by Dr Bruce Scott

October 23, 2020

from Off-Guardian Website

(Jose Carlos Fajardo/Bay Area News Group)
 

In March, it was just a three-week lockdown, to flatten the curve so as not to overwhelm the NHS.

The narrative has quickly evolved. It has progressed from what seemed a reasonable idea of keeping NHS bed space free based on the completely false Neil Ferguson prediction that hospitals would be overwhelmed by patients suffering from COVID-19.

This never happened...

Many weeks passed where face masks were not needed and then suddenly in July, long after the majority of supposed COVID-19 deaths had occurred, face masks were made compulsory.

Indeed, the UK government advice from the likes of Chris Whitty and the World Health Organization (WHO) was that,

face masks were not effective in stopping the spread of COVID-19 or in contracting it; science does not change that quick - anyone who tells you otherwise is a liar...

The result is that we have now fallen deep into a Covidian Cult, a totalitarian psychotic narrative that has little connection to reality or to the facts.

The opposition to official government narratives regarding COVID-19 are well known. I will not bother again telling you what is already known or can be readily ascertained.

Suffice to say, one just needs to type into Google "The Great Barrington Declaration" or ACU2020, where one can read about the doctors, scientists and lawyers who are opposing multi-governmental COVID-19 restrictions and laws of,

• social distancing

• lockdown

• mandatory/coerced consent to vaccines

• mandatory face masks,

...amongst other things.

Their essential argument, contra the multi-government policy on COVID-19, is that virus is not the danger we are being told it is; the data on COVID-19 is clear:

we do not need to lockdown society, wreck the economy, or frighten people into death as they are scared to leave home for fear of catching COVID-19 or seek medical treatment for non-COVID-19 illness, which has happened...

Specifically, many doctors and scientists argue that,

face masks are not protective and could be very harmful...

Dr Jay Bhattacharya, a signatory of the Great Barrington Declaration, which 40,000 medical, public health scientists and medical practitioners have signed, said that the use of face masks are not supported in the scientific literature.

There is no randomized data to indicate if they are effective in reducing the spread of COVID-19.

Indeed, face masks have no effectiveness in the spread of influenza.

 

This is backed up by the fact that social distancing and face masks have not made a difference on yearly rate of influenza deaths in the UK.

On the 15^th October 2020 the stark reality that we are being led by a psychotic Covidian cult narrative became even more evident:

Nicola Sturgeon, the First Minister of Scotland, announced with great glee that couples marrying would no longer have to wear face masks when tying the knot.

 

Of course, the Priest, Vicar, or Registrar etc. conducting the ceremonies never had to wear a mask to conduct the marriage ceremony.

What kind of political leader would impose on couples, who for all intent and purposes will be living together and spending the night together after the wedding, have to wear a mask during their wedding ceremony?

 

Would a mask be required for the happy couple to consummate their marriage on their wedding night?

This ridiculous face mask rule imposed by Nicola Sturgeon shows quite clearly the dark side of Scottish politics.

It is ridiculous because Nicola Sturgeon (as well as all the other MSP's and Holyrood staff) has met many people from other households indoors in parliament (before and after face masks were imposed), whilst at the same time continually telling the masses that they cannot meet people from other households indoors.

One rule for me, one for thee.

The paranoid fuelled COVID-19 rules delivered by Sturgeon on a daily basis during the week and even reiterated on her twitter account on a frequent basis, and the blatant inconsistent and illogical nature of these rules, are not meant to console or comfort the masses.

No, they are a deliberate attempt to disorientate and control the minds of the masses.

Cult leaders do this to their followers to short circuit their critical thinking.

 

Cult leaders will also change the rules or the narrative at a whim for no apparent reason.

Hence the change of now being able to get married without a face mask, even though the COVID-19 restrictions are being tightened again all over the UK; it makes no sense, its not meant to, and the masses are meant to follow, not question and obey.

Cult leaders want to make the masses follow chaos.

This kind behavior is equally applicable to the realm of BDSM (bondage, domination, sado-masochism) or the Master-Slave dialectic. In the world of BDSM, a master or mistress will impose illogical rules, but demand to be obeyed.

As a slave in BDSM scenario might say,

"Mistress is correct even when Mistress is wrong".

This forms the basis for a human subject becoming an object, of becoming alienated from themselves.

This logical structure underpins the dictates from politicians in relation to COVID-19 restrictions.

The blatant flaunting of the dictates by the likes of,

• Catherine Calderwood

• Neil Ferguson

• Dominic Cummings

• Margaret Ferrier,

...and the many more we have not heard about yet, is testament to the fact that they don't really take this COVID-19 restrictions all that seriously.

This abusive objectification and alienation are what totalitarians and cult leaders want to achieve and impose on their followers.

Initiation rituals like mask wearing (especially when getting married) and social distancing, attack a person with terror, pain, humiliation and subjugation.

Of course, anyone who has been in an abusive relationship will tell you that pointless rituals or behaviors are demanded by the abusive and sadistic abusive partner to wear the other person down.

As is so often found in cults and individuals in abusive relationships, the cult members or abused partner will even go to great lengths to defend the cult leader's demands or the person who abuses them.

In our current predicament, this is highly ironic as the Scottish government have recently introduced psychological abuse as a crime.

This abusive dialectic that is playing out between the UK government/Scottish government/devolved assemblies and the masses might explain why so many people cannot perceive the totalitarianism that is being inflicted upon them right in front of them, or right on their faces in the guise of masks and up till recently masked up in front of the alter getting married.

The problem we have is this: people generally find it very difficult to recognize the delusional nature of a totalitarian master narrative.

One case in point was Nazi Germany:

cognitive dissonance was a prevalent characteristic of people during these times...

People who cannot see the totalitarian moves made upon them are not ignorant or unintelligent; they have been initiated into a cult through the methods of initiation, chaos, confusion and the short circuiting of critical thinking.

We are being initiated and conditioned for a future way of life where there will be no return to normality, and it has nothing to do with a virus.

This is why children are being socially distanced in schools, are made to wear masks in certain contexts, are treated like bio-hazards by their teachers and are frightened half to death by being made to obsessively wash their hands multiple times a day with an abrasive hand sanitizer.

Drawing on psychoanalytic thought, such directives pushed onto children will ensure that many children will grow up to be socially anxious and fearful of social interaction.

It begs belief that the Adverse Childhood Experiences "movement" (ACEs) in Scotland are utterly silent about the harms being committed upon children as a result of these scientifically challengeable COVID-19 restrictions and rules.

As the Centre for Disease Control state, the survival rate estimates for people aged 0-19 years for COVID-19 is 99.997%, 20-49 years is 99.98%, 50-69 years 99.5%, and 70 years+ 94.6% respectively.

 

And now we have a casedemic where the rates of false positives (89%-94% of positives potentially false) and the PCR test does not even test for COVID-19 (See ACU, 2020).

Of course, the politicians ignore the fact that the PCR test was never intended to be a diagnostic instrument to be used to inform public health policy, never mind mandate it.

The culture of de-individuation that the totalitarian abusive cult-like rituals of social distancing, mask wearing and not being able to meet people freely is also primed to be ramped up even further.

Nicola Sturgeon has stated that she is considering face masks to be compulsory even in outside spaces-seven months into this COVID-19 nightmare-another illogical and ridiculous idea with no basis in science.

We are now entering a precarious tipping point:

not from the virus, but from de-individuated members of the cult slavishly following these new rules and not challenging the wearing of masks outside...

No doubt the "nudging" from the Government will work a treat on the masses

This is because the UK and Scottish governments are manipulating, coercing and frightening us into following the rules and shaming us when we don't.

The UK and Scottish Governments are using applied behavioral psychology, breaking the ethical guidelines for psychologists, to deliberately ramp up fear in the population.

A group of psychologists called Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviours (SPI-B) of SAGE have been tasked with advising the UK and Scottish Governments how to get people to adhere to COVID-19 restrictions.

From their document which is freely available on the UK Government website, it is written:

"A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened."

And:

"The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging."

The psychologists of SPI-B and the UK government knew fear alone would not be enough...

Therefore, SPI-B suggested to government to use and promote social approval for desired behaviors, to consider enacting legislation to compel required behaviors, and to consider the use of social disapproval for failure to comply.

They have used the Mainstream Media and Social media, along with false fact-checking and censorship to get their message across and it has been working.

The tactics of the SPI-B psychologists informing UK and Scottish Governments' policies on the COVID-19 response are in my opinion contrary to the ethical and practice guidelines of The British Psychological Society (BPS); the psychology equivalent of the Hippocratic oath for medicine.

The mainstream media are silent on these unethical practices of deliberately ramping up people's sense of personal threat, creating a culture of feeling shame to follow COVID-19 regulations and encouraging people to shame others for not following regulations.

From the reports of several mental health charities, UK and Scottish Government reports, mental ill-health is in a crisis because of the COVID-19 response/measures.

Suicide risk factors have undoubtedly been hugely multiplied (house repossessions, unemployment, poverty and stress etc).

When the official figures are completed, I have no doubt that there will have been, and there will be to come, many suicides because of the COVID-19 lockdown and associated measures.

Our political leaders, despite their lip service to mental health, are aware of the mental health and suicide crisis that now engulfs us, yet they proceed onwards with the COVID-19 agenda regardless complicit in more psychological abuse being foisted upon people, knowing full well that this will cause untold misery.

Vladimir Bukovsky, a Soviet dissident who was imprisoned in a psychiatric hospital (enforced incarceration for political dissidents) described well our current predicament:

The peculiar features of the Soviet political system, the Communist ideology, the uncertainties and difficulties of the science of psychiatry, the labyrinths of the human conscience-all these have weirdly woven themselves together to create a monstrous phenomenon, the use of medicine against man."
Forward from Russia's political hospitals, 1977

(S. Bloch and P. Reddaway)

by Vladimir Bukovsky.

Like the Soviet Union today the monstrous phenomenon is again the use of science and medicine against the masses by many Governments in the battle against COVID-19.

Not only do our political leaders want to "keep us safe until a vaccine" but they seem to want to,

destroy the economy, create huge unemployment and destroy businesses...

They also want to,

monitor our every move and impose restrictions on work, travel and social and family life...

There will be no end to this nightmare:

There never is an end when one is in an abusive relationship.

 

The goalposts always keep moving.

 

The victim is broken down until they can offer no resistance.

Indeed, Bill Gates recently indicated that,

even if we get a vaccine for COVID-19, there will be no return to normal as it will probably take a second or third generation vaccine to get us back to normal...

Of course, we know full well, when we get that second or third generation vaccine, it will not herald a return to the old normal.

Unfortunately, at the moment there is not enough people (especially politicians and mainstream media journalists) with the necessary courage to call out the tyranny and call out the abuser.

Historically this has also been a problem, politically and within an abusive context (e.g., the victim finds great difficulty calling out their abuser).

In a critical remark and warning to the West, Alexander Solzhenitsyn said in his Harvard address in 1973:

A decline in courage may be the most striking feature which an outside observer notices in the West in our days.

 

The Western world has lost its civil courage, both as a whole and separately, in each country, each government, each political party, and, of course, in the United Nations...

 

Should one (have to) point out that from ancient times declining courage has been considered the beginning of the end...?"

 

Is this Scotland's beginning of the end?

 

Will the masses start to wake up to the dictatorial and totalitarian measures?

Only time will tell.

It might be too late. If it is the end, just don't say you didn't see it coming or nobody told you. There is hope. We can learn from history and enact that famous dictum after World War II:

it should never happen again...

Perhaps our politicians should mediate upon the Nuremberg Code of guidelines for determining what constitutes a war crime and UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights - Article 6.
 

Nuremberg Code

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
    

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
    

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
    

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
    

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
    

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
    

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
    

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
    

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
    

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

 

 

UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: Article 6 - Consent

1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
    

2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law.
    

3. In appropriate cases of research carried out on a group of persons or a community, additional agreement of the legal representatives of the group or community concerned may be sought. In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual's informed consent.

The Nuremberg Code and UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights - Article 6, make for sobering reading when it comes to governmental mandates or ideas in the pipeline regarding COVID-19.

Just think of face masks (especially for children), social distancing, travel restrictions, work restrictions, immunity passports and ideas about giving people a rushed out unlicensed vaccine for COVID-19 (which will be indemnified) which has not been assessed for the long-term side effects.

The cult-like nature of the Brave New Normal that is COVID-19 is insidiously pervading more and more aspects of our lives, with seemingly less and less science to back it up, and curiously being seen by those in power as an "opportunity" to reshape our society, not for our good, but for the good of those in power.

Perhaps we should all think about what all this means for us, our children, our grandchildren and democracy in the UK and wider world...