by Robert W Malone MD, MS
July 26, 2023
from
RWMaloneMd Website
Photo by Gleilson Miranda
Wikipedia
The world is getting much greener, and fast.
Much of it because of
the atmospheric gas that so many are afraid of
Here we present a global,
measurement-based estimate of GPP growth during the twentieth
century that is based on long-term atmospheric carbonyl sulfide
(COS) records, derived from ice-core, firn and ambient air samples.
5
Source
and
'Large
Historical Growth in Global Terrestrial gross Primary Production'
We interpret these records using a model that simulates changes in
COS concentration according to changes in its sources and sinks -
including a large sink that is related to GPP.
We find that the observation-based COS record is most consistent
with simulations of climate and the carbon cycle that assume large
GPP growth during the twentieth century (31 percent ± five percent
growth; mean ± 95 percent confidence interval).
In particular,
semi-arid areas are getting greener and some deserts,
like the sub-Saharan are actually
changing their eco-system
significantly.
Nature Communications
Volume 9, Article number: 2272 (2018)
The full abstract
reads:
While global
deforestation induced by human land use has been quantified, the
drivers and extent of simultaneous woody plant encroachment
(WPE) into open areas are only regionally known.
WPE
has important consequences for ecosystem functioning, global
carbon balances and human economies.
Here we report, using
high-resolution satellite imagery, that woody vegetation cover
over sub-Saharan Africa increased by eight percent over the past
three decades and that a diversity of drivers, other than CO2,
were able to explain 78 percent of the spatial variation in this
trend.
A decline in
burned area along with warmer, wetter climates drove WPE,
although this has been mitigated in areas with high population
growth rates, and high and low extremes of herbivory,
specifically browsers.
These results
confirm global greening trends,
thereby bringing into question widely held theories about
declining terrestrial carbon balances and desert expansion...
Importantly,
while global drivers such as climate and CO2 may
enhance the risk of WPE, managing fire and herbivory at the
local scale provides tools to mitigate continental WPE.
Right now, world
leaders believe that they can terraform the planet to meet their
ideas of what "the climate" 'should' be...
Right now, they are
limited by what they are able to achieve technologically.
So, green
colonialism (or a better term may be green
imperialism...) is one
of the current strategies being used (unsuccessfully) to
influence climate around the world...
Green imperialism
is,
when leaders from rich nations force less wealthy (and nonwhite)
nations to use inferior methods to generate power, such as wind and
solar and not allow those nations to develop their more efficient
fuel (hydrocarbon and nuclear) by withholding funds, knowledge and
resources.
This strategy has
the added benefit of
limiting population growth...
With the strategy
being that a less wealthy nation can not grow their population as
fast. In fact, the
1975 Kissinger report specifically mentions withholding
resources as a way to stop population growth in less developed
nations.
But this alone will
not get world leaders the 'climate change' they desire, and cloud
seeding has only limited utility.
This in NOT a
page from a science fiction novel...
"Cloud seeding"
is a real practice - in fact, it's been around for decades. It's
used today to boost precipitation in at least eight states
across the western U.S. and dozens of countries around the
world.
Interest in
cloud seeding is growing as temperatures steadily rise,
increasing drought risks in places like the Mountain West. But
there's a catch.
Scientists
aren't sure how well cloud seeding works today, let alone in a
warmer climate.
So they have big
plans for the future.
Geoengineering, the
large-scale manipulation of a specific process central to
controlling Earth’s climate for the purpose of obtaining a
specific benefit....
Terraforming. that is,
geo-engineering the earth...!
THIS is how
we will hold off disaster.
To help us avoid dangerous climate
change, we will need to create the largest industry in history:
to suck greenhouse gases out of the air on a giant scale...
For the first time, we can sketch
out this future industry - known as
geoengineering - and
identify where it would operate.
Some of the methods
often discussed:
Solar geo-engineering,
which is a light reflecting method. Such as spraying tiny
sulfate particles (aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect away
sunlight.
However, this
method has some risk.
As the stratosphere
contains a layer of ozone, a gas that absorbs the most harmful types
of ultraviolet radiation from the sun.
It is possible that
these sulfate aerosols could
initiate reactions that would destroy the ozone.
...solar
geoengineering
technologies.
These include
marine cloud brightening, cirrus cloud thinning, space-based
techniques, and stratospheric aerosol scattering, amongst
others.
Marine cloud
brightening would attempt to brighten marine clouds to reflect
more sunlight back into space.
Cirrus cloud
thinning would attempt to reduce the thin, high-altitude cirrus
clouds to emit more long-wave radiation from the earth to space.
Space-based
technologies would attempt to reflect a small fraction of
sunlight away from the earth by positioning sun shields in
space.
Lastly,
stratospheric aerosol scattering would introduce tiny reflective
particles, such as sulfate aerosols or perhaps calcium
carbonate, into the upper atmosphere, where they could scatter a
small fraction of sunlight back into space.
Brightening clouds
above oceans is another method being developed.
To brighten clouds,
aerosolized seawater would be sprayed in the sky. However, droplet
size could also
affect the clouds in unexpected ways and cause even
more irregular weather patterns.
So, again there is
risk that this could backfire...!
Rewilding
the planet is the idea that humans give up land already in
production to let other life-forms repopulate vast areas of the
earth.
Agenda 2030
specifically targets giving up agricultural land and the 2022
inflation reduction Act has language to match Agenda 2030's goals of
taking back land for 'conservation'...
This may also be
why
Bill Gates and Ted Turner have bought up so much of the farmland
in the United States.
These are just a
few of the methods being actively pursued.
Of course, all of
these methods are already making a lot of money for a lot of very
wealthy people. Governments worldwide are pouring money into the
development of geo engineering to terraform the planet.
But in this
gold-rush of money, the true risks
of terraforming seem to be
overlooked.
Such as what
happens when 20 percent of farm lands are taken out of production
(which would cause large-scale food shortages and a huge jump in
starvation) or when geo-engineering backfires and the earth's
temperature become unstable or specific regions get more extreme
weather patterns.
So what does
the UN and
the WEF propose should be done
about 'climate change'...?
What's the World Economic
Forum doing about climate change?
To limit global
temperature rise to well below 2°C and as close as possible to
1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, it is essential that
businesses, policy-makers, and civil society advance
comprehensive near- and long-term climate actions in line with
the goals of the Paris Agreement on climate change.
The World
Economic Forum's
Climate Initiative supports the scaling and acceleration of
global climate action through public and private-sector
collaboration.
The Initiative
works across several workstreams to develop and implement
inclusive and ambitious solutions.
This includes
the Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders, a global network of
business leaders from various industries developing
cost-effective solutions to transitioning to a low-carbon,
climate-resilient economy.
CEOs use their
position and influence with policy-makers and corporate partners
to accelerate the transition and realize the economic benefits
of delivering a safer climate.
Did you read
that...?
Why yes, Dorothy
we are going back to the Land of OZ and need to get the earth
back to 1.5° to 2°C above pre-industrial levels. That would be
before 1750, and means,
they want to
lower Earth's temperature by about three
or four degrees...!
Yeh... - lets go
back to the Little Ice Age...
How are we going to
do it, you ask?
Easy...!
"CEOs will use
their position and influence with policy-makers and corporate
partners to accelerate the transition and realize the
economic benefits of delivering a safer climate ". That is, they
will drive business to
expensive energy solutions that benefit their companies at the
expense of those living in poverty.
Corporatism plus
green imperialism... What could possibly go wrong?
Of course, the
problem in trying to decipher what is really going on with 'climate
change' is that the propaganda gets in the way of science.
Studies on weather,
carbon dioxide, the greening of the earth, atmospheric science,
geo-engineering - all must end with a statement affirming
'climate change' is REAL... (sic)
The truth is that
one solution to 'climate change' is that,
humans must accept the
weather and climate are what they are...
Because the road to
drastically changing the earth's temperature through man-made
interventions may lead to outcomes that are devastating to
all of us.
The "cure" may
be worse than the "disease"...
Our "intelligence
community" and their corporate partners have a very long history of
completely overlooking the possibility of unintended consequences
("blowback") in their chronic rush to implement shiny new
technologic solutions to complex problems.
|