by Kit Knightly
December
, 2020
from
Off-Guardian
Website
Spanish
Version
Warnings
concerning high CT value of
tests
are months too
late...
So why are they
appearing now?
The potential
explanation is
shockingly
cynical...
The World Health Organization (WHO)
released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that
high cycle
thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.
While this information is accurate, it has also been available for
months, so we must ask:
Why are they
reporting it now?
Is it to make it
appear the vaccine 'works'...?
The "gold standard"
Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
PCR works by taking
nucleotides - tiny fragments of DNA or RNA - and replicating
them until they become something large enough to identify.
The replication is
done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic
material.
The number of cycles
it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the
"cycle threshold" or "CT value".
The higher the CT
value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything
significant.
This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for
the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive
results...
To quote their own words:
Users of RT-PCR
reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual
adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to
account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen
with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being
interpreted as a positive result.
They go on to explain:
The design principle
of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of
circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be
needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low.
Conversely, when
specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were
required to detect virus.
In some circumstances, the distinction
between background noise and actual presence of the target virus
is difficult to ascertain.
Of course, none of this
is news to anyone who has been
paying
attention...
That PCR tests were
easily manipulated and potentially highly inaccurate has been one of
the oft-repeated battle cries of those of us opposing the "pandemic"
narrative, and the policies it's being used to sell.
Many articles
have been written about it, by many experts in the field,
medical journalists and
other researchers.
It's been commonly available knowledge, for
months now, that any test using a CT value over 35 is potentially
meaningless...
Dr Kary Mullis,
who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear
that it
wasn't meant as a diagnostic tool, saying:
"with PCR, if
you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody."
And, commenting on
cycle thresholds, once said:
"If you have to
go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is
something seriously wrong with your PCR."
The
MIQE guidelines for PCR use state:
"Cq values
higher than 40 are suspect because of the implied low efficiency
and generally should not be reported,"
This has all been
public knowledge since the 'beginning of the lockdown'...
The Australian
government's
own website admitted the tests were flawed, and a court in
Portugal ruled they
were not fit for purpose.
Even Dr
Anthony Fauci has
publicly admitted that a cycle threshold over 35 is going to
be detecting "dead nucleotides", not a living virus:
Despite all this,
it is known that many labs around the world have been using PCR
tests with CT values over 35, even into the low 40s.
So,
Why has the WHO
finally decided to say this is wrong?
What reason
could they have for finally choosing to recognize this simple
reality?
The answer to that
is potentially shockingly cynical:
We have
a vaccine now. We don't
need false positives anymore...
Notionally, the
system has produced its 'miracle' cure...
So, after everyone
has been vaccinated, all the PCR tests being done will be done
"under the new WHO guidelines",
and running only 25-30 cycles instead of 35+.
Lo and behold, the
number of "positive cases" will plummet, and we'll have confirmation
that our miracle vaccine 'works'...
After months of
flooding the data pool with false positives,
miscounting deaths "by accident", adding "Covid19
related death" to every other death certificate... they can
stop.
The
create-a-pandemic machine can be turned down to zero again,
...as long as
we all 'do as we're told'...
Any signs of
dissent - masses of people refusing the vaccine, for example - and
the CT value can start to climb again, and
they bring back their magical disease...
|