land use has been quantified, the 
				drivers and extent of simultaneous woody plant encroachment 
				(WPE) into open areas are only regionally known. 
				  
				
				WPE 
				has important consequences for ecosystem functioning, global 
				carbon balances and human economies. 
				  
				
				
				Here we report, using 
				high-resolution satellite imagery, that woody vegetation cover 
				over sub-Saharan Africa increased by eight percent over the past 
				three decades and that a diversity of drivers, other than CO2, 
				were able to explain 78 percent of the spatial variation in this 
				trend. 
				  
				
				A decline in 
				burned area along with warmer, wetter climates drove WPE, 
				although this has been mitigated in areas with high population 
				growth rates, and high and low extremes of herbivory, 
				specifically browsers. 
				  
				
				
				
				These results 
				confirm global greening trends, 
				thereby bringing into question widely held theories about 
				declining terrestrial carbon balances and desert expansion... 
				  
				
				Importantly, 
				while global drivers such as climate and CO2 may 
				enhance the risk of WPE, managing fire and herbivory at the 
				local scale provides tools to mitigate continental WPE. 
			 
			
			Right now, world 
			leaders believe that they can terraform the planet to meet their 
			ideas of what "the climate" 'should' be... 
			  
			
			Right now, they are 
			limited by what they are able to achieve technologically. 
			 
			
				
				So, green 
				colonialism (or a better term may be green 
				imperialism...) is one 
				of the current strategies being used (unsuccessfully) to 
				influence climate around the world... 
			 
			
			
			
			Green imperialism 
			is, 
			
				
				when leaders from rich nations force less wealthy (and nonwhite) 
			nations to use inferior methods to generate power, such as wind and 
			solar and not allow those nations to develop their more efficient 
			fuel (hydrocarbon and nuclear) by withholding funds, knowledge and 
			resources. 
			 
			
			
			 
			This strategy has 
			the added benefit of 
			
			limiting population growth... 
			  
			
			With the strategy 
			being that a less wealthy nation can not grow their population as 
			fast. In fact, the
			
			1975 Kissinger report specifically mentions withholding 
			resources as a way to stop population growth in less developed 
			nations. 
			  
			
			But this alone will 
			not get world leaders the 'climate change' they desire, and cloud 
			seeding has only limited utility. 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			  
			
			  
			
				
				This in NOT a 
				
				
				page from a science fiction novel... 
				  
				
				"Cloud seeding" 
				is a real practice - in fact, it's been around for decades. It's 
				used today to boost precipitation in at least eight states 
				across the western U.S. and dozens of countries around the 
				world. 
				  
				
				Interest in 
				cloud seeding is growing as temperatures steadily rise, 
				increasing drought risks in places like the Mountain West. But 
				there's a catch.  
				  
				
				Scientists 
				aren't sure how well cloud seeding works today, let alone in a 
				warmer climate. 
			 
			
			So they have big 
			plans for the future. 
			
				
				Geoengineering, the 
				large-scale manipulation of a specific process central to 
				controlling Earth’s climate for the purpose of obtaining a 
				specific benefit.... 
			 
			
			Terraforming. that is, 
			geo-engineering the earth...! 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			  
			
			  
			
				
				THIS is how 
				
				
				we will hold off disaster.
				 
				  
				
				
				To help us avoid dangerous climate 
				change, we will need to create the largest industry in history: 
				
				 
				
					
					
					to suck greenhouse gases out of the air on a giant scale... 
				 
				
				
				For the first time, we can sketch 
				out this future industry - known as 
				
				geoengineering - and 
				identify where it would operate. 
			 
			
			Some of the methods 
			often discussed: 
			
				
				
				
				
				Solar geo-engineering, 
				which is a light reflecting method. Such as spraying tiny 
				sulfate particles (aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect away 
				sunlight.  
				  
				
				However, this 
				method has some risk. 
			 
			
			As the stratosphere 
			contains a layer of ozone, a gas that absorbs the most harmful types 
			of ultraviolet radiation from the sun. 
			  
			
			It is possible that 
			these sulfate aerosols could
			
			initiate reactions that would destroy the ozone. 
			
				
				...solar 
				geoengineering
				technologies.  
				  
				
				These include 
				marine cloud brightening, cirrus cloud thinning, space-based 
				techniques, and stratospheric aerosol scattering, amongst 
				others. 
				  
				
				Marine cloud 
				brightening would attempt to brighten marine clouds to reflect 
				more sunlight back into space. 
				  
				
				Cirrus cloud 
				thinning would attempt to reduce the thin, high-altitude cirrus 
				clouds to emit more long-wave radiation from the earth to space. 
				  
				
				Space-based 
				technologies would attempt to reflect a small fraction of 
				sunlight away from the earth by positioning sun shields in 
				space. 
				  
				
				Lastly, 
				stratospheric aerosol scattering would introduce tiny reflective 
				particles, such as sulfate aerosols or perhaps calcium 
				carbonate, into the upper atmosphere, where they could scatter a 
				small fraction of sunlight back into space. 
			 
			
			
			Brightening clouds 
			above oceans is another method being developed.  
			  
			
			To brighten clouds, 
			aerosolized seawater would be sprayed in the sky. However, droplet 
			size could also
			
			affect the clouds in unexpected ways and cause even 
			more irregular weather patterns. 
			  
			
			So, again there is 
			risk that this could backfire...! 
			  
			
			
			Rewilding 
			the planet is the idea that humans give up land already in 
			production to let other life-forms repopulate vast areas of the 
			earth. 
			  
			
			
			
			Agenda 2030 
			specifically targets giving up agricultural land and the 2022 
			inflation reduction Act has language to match Agenda 2030's goals of 
			taking back land for 'conservation'... 
			  
			
			This may also be 
			why 
			
			Bill Gates and Ted Turner have bought up so much of the farmland 
			in the United States. 
			  
			
			These are just a 
			few of the methods being actively pursued. 
			  
			
			Of course, all of 
			these methods are already making a lot of money for a lot of very 
			wealthy people. Governments worldwide are pouring money into the 
			development of geo engineering to terraform the planet. 
			  
			
			But in this 
			gold-rush of money, the true risks
			
			of terraforming seem to be 
			overlooked.  
			  
			
			Such as what 
			happens when 20 percent of farm lands are taken out of production 
			(which would cause large-scale food shortages and a huge jump in 
			starvation) or when geo-engineering backfires and the earth's 
			temperature become unstable or specific regions get more extreme 
			weather patterns. 
			  
			
			So what does
			
			the UN and
			
			the WEF propose should be done 
			about 'climate change'...? 
			  
			  
			  
			  
			
			
			What's the World Economic 
			Forum doing about climate change? 
			
				
				To limit global 
				temperature rise to well below 2°C and as close as possible to 
				1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, it is essential that 
				businesses, policy-makers, and civil society advance 
				comprehensive near- and long-term climate actions in line with 
				the goals of the Paris Agreement on climate change. 
				  
				
				The World 
				Economic Forum's
				
				Climate Initiative supports the scaling and acceleration of 
				global climate action through public and private-sector 
				collaboration.  
				  
				
				The Initiative 
				works across several workstreams to develop and implement 
				inclusive and ambitious solutions. 
				  
				
				This includes 
				the Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders, a global network of 
				business leaders from various industries developing 
				cost-effective solutions to transitioning to a low-carbon, 
				climate-resilient economy. 
				  
				
				CEOs use their 
				position and influence with policy-makers and corporate partners 
				to accelerate the transition and realize the economic benefits 
				of delivering a safer climate. 
			 
			
			Did you read 
			that...? 
			  
			
			Why yes, Dorothy 
			we are going back to the Land of OZ and need to get the earth 
			back to 1.5° to 2°C above pre-industrial levels. That would be 
			before 1750, and means, 
			
				
				they want to 
				lower Earth's temperature by about three 
				or four degrees...! 
			 
			
			Yeh... - lets go 
			back to the Little Ice Age... 
			  
			  
			
			
			  
			  
			  
			
			How are we going to 
			do it, you ask?  
			  
			
			Easy...! 
			
				
				"CEOs will use 
				their position and influence with policy-makers and corporate 
				partners to accelerate the transition and realize the 
				economic benefits of delivering a safer climate ". That is, they 
				will drive business to 
				expensive energy solutions that benefit their companies at the 
				expense of those living in poverty. 
			 
			
			
			
			Corporatism plus 
			green imperialism... What could possibly go wrong? 
			  
			
			Of course, the 
			problem in trying to decipher what is really going on with 'climate 
			change' is that the propaganda gets in the way of science. 
			 
			  
			
			Studies on weather, 
			carbon dioxide, the greening of the earth, atmospheric science, 
			geo-engineering - all must end with a statement affirming 
			'climate change' is REAL... (sic) 
			  
			
			The truth is that 
			one solution to 'climate change' is that, 
			
				
				humans must accept the 
				weather and climate are what they are... 
			 
			
			Because the road to
			drastically changing the earth's temperature through man-made 
			interventions may lead to outcomes that are devastating to 
			all of us. 
			
				
				The "cure" may 
				be worse than the "disease"... 
			 
			
			Our "intelligence 
			community" and their corporate partners have a very long history of 
			completely overlooking the possibility of unintended consequences 
			("blowback") in their chronic rush to implement shiny new 
			technologic solutions to complex problems. 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			
			 
			
			  |