Protesters ransack Muslim Brotherhood offices across the country
as "Arab Spring" facade is further exposed.
			
			
			Riding upon a wave of Palestinian blood, Egyptian president Mohammed Morsi has opportunistically used the afterglow
			
			of an alleged "ceasefire" he claims to have brokered between 
			Hamas and Israel to announce a sweeping power-grab many are calling 
			a "coup."  
			As a result, protests and attacks have been reported 
			across the country targeting the Muslim Brotherhood and its offices.
			
			
			While we are told that in Egypt, "democracy" has prevailed resulting 
			in the ascent of 
			
			the Muslim 
			Brotherhood into power, the reality is 
			that the vast majority of Egyptians do not support the Muslim 
			Brotherhood, and the country itself is far from the sectarian 
			extremist cesspool it is portrayed as turning into.
			
 
Backlash against the Brotherhood. Despite the Muslim Brotherhood's political success, it represents a violent, loud, minority that is quietly opposed by the vast majority of not only Egyptians, but Arabs across North Africa and the Middle East.
Its high level of organization, immense funding provided by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and even the West, including Israel, allows it to perpetuate itself in spite of its unpopularity, while its violent tactics allow it to crush dissent.
The Brotherhood is simply the best funded, most organized, loudest, most violent and assertive political movement in Egypt, with its opponents being divided, co-opted, and scattered, hopelessly weak in comparison, despite their numerical superiority.
			The Muslim Brotherhood, despite its 
			performance at the polls, and like many prevailing political 
			movements around the globe (e.g.
			
			the US and
			
			Thailand), is in fact a minority. 
			
			The money and organizational skills the Brotherhood has, are owed to 
			their long standing support from the US, Israel, and its regional 
			partners through whom Western money and support is laundered - 
			namely Saudi Arabia and
			
			Qatar. 
			Morsi and the Brotherhood, like Mohammed ElBaradei's 
			opposition movement in Egypt, are creations and political 
			manifestations of Western foreign policy and their regional, 
			hegemonic objectives. 
			
			Angry protesters have now risen up across the country, and while 
			fellow foreign collaborator ElBaradei attempts to pose as the face 
			of this opposition, it is clear that the protesters represent a much 
			larger and diverse segment of the population. With ElBaradei already 
			exposed and diminished politically, Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood 
			remain one of the West's last viable footholds in the country. 
			
			Morsi's fall would be a tremendous setback, one that ElBaradei will 
			be unlikely able to salvage. 
			
			And because Morsi's fall would be so catastrophic for his Western 
			sponsors and their overarching agenda, it should be expected that 
			extraordinary measures will be taken to ensure either he remains in 
			power, or that a suitable replacement takes over his office.
 
			
			The 
			Brotherhood's "Credentials" 
			
			The Muslim Brotherhood is a faux-theocratic sectarian extremist 
			movement - a regional movement that transcends national borders. 
			It 
			is guilty of decades of violent discord not only in Egypt, but 
			across the Arab World and it has remained a serious threat to 
			secular systems from Algeria to Syria and back again.
 
			
			 
  
Mohamed Morsi - hardly a "hardline extremists" himself, he is the embodiment of the absolute fraud that is the Muslim Brotherhood - a leadership of Western-educated, Western-serving technocrats posing as "pious Muslims" attempting to cultivate a base of fanatical extremists prepared to intimidate through violence the Brotherhood's opposition.
Failing that, they are prepared to use (and have used) extreme violence to achieve their political agenda.
			
			Today, the Western press has decried Egyptian and Syrian efforts to 
			hem in these sectarian extremists, particularly in Syria where the 
			government was accused of having "massacred" armed Brotherhood 
			militants in Hama in 1982. 
			The constitutions of secular Arab nations 
			across Northern Africa and the Middle East,
			including the newly 
			rewritten Syrian Constitution, have attempted to exclude 
			sectarian political parties, especially those with "regional" 
			affiliations to prevent the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda 
			affiliated political movements from ever coming into power.
			
			And while sectarian extremists taking power in Egypt and attempting 
			to take power in Syria may seem like an imminent threat to Western 
			(including Israeli) interests - it in reality is a tremendous boon.
			
			Morsi himself is by no means an "extremists" or an "Islamist." 
			He is
			
			a US-educated technocrat who merely poses as "hardline" in order 
			to cultivate the fanatical support of the Brotherhood's rank and 
			file. Several of Morsi's children are even US citizens. Morsi will 
			gladly play the part of a sneering "anti-American," "anti-Israeli" 
			"Islamist," but in the end, no matter how far the act goes, he will 
			fulfill the West's agenda. 
			
			Already, despite a long campaign of feigned anti-American, 
			anti-Israeli propaganda during the Egyptian presidential run-up,
			
			the Muslim Brotherhood has joined US, European,
			
			and Israeli calls for "international" intervention in Syria.
Egypt has continued to collude with the West, even as it feigned support for Gaza during its recent conflict with Israel.
			Alongside 
			the CIA, Mossad, and the Persian Gulf State despots of Saudi Arabia 
			and Qatar, the Muslim Brotherhood's Syrian affiliates have been 
			funneling weapons, cash, and foreign fighters into Syria to fight 
			Wall Street, London, Riyadh, Doha, and Tel Aviv's proxy war.
			
			
			In
			
			a May 6, 2012 Reuters article it stated:
"Working quietly, the Brotherhood has been financing Free Syrian Army defectors based in Turkey and channeling money and supplies to Syria, reviving their base among small Sunni farmers and middle class Syrians, opposition sources say."
			The Muslim Brotherhood was nearing 
			extinction in Syria before the latest unrest, and while Reuters 
			categorically fails in its report to explain the "how" behind the 
			Brotherhood's resurrection, it was revealed in a 2007 New Yorker 
			article titled, "The 
			Redirection" by Seymour Hersh.
			
			The Brotherhood was being directly backed by the US and Israel who 
			were funneling support through the Saudis so as to not compromise 
			the "credibility" of the so-called "Islamic" movement. 
			
			Hersh 
			revealed that members of the Lebanese Saad Hariri clique, then led 
			by Fouad Siniora, had been the go-between for US planners and the 
			Syrian Muslim Brotherhood.
			
			Hersh reports the Lebanese Hariri faction had met Dick Cheney in 
			Washington and relayed personally the importance of using the Muslim 
			Brotherhood in Syria in any move against the ruling government: 
			
"[Walid] Jumblatt then told me that he had met with Vice-President Cheney in Washington last fall to discuss, among other issues, the possibility of undermining Assad.
He and his colleagues advised Cheney that, if the United States does try to move against Syria, members of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood would be “the ones to talk to,” Jumblatt said."
The article would continue by explaining how already in 2007, US and Saudi backing had begun benefiting the Brotherhood:
It was warned that such backing would benefit the Brotherhood as a whole, not just in Syria, and could effect public opinion even as far as in Egypt where a long battle against the hardliners was fought in order to keep Egyptian governance secular.
			Clearly the Brotherhood did not spontaneously 
			rise back to power in Syria, it was resurrected by US, Israeli, and 
			Saudi cash, weapons and directives.
			
			Likewise, its rise into power in Egypt was facilitated by
			
			Western-backed and funded destabilization, sometimes referred to 
			as the "Arab Spring." 
 
			
			ElBaradei 
			Still Lies in Wait
			
			Mohammed ElBaradei's own movement
			
			eventually exposed him as an agent for Western interests. 
His fall from grace helped set the stage for Morsi's ascent into power. It appears that ElBaradei and his movement are now attempting to position themselves once again to cover the West's bases in the event Morsi falls, sabotaging once again any real legitimate opposition Egyptians attempt to rally together.
			ElBaradei and his 
			Western trained, funded, and directed opposition movement
			
			are currently leading one of several factions now in Egypt's streets 
			and have been gladly afforded publicity across the Western press.
			
 
ElBaradei, despite frequent anti-Israeli rhetoric, literally sat around the same table as the Israeli president, the Israeli foreign minister, and the governor of the Bank of Israel, as a fellow board member and adviser to the Wall Street-London funded International Crisis Group.
ElBaradei and his Muslim Brotherhood counterpart Morsi, play "good cop-bad cop" versus the Egyptian people, both as clear agents of Western corporate-financier interests.
It should be remembered that like the Muslim Brotherhood, ElBaradei directly represents Western interests.
ElBaradei himself is a board member of the Wall Street-London funded International Crisis Group, which features,
US financiers like George Soros and Larry Summers
Neo-Conservative warmongers like Richard Armitage and Kenneth Adelman
perhaps more inexplicable considering ElBaradei's feigned "anti-Israeli" rhetoric, the President of Israel, Shimon Peres, former Foreign Minister of Israel Shlomo Ben-Ami, and Stanley Fischer, the governor of the Bank of Israel
			Like the Brotherhood, ElBaradei's rise to political power was made 
			possible by a movement trained, funded, and directed by the US 
			government and organizations such as the US Congress-funded National 
			Endowment for Democracy, years before the "Arab Spring" would 
			actually unfold.
			
			In an April 2011 article published by the New York Times titled, "U.S. 
			Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings," it was stated: 
			
"A number of the groups and individuals directly involved in the revolts and reforms sweeping the region, including the April 6 Youth Movement in Egypt, the Bahrain Center for Human Rights and grass-roots activists like Entsar Qadhi, a youth leader in Yemen, received training and financing from groups like the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute and Freedom House, a nonprofit human rights organization based in Washington."
The article would also add, regarding the US State Department-funded National Endowment for Democracy (NED):
"The Republican and Democratic institutes are loosely affiliated with the Republican and Democratic Parties. They were created by Congress and are financed through the National Endowment for Democracy, which was set up in 1983 to channel grants for promoting democracy in developing nations.
The National Endowment receives about $100 million annually from Congress. Freedom House also gets the bulk of its money from the American government, mainly from the State Department. "
In 2008, Egyptian activists from the above mentioned April 6 movement were in New York City for the inaugural Alliance of Youth Movements (AYM) summit, also known as Movements.org.
			There, they received training, networking 
			opportunities, and support from AYM's
			various corporate 
			and US governmental sponsors, including the US State Department 
			itself.
			
			Shortly afterward, April 6 would travel to Serbia to train under
			US-funded 
			CANVAS, formally the US-funded NGO "Otpor" who helped overthrow 
			the government of Serbia in 2000. 
			Otpor, the
			
			New York Times would report, was a "well-oiled movement backed 
			by several million dollars from the United States." After its 
			success it would change its name to CANVAS and begin training 
			activists to be used in other US-backed regime change operations.
			
			The April 6 Movement, after training with CANVAS, would return to 
			Egypt in 2010, a full year before the "Arab Spring," along with UN 
			IAEA Chief Mohammed ElBaradei.
			
			April 6 members would even be arrested while waiting for 
			ElBaradei's arrival at Cairo's airport in mid-February. 
Already, ElBaradei, as early as 2010, announced his intentions of running for president in the 2011 elections.
			Together with April 6,
			
			Wael Ghonim of Google, and a coalition of other opposition 
			parties, ElBaradei assembled his "National 
			Front for Change" and began preparing for the coming "Arab 
			Spring" where his more presentable "pro-democracy" front would cover 
			for large masses of Muslim Brotherhood followers in Tahrir Square as 
			well as violence the Brotherhood carried out nationwide before the 
			fall of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.  
			
			While the Western press attempts to portray Elbaradei and the Muslim 
			Brotherhood as opponents, they are in reality complementary - a 
			Western-backed, "good cop-bad cop" routine attempting to control 
			both ends of Egypt's political spectrum. 
 
			
			Caution as 
			Opposition Builds Vs. the Muslim Brotherhood
			
			Clearly, both the Brotherhood and ElBaradei represent neither the 
			people of Egypt, nor Egypt's best interests. 
			
			In the coming days, 
			weeks, and months, as the Muslim Brotherhood faces increased 
			opposition, Egyptians and onlookers around the world must carefully 
			examine and delineate between the different opposition groups coming 
			forward to challenge the current ruling government and ensure that 
			real opposition prevails, while collaborators like ElBaradei are 
			exposed and sidelined.
			
			There is real, legitimate opposition in Egypt, and it is essential 
			that is avoids the common tricks used to neutralize and subdue 
			legitimate activism. 
			
			Those falling into ElBaradei's camp must 
			recognize that while their intentions may be noble, the movement 
			they are helping hold aloft is not, and stands opposed to their very 
			political convictions and future aspirations.
			
			Those amongst the Muslim Brotherhood's supporters must sincerely ask 
			themselves why, for decades, their leaders' ambitions have 
			consistently and "conveniently" dovetailed with Western designs 
			against real progress in the Arab World.   


