|
by Frank Salvato
December 27,
2020
from
NationalFile Website
Italian
version
Anthony
Fauci
There is no scientific data to corroborate the
asymptomatic spread of COVID-19.
This myth was created and promoted by Technocrat
scientists to control populations and drive social
engineering outcomes, including the WEF's
Great
Reset.
Source
WHAT...?!
New study of 10
million chinese
finds
Asymptomatic Covid Spread
never existed...
A new study on
asymptomatic transmission
of
COVID not only proves it doesn't
happen it proves the panic promoted by the political class was meant
to control the populations.
In complete contradiction to the popular narrative used by Democrat
politicians and governors across the United States, a new study of
10 million people in Wuhan, China - ground zero
for the COVID virus, showed that asymptomatic spread of COVID does not occur,
nullifying all reasoning for business closures and
lockdowns...
The study, published in the November issue of the peer-reviewed
scientific journal Nature Communications, studied 9,899,828
residents of Wuhan, screening them between May 14, 2020 and June 1,
2020.
The results provided
clear evidence as to the possibility of any asymptomatic
transmission of the virus.
The study was compiled by 19 scientists from the Huazhong
University of Science & Technology in Wuhan, and highly
respected scientific institutions in the UK and Australia.
Titled "Post-lockdown
SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly 10 million residents of
Wuhan, China", the study thoroughly debunked the concept
of asymptomatic transmission...
Out of the nearly 10 million people in the study, results revealed
"300 asymptomatic cases" were found.
Utilizing contact
tracing, of those 300, not a single case of COVID-19 were detected
in any of them.
"A total of 1,174
close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced,
and they all tested negative for the COVID-19," the study
concluded.
Both the asymptomatic
patients and their contacts were placed in isolation for a period of
no less than two weeks and the results remained the same.
"None of detected
positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or
newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period," the
study found.
Source
Further examination of
the study subjects revealed that "virus cultures" in the positive
and re-positive asymptomatic cases were all negative,
"indicating no
‘viable virus' in positive cases detected in this study."
The age range of those
found to be asymptomatic was between 10 and 89
years of age.
The asymptomatic positive
rate was "lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below" and
the highest rate was found among people older than 60.
The study also concluded with high confidence that due to a
weakening of the virus itself,
"newly infected
persons were more likely to be asymptomatic and with a lower
viral load than earlier infected cases."
Maria Van Kerkhove
In June of 2020, Dr.
Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the
World Health Organization's
emerging diseases and zoonosis unit,
stated publicly that she,
doubted the narrative
advanced by the political class on
asymptomatic transmission...
Van Kerkhove explained
during a press conference that,
"from the data we
have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person
actually transmits onward to a secondary individual."
In fact, Van Kerkhove
couldn't point to a single case of asymptomatic transmission, noting
that numerous reports,
"were not finding
secondary transmission onward."
The false narrative
of asymptomatic transmission has been the
justification used by the political and activist classes
for lockdowns enacted all across
the world.
Even the US Centers for Disease Control has been
politicized in its advancing of the asymptomatic transmission
false narrative.
They falsely advance
claims that asymptomatic people,
"are estimated to
account for more than 50 percent of transmissions."
There is no scientific
data to corroborate this position...
A growing number of social scientists have started to advance the
idea that the lockdowns,
most prevalent in
states with Democrat and Progressive governors (in the
U.S.), and in many cases states critical to the 2020 General
Election,
...were nefariously
instituted to facilitate a manipulation of the election
process...
| 
