
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
July 13, 2025
from
Mercola Website
PDF version

Dr. Mary Talley
Bowden
Story at-a-glance
-
Dr. Bowden used rapid PCR (polymerase chain
reaction) tests and early interventions like
monoclonal antibodies and Ivermectin to successfully
treat over 6,000 patients during the COVID-19
'pandemic'
-
Government agencies and medical boards coordinated
to suppress effective treatments while promoting
expensive alternatives through an $11.5 billion
propaganda campaign
-
Hospitals indiscriminately used ventilators and
harmful protocols, with some cases resembling
euthanasia rather than proper patient care during
the peak of the 'pandemic'
-
Athletic sudden deaths rose from 29 to 290 annually,
with myocarditis cases rising significantly, yet
politicians remain silent due to pharmaceutical
industry influence
-
Despite growing political support for medical
autonomy, powerful medical organizations continue
suppressing free speech and patient choice regarding
treatments
In a three-hour interview with Joe Rogan, Dr. Mary Talley
Bowden recounts her experience in the trenches during the
COVID-19 'pandemic'. 1
While she has saved thousands of lives, the
establishment vilified her by refusing to use treatments they
endorsed.
I encourage you to
watch al bottom page the entire episode, as it's
an eye-opening story of what went on behind the scenes.
Early Testing and Treatment Save
Lives
According to Bowden, early 'pandemic'
testing delays were severe, often lasting up to two weeks.
These delays allowed the virus more time to
spread, exacerbating illness and overwhelming health care systems.
-
Quick testing helps the
appropriate patients
Bowden contributed to widespread testing
by adopting saliva-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
tests, dramatically reducing waiting times to just 24 hours:
"I was already working with a lab for
patients with chronic sinusitis, they were doing a PCR
testing for chronic sinusitis.
So, tests for bacterial and fungal
infections of the sinuses. It's called Microgen DX, and
they came out with a saliva test for COVID.
So, we were able to get the results back the next day.
So, I started offering that and my little clinic
exploded …"
-
Doctors still helped whenever
they could
Even if patients already had a full-blown
infection, Bowden was still bound by her oath to help treat
them with whatever tools were available:
"I also had patients come in that
were really sick in the second week.
And that, that was such a learning
experience for me because, you know, normally, if
somebody walked into my office with an oxygen saturation
in the low 80s, I would call an ambulance.
But I had patients who were refusing
to go to the hospital, and I had to give them the option
to possibly die in my office, which is scary, but we
saved them."
-
Monoclonal antibodies worked
Simply put, monoclonal antibodies are
lab-grown antibodies 2 designed to stimulate your
immune system.
Bowden recounts how they "worked very
well" for her patients, and she would notice improvement the
following day.
-
Early treatment increases
survival outcomes
Bowden says that patients coming in
during the beginning phases of the disease helped improve
their chances of full recovery:
"[O]nce I knew it was safe, then I
started using [Ivermectin] and found it worked... All in
all, I treated well over 6,000 patients and everybody
that got early treatment stayed out of the hospital."
What Happens When Doctors Speak
Out Against the Narrative
Bowden personally encountered severe side effects of the COVID-19
jab while treating patients.
But when she spoke out, she was met with vehement
opposition:
"So, it used to be 29 per year.
Now it's 290 per year, [a] growth
[of] 10 times... And I worry about these kids because
myocarditis, the primary symptom is chest pain.
But if you've got a kid who's not
even speaking yet, you have no idea if they have
myocarditis, and myocarditis can leave a permanent scar
on the heart and then lead to a lifelong increased risk
of sudden cardiac death and we have no idea if these
kids have been affected."
-
The government schemed to hit
Ivermectin
In addition to the rollout of
the shots,
Bowden believes there was a concerted effort by different
parties to suppress
Ivermectin:
"[T]he Federation of State Medical
Boards, which is this private entity - they're actually
located in Texas - who oversees all the state medical
boards, they sent out a directive to all the state
medical boards concerning Ivermectin, concerning
misinformation, and basically encouraging the medical
boards to go after doctors like myself."
-
Opposition will have a hard
time prosecuting lifesavers
While Bowden has been maligned, she is
proud of what she did to help patients. In turn, her
attackers have no leverage because in the end, she saved
lives:
"They can't find an expert witness to
testify against me. There have been three continuances.
They finally were awarded summary judgment against me.
So, they've decided I'm guilty. And
now I'm waiting for my punishment. There was a hearing
about a month ago to find out what they're going to find
me with and that sort of thing.
And I'm just waiting on that, but I
do plan on appealing."
Going deeper into the censorship angle, Bowden
shares that the big players are working together to bring down
cheap, effective treatments for patients suffering from the COVID-19
'pandemic':
"If you look at the timing, in March,
the government put out the big information on
Ivermectin
and why you should not take it for COVID.
They put that on the FDA 's website.
At the same time, they launched COVID-19 Community
Corps, and this was April 1st, 2021.
This was an $11.5 billion slush fund to feed out
propaganda and censor people.
And the day that they launched the
COVID-19 Community Corps was the same day that Houston
Methodist, which is where I had privileges, mandated the
COVID shots for all their employees, and they were the
first in the country."
-
The government purposefully
made it hard for doctors to do their jobs
This led to the suppression of effective
treatments, such as monoclonal antibodies.
Bowden said,
she didn't even use Ivermectin until
the government took over distribution of monoclonal
antibodies.
After that, it became increasingly
difficult to get them.
Were Hospital
Protocols Helping or Hurting Patients?
Early 'pandemic' hospital protocols often used ventilators
aggressively and universally, regardless of patient-specific needs,
frequently worsening outcomes for many individuals:
-
Ventilators were forced on
patients
Despite leading to worsened pulmonary
function, hospitals still put patients on ventilators:
"You don't look at a number to put
somebody on a ventilator. And unfortunately, the people
in the hospital didn't learn.
They didn't experiment in that
fashion. They just went by this protocol and
automatically put people on ventilators. They also
didn't give people breathing treatments.
They thought that breathing
treatments would spread the virus."
-
Hospitals were
indiscriminately harming patients
During the height of the 'pandemic',
Bowden recounts that hospitals were essentially euthanizing
patients to make room for others:
"They'll justify giving morphine
because they'll say,
'Oh, well, they're struggling to
breathe.'
Well, guess what...?
Morphine actually depresses your
drive to breathe.
Like this one case I remember, this
patient, he was sick, he looked like he was dying, but
they just pushed morphine.
He had no pain. They do a pain score,
so zero to 10.
This guy had zero pain. And then they pushed insulin to
drop his sugar, and his glucose was fine. And then he
died three minutes later...
I reviewed this chart and turned him
in the medical board. Nothing. They didn't do anything."
"[W]e have hard facts showing it
should be pulled off the market.
I mean, any other product would have
been pulled a long time ago. If this were an antibiotic
and we'd seen all the carnage from an antibiotic, it
would have been yanked off long ago.
It should have been yanked off in the
first month. There's no other explanation than there's
just fraud, there's corruption, there's ego, there's
money.
But it's not science."
Medical Freedom is Constantly
Under Threat
Recent victories for medical freedom, such as Idaho's ban on jab
mandates, 3 demonstrate growing support for patient
autonomy.
Yet powerful medical organizations remain opposed
to broad reforms.
-
More like-minded politicians
are needed
Bowden formed the Americans for Health
Freedom to increasingly influence policy discussions,
advocating strongly for the restoration and protection of
medical freedoms:
"I started an organization called
Americans for Health Freedom to try to find the
politicians with moral courage to simply state that the
COVID shots should be pulled off the market.
It has been slow-growing, but we are
up to 252 politicians who will go on record just to
state that these shots should be pulled off the market."
-
Politicians have been bought
Rogan and Bowden agree that money has
caused many politicians to stay quiet about the efficacy and
safety of the shots, most likely because of
Big Pharma's
bribery:
"[T]hese politicians are not getting
these shots anymore and they're not giving them to their
kids, and yet they're fine just staying quiet and not
saying anything.
They're fine letting their
constituents get these shots when we know all the
complications, we know that it doesn't work.
We know that the risk far outweighs
the benefit, and the politicians are staying quiet.
So, our goal is to support the ones
who will speak up and get them more power."
-
Organizations continue to
suppress free speech
Bowden frequently clashed with mainstream
medical experts during the 'pandemic'.
She called out the Texas Medical
Association (TMA), saying:
"They are anti-free speech for
physicians.
They are pro-mandate. They've gone
after me, and they have a tight control over the people
in our House and State.
So, I just think we need to be
careful. I mean, you saw it during the 'pandemic' and
the economy of our state is dominated by health, and
people don't realize that.
They just think oil, but health is a
huge dominating factor in our economy and, you saw what
they did to me, what they're still doing to me."
The Best Ways to Protect Yourself
Despite the assault on physicians and patient medical freedom,
Bowden hasn't given up.
Things are looking up, and she hopes that the
new Health Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, "will save us
all."
In the meantime, there are things you can do to
protect yourself against the ever-evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants, as
well as other diseases by boosting your immune system.
As noted in Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong's
interview with Tucker Carlson,
your immune system is everything, especially against chronic
diseases.
However, many people have compromised immune
function nowadays due to
getting the shot.
To rebuild your resilience, here are my
recommendations:
1.
Prioritize sleep
Ensure you're getting at least seven to
nine hours of high-quality sleep every night.
Sleep is when your body heals and
rejuvenates. Lack of proper sleep weakens your immune system
and increases inflammation.
But that's not all - you also need to
consider sleep quality.
For simple, actionable fixes that will
help you get the rest you need, read "Subtle
Signs You Are Not Getting Enough Sleep."
2.
Dietary adjustments
Your diet plays a huge role in your
overall health.
If you're eating unhealthy foods, it's
time to change. Limit ultraprocessed foods, refined sugar,
and
linoleic acid (LA), which is an inflammatory
polyunsaturated fat (PUFA).
Focus instead on
healthy carbohydrates to optimize your metabolic health
and reduce immune-damaging inflammation.
3.
Sunlight exposure
In a previous article, I noted that
vitamin D from sunlight exposure
helps prevent respiratory infections.
I recommend you get daily sunlight
exposure at solar noon, but only after you've been off
vegetable oils for two to six months.
4.
Add C15:0 fat to your diet
In relation to the point above, did you
know that after you eat enough LA, it becomes embedded in
your skin?
Once it's exposed to sunlight,
inflammatory metabolites are produced, leading to increased
risk of chronic disease and inflammation.
Taking 250 milligrams of pentadecanoic
acid (C15:0) daily may help shorten the time it takes for
your skin to safely interact with sunlight again, but
emerging research suggests much larger doses may be even
better.
The logic behind this strategy is to push
out the existing LA from your tissues, replacing them with
healthier fat. If you simply followed a low-LA diet, it
would take two to three years for the strategy to work.
But if you add C15:0, the LA clearance
significantly shortens to 12 to 18 months.
To understand this strategy in more
detail, read "The
Skin Microbiome Secret to Sun Protection and Radiant Health."
5.
Manage your stress
Chronic stress weakens your immune
response due to elevated cortisol levels.
Engage in daily stress-relief activities
like meditation, deep breathing exercises, gentle yoga, or
simply spending more time in nature.
For more information, read "Key
Strategies to Reduce Your Cortisol Levels."
6.
Don't get the COVID shot
Given concerns raised by Bowden about
serious side effects, opting out of the COVID jab and
focusing instead on natural strategies to boost your
immunity provides a safer, more effective approach.
If you or a loved one has already gotten
the jab, I recommend you go over the I-RECOVER program by
the Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), formerly known as
the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC).
It provides extensive information about
how to treat long COVID
4 and post-jab injuries.
5
Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQs) about the Doctors during the COVID-19 'Pandemic'
Q: What was Bowden's approach to
COVID-19 testing and early treatment?
A: Bowden emphasized that early testing and intervention
were crucial in saving lives during the 'pandemic'.
She implemented saliva-based PCR testing with
a 24-hour turnaround, enabling faster diagnosis compared to the
then-common two-week delays.
She treated patients with monoclonal
antibodies and
Ivermectin, and that early intervention kept
thousands out of the hospital.
Q: Why did Bowden face backlash from the medical
establishment?
A: Bowden publicly challenged the mainstream COVID-19
treatment protocols, questioned the shot safety, and promoted
off-label use of Ivermectin.
As a result, she was targeted by medical
boards and hospital administrators who allegedly acted on
federal directives to suppress dissent.
She claims that propaganda, financial
incentives, and censorship motivated the backlash, not science.
Q: How did hospital protocols during the 'pandemic'
impact patient outcomes, according to Bowden?
A: Bowden criticized hospitals for over-reliance on
ventilators, often administered without patient-specific
evaluation.
She alleges that some institutions
essentially euthanized patients through unnecessary morphine and
insulin use, and even withheld supportive care like breathing
treatments.
She argues that these decisions were driven
by protocols, profit motives, and flawed incentives - not
patient welfare.
Q: What role does Bowden believe government and
pharmaceutical interests played in shaping the 'pandemic'
response?
A: She asserts there was a coordinated effort to suppress
effective, low-cost treatments like
Ivermectin
in favor of shot
mandates.
She points to initiatives like the $11.5
billion COVID-19 Community Corps, claiming it was used to spread
propaganda and enforce censorship, while pharmaceutical
interests influenced both policy and the public's perception.
Q: What is Bowden's stance on medical freedom and jab
mandates today?
A: Bowden founded
Americans for Health Freedom, an
organization aimed at supporting politicians who oppose
COVID-19
shot mandates and advocate for medical autonomy.
She celebrates moves like Idaho's decision on
mandates and criticizes institutions like the Texas Medical
Association for suppressing physician free speech.
Video
Sources and
References
|