Perspective, Use It or
Lose It!
We are the most
conditioned, programmed beings the world has ever known. Not only
are our thoughts and attitudes continually being shaped and molded;
our very awareness of the whole design seems like it is being subtly
and inexorably erased. The doors of our perception are carefully and
precisely regulated. Who cares, right?
It is an exhausting and
endless task to keep explaining to people how most issues of
conventional wisdom are scientifically implanted in the public
consciousness by a thousand media clips per day. In an effort to
save time, I would like to provide just a little background on the
handling of information in this country. Once the basic principles
are illustrated about how our current system of media control arose
historically, you might be more apt to question any given story in
today's news. If everybody believes something, it's probably wrong.
We call that Conventional Wisdom. In America,
conventional wisdom
that has mass acceptance is usually contrived: somebody paid for it.
Examples:
-
Pharmaceuticals restore health
-
Vaccination brings immunity
-
The cure for cancer is just around the comer
-
When a child is sick,
she needs immediate antibiotics
-
When a child has a fever he needs Tylenol
-
Hospitals
are safe and clean
-
America has the best health care in the world
And many, many more!
This is a list of illusions that have cost billions and billions to
conjure up. Did you ever wonder why you never see the President
speaking publicly unless he is reading? Or why most people in this
country think generally the same about most of the above issues?
Well, let's look at how this set-up got started in the first place.
In a book titled, "Trust Us We're Experts",
Stauber and
Rampton pull together some compelling data describing the science of
creating public opinion in America.
They trace modem public
influence back to the early part of the last century, highlighting
the work of guys like Edward L. Bernays, the Father of Spin. From
his own amazing chronicle Propaganda, we learn how Edward L. Bernays
took the ideas of his famous uncle Sigmund Freud himself, and applied
them to the emerging science of mass persuasion. The only difference
was that instead of using these principles to uncover hidden themes
in the human unconscious, the way Freudian psychology does, Bemays
used these same ideas to mask agendas and to create illusions that
deceive and misrepresent, for marketing purposes.
Bemays dominated
the PR (Public Relations) industry until the 1940s, and was a significant force for
another 40 years after that. During all that time, Bernays took on
hundreds of diverse assignments to create a public perception about
some idea or product. A few examples: As a neophyte with the
Committee on Public Information, one of Bemays' first assignments
was to help sell the First World War to the American public with the
idea to "Make the World Safe for Democracy." A few years later,
Bernays set up a stunt to popularize the notion of women smoking
cigarettes. In organizing the 1929 Easter Parade in New York City,
Bemays showed himself as a force to be reckoned with.
He organized
the Torches of Liberty Brigade in which suffragettes marched in the
parade smoking cigarettes as a mark of women's liberation. Such
publicity followed from that one event that from then on women have
felt secure about destroying their own lungs in public, the same way
that men have always done. Bemays also popularized the idea of bacon
for breakfast. Not one to turn down a challenge, he set up the
advertising format along with the AMA that lasted for nearly 50
years proving that cigarettes are beneficial to health. Just look at
ads in issues of Life or Time from the 40s and 50s.
Bernay's job was
to reframe an issue; to create a desired image that would put a
particular product or concept in a desirable light. Bemays described
the public as a 'herd that needed to be led.' And this herd like
thinking makes people "susceptible to leadership." Bemays never
deviated from his fundamental axiom to "control the masses without
their knowing it." The best PR happens with the people unaware that
they are being manipulated.
Stauber describes
Bernays' rationale
like this:
"the scientific manipulation of public opinion was
necessary to overcome chaos and conflict in a democratic society."
These early mass persuaders postured themselves as performing a
moral service for humanity in general - democracy was too good for
people; they needed to be told what to think, because they were
incapable of rational thought by themselves.
Here's a paragraph from
Bernays' Propaganda:
"Those who manipulate the unseen mechanism of
society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling
power of our country. We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes
formed, our ideas suggested largely by men we have never heard of.
This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society
is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this
manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning
society. In almost every act of our lives whether in the sphere of
politics or business in our social conduct or our ethical thinking,
we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons who
understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses.
It is they who pull the wires that control the public mind."
Once
the possibilities of applying Freudian psychology to mass media were
glimpsed, Bemays soon had more corporate clients than he could
handle. Global corporations fell all over themselves courting the
new Image-Makers. There were dozens of goods and services and ideas
to be sold to a susceptible public. Over the years, these players have had the money to make their images happen. A few examples:
-
Philip Morris
-
Pfizer
-
Union Carbide
-
Allstate
-
Monsanto
-
Eli Lilly
-
Tobacco industry
-
Ciba Geigy lead industry
-
Coors
-
DuPont
-
Clorox
-
Shell
Oil
-
Standard Oil
-
Procter & Gamble
-
Boeing
-
General Motors
-
Dow Chemical
-
General Mills
-
Goodyear
Though world-famous within
the PR industry, the companies have names
we don't know, and for good reason. The best PR goes unnoticed. For
decades they have created the opinions that most of us were raised
with, on virtually any issue which has the remotest commercial
value, including:
-
Pharmaceutical drugs vaccines
-
Medicine as a
profession alternative medicine
-
Fluoridation of city water chlorine
-
Household cleaning products tobacco
-
Dioxin global warming
-
Leaded
gasoline cancer research and treatment
-
Pollution of the oceans
forests and lumber
-
Images of celebrities, including damage control
crisis and disaster management
-
Genetically modified foods aspartame
-
Food additives processed foods dental amalgams
Lesson #1
Bernays
learned early on that the most effective way to create credibility
for a product or an image was by "independent third-party"
endorsement. For example, if General Motors were to come out and say
that global warming is a hoax thought up by some liberal
tree-huggers, people would suspect GM's motives, since selling
automobiles makes GM's fortune.
If however some independent research
institute with a very credible sounding name like the Global Climate
Coalition comes out with a scientific report that says global
warming is really a fiction, people begin to get confused and to
have doubts about the original issue.
So that's exactly what
Bemays
did. With a policy inspired by genius, he set up "more institutes
and foundations than Rockefeller and Carnegie combined." Quietly
financed by the industries, whose products were being evaluated,
these "independent" research agencies would chum out "scientific"
studies and press materials that could create any image their
handlers wanted.
Such front groups are given high-sounding names
like:
-
Temperature Research Foundation Manhattan Institute
-
International Food Information Council Center for Produce Quality
-
Consumer Alert Tobacco Institute Research Council
-
The Advancement of
Sound Science Coalition Cato Institute
-
Air Hygiene Foundation
American Council on Science and Health
-
Industrial Health Federation
-
Global Climate Coalition
-
International Food Information
-
Council
Alliance for Better Foods
Sound pretty legit don't they?
As Stauber
explains, these organizations and hundreds of others like them are
front groups whose sole mission is to advance the image of the
global corporations who fund them, like those listed before. This is
accomplished in part by an endless stream of 'press releases'
announcing "breakthrough" research to every radio station and
newspaper in the country. Many of these canned reports read like
straight news, and indeed are purposely molded in the news format.
This saves journalists the trouble of researching the subjects on
their own, especially on topics about which they know very little.
Entire sections of the release or in the case of video news
releases, the whole thing can be just lifted intact, with no
editing, given the byline of the reporter or newspaper or TV station
- and voila! Instant news - copy and paste. Written by corporate PR
firms. Does this really happen?
Every single day, since the 1920s
when the idea of the News Release was first invented by Ivy Lee.
Sometimes as many as half the stories appearing in an issue of the
Wall St. Journal are based solely on such PR press releases. These
types of stories are mixed right in with legitimately researched
stories. Unless you have done the research yourself, you won't be
able to tell the difference.
As 1920s spin pioneers like
Ivy Lee and
Edward Bemays gained more experience, they began to formulate rules
and guidelines for creating public opinion. They learned quickly
that mob psychology must focus on emotion, not facts. Since the mob
is incapable of rational thought, motivation must be based not on
logic but on presentation. Here are some of the axioms of the new
science of PR:
-
Technology is a religion unto itself
-
If people are
incapable of rational thought, real democracy is dangerous
-
Important
decisions should be left to experts
-
When reframing issues, stay away
from substance; create images
-
Never state a clearly demonstrable lie
Words are very carefully
chosen for their emotional impact. Here's an example.
A front group
called the International Food Information Council handles the
public's natural aversion to genetically modified foods. Trigger
words are repeated all through the text. Now in the case of GM
foods, the public is instinctively afraid of these experimental new
creations which have suddenly popped up on our grocery shelves which
are said to have DNA alterations.
The IFIC wants to reassure the
public of the safety of GM (genetic modified) foods, so it avoids words like:
Franken foods Hitler biotech Chemical DNA experiments Manipulate
money safety Scientists radiation roulette Gene-splicing gene gun
random Instead, good
PR for GM foods contains words like:
hybrids
natural order beauty choice bounty cross-breeding diversity earth
farmer organic wholesome It's basic Freudian/Tony Robbins word
association.
The fact that GM foods are not hybrids that have been
subjected to the slow and careful scientific methods of real
crossbreeding doesn't really matter. This is pseudoscience, not
science. Form is everything and substance just a passing myth. Who
do you think funds the International Food Information Council? Take
a wild guess. Right - Monsanto, DuPont, Frito-Lay,
Coca-Cola, Nutrasweet - those in a position to make fortunes from GM foods.
As
the science of mass control evolved, PR firms developed further
guidelines for effective copy. Here are some of the gems:
-
Dehumanize
the attacked party by labeling and name-calling
-
Speak in glittering
generalities using emotionally positive words
-
When covering
something up, don't use plain English; stall for time; distract
-
Get
endorsements from celebrities, churches, sports figures, street
people - anyone who has no expertise in the subject at hand
-
The 'plain folks' ruse: us billionaires are just like you
-
When
minimizing outrage, don't say anything memorable, point out the
benefits of what just happened, and avoid moral issues
Keep this
list. Start watching for these techniques. Not hard to find - look
at today's paper or tonight's TV news. See what they're doing; these
guys are good! PR firms have become very sophisticated in the
preparation of news releases.
They have learned how to attach the
names of famous scientists to research that those scientists have
not even looked at. This is a common occurrence. In this way the
editors of newspapers and TV news shows are often not even aware
that an individual release is a total PR fabrication. Or at least
they have "deniability," right?
Stauber tells the amazing story of
how leaded gas came into the picture. In 1922, General Motors
discovered that adding lead to gasoline gave cars more horsepower.
When there was some concern about safety, GM paid the Bureau of
Mines to do some fake "testing" and publish spurious research that
'proved' that inhalation of lead was harmless.
Enter Charles
Kettering. Founder of the world famous Sloan-Kettering Memorial
Institute for medical research, Charles Kettering also happened to
be an executive with General Motors. By some strange coincidence, we
soon have the Sloan Kettering institute issuing reports stating that
lead occurs naturally in the body and that the body has a way of
eliminating low level exposure.
Through its association with
The
Industrial Hygiene Foundation and PR giant Hill & Knowlton,
Sloane
Kettering opposed all anti-lead research for years. Without
organized scientific opposition, for the next 60 years more and more
gasoline became leaded, until by the 1970s, 90 of our gasoline was
leaded. Finally it became too obvious to hide that lead was a
major
carcinogen, and leaded gas was phased out in the late 1980s.
But
during those 60 years, it is estimated that some 30 million tons of
lead were released in vapor form onto American streets and highways.
30 million tons! That is PR, my friends. In 1993 a guy named Peter
Huber wrote a new book and coined a new term. The book was
Galileo's
Revenge and the term was junk science. Huber's shallow thesis was
that real science supports technology, industry, and progress.
Anything else was suddenly junk science.
Not surprisingly, Stauber
explains how Huber's
book was supported by the industry-backed Manhattan Institute.
Huber's book was generally dismissed not only because it was so
poorly written, but because it failed to realize one fact: true
scientific research begins with no conclusions. Real scientists are
seeking the truth because they do not yet know what the truth is.
True scientific method goes like this:
1. Form a hypothesis
2. Make
predictions for that hypothesis
3. Test the predictions
4. Reject or
revise the hypothesis based on the research findings
Boston
University scientist Dr. David Ozonoff explains that ideas in
science are themselves like,
"living organisms that must be
nourished, supported, and cultivated with resources for making them
grow and flourish."
Great ideas that don't get this financial
support because the commercial angles are not immediately obvious -
these ideas wither and die. Another way you can often distinguish
real science from phony is that real science points out flaws in its
own research. Phony science pretends there were no flaws.
Contrast
this with modem PR and its constant pretensions to sound science.
Corporate sponsored research, whether it's in the area of drugs, GM
foods, or chemistry begins with predetermined conclusions. It is the
job of the scientists then to prove that these conclusions are true,
because of the economic upside that proof will bring to the
industries paying for that research. This invidious approach to
science has shifted the entire focus of research in America during
the past 50 years, as any true scientist is likely to admit.
Stauber
documents the increasing amount of corporate sponsorship of
university research. This has nothing to do with the pursuit of
knowledge. Scientists lament that research has become just another
commodity, something bought and sold. It is shocking when Stauber
shows how the vast majority of corporate PR today opposes any
research that seeks to protect public health or the environment.
It's a funny thing that most of the time when we see the phrase
"junk science," it is in a context of defending something that may
threaten either the environment or our health.
This makes sense when
one realizes that money changes hands only by selling the illusion
of health and the illusion of environmental protection. True public
health and real preservation of the earth's environment have very
low market value.
Stauber thinks it ironic that industry's self-proclaimed debunkers
of junk science are usually non-scientists themselves. Here again
they can do this because the issue is not science, but the creation
of images. When PR firms attack legitimate environmental groups and
alternative medicine people, they again use special words that will
carry an emotional punch:
Outraged sound science junk science
sensible Scare mongering responsible phobia Hoax alarmist hysteria
The next time you are reading a newspaper article about an
environmental or health issue, note how the author shows bias by
using the above terms. This is the result of very specialized
training. Another standard PR tactic is to use the rhetoric of the
environmentalists themselves to defend a dangerous and untested
product that poses an actual threat to the environment. This we see
constantly in the PR smokescreen that surrounds genetically modified
foods.
They talk about how GM foods are necessary to grow more food
and to end world hunger, when the reality is that GM foods actually
have lower yields per acre than natural crops. The grand design sort
of comes into focus once you realize that almost all GM foods have
been created by the sellers of herbicides and pesticides so that
those plants can withstand greater amounts of herbicides and
pesticides.
Now I hope this chapter has given you a hint to start
reading newspaper and magazine articles a little differently, and
perhaps start watching TV news shows with a slightly different
attitude than you had before. Always ask, what are they selling
here, and who's selling it? And if you actually follow up on Stauber
& Rampton's book you might even glimpse the possibility of advancing
your life one quantum simply by ceasing to subject your brain to
mass media. That's right - no more newspapers, no more TV news, no
more Time magazine or Newsweek. You could actually do that.
Just
think what you could do with the extra time alone. Really feel like
you need to "relax" or find out "what's going on in the world" for a
few hours every day? Think about the news of the past couple of
years for a minute. Do you really suppose the major stories that
have dominated headlines and TV news have been "what is going on in
the world?" Do you actually think there's been nothing going on
besides the contrived tech slump, the contrived power shortages, the
re-filtered accounts of foreign violence and disaster, and all the
other non-stories that the puppeteers dangle before us every day?
What about when they get a big one, like with 9/11 or Monica Lewinsky
or the Oklahoma City bombing? Do we really need to know all that
detail, day after day? Do we have any way of verifying all that
detail, even if we wanted to? What is the purpose of news? To inform
the public? Hardly! The sole purpose of news is to keep the public
in a state of fear and uncertainty so that they'll watch again
tomorrow and be subjected to the same advertising.
Oversimplification? Of course. That's the mark of mass media mastery
- simplicity. The invisible hand.
Like Edward Bemays said,
the
people must be controlled without them knowing it.
Consider this:
what was really going on in the world all that time they were
distracting us with all that stupid vexatious daily smokescreen?
Fear and uncertainty - that's what keeps people coming back for
more. If this seems like a radical outlook, let's take it one step
further:
-
What would you lose from your life if you stopped watching
TV and stopped reading newspapers altogether?
-
Would your life really
suffer any financial, moral, intellectual or academic loss from such
a decision?
-
Do you really need to have your family continually
absorbing the illiterate, amoral, phony, uncultivated, desperately
brainless values of the people featured in the average nightly TV
program?
-
Are these fake, programmed robots "normal"?
-
Do you need to
have your life values constantly spoon-fed to you?
-
Are those shows
really amusing, or just a necessary distraction to keep you from
looking at reality, or trying to figure things out yourself by doing
a little independent reading?
Name one example of how your life is
improved by watching TV news and reading the evening paper! There's
no question that as a nation, we're getting dumber year by year.
Ever notice the blatant grammar mistakes so ubiquitous in today's
advertising and billboards? Literacy is marginal in most American
secondary schools. Three fourths of California high school seniors
can't read well enough to pass their exit exams.
But it also doesn't stop the schools from giving them diplomas. If you think
other parts of the country are smarter, try this one: hand any high
school senior a book by Dumas or Jane Austen, and ask them to open
to any random page and just read one paragraph out loud. Go ahead,
do it. SAT scales are arbitrarily shifted lower and lower to
disguise how dumb kids are getting year by year.
At least 10 have documented "learning disabilities," which are
reinforced and rewarded by special treatment and special drugs. Ever
hear of anyone failing a grade any more? Or observe the intellectual
level of the average movie which these days may only last one or two
weeks in the theatres, especially if it has insufficient explosions,
chase scenes, silicone, fake martial arts, and cretinesque dialogue.
Radio? Consider the low mental qualifications of the falsely
animated corporate simians they hire as DJs - they're only allowed
to have 50 thoughts, which they just repeat at random. And at what
point did popular music cease to require the study of any musical
instrument or theory whatsoever, not to mention lyric? Perhaps we
just don't understand this emerging art form, right? The Darwinism
of MTV - apes descended from man.
Ever notice how most articles in
any of the glossy magazines sound like they were all written by the
same guy? And this guy just graduated from junior college? And yet
he has all the correct opinions on social issues, no original ideas,
and that shallow, smug homogenized corporate omniscience, which
enables him to assure us that everything is going to be fine... All
this is great news for the PR industry - makes their job that much
easier.
Not only are very few
paying attention to the process of conditioning; fewer are capable
of understanding it even if somebody explained it to them. Let's say
you're in a crowded cafeteria, and you buy a cup of tea. And as
you're about to sit down you see your friend way across the room. So
you put the tea down and walk across the room and talk to your
friend for a few minutes. Now, coming back to your tea, are you just
going to pick it up and drink it? Remember, this is a crowded place
and you've just left your tea unattended for several minutes.
You've given anybody in that room
access to your tea. Why should your mind be any different? Turning
on the TV, or uncritically absorbing mass publications every day -
these activities allow access to our minds by "just anyone" - anyone
who has an agenda, anyone with the resources to create a public
image via popular media. As we've seen above, just because we read
something or see something on TV doesn't mean it's true or worth
knowing. So the idea here is, like the tea, the mind is also worth
guarding, worth limiting access to it. This is the only life we get.
Time is our total capital. Why waste it allowing our potential, our
personality, our values to be shaped, crafted, and limited according
to the whims of
the mass panderers? There are many important issues that are crucial
to our physical, mental, and spiritual well being. If it's an issue
where money is involved, objective data won't be so easy to obtain.
Remember, if everybody knows something, that image has been bought
and paid for.
Real knowledge takes a little effort, a little
excavation down at least one level below what "everybody knows". And
that is where we are at now my dear friends, the level below what
everybody else knows. You've made a great beginning too, in getting
where you are now, I mean just look at the obstacles you have had to
overcome in order to just begin to find the truth about anything
these days! When you first opened this book I told you I was going
to tell you a story, and that's what I've done to the best of my
ability.
But in listening to my story you've also put yourself on
another path, one less, way less, traveled by your fellow human
beings. The information I've put in my story are all true facts, but
less known than maybe those you've been used to hearing. Most people
can't or won't believe facts anymore unless they've heard them from
the popular newspapers, radio, or television outlets utilized for
indoctrinating the masses. And that's pretty sad isn't it?
This isn't
you though, is it? You are searching for the truth. And I can tell
you with 100% certainty that if you keep searching not only will you
find the truth, it will find you too! There isn't a lot of time left
my dear friends but as long as we do have together I'll continue to
do my best to tell you the truth and by the time we're finished,
we'll be survivors in a much better world than the one we find
ourselves in now.
And They Lived Happily Ever After.
The End.
Dave's
website is
www.whatdoesitmean.com.
So, what do Dave's visions mean?
He makes a good case for a soon to come world-wide catastrophe and
the secret government preparations which have, been secretly made to
with it. But, I'm a pragmatist, so my question is simple: what all
this mean to me? I can't do anything about the Bush dynasty or the
Anunnaki, but if the danger Dave has envisioned is real, there's a
lot I can do to help people survive.
So, how real is the danger? Let's look at the evidence.
First,
Dave's 1979 ten precognitive visions were proven correct. Thus, his
second set of visions, last year, have to be considered seriously.
Okay, what other evidence have we? Well, we have the hysteria Nancy
Lieder last year with her
www.zetatalk.com predictions of
Planet-X
swishing past the Earth on its 3630 year sweep through our solar
system.
She got a lot of radio exposure with her information relayed
from the Zeta Riticulans.
Planet X was supposed to be a brown dwarf'
companion of our Sun, which, orbits through our solar system and
regularly cleans our clocks. Think
Atlantis. When her May 15, 2003
uneventfully we relaxed.
Next, Mark Hazelwood and his book,
Blindsided- Planet-X Passes in 2003 - Earthchanges!
Mark does an
excellent Job of tying known historical catastrophes to the regular
visit of X.- like the sudden appearance of the Great Lakes about
3600 years ago. Mark has clearly done his home-work. I had trouble
finding the book so I got a bunch from the publisher. It's #94 in my
catalog and sells for $15.
After reading Mark's book, and one by
Jim McCanney, Dave's visions didn't come as all that much of a surprise. Jim's book is
Planet-X, Comets & Earth Changes. Jim is a
well-respected scientist, even if at odds with the hierarchy at NASA
over the significant affect passing comets have on the Earth. The
rift was made much worse every time Jim used the passing of comets
to predict earthquakes and volcano eruptions — and was right on the
money. His book is #95 in my catalog, $18.
My own copy is
highlighted on almost every page. Jim's theories tell us that one of
the manifestations that a large body entering our solar system would
be the heating up of the planets and the Sun.
Well, d'uh, NASA
has reported that Pluto has recently warmed up and so has
Mars, with its
ice caps starting to melt And we have the Sun with massive solar
flares and acting up as never before seen in recorded history. Hmm,
what was that about global warming? Could that be from car exhaust
and power plants making electricity, or Planet-X upsetting the solar
system's balance?
Screw those Kyoto Protocols the politicians are
waving at us and start digging a refuge somewhere in the mountains
for your family. We're having a record number of volcanoes and
earthquakes. Car exhaust isn't causing them. Maybe it's like Jim
says, the disturbance of the electrical balance of the solar system.
A recent survey of one area of the Pacific Ocean showed over 3,000
new undersea volcanoes. No wonder the
Antarctic Ross Ice Shelf is
melting and calving.
Oh, have you been following Yellowstone heating
up? I understand it's been closed to visitors. Say, isn't that about
where Dave saw the huge explosion from his vantage point in space?
Some worry-warts have been telling us that if Yellowstone blows it
could take out an area for 600 miles around. Golly, that's the
western third of the US. Yoiks!
That's
where Scallion's map of 21st century America has ocean. But, if
something tha-a-at big is coming, wouldn't our astronomers be
screaming bloody murder? Headlines? Extra editions of the National
Enquirer?. Several concerned astronomers who've called me say that
the world's major telescopes have been "shut down for repairs." The
secondary telescopes are not available, once it's admitted where
they want to look.
Further, I understand that
the US and
the Vatican
have set up observatories in Antarctica. Booth's visions had
Planet-X coming from the south pole up past the Earth. And what
about those Australian astronomer reports of a new star... which
seems to be growing in size?
Well, Dave isn't the only person to get
visions of the future.. .what about some others? Ed Dames (Major
Doom) is holed up in a cave on Maui. He's recently predicted
Planet-X will cause a pole change, with 300 mile-an-hour winds. The
highest wind ever recorded on Earth was 261 mph, atop Mt.
Washington, here in New Hampshire. I saw what winds half that speed
did to New Hampshire during the 1938 hurricane. Every tree in its
path was flattened. Whole mountains of trees up through Franconia
Notch, with not one left standing.
Gordon Michael Scallion is holed
up underground a few miles from my home. He's got food and fuel for
a couple of years. Dave's built an underground refuge for his family
right next to his home. It's built out of a group of those big steel
shipping containers. Ever practical, he's growing mushrooms in them
for his organic food customers. If you don't know much about the
accuracy of
Nostradamus' predictions, read
Dolores Cannon's Conversations With Nostradamus and come up to speed.
The old boy has
been remarkably accurate. So what's he say? Five hundred years ago
he predicted that shortly after the millennium there would be a pole
shift which would wipe out 97 of humanity. Uh, oh! Well, we know
there have been pole shifts in the past. We've dug mammoths out of
the Siberian ice with tropical plants in their stomachs. And we've
found huge piles of bones which resulted from a sudden tidal wave
killing thousands of animals all at once. Archeologists have found
plenty of evidence for past extinctions.
Planet-X, passing by, could
easily shift me tectonic plates big time, giving us that pole shift.
Nostradamus said the new poles would be over Siberia and
South
America. Whew, that would put New Hampshire where Florida is today.
Wow, where's my scuba gear?
Okay, the evidence all fits the pattern.
It sure looks like we're going to have enormous earthquakes,
volcanoes, Yellowstone exploding, and a sudden pole shift. That
means the mother of all storms, mile-high waves sloshing around the
globe, wiping out all coastal
cities, and unbelievable winds. We're talking about moving
underground or joining the souls in heaven waiting for babies to be
born for their reincarnation.
Oh, I almost forget
Chet Snow's Mass
Dreams of the Future. Chet's group, using hypnosis, progressed about
2500 people to their next lives. Very few were able to reincarnate
in the 21st century due to a shortage of babies being born. They
traced the problem back to some sort of mass human extinction early
in the 21st century. Coincidence? Sure. So, if we want to survive
this mess, what's our best bet? I like Dave's approach, burying
steel shipping containers in which to weather the storm. You'll want
to have a good supply of food and water. Are there any solar-powered
water purifiers? A big supply of strike-anywhere matches. Hand saws,
shovels and other non-powered tools.
Cots, sleeping bags, a wood
stove and wood, plates and utensils... you make the list. You'll
sure be glad you have a silver collide making kit. Silver is the
best antibiotic there is and it's inexpensive to make. Penny a
gallon. I have an ac-dc kit available which includes heavy duty pure
silver wire, instructions, a small power supply that plugs into the
wall while you still have power, and battery backup power for when
the power is gone. Silver colloid works like magic on cuts, sores,
rashes, colds, flu.. .or to wash germs off food.. .like salmonella
and E Coli.
With the roads destroyed and no source of gas, even if
some cars survive, we'll want to have mountain bikes for the whole
family. If you're planning to weather the chaos Booth has envisioned
you'll be faced with a continuing battle to survive in a world with
few doctors and no drugs. One of the last things you need is to be
sick, so I'm going to let you in on a secret. This is not a little
secret, I think you'll agree that this is one of the biggest secrets
in the world. It has to do with why we get sick and how we can get
well.. .without any drugs.
The only reason we get sick... and I mean
any illness... is because we've poisoned ourselves. Our bodies are a
miracle of design, so doesn't it make sense that we'd have a first
rate repair department built in? We do, and it's called our immune
system. It's there to deal with any damage that we inflict on
ourselves.. .cuts, bruises, broken bones, and so on. Also, when we
eat, drink, or breathe anything toxic, get poisons on our skin, or
are attacked by microbes, viruses, parasites, fungi, or yeast
infections, the immune system rushes out the troops to deal with the
problem.
And, if it isn't overwhelmed by multiple attacks, it can
deal with almost anything. My Secret Guide to Health, goes into
detail on the toxins we're unknowingly dumping on our immune systems
and thus helping make us sick. Toxins? Unknowingly? Like what?
Number one is cooked food. Our bodies, over thousands of
generations, adapted to the food that was available. Raw food. Raw
fruit, not that stuff that's cooked in sugar and put in a can. Raw
vegetables, not canned or blanched and then frozen for us to finish
the cooking. Raw meat and fish.
As soon as you cook any food you
kill the enzymes which your I' body needs to properly digest it.
Your immune system then treats it as toxic, rushing out the white
cells to fight it as an alien invader. In today's cooked food world
this is helping to keep our immune systems maxed out so they can't
fight cancer. Then there's sugar, a very addictive poison. And
poisons such as caffeine (one drop injected into your body will kill
you), alcohol, nicotine,
aspartame (a.k.a. NutraSweet™),
fluorides
and chlorine in your tap water, pesticides in your food,
mercury in
your mouth, vaccinations, and so on...
My friends, we're doing a
fantastic job of poisoning ourselves with stuff that wasn't around a
hundred years ago, and we're paying the price with arthritis, fat,
cancer, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, lost libido, depression, fatigue,
multiple sclerosis, diabetes, and so on...everything from acne to
zits.
Once you stop poisoning yourself your immune system will be
able to get to work and repair the damage you've unknowingly done.
You don't need any drugs. Readers of my
Secret Guide to Health are
calling every day with reports of disappeared cancer, lost excess
weight, emphysema-destroyed lungs repaired, etc. The book is catalog
#05 and is $20. With or without Planet-X, it sure pays to be
healthy, so read my guide.
Once you see what a lifestyle change can
do for you you'll be giving copies for your family and friends.
Employers will be giving copies to every employee in order to
drastically cut their health insurance costs and avoid sick days.
Silver Colloid
Solution Silver, is one of the best antibiotics ever
discovered. The only serious problem with it is that it is not
patentable, so the drug companies can't charge $20 a dose for it.
Silver is the only antibiotic that pathogens haven't been able to
adapt to. On the plus side, silver colloid.. .which is a suspension
of micro-scopic particles in pure water, particles so fine that they
don't settle out.. .is easy to make on the kitchen table. I got fed
up with so-called health stores charging $25 for a small bottle of
silver colloid, so I've a kit which includes a small power supply
you plug into the wall, two heavy duty pieces of silver wire,
instructions, and a reprint of an article on the subject. There is
also a battery clip kit so you can still make it when the power goes
off.
A few minutes after opening the box you'll have made enough
silver colloid to protect you and your family from colds, flu,
rashes... and to rinse any food in that might have E-coli or
salmonella, or any other germs. The kit is #82A in my catalog and
costs $40 complete. Other Stuff Just in case America doesn't manage
to get wiped out this year, I have some other books you'll want to
read. My
Secret Guide to Wealth ($5 - book #03) explains how just
about anyone can make all the money they want and have the freedom
this provides.
The "secret" is simple.. .own
your own business.
My book explains how you can get someone else to
pay you to learn everything you need to know to do this. Survivors
are going to have to grow food. My book #86 ($3) explains twelve
ways to grow bigger, better crops. We can grow ten times as much on
the same land when we know how. And, with about a tenth the water
we're currently using. My Secret Guide to Wisdom is a review of
about a hundred books you're crazy if you don't read. These books
will open your eyes to the endless lies we're being told.. .and the
media cover-ups. Out of the millions of books that have been
published there are just a few that are really important for you to
read.
My Preparations First
I'm living on a 200-acre New Hampshire
farm. My place is at 1,000 feet altitude, so even if the oceans rise
a couple hundred feet I won't get my feet wet. We're busy right now
converting the cellar into a storm-proof haven. I have two emergency
generators, a deep well, a 700-gallon water tank, and a composting
toilet. There are several natural springs within easy walking
distance, and a 15-acre pond to provide fish and frogs.
Your
Survival
If you're in a city when IT happens, you and your family
are toast. I suggest you head for the mountains and look for a place
you can build an underground refuge. You can go the David Booth
family route, burying steel shipping containers, and making an
apartment out of them. Mine cost about $ 1,000 each. Another
approach would be to buy an old beat-up mobile home and bury it,
with the ground around it beamed for protection. In that way you'll
have a complete apartment all built in.
Underground homes are
relatively inexpensive to build and they don't need much energy for
heat in the winter or cooling in the summer. You want to run an air
intake pipe a couple hundred feet about six feet down, where the
ground temperature is constant year around. There are some excellent
books on building underground homes.
I recommend Stu Campbell's
The
Underground House Book. This is an 8-1/2 x 11 inch, 200-page $11
book. Garden Way Publishing, Charlotte VT 05445 and ISBN
0-88266-188-3.
Then there's Mike Oehler's
The $50 & Up Underground
House Book. It's $17, Route 4, Box 618, Bonners Ferry ID 83805, ISBN
0-442-27311-8.
David Carter's
Build It Under-ground, $8, 208-pages,
Sterling Publishing, 2 Park Avenue, NYC 10016.
Malcolm Wells has a
wonderful book,
An Architect's Sketchbook of Underground Buildings,
$15,200" pages 8-1/2 x 11-inches, 673 Satucket Road, Brewster MA
02631 (508) 896-6850, ISBN 0-9621878-1-X.
You'll want protection
from super high winds, plenty of water, food, clean air, and a hamradio all-band transceiver powered by a bicycle-mounted 12-volt
generator. You'll want lots of seeds. Make those the heirloom type,
please.
You'll want a solar-powered system if you're going to have any
electricity later on. Banks of solar cells, industrial batteries,
and a converter to give you 120V AC. And lay in some spare parts to
keep it going. If you can get a local group to prepare for survival,
you'll have an even better chance. If Nostradamus and Booth are
right, it's going to be a long time before any civilization
infrastructure is rebuilt. Roads, fuel, power, and so on could take
years to centuries to rebuild. If past pole shifts are any kind of a
guide, the old boy wasn't exaggerating.
We're not going to have a
big need for politicians, lawyers, bankers, stock analysts, airline
pilots, and so on for a long time. Maybe hundreds of years. We're
going to need savvy farmers. Maybe it's time to invest in gardening
books. I remember Art Bell one night interviewing someone who
claimed to be a time traveler from the far future. He claimed that a
21st century pole shift put us back to the caveman days for hundreds
of years. How Come?
-
How come you haven't been reading about
Planet-X
in the newspapers and seeing it on the TV news?
-
The same reason
you've never heard the truth about Flight 800 (unless you read “Into
The Buzzsaw”).
-
And why you haven't seen any headlines about the
UFO
crash at Roswell or the alien they captured there.
-
Or the salvaged
UFOs at Area 51 in Nevada, or the success of cold fusion,
-
Or why we
get sick and how we can cure ourselves of any illness (including
cancer) with no drugs
-
- the fluoridation scam
-
- the danger of
vaccinations (particularly for babies)
-
- root canals
-
- nearby
power lines
-
- electric blankets
-
- the real story of Pearl Harbor
-
-
Aspartame in diet colas causing multiple sclerosis
-
- milk being
dangerous to drink
-
- hamburgers being dangerous to eat
-
- sugar being
an addictive poison
-
- coffee ditto
-
- medications such as Prozac,
Ritalin, Zoloft, Paxil, etc., causing mania
-
- that the use of baby
formula instead of breast feeding causes brain damage, reducing a
baby's IQ by about 10 points (the difference between high school and
college
-
- chemtrails
-
- the Apollo Moon missions all being faked
-
-
there having been four bombs at Oklahoma City
-
- the space shuttle
never having proved any value
-
- the space station never providing
anything of scientific value
-
- cell phones frying brains, causing
memory loss and brain tumors
-
- genetically modified foods not being
safe to eat
-
- precognition being scientifically validated
-
- hot
fusion never having any potential as an energy source
-
- sonograms
being harmful to babies
-
- the Sun not causing skin cancer
-
- global
warming not being caused by man
-
- a college education being
unimportant for success
-
- ten year olds easily learning to speed
read at 20,000 words per minute
-
- the dangers of mad cow and West
Nile diseases being insignificant
-
- death certificate lies covering
up fatal doctor and hospital errors.
These are the sorts of things I
write about in my essays. You'll find I've done my homework.
Planet-X is going to have to loom in our sky before the media will
admit it's there. And, with the official secrecy lid on, it's your
guess as to how they will try to explain what we can all plainly
see. I wish that David's visions didn't fit in with so many other
recent events, and that his history of the world's major players
didn't fit into the pattern we're seeing.
The Pollyana in me wants
to ignore the whole mess and carry on with my life, ignoring his
visions. More than any other single person I've helped us have cell
phones and personal computers. My hope has been to lead the world
into a wellness revolution. An educational revolution would be next.
Hey, why think small? If the major players haven't finished me off
by then, how about an energy revolution?
Cold fusion can supply all
the energy we need at less than a tenth the cost of oil and coal,
with no pollution products.
Wayne Green
Back to Index
|