Exopolitics, as the name suggests, is extraterrestrial politics.
(The use of the "exo-" prefix to refer to extraterrestrial matters is already established, for example, by the term "exobiology" meaning the study of extraterrestrial life.)
Exopolitics is a direct
logical extension of conventional politics to the interplanetary
theatre.
Dr.
Alfred Webre, who formally
introduced exopolitics as a discipline of study, defined it as the
study of law, governance and politics in the Universe.
This conclusion rests on the premise of the von Daniken hypothesis being correct, but this hypothesis has been confirmed by scores of researchers of alternative archaeology, alternative history and ancient mysteries.
Most notable among the
latter are
Zecharia Sitchin, Maurice
Chatelain, and Erich von Daniken himself.
Evidence for this assertion comes from the testimony of government and military insiders who have broken ranks and come forward with classified information (whistle-blowers), victims of experiments and operations that appear to be conducted jointly by government/military operatives and some ETs, and witnesses to unusual activities happening around clandestine government/military facilities believed to house research and operations involving ETs, such as Area 51 and Dulce, New Mexico.
This assertion is also
confirmed by many
remote viewers.
For any given exopolitical party, we can analyze its exopolitical agenda as to whether it lies in line with the best interests of humanity, in which case we can classify the exopolitical party as friendly to humanity, or whether it goes against the best interests of humanity, in which case we may classify the exopolitical party as unfriendly or hostile.
Sources ranging from ancient evidence to present day contactee testimony to remote viewing indicate that the interplanetary community in our immediate neighborhood hosts groups with widely differing exopolitical agendas, some of which lie in line with the best interests of humanity while others don’t.
Such spectrum of exopolitical differences fully agrees with natural expectations: an environment as diverse as the interplanetary community would be naturally expected to host many widely different individuals and groups.
Every society on Earth has its exemplary
citizens and its criminals; why would one expect the interplanetary
community to be different?
Every individual regardless of race or planet of origin has the power and responsibility of free choice, and must be held to the standards of moral rights and responsibilities independently of any others. Just like not every German forced to live under Hitler’s regime during World War II was a Nazi, even if a certain planet were determined to be ruled by a tyrant with a hostile exopolitical agenda, that would not make everyone from that planet an "evil alien".
Conversely,
there can be bad apples in good bunches, and it is possible for
advanced and positive societies to have rogue members.
Their exopolitical agendas need to be examined and a determination made as to whether they act in the best interests of humanity or not. The politically engaged citizenry must force full disclosure out of its leaders and rulers regarding all contacts and deals with any exopolitical parties.
Our immediate neighborhood
should be searched for any potential allies or enemies of humanity.
Though the
book is not ready yet, a
rough briefing document
listing some preliminary findings is available.
|