The PCR Test
by Dr. Vernon Coleman
February 09, 2021
Source
Right from the start of 2020, my articles and videos about Covid
attracted an enormous amount of abuse.
But the one article which seemed to attract
most abuse was one in which I warned about the dangers of the
PCR test. Journalists and broadcasters who wouldn't know what to
do with a scientific paper if they were given one, jumped up and
down with great indignation.
I was vilified for having said such a thing.
But now that more and more doctors are
belatedly beginning to wake up to the fact that there was no
pandemic, that Covid was just the annual flu and that the
heavily promoted vaccine doesn't work and is dangerous, it is
time to take another look at the evidence about the PCR Test.
(For the record I have a one-inch thick stack
of scientific papers proving that the PCR test is dangerous and
can be lethal. Curiously, those scientific references appear to
have disappeared from the internet - or are at least difficult
to find.)
We all know now that PCR tests are useless for finding cases of
Covid-19 but very good at helping governments keep us in our own
homes under house arrest.
In some parts of the world, the PCR tests are
banned as utterly useless. I explained precisely what's wrong
with these misused tests in an article on this website subtly
called 'The
PCR Test Is Useless for Covid-19 (But Useful for Crooked
Governments)'.
The big problem, of course, is that the British Government, for
example, deliberately ignores the WHO guidelines and does the
test in a crooked way which would, in a just and sensible world,
result in
Johnson,
Hancock and their
"advisors" crowded into the dock.
You'd get as good a result if you just divided people into two
groups:
...and then announced that the ones with the
vowel all had Covid-19 and the rest all needed to change their
names within seven days or pay a huge fine.
So, everyone with functioning brain tissue knows
that the PCR test is useless, except for political reasons, and
that the whole testing program is an outrageously expensive and
disruptive shambles.
Only,
...think that PCR tests are valuable.
Did you know, by the way, that the
Government has allegedly hired 900 consultants to help with
the test and trace scheme?
The consultants are being paid £1,000 a
day each though what they do for that I cannot imagine.
That's £900,000 a day.
I suspect that 99.99% of the population
would be happier if the £900,000 a day were spent on
dentists.
But that's not the half of it.
Most people seem to have
accepted the need for regular PCR testing...
Indeed, people in the UK queue up to have it
done as often as possible - as though they get some sort of
thrill out of having a complete stranger stuff something into a
bodily orifice - pushing it in as far as it will go, twizzling
it about a bit, and then pulling it out and buggering off
without so much as,
"a thank you very much I'll give you a
ring tomorrow and we'll have dinner and then do it again."
There is talk of children having daily
tests though I haven't been able to find any evidence that
this would be a good idea for anyone other than the hugely
profitable industry now involved in making and looking at the
swabs.
What no one ever mentions is that,
the PCR tests are dangerous and can, if
done improperly, cause excruciating pain...
This is probably why some countries don't
like them.
There is indeed a great deal of confusion
about how far the swab should go. (Or should that be the
Klaus Schwab...)
In Australia, the guidelines are that the
swab should only go a few centimeters up the nostril but
nasopharyngeal swabs can go much further.
The United States Department of Health
and Human services says that the swab should reach a depth
equal to the distance from the nostrils to the outer opening
of the ear.
That's a huge distance.
In Ottawa, Canada, the recommendation is
half that distance.
In October last year (2020) I reported on at least one case
where a healthy individual had noticed cerebrospinal fluid
pouring out of her nose after an invasive PCR test.
That really isn't something you want
happening.
The woman concerned, who was in her 40s, had
a PCR nasal swab test and later went to see a doctor complaining
of vomiting, a runny nose, a headache and a stiff neck.
The pseudo-journalists at the BBC
can, if they are interested in facts, find the details in the
JAMA Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.
Surgeons found that the fluid running
down her nose was cerebrospinal fluid - the fluid that
protects the brain.
Then there was the case which was accepted
for The Medical Journal of Australia on the 4 December
but which I don't think has been published yet.
This reported a healthy 67-year-old woman who
had cerebrospinal fluid coming down her nose and the symptoms of
meningitis.
This followed a Covid-19 swab test.
How many are being killed - especially in
care homes - by this useless and dangerous test?
The authors of the paper stated that the,
"techniques for deep nasal and
nasopharyngeal swabs may be easily confused."
They offer instructions for those conducting
the tests.
Here's one part of their instructions:
"It involves swab insertion into the
nasal cavity at a plane between the opening of the nose and
the external ear canal on the patient, which can be
considered as the horizontal plane for the purpose of
relationship to surface anatomy.
This will allow the swab to be inserted
parallel to the nasal floor which would avoid injury to the
middle turbinates.
Swabs inserted in an upward orientation
into the nasal cavity, (greater than 30 degrees) not only
have a risk of failing to achieve an adequate diagnostic
sample from the desired nasal mucosa and nasopharynx but
also puts the patient at greater risk of injury to the thin
and delicate areas of the skull base (attachment of middle
turbinate and cribriform plate) which are superior and
anterior to the sphenoid sinus ostium."
There is then an illustration for swabbing
and the authors conclude:
"We urge that this angle is not exceeded
when performing diagnostic tests as it places the patient at
greatest risk of serious adverse events."
Might I suggest that anyone having a PCR test
should ensure that the person holding the swab has studied and
understood these instructions - and will follow them.
In Tripura, a three-day-old baby bled to
death after a nasal swab test.
In Saudi Arabia an eighteen-month-old
child died after a test swab broke inside his nasal cavity.
These are not safe tests.
Children are being traumatized by these
incredibly invasive tests.
These are not safe procedures and they're
often being done by people who know as much about medicine and
human anatomy as I know about running a submarine - though I
have seen Ice Station Zebra with Patrick McGoohan, and
that film with Gene Hackman and Denzel Washington in it.
And there was Red October with Sean
Connery.
Actually, come to think about it, I probably
know far more about submarines than the average test and tracer
tester knows about anatomy...!
Quite a few things have puzzled me about the PCR test.
First,
Why the devil do they have to push
the swab so far up your nose - and so close to your
brain?
Where is the indisputable scientific
evidence that all the little Covid-19 bugs are gathering
up there for some reason?
Do they like out-of-the-way places?
Normally, if you have a bug in your nose,
it will be in your nose.
Where is the solid proof that the
test only works if a sample is taken from a spot so far
up your nose that the tissue up there probably speaks
another language and only gets home once a year?
Since these tests are now being performed
by people who aren't doctors or nurses or probably even Boy
Scouts, we need some evidence that the test is essential.
Actually, since the tests produce more
false positives than real positives, they are clearly a
waste of time anyway and it would make as much sense if the
testing swab were inserted into the umbilicus and given a
good twizzle there.
Second, researchers at Johns Hopkins
University in the US published a study describing a device
which has been developed.
It's a tiny, star-shaped micro-device
capable of delivering a drug. The devices are no larger than
a speck of dust but contain a metal core coated in
heat-sensitive paraffin wax.
At the centre of the core, there is the
drug...
Now, we know that around half of Americans
are reluctant to have the
Covid-19 vaccination.
I think that this hidden injection technology could be used to
vaccinate people through nasal or anal PCR swabs.
Is this why anal swabs are being
introduced?
The procedure works best on intestinal
tissue.
This could be used to deliver a vaccine
to people without their knowledge or consent...
People who think they are just being tested
could be receiving the mRNA jab.
Is it going to happen?
How the hell would we know?
The authorities are already collecting the
names and details of people who have declined the vaccine.
Are they planning to use
the PCR test for those who
refuse the vaccination?
We cannot trust the Government or its
advisers.
We cannot trust the mainstream media.
We definitely cannot trust the BBC which
has financial links to the
Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation and which long ago betrayed us.
We can only trust one another.
Giving vaccines nasally is nothing new.
Children sometimes have the flu vaccine
sprayed up their noses - that's a live attenuated vaccine,
by the way.
Attenuated means it's weaker.
But it could still kill granny, of
course...
Personally, I might use the stuff to clear
the drains but I wouldn't squirt it up a child's nose.
And you should perhaps know this:
nasal vaccinations are already used on
cattle...!
