|
by Brian Shilhavy
October 05,
2021
from
HealthImpactNews Website
"Universal mRNA
Flu Vaccine"
became the
"COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine"
because People
were not Afraid Enough
of the Flu
Virus...
Last night Alex Jones of
Infowars.com did a special broadcast
regarding an October, 2019 video that they had just become aware of
that was a panel discussion hosted by the Milken Institute
discussing the need for a Universal Flu Vaccine.
The video clip that they played of this event was a 1 minute and 51
second dialogue between,
-
the moderator,
Michael Specter, a journalist who is a New Yorker staff
writer and also an adjunct professor of bioengineering at
Stanford University
-
Anthony Fauci,
the director of the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases
-
Rick Bright, the
director of HHS Biomedical Advanced Research and Development
Authority (BARDA)
In this short clip, which
was extracted from the hour-long panel discussion, Anthony
Fauci explains that bringing a new, untested kind of
vaccine like an mRNA vaccine, would take at least a decade ("if
everything goes perfectly") to go through proper trials and be
approved by the FDA.
He would know, because he had been trying to do it for about a
decade already by then (October, 2019), trying to develop an mRNA
based vaccine for HIV.
But now they were discussing something much bigger than just a
vaccine for AIDS patients. They are talking about a "Universal Flu
Vaccine" that everyone would have to take - a huge market
for Big Pharma!
Rick Bright, the director of HHS Biomedical Advanced
Research and Development Authority (BARDA),
then speaks and states that what could happen is that,
"an entity of
excitement that is completely disruptive and is not beholden to
bureaucratic strings and processes" could change that.
Here is the short clip
which I put on our
Bitchute channel last night:
Alex Jones spent over 50 minutes
covering this on his show last
night, and it looks like he
covered it on his show today as well.
I have not had a chance to watch these yet, as I went and found the
original 1 hour panel discussion video, and spent the day listening
to and analyzing that, so that I could supply this report to our
readers.
Joining Fauci, Rick Bright, and Michael Specter at this event were:
-
Margaret Hamburg,
Foreign Secretary, National Academy of Medicine
-
Bruce Gellin,
President, Global Immunization, Sabin Vaccine Institute
-
Casey Wright,
CEO, FluLab
In short, this panel
discussion focused on what they perceived as the need for a
universal flu vaccine, but they admitted that the old way of
producing vaccines was not sufficient for their purposes, and that
they needed some kind of global event where many people were dying
to be able to roll out a new mRNA vaccine to be tested on the
public.
They all agreed that
the annual flu virus was not scary enough to create an event
that would convince people to get a universal vaccine.
And as we now know today, about 2 years after this event, that
"terrifying virus" that was introduced was the COVID-19 Sars
virus.
And so now we know why
the flu just "disappeared" in the 2020-21 flu season. It was simply
replaced by COVID-19, in a worldwide cleverly planned "pandemic" to
roll out the world's first universal mRNA vaccines.
This was always the goal, and previous efforts through various
influenzas, AIDS, Ebola, and other "viruses" were all unsuccessful
in leading to the development of a universal vaccine to inject into
the entire world's population.
Margaret Hamburg stated regarding getting a "Universal
Vaccine" into the market:
"It's time to stop
talking, and it's time to act."
"I think it is also because we haven't had a sense of urgency."
Michael Specter
asks:
"Do we need lots of
people to die for that sense of urgency to occur?"
Hamburg replies that:
"There are already
lots of people dying" from the flu each year.
Bruce Gellin
states that basically people just are not afraid enough of the term
"the flu."
There are so many things that are revealed about how Big Pharma and
government health authorities think in this panel discussion. For
example, they bemoan the fact that if they do too good of a job in
public health, then they lose funding to develop products that fight
viruses.
Michael Specter states:
"It seems to me that
one of the curses of the public health world is, if you guys do
your job well, everyone goes along well and healthy."
Hamburg:
"And they cut your
funding."
Rick Bright
complains that the yearly distribution of flu vaccines is
inefficient in terms of collecting data, and in the process actually
admits that some vaccines just don't work well:
"We distribute 150
million doses of the seasonal (flu) vaccines every year, we
don't even know how many people are being vaccinated from the
doses that are delivered to the people, which doses they got,
and what the real outcome was, so that we can learn from that
knowledge base on how to optimize or improve our vaccine.
So there are
opportunities that we have today…
I think if we uncloaked the poorest performing vaccines in the
market place today, it might be very revealing to tell us which
of the technologies we have, and allow us to go deeper into
those technologies to determine why they are more effective.
There are vaccine
licenses today that are more effective.
I think that we're
just afraid to admit the truth."
So much for the public
mantra that is espoused by Big Pharma and government that the
"science" of vaccines is "settled," and that they are completely
"safe and effective."
Casey Wright repeats the mantra that was publicized every
year, before COVID, about just how deadly the flu virus was:
"650,000 people die
every year from the flu."
As we have documented
many times over the past decade here at Health Impact News, this is
simply not true.
This is an estimate
because actual laboratory confirmed cases of influenza each year
are very small, probably less than 1000 in the U.S.
Most flu-like symptoms
are never tested in a lab to determine what is causing the symptoms.
They were always just
classified as "flu" to inflate the numbers to justify the very
profitable flu shot each year. Some of our previous coverage of this
issue:
So as they have inflated
the COVID-19 cases since last year, they are simply continuing their
policy of inflating flu numbers each year in order to sell their
vaccines.
They obviously could not
have done both last year, as the public would have quickly seen that
the math doesn't work.
And yet, so many in the public bought the lie that the COVID-19
measures got rid of the flu, but not COVID-19.
Ultimately, this panel discussion can be boiled down to:
Nobody wants to fund
research for a universal flu vaccine...
So how do we change that?
Create a pandemic of
fear over the flu (but they couldn't call it the "flu" because
people are no longer afraid of influenza, and the fear over
"AIDS" had also subsided).
Fauci then addressed this
"perception problem."
There's this
perception (about the flu), if it's so serious, how come people
get the flu each year and it isn't a catastrophe?
When you're dealing with a disease like HIV, if you get HIV,
it's serious. Whether you're young, whether you're middle aged,
or whether you're old.
If you get cancer,
that's bad. Whether you're young, whether it's intermediate...
whereas if it's influenza, some people, they go throughout life
and it doesn't impact them at all.
There isn't anyone who is afraid of influenza. You go into a
focus group and you say: Are you afraid of getting HIV if you're
at risk? Oh, absolutely.
Are you afraid of getting cancer? Absolutely. Are you afraid of
the flu? Don't bother me.
That's the reality of how people perceive flu.
And it is going to be very difficult to change that, unless you
do it from within and say, I don't care what your perception is,
we're going to address the problem, in a disruptive way...
Specter then asks:
In the long run, over
time, if the 2009 pandemic had been much more deadly, would that
have ended up being a better thing for humanity?
Everyone is silent as
they obviously were thinking about how to answer that, and Specter
says:
"Come on gang."
Fauci ultimately answers
and says "No" because there were other years that were worse than
2009 and it didn't change a thing in terms of creating a universal
vaccine.
Hamburg then states:
The sad truth is that
when there is a major crisis, it focuses attention and usually
resources and some significant mobilization follows.
We need, #1, this time to be different, and we also need to
really organize ourselves in a way where there will be
accountability for sustained action, and not just response.
Specter states:
Craig Venter, who is
a controversial person, but interesting to me, has written that
he thinks we ought to have a vaccine, such that, if you take off
in a plane from Hong Kong, and are infected, by the time your
plane lands in New York, there ought to be a vaccine assembled
and deliverable to you.
How crazy is that? How far are we from that? Are we ever going
to get there?
Bright replies:
I'm not going to say
how far away, but I don't think that's too crazy.
I think that if we move towards the era of synthetic-based
vaccines, I think we remove the dependencies of thinking the
vaccine has to be grown into something else, an egg, a cell, or
insect cell - any type of dependency embryo.
If we can move into more synthetic, the nucleic acid based,
messenger RNA based, those sequences can be rapidly shared
around the world.
He then goes on to talk
about using a 3D printer to print out a "vaccine patch" that people
use to administer the "vaccine."
We also learn in this panel discussion why Anthony Fauci is
so opposed to natural immunity,
because natural
immunity for influenza, according to his view, translates to an
immune response against other strains of a particular influenza
virus, which will interfere with what they are trying to do with
the vaccines.
That is why he wants to
inject infants as young as 6 months old with a universal vaccine, as
he states here, to prevent that "confused" natural immunity from
happening before the child grows older.
So the big question that this panel was tackling, was how do they
implement their strategies, and what is holding them back?
Certainly the government/regulatory issue is a big one, and now two
years later we can see exactly how they did that, by controlling the
FDA and the CDC to promote the "killer virus pandemic" narrative as
long as possible to justify taking emergency measures that short-cut
the normal procedures for bringing novel, new drugs to the market.
It also clearly explains the vicious opposition to existing, cheap
therapeutics that very easily treated what is really just the
seasonal flu "virus," which stood in their way of rolling out a
universal vaccine.
Casey Wright then made a rather remarkable comment about
"philanthropy" and its role in this effort:
There's a potential
role for philanthropy to play there... we are in a position to
take on a little more risk (she smiles eerily as she says this),
to be open to a little bit more experimentation and methods in
how we do things.
That's what I think
is unique about FluLab, and is unique about other
philanthropies.
I think they can play a really important role there, and fund a
set of bolder, maybe earlier promising concepts.
Bingo...!
Think Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation, the
Rockefeller Foundation, and
other "philanthropies" that are "unburdened" by regulatory issues as
they spend their money pretty much unchecked, with no
accountability, all in the name of "science" and the "greater good."
We have seen most certainly how the Gates Foundation has done this
in India by luring poor people into highly questionable ethical
experimentations on vaccines, such as the Gardasil vaccine
which we have covered so often over the years here at Health Impact
News.
Bruce Gellin then talks about a report published by his
organization that called for an "entity" that would make these
decisions and bring everyone together to collaborate to create this
universal vaccine, and eliminate those who oppose.
The report was published in 2019, and
here is the press release.
He states:
They called for this
"entity" which is the collaboration we talked about.
They called for the
need to infuse innovation, to find some of these people who we
don't know might be part of the problem to come into this.
And to try to think
about how we talk about this differently so that your stomach
flu doesn't keep us from making progress. (everyone laughs…)
I assume that this
"entity" is Gellin's group, The Sabin-Aspen Vaccine Science &
Policy Group.
Today, this is the main group fighting "vaccine hesitancy" and
trying to silence any dissenting voices that get in their way of
rolling out this universal vaccine, which of course we now know is
the COVID-19 vaccine:
Online
Misinformation about Vaccines
Watch the entire panel discussion to learn just how arrogant these
people are.
This is on our
Bitchute channel:
Your Life Only
has Value as a Lab Rat to These Satanic Tyrants
This is one of the most explosive videos I have ever watched that
takes us into the mindset of the Globalist Tyrants and their
greedy desire to control the human race by means of vaccines.
As you watch this, you need to ask yourself:
Who appointed these
people as caretakers of humanity to decide what is good for the
entire human race?
At the very core of this
problem of medical tyranny is a fundamental difference of how one
views life.
When they talk about the
"deficiencies" of natural immunity, this is a direct attack on the
human race, and this has always been the case behind the "science"
of vaccines.
This worldview represented by this panel believes that they are a
higher form of life that can dictate to the masses how to live their
lives, because these people honestly believe that they are tasked
with saving humanity, and saving the planet, and that everyone else
is too ignorant to make these decisions.
They are psychopaths driven by greed and the desire to control.
We only see their public
side, but they are human beings just like everyone else, and if we
could see how they live outside of their public life, they would
probably never be able to maintain their positions of power, because
it would be plain to see just how evil they are.
Look at
Anthony Fauci, for example.
Does he look like an
80-year-old man?
What does he do to
stay looking so young?
We know that the rich and
famous are addicted to pursuing youth and maintaining their power,
and that many do so by consuming "young blood," the blood taken from
young people, including what is reportedly the very addictive drug "adrenochrome"
harvested from babies just before they are executed.
See:
"Young Blood" - The
Emerging Market for Products Made from the Blood of Children
They think nothing of
people dying in mass for the sake of "science" and developing their
universal vaccines.
This universal vaccine is
something they have worked on for decades now, and their dreams are
finally coming to fruition through COVID-19.
I have been covering this issue for over a decade now, and nothing
in this panel discussion surprised me at all.
The only way to control the global population for their own agendas
is to control their health, and they have learned after decades of
failure that it is nearly impossible to develop a biological weapon
capable of infecting and spreading through the entire population.
The reason for this is because natural immune system is just too
strong, as it adapts and overcomes these diseases, as a built-in
safe guard for the human race.
I would suspect that pretty much ALL of the past historical
"pandemics" have been failed biological weapon programs that they
have tried to develop. In the end, they have learned that the only
way to infect everyone on the face of the earth, is to inject them
with a poison via vaccines.
This has ALWAYS been the goal of the vaccine movement, even if most
in the movement were not aware of it, and were foolish enough to
believe that vaccines actually conferred health upon people.
|
