|
If it has major flaws,
it's as if a stage magician screws up a trick in full view of the
audience. As he's sawing a woman in a box in half, everyone sees her
sneaking out of the back of the box. Busted.
Soon, researchers
discovered the never-before-seen coronavirus in the patient.
Let's break this down.
BUT as I've pointed out in past articles, the city of Wuhan is famous for clouds of foul pollution.
The unprecedented combination of toxic compounds in the air constitutes a clear and present danger. Last summer, there was a large protest in the city focusing on this very issue.
When lots of people take to the streets in China, you know the issue is serious - because the brutal government doesn't take kindly to public expressions of dissatisfaction.
SO… who cares if doctors in a Wuhan hospital couldn't find familiar bacteria or viruses in a PNEUMONIA patient?
In other words,
This whole origin-story is absurd. It vibrates with ripples of FAKE...
There is more. Much more.
The medical professionals had to deal with the possibility that this "new" coronavirus wasn't new at all. Suppose it had been in the world for decades or centuries, obviously causing people no harm? If so, that would sink their ship.
They couldn't have that. They couldn't admit,
No, no, that would never do.
Instead, the pros would have to claim the coronavirus 'JUST EMERGED' in humans for the very first time.
A FEW MONTHS AGO, it crossed over from animals (bats, snakes) to humans. And that's exactly what they are saying.
Here is a statement from StatNews ("DNA Sleuths read the Coronavirus Ggenome, tracing its Origins and looking for Dangerous Mutations," January 24, 2020).
It's a bit complicated, but read it over, and then I'll comment:
My, my...
That's quite a precise peg:
The experts can assure us that it never existed in humans until that one-month period.
Absurd...
No one can perform such an exact analysis. Therefore, their whole story about the human origin of the coronavirus wobbles out of the range of credibility. By miles...
Whether they're just winging it, or fabricating it, or making gross errors in bolstering their tale… there is no reason to believe anything they say about when the coronavirus surfaced in humans.
To cite a precedent, several years ago the Zika virus was called an ominous germ that was spreading around the world, causing women to give birth to babies with smaller heads and brain damage (microcephaly).
I then reported that,
In yet another fake epidemic story - this one, also a coronavirus - the SARS "epidemic" of 2003 turned out to be a dud.
The official death toll, when all was said and done?
And in Canada, a World Health Organization microbiologist, Frank Plummer, confessed to the press that the number of SARS patients who actually had the coronavirus in their bodies was approaching ZERO...
In other words, these patients, who had nothing more than typical flu symptoms, couldn't have SARS, because they didn't have the virus that was supposed to be causing SARS.
Sorry. No sale...
Some people, reading what I've laid out in this article, will say,
Take a step back.
A so-called confirmed case of the coronavirus doesn't necessarily refer to a person who is sick.
If "tests show" a person "has the virus," he is counted as "a case."
Most so-called cases ARE mild - and, as I've explained in other articles, the diagnostic tests for the coronavirus do not prove a patient's symptoms are CAUSED by the virus.
This fact applies to anyone with any degree of illness who is called "a case of the epidemic."
Finally, keep in mind that people all over the planet have the symptoms that are now being labeled, "China epidemic":
These symptoms can and do come about from a whole catalog of various reasons, none of which need "the story of the coronavirus."
It's as easy as pie to claim, without evidence, that someone who has these symptoms, and,
This is exactly how some of the fake epidemics ARE synthetically put together and fabricated...
The tests say NOTHING about whether the virus is causing harm. But gloss over that vital fact.
Skip ahead and say:
No...!
Case unproven and therefore dismissed...
|
