by Frank Salvato
December 27, 2020

from NationalFile Website

Italian version

 

 

 

 

Anthony Fauci

 

 

There is no scientific data to corroborate the asymptomatic spread of COVID-19.

 

This myth was created and promoted by Technocrat scientists to control populations and drive social engineering outcomes, including the WEF's Great Reset.

Source

 

WHAT...?!

New study of 10 million chinese

finds Asymptomatic Covid Spread

never existed...

 

 

 

A new study on asymptomatic transmission of COVID not only proves it doesn't happen it proves the panic promoted by the political class was meant to control the populations.

In complete contradiction to the popular narrative used by Democrat politicians and governors across the United States, a new study of 10 million people in Wuhan, China - ground zero for the COVID virus, showed that asymptomatic spread of COVID does not occur, nullifying all reasoning for business closures and lockdowns...

The study, published in the November issue of the peer-reviewed scientific journal Nature Communications, studied 9,899,828 residents of Wuhan, screening them between May 14, 2020 and June 1, 2020.

 

The results provided clear evidence as to the possibility of any asymptomatic transmission of the virus.

The study was compiled by 19 scientists from the Huazhong University of Science & Technology in Wuhan, and highly respected scientific institutions in the UK and Australia.

Titled "Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly 10 million residents of Wuhan, China", the study thoroughly debunked the concept of asymptomatic transmission...

Out of the nearly 10 million people in the study, results revealed "300 asymptomatic cases" were found.

 

Utilizing contact tracing, of those 300, not a single case of COVID-19 were detected in any of them.

"A total of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19," the study concluded.

Both the asymptomatic patients and their contacts were placed in isolation for a period of no less than two weeks and the results remained the same.

"None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period," the study found.

 

Source

 

 

Further examination of the study subjects revealed that "virus cultures" in the positive and re-positive asymptomatic cases were all negative,

"indicating no ‘viable virus' in positive cases detected in this study."

The age range of those found to be asymptomatic was between 10 and 89 years of age.

 

The asymptomatic positive rate was "lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below" and the highest rate was found among people older than 60.

The study also concluded with high confidence that due to a weakening of the virus itself,

"newly infected persons were more likely to be asymptomatic and with a lower viral load than earlier infected cases."

In June of 2020, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization's emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, stated publicly that she,

doubted the narrative advanced by the political class on asymptomatic transmission...

Van Kerkhove explained during a press conference that,

"from the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual."

In fact, Van Kerkhove couldn't point to a single case of asymptomatic transmission, noting that numerous reports,

"were not finding secondary transmission onward."

The false narrative of asymptomatic transmission has been the justification used by the political and activist classes for lockdowns enacted all across the world.

Even the US Centers for Disease Control has been politicized in its advancing of the asymptomatic transmission false narrative.

 

They falsely advance claims that asymptomatic people,

"are estimated to account for more than 50 percent of transmissions."

There is no scientific data to corroborate this position...

A growing number of social scientists have started to advance the idea that the lockdowns,

most prevalent in states with Democrat and Progressive governors (in the U.S.), and in many cases states critical to the 2020 General Election,

...were nefariously instituted to facilitate a manipulation of the election process...