Chapter 4
Chaos 101 - Building Your Own Enemies
Puppet On A String: Hamas Dances To Israel’s Tune
Many people identify Zionism and the expansion of Israel as the head
of
the New World Order hydra. In reality, Israel is just another
tentacle of the beast.
The Globalists do not owe allegiance to any
particular country, they will use any nation or movement as muscle
to ram through their agenda. In saying this, it is no surprise to
learn that the people who control Israel use the same tactics as
their peers to oppress their population beneath a choking police
state.
After September 11 Israel hijacked the rhetoric of the ‘war on
terrorism’ and used it to stoke the fire of their own agenda,
sanctioned within the wider context of the overall Globalist game
plan. In a January 2003 United Press International report, it was
openly stated that Israel feel completely justified in admitting
that Mossad will be carrying out political assassinations on
American soil, Israel is embarking upon a more aggressive approach
to the war on terror that will include staging targeted killings in
the United States and other friendly countries, former Israeli
intelligence officials told United Press International.
Israeli
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has forbidden the practice until now,
these sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity.1 Of course,
it has been known for decades that Mossad conduct so-called
‘preemptive’ assassinations of political enemies on foreign shores.
The public admission itself is what makes the story, not the
details, which were already largely known. When asked about this
report, White House press secretary Ari Fleischer simply dismissed
the question.
1 ‘Israel to kill on U.S., allies soil’ – Richard Sale
– United Press International – January 15 2003 -
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030115-035849-6156r
Israel’s supposed arch-enemy,
the terrorist group Hamas, was
founded and funded by Israel’s dominant Likud party and continues to
be bankrolled to this day by political bodies pushing a one world
government system. This is not my opinion and I am not breaking an
exclusive story. It is a documented fact reported on by mainstream
news outlets and admitted by respected individuals within the US and
Israeli governments and intelligence agencies.
The objectives of Hamas dovetail with those of the Likud, no
settlement at all costs. Whenever the prospect of a workable peace
settlement between the Israelis and Palestinians arises, Hamas or
one of their offshoots blows a bus, restaurant or a hotel to bits.
This gives Israel the justification needed to scupper any agreement
and further entrench their occupation of disputed lands.
All the
outsider sees is carnage, death and a mainstream media that spins
the issue so that these atrocities somehow represent the wishes of the
Palestinian people. The Globalists have no intention of settling the
conflict and will likely use it several years down the line to
initiate a near-apocalyptic third world war that will fully ensconce
their wicked empire.
The final phase is a stage-managed ‘clash of
civilizations’ between the Arab world, possibly supported by China,
and the west.
According to United Press International,
Israel and Hamas may currently be locked in deadly combat, but,
according to several current
and former U.S. intelligence officials, beginning in the late 1970s,
Tel Aviv gave direct and indirect
financial aid to Hamas over a period of years.2
2 ‘Analysis: Hamas history tied to Israel’ – Richard Sale – United
Press International – June 18 2002 -
http://www.upi.com/print.cfm?StoryID=18062002-051845-8272r
Israel wanted to radicalize the dispute by molding Hamas into a
fundamentalist militant crusade to ape the Khomeini revolution in
Iran. So much so that Israel groomed potential Hamas leaders,
pressuring Israeli authorities to give them licenses to set up food
kitchens, clinics, schools, and day-care centers, to create a
governing structure alternative to Arafat’s Fatah. These were known
as ‘Village Leagues’ - and provided future Hamas operatives with a
political and governmental foothold. This began in 1978 when Prime
Minister Menachem Begin, himself a former terrorist leader, approved
an application from Sheik Ahmad Yassin to license the Islamic
Association, which would later produce a military wing, Hamas, in
1987. The Israeli Likud party propped up Yassin because they both
had the same agenda, to destabilize Arafat’s Fatah.
The Village Leagues were then infiltrated by the Israeli
intelligence agency Shin Bet, which provided weapons training for
the Palestinians and also created a network of thousands of
informers. This funding and support continued even after the signing
of the 1993 Oslo accords.
The deliberate insertion of a competing faction would dilute support
for the Palestinian Liberation Organization. Current Israeli Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon had a key role in the formation of this
policy. After the first wave of suicide bombings began in 1994,
Israel could also discredit the PLO by linking it with Hamas after
every terrorist atrocity. The hard line Likud party could then
increase its standing amongst the Israeli people by promising a
brutal crackdown on Palestinian terrorism. Chaos and anarchy on the
West Bank entails order –Likud’s order.
FIG 4.1
[CAPTION: Hamas – the Israeli-controlled terror
wind-up toy.]
Correspondingly, the US government used the tactic of radicalizing a
group or a
country when it shipped millions of Islamic fundamentalist
schoolbooks to
Afghanistan under George Bush senior.3 The books encouraged violent
jihad and
the overthrow of the then secular Afghan government. This
conditioned a whole
generation to calmly accept the subsequent fundamentalist Taliban
regime,
which was put into power in 1996 by the CIA.4
Of course, an even more plentiful supply of compliance from Israeli
citizens is
harvested from manufactured terrorist threats, a tactic used to
perfection by the
post-9/11 Bush and Blair governments. By managing both the Hamas
leadership
and perception of the group’s deadly potential in the media, the
Israeli elite could
frighten their people into living under a police state,
Sharon is conducting a vicious psychological operation inside
Israel, to secure popular support for
a war by staging continuous terror scares. One Israeli businessman
confirmed that almost nightly,
Israeli police enter restaurants, hotels, shops, etc., ordering
patrons to evacuate due to “bomb
threats.” The businessman, a former Mossad official, was told by
Israeli authorities that the
scares are in almost all cases hoaxes, perpetrated to traumatize the
public into accepting any
anti-Arab military actions.5
Previous to Israel’s intervention, Hamas was a relatively dormant
and sidelined
minority group. According to UPI’s US government source,
“The
thinking on the
part of some of the right-wing Israeli establishment was that Hamas
and the
others, if they gained control, would refuse to have any part of the
peace process
and would torpedo any agreements put in place.”6
The well-respected
International Herald Tribune could only agree,
It is well-known that, in its long war against Palestinian
nationalism, Israel penetrated every faction and recruited a
veritable army of Palestinian informers and collaborators.7
Secretary-General of the Palestinian Authority Tayeb Raheem went
into further details by stating that Hamas cells existed within the
Israeli army and security services, proof of which was documentation
highlighting the fact that Islamic operatives were regularly
entering camps such as Dahaniya that only Israeli collaborators were
permitted to access.
The closest the world came to seeing a settlement in Israel was
during the term
of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. Rabin had signed the Oslo agreement
with Yasser Arafat, which was the framework for the establishment of a
Palestinian
state by 1998. Rabin was by no means a soft touch to the
Palestinians during his
early years in office, but by late 1995 he had reached effective
accords with both
the Palestinians and Jordan, and was on the verge of repeating the
trick with Syria.
3 ‘Bush and the media cover-up of the jihad schoolbook scandal’ –
Jared Israel – April 9 2002 –http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/jihad.htm
4 ‘CIA worked in tandem with Pakistan to create Taliban’ – Times of
India – March 7 2001 – available at
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/cia_tandem_create_taliban.html
5 ‘Sharon War Plan Exposed: Hamas Is His Gang Tool’ – Jeffrey
Steinberg – Executive Intellligence Review – July 20
2001 -
http://www.prisonplanet.com/news_alert_hamas5.html
6 ‘Analysis: Hamas history tied to Israel’ - Ibid
7 ‘Who controlled Abu Nidal?’ – Patrick Seale – International Herald
Tribune – August 22 2002 –http://www.iht.com/cgi-bin/generic.cgi?template=articleprint.tmplh&ArticleId=68357
As Arab governments’ support for the initiative increased,
their funding and support of Hamas decreased.
It was at this point, on November 4 1995, that Rabin was gunned
down by a ‘lone nut assassin’ after a peace rally in Tel Aviv. His
assassin, Yigal Amir was trained by Shin Bet, the Israeli domestic
intelligence service. Shin Bet had received multiple warnings in the
weeks preceding the event that an assassination attempt would take
place. Strange therefore that Rabin’s security detail, who were
trained to immediately fire upon any armed intruder, stood idly by
and watched as Amir walked within six feet of Rabin and discharged
his weapon.
According to the New York Times, Rabin was able to get
up and enter his nearby limousine stating, “it hurts, but it’s not
so bad” before being driven to the hospital. Upon arrival, Rabin’s
chauffeur had to sprint through the hallways shouting in an attempt
to get some attention. The notion that a hospital wouldn’t have a
medical team on standby for the arrival of a seriously wounded Prime
Minister is inconceivable. These are just a few pieces of evidence
out of hundreds to suggest that Rabin was meant to die.
Rabin’s wife, Leah, directly blamed the Likud party and particularly
its bloodthirsty leader, Benjamin Netanyahu. The Rabin murder
underlines the fact that whether Hamas dupes or their own agents are
utilized, the tactics and ideology are always the same. Israel’s
right-wing elite and their global puppet masters were anxious to
crumble any hope for peace, which before Rabin’s assassination was a
viable possibility.
Another reason for Rabin’s elimination was his open understanding
that Hamas was a tool of the Israeli elite, according to Yasser
Arafat. In an interview with the Italian daily Corriere della Sera,
Arafat said,
“We are doing everything to stop the violence. But
Hamas is a creature of Israel which at the time of Prime Minister
[Yitzhak] Shamir [the late 1980s, when Hamas arose], gave them money
and more than 700 institutions, among them schools, universities and
mosques. Even [former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak] Rabin ended up
admitting it, when I charged him with it, in the presence of [Egpytian
President Hosni] Mubarak.”8
Rabin defined Israel’s covert support of Hamas as a “fatal error” and was in the process of putting an end to
it before his assassination. He expelled 400 of its operatives in
1992 and arrested 4,000 of them in the months before his death.
Hamas responded by taking a ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’
stance and
pledged allegiance to the Israeli opposition party, the Likud.
Taking into
consideration the fact that such information could have been
propaganda
emanating from either Arafat or Rabin, a Jerusalem Post editorial
still concluded
that the Hamas-Likud partnership wasn’t bellicose propaganda – they
defined it
as “conventional wisdom.”9
8 ‘Israeli Roots of Hamas are Being Exposed’ - Dean Andromidas –
Executive Intelligence Review – January 18 2002 -http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2002/2902isr_hamas.html
9 ‘The Hamas-Likud Pairing’ – Jerusalem Post – August 25 1995 –
http://www.prisonplanet.com/news_alert_hamas4.html
Israeli, American and British control of Palestinian terrorists can
be put in the context of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Abu Nidal was
accused of nearly 900 political assassinations spanning the entire
globe, as member of the Palestinian terror group Fateh Revolutionary
Council. This group mysteriously escaped any Israeli reprisal,
leading many analysts to conclude that it was firmly under Mossad
control and used to discredit the PLO. In August of 2002 Nidal was
found dead in a Baghdad hotel.
Experts were certain that he had
committed suicide to escape capture but the fact that he had
sustained multiple gunshot wounds heavily suggests he was killed by
Iraqi operatives. According to The Intelligence Network, Abu Nidal
was working for the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, for the
last four years and was plotting a coup against Iraqi president
Saddam Hussain at the behest of Western powers, top diplomats
said.10 Many experts contend that Israel was pulling Nidal’s strings
as far back as the 1960’s.
Nidal was somehow able to obtain
multi-entry visas and passports for numerous countries. Mossad had
to shift him around the globe on several occasions to avoid his
arrest. As the anti-war chorus grew to a crescendo in late 2002, the
Americans began to formulate contingency plans that would enable
them to overthrow Hussein without the need for a full-scale invasion
of Iraq. The Iraqis, who themselves utilized Nidal in the 70’s,
learned of the Israeli/American plot to use the asset Nidal and
consequently had him neutralized.
After the mid-seventies, Nidal’s renegade attacks on Palestinian
Fatah leaders far outweighed those against Israelis and Jews.
Arafat’s most trusted lieutenants were Nidal’s favorite targets,
most notably PLO’s former intelligence chief Abu Iyad. Apart from
Arafat, all the other founding members of Fatah were killed by Nidal
in concert with Israel. Israel exploited their control of Nidal to
the greatest effect in June 1982. Three gunmen seriously wounded
then-ambassador Shlomo Argov in London, giving Menachem Begin’s
government the excuse it needed to implement then-defense minister
Ariel Sharon’s plan to invade Lebanon and push the PLO out of
Beirut.
Told it was Abu Nidal’s men, not Arafat’s, who shot Argov,
then-chief of staff Rafael Eitan was reported to have said, “Nidal,
Shmidal, they’re all the same.”11 Nidal always acted in the
countries where Palestinian support was the strongest such as
Greece, Cyprus and Sudan, and never in the occupied areas. He was in
essence a gun for hire, carrying out assassinations on behalf of
Syria and Iraq during the eighties. Israel took full advantage in
that they could use Nidal to both attack the PLO directly and commit
terrorism, which Israel would then falsely link to the PLO.
10 ‘Nidal planned to oust Saddam’ – The Intelligence Network –
August 28 2002 -http://www.intellnet.org/news/2002/08/29/11285-1.html
11 ‘Abu Nidal reported dead in Baghdad’ - Danny Rubinstein and Yossi
Melman - Ha’aretz – August 20 2002 -
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=199312
The European Union began as a free trade agreement but is now a
centralized, un-elected, unaccountable federal power block that has
subjugated the sovereignty of its member states. The parallels
between Hitler’s plan for Europe and the developments that actually
transpired under the EU are frightening. As with all attack arms of
global government, the EU’s success is dependent on creating
problems that it then ‘solves’ by increasing its own authority. The
militarization of the EU as a standing army (and one not restricted
to Europe) would be worthless and unprofitable unless there was a
healthy supply of global chaos to counteract.
Therefore we should
not be surprised that EU money is being laundered to Hamas.
According to the EU Observer,
The allegations have been in the air
for over two years: EU money is being used by Yassir Arafat’s
Palestinian Authority to fund terrorist activities. The claim by
Ariel Sharon’s government at the beginning of May that it had found
“damning evidence” to support this allegation brought the polemic
into the open. Concerned at the accusations, the Parliament
suspended payment of some 18.5 million euro due to the Palestinians
until May 19.12
Why Arafat would want to channel money into those
groups that actually weaken his authority is unclear. It seems more
likely that Sharon is trying to distract from his own
administration’s funding of Hamas. As for the EU, this issue is very
unpopular in the European parliament. At the time of writing, a bill
proposed to investigate the matter looks set to be abandoned because
the petition is 17 names short of its required total.
Despite the EU’s claim that its hands are clean and that any money that reaches
the hands of terrorist groups is the responsibility of the
Palestinian Authority, they have been nothing short of desperate to
prevent a simple probe, EU Commissioner for External Affairs Chris
Patten has successfully persuaded 12 of the MEPs that wanted to sign
on to the petition to withdraw their support on the basis that he
has seen no evidence of misuse of EU money, and has accused the MEPs
supporting the investigation of “flogging a dead horse.”
MEP Charles
Tannock says he is astonished by his fellow Conservative Party
colleague’s attitude:
“My campaign has incurred the wrath of
Commissioner Patten, who regards this initiative as a direct
challenge to his authority and credibility. The sole purpose of this
investigation is to clear the air, and I have always maintained a
balanced approach to the Israel/Palestine question, favoring a
peaceful settlement based on a two-state solution.”
Commissioner
Patten’s response is that he needs an investigation of PA abuse of
his funds “like I need a hole in the head.” Patten’s unwillingness
to investigate how the PA used the money it was given by the EU
seems remarkably peculiar considering that the EU Court of Auditors
declined last November to approve the EU’s budget for the eighth
year running, admitting it can only guarantee that 5 percent of
taxpayers’ money is being spent properly.13
The question has been
raised as to, if Yasser Arafat is such a loose cannon and a danger
to the Israeli/Globalist agenda, why hasn’t he been assassinated?
It
seems Arafat is merely the other side of the coin. He’s a Bilderberger.
12 ‘Patten to face tough questions on EU money for Palestinian
terrorists issue’ - Honor Mahony – EU Observer – June 18
2002 -
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?sid=9&aid=6677
13 ‘EU funds for PA terror’ - Rachel Ehrenfeld and Sarah Zebaida –
World Net Daily – January 24 2003 -
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30653
Every year since 1954, the secretive
Bilderberg Group (named after
the hotel where they first met in the Netherlands), comprising elite
powerbrokers from Europe and North America, has convened to discuss,
and influence, the changing global, political, economic and social
landscape. The meeting is a coming together of the world’s most
powerful individuals and yet yearly media coverage is non-existent.
Bilderberg is arguably the highest-level known semisecret
organization pushing a one-world order. Bilderberg has used its
considerable influence to oust political figures that cease to
cooperate with the global agenda, most notably Margaret Thatcher who
was proving a thorn in the side of European federalism until she was
replaced by the Carlyle Group’s John Major.
The Bilderberg Group also counts amongst its members one Yasser
Arafat.
Arafat attended the group’s June 1999 meeting in Sintra, Portugal.
I suspect Arafat is an unwitting accomplice to the Globalists and is
being manipulated to react in ways that are harmful to his own
cause, and of course beneficial to those who seek to indefinitely
enflame the Middle East.
The solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is of the same
brand as the solution to all other devastating conflicts around the
world. Expose the chaos mongers, expose the global elite who manage
and inflict total bedlam to further their own agenda. They are the
source of all our ills and yet a vast majority of the world don’t
even know who ‘they’ are or what their agenda is.
If we are to
ensure that future generations of Israelis and Palestinians are not
to live in abject day-to-day terror, we must point out who benefits
from keeping Israel in permanent turmoil.
Middle Eastern Chessboard: Arming Iraq
Iraq is now an occupied country and the significance of the war will
be discussed in a later chapter. The purpose of this segment is to
ascertain how Iraq acquired its arsenal of weapons that eventually
led to it being declared as a ‘rogue state’. Again, I stress that
some of these subjects have been exhaustively documented elsewhere
numerous times. The scope here is to provide a thumbnail sketch that
includes the latest up to date information.
It is necessary to understand why the Globalists arm rogue nations
only to overthrow them ten or fifteen years later. Obviously it
makes significant amounts of money for giant defense contractors,
which often have tentacles into government itself, like the Carlyle
Group. Any such rogue state will not be provided with the latest
advanced weaponry but will receive enough arms to make it a threat
to its neighbors, thus destabilizing its geographic region. This
then provides the pretext for
the Globalists
to later invade the
country in the name of saving the region from collapse, citing
dangerous weapons of mass destruction that the Globalists had
provided the rogue state with in the first place.
We are in the arena of geopolitical chess. A move is only made after
the
subsequent twenty moves have already been mapped out.
In December of 2002, Iraq compiled a dossier to be sent to the United
Nations
detailing records of how their weapons program had developed and
what steps
they had taken to abandon it. Iraq merely listed the source of their
weapons –
from which companies they had acquired the weapons that now made
them the
target of an imminent U.S. invasion.
The companies listed were
largely either
American or British, namely,
-
Honeywell
-
Spectra Physics
-
Semetex
-
TI Coating
-
Unisys
-
Sperry Corp.
-
Tektronix
-
Rockwell
-
Leybold Vacuum Systems
-
Finnigan-MAT-US
-
Hewlett-Packard
-
Dupont
-
Eastman Kodak
-
American Type Culture Collection
-
Alcolac International
-
Consarc
-
Carl Zeiss
-
Cerberus
-
Electronic Associates
-
International Computer Systems
-
Bechtel
-
EZ Logic Data Systems, Inc.
-
Canberra Industries Inc.
-
Axel Electronics Inc.
-
Euromac Ltd-Uk
-
C. Plath-Nuclear
-
Endshire Export Marketing
-
International Computer Systems
-
MEED International
-
Walter Somers Ltd.
-
International Computer Limited
-
Matrix Churchill Corp.
-
Ali Ashour Daghir
-
International Military Services
-
Sheffield Forgemasters
-
Technology Development Group
-
International Signal and Control
-
Terex Corporation
-
Inwako
-
TMG Engineering
-
XYY Options, Inc14
By pure coincidence, the Americans seized the document before it
could be passed on to the U.N. Security Council. They edited out
8,000 pages, more than two-thirds of the entire dossier, citing its
contents as ‘risky’. CFR henchman Kofi Annan made noticeably little
fuss, describing the theft as ‘unfortunate,’ but angry U.N.
diplomats did see that the original contents were leaked to a German
media source.
U.S. war hawks pounced on the ‘gaps’ that they had
personally created, citing them as a material breach of U.N.
resolutions, A UN source in New York said:
“The questions being
asked are valid. What did the US take out?
And if weapons inspectors are supposed to be checking against the
dossier’s content, how can
any future claim be verified. In effect the US is saying trust us,
and there are many who just will
not.”15
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw bemoaned ‘big gaps’ in the
Iraqi
declaration. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell called the
omissions
‘troublesome’. The Americans seized and edited the document because
it was
proof that the so-called Iraq threat was a result of U.S. and
British government approved
companies illegally arming Iraq throughout the 1980’s and even into
the 1990’s.
The Associated Press reported,
Iraq’s bioweapons program, which U.S. President
George W. Bush wants
to eradicate, got its start with help from Uncle Sam two decades
ago, according to government records getting new scrutiny in light
of the discussion of war against Iraq.16
These records were a 1994
Senate Banking Committee report and a 1995 follow-up letter from The
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the Senate.
14 Die Tageszeitung – December 19 2002 -
http://www.taz.de/pt/2002/12/19/a0080.nf/text
15 ‘America tore out 8,000 pages of Iraq dossier’ – James Cusick –
Sunday Herald – December 22 2002 -
http://www.sundayherald.com/30195
16 ‘U.S. helped launch Iraq’s bioweapons program’ – Associated Press
– September 30 2002 – available at
http://www.prisonplanet.com/news_alert_093002_enemies.html
The CDC is a deeply corrupt New World Order attack arm and exists to
proliferate disease rather than prevent it. The full checklist of
horrors that the
U.S. government graciously handed over to Iraq included the
following,
-
Anthrax: The American Type Culture Collection, a biological
samples
repository in Manassas, Va., sent two shipments of anthrax to Iraq
in the 1980s. Three anthrax strains were in a May 1986 shipment sent
to the University of Baghdad, which UN inspectors later linked to
Iraq’s biological weapons program. A 1988 shipment from ATCC to Iraq
also included four anthrax strains.
-
VX Nerve Gas: The Iraqi Air Force began using chemical agents
against Kurdish resistance forces in northern Iraq in late 1987,
provoking outrage on Capitol Hill, particularly after the now
infamous March 1988 attack on the Kurdish village of Halabja. This
was cited as a fundamental reason justifying the invasion of Iraq.
-
Pralidoxine: An antidote to nerve gas which can be easily
back-engineered to create nerve gas. U.S. Defense Department
Documents detail that Britain sold the drug to Iraq in March 1992,
AFTER the Iraqis had gassed the Kurds and AFTER the end of the Gulf
War. The Sunday Herald reported, The shipments to Iraq went on even after Saddam Hussein ordered the
gassing of the Kurdish
town of Halabja, in which at least 5000 men, women and children
died. The atrocity, which
shocked the world, took place in March 1988, but a month later the
components and materials of
weapons of mass destruction were continuing to arrive in Baghdad.17
-
West Nile Virus: West Nile virus was actually used as a bio-weapon
to attack America, Israel and Saudi Arabia from the late 1990’s
onwards.
You didn’t hear about it because the mosquito-borne agent was also
given
to Hussein by the U.S., as outlined in the CDC letter. An Iraqi
defector
reported in 1997 that Saddam had bragged he would use West Nile toattack the U.S. and that his scientists had developed an unusual
strain of
the virus. The first outbreak in New York City was by way of an
‘unusual
strain’ of the virus.18
-
Botulinum: Iraq admitted making 20,000 liters of botulinum toxin,
a deadly poison produced by the Clostridium botulinum bacteria, and
putting some of it into weapons. The American Type Culture
Collection sent six strains of Clostridium botulinum to the
University of Baghdad in the May 1986 shipment. The September 1988 ATCC shipment to Iraq also contained
one strain of Clostridium botulinum. In March 1986, the CDC sent
samples of botulinum toxin and botulinum toxoid (used to make a
vaccine against botulinum poisoning) directly to Iraq’s al-Muthanna
complex, a center for Iraq’s chemical weapons program and the site
where Iraq restarted its dormant biological weapons program in 1985.
-
Gas Gangrene: Gas gangrene, caused by the Clostridium Perfringens
bacteria, causes toxic gases to form inside the body, killing
tissues and causing internal bleeding, lung and liver damage. ATCC
sent three strains of Clostridium Perfringens to the University of
Baghdad in the May 1986 shipment and another three strains in the
1988 shipment.
17 ‘How did Iraq get its weapons? We
sold them’ – Neil Mackay – Sunday Herald – September 8 2002 -
http://www.sundayherald.com/27572
18 ‘U.S. Gave West Nile, Other
Viruses, to Iraq’ – John O. Edwards - Newsmax – September 24 2002 -
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/9/23/213349.shtml
These examples are just a handful of the almost two dozen forms of
viruses, retroviruses, bacteria and fungi provided by the U.S. to
Iraqi labs during the 80’s and 90’s.
The usual retort to the fact that the U.S. armed Iraq is, ‘oh but
they were our allies against the Iranians’ – just like Osama bin
Laden was our ally against the Soviets. Firstly there is no ‘us’ or
‘we’ – a government that knowingly sends a country nerve gas to kill
its own citizens as with the Kurds cannot be said to be acting in
our best wishes. Just think how many times the line ‘but they killed
their own people’ has been used to justify Gulf War II. That’s not
what these same war hawks said about it at the time.
Another veteran
of the programme said the Pentagon,
“wasn’t so horrified by Iraq’s
use of gas. It was just another way of killing people - whether by
bullet or phosgene, it didn’t make any difference.”19
Secondly, if
it was all one big accident and just a quirk of geopolitics at the
time, then why don’t they admit it? Why do the column inches never
mention the fact that the latest bogeyman is always a creation of
those who want to ‘protect us’ from him. Donald Rumsfeld and
Colin
Powell were eager to tell us how much of a threat Saddam is but when
questioned about who set up his weapons program they seemed to have
an uncanny knack of sudden amnesia.
Powell dismissed the proven
documentation as “dead wrong” and ‘Mr. Aspartame’ Rumsfeld goes all
foggy whenever the subject is raised. Powell went before the U.N.
Security Council on February 5th 2003 to present evidence of the
Iraqi weapons program and their links with Al-Qaeda. This is a sick
joke because Powell and the criminal administrations he has worked
for have direct links to arming and empowering both Al-Qaeda and
Iraq, while it’s common knowledge for anyone that can read that Iraq
and Al-Qaeda are and always have been sworn enemies.
19 ‘US helped as Saddam plotted chemical attacks, report says’ –
David Teather – London Guardian – August 19 2002 -http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,776844,00.html
Both Rumsfeld and Powell were pivotal players in beefing up Iraq’s
military
prowess,
Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defense Secretary and one of the most
strident critics of Saddam Hussein, met the Iraqi President in 1983
to ease the way for US companies to sell Baghdad biological and
chemical weapons components, including anthrax and bubonic plague
cultures, according to newly declassified US Government documents.20
The ‘warm handshake’ between then Middle East envoy Rumsfeld and
Hussein was captured on film and is a perfect example of how a
picture can destroy a thousand hypocritical words. After U.S.
intelligence confirmed that Iraq was using chemical weapons on an
almost daily basis against both in the war against Iran and
domestically, Ronald Reagan signed secret National Security Decision
Directive 114, one of few Reagan era foreign policy documents that
remains classified. The directive stated that the United States
would do “whatever was necessary and legal” to prevent Iraq from
losing the war with Iran.
Selling biological weapons to Hussein was
only deemed ‘legal’ because the State Department had lovingly
removed Iraq from the list of terrorist sponsors the previous year.
FIG 4.2
[CAPTION: Donald Rumsfeld, shown in December 1983
shaking hands with Iraqi President Saddam Hussein in Baghdad,
before
agreeing to sell him the chemical and biological weapons which Rumsfeld’s own administration would use to justify attacking Iraq in
2003.]
In recent interviews Rumsfeld
lied by saying he “cautioned” Saddam
Hussein about the use of chemical weapons when the declassified
State Department minutes of the meeting state no such thing. The
mishap was covered up by Pentagon spokesman Brian Whitman, who
changed the story by saying that the comments were made to Iraqi
foreign minister Tariq Aziz.
The Washington Post reported,
According to a sworn court affidavit prepared by Teicher (NSC
official under Reagan) in 1995, the United States “actively
supported the Iraqi war effort by supplying the Iraqis with billions
of dollars of credits, by providing military intelligence and advice
to the Iraqis, and by closely monitoring third country arms sales to
Iraq to make sure Iraq had the military weaponry required.” Teicher
said in the affidavit that former CIA director William Casey used a
Chilean company, Cardoen, to supply Iraq with cluster bombs that
could be used to disrupt the Iranian human wave attacks.
Teicher refuses to discuss the affidavit.21
This military support included more than 60 defense intelligence
agency officers who secretly provided information on Iranian
deployments, tactical planning for battles, plans for air strikes
and bomb-damage assessments. As Reagan’s national security advisor, Colin Powell had intimate knowledge and
influence over this operation.
20 ‘How US helped Iraq
build deadly arsenal’ – Tim Reid – London Times – December 31 2002 -
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-528574,00.html
21 ‘U.S.
Had Key Role in Iraq Buildup’ – Michael Dobbs – Washington Post –
December 30 2002 -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52241-2002Dec29.html
Powell played the role of being cautious against a second war on
Iraq all along until his ‘Adlai Stevenson moment’ U.N. presentation.
This was subtle manipulation to make people think, ‘oh even the dove
now wants war, perhaps the war is just’. From Grenada to Panama,
whenever there’s a blatantly unjust war to be waged, Powell’s always
there to put a respectable sheen on it.
In July of 1990, after years of building the Iraqi war machine,
Secretary of State
James Baker (business partner of both the Bush’s and bin Laden’s)
dispatched
American ambassador April Glaspie to Iraq where she told Saddam
Hussein,
“We have no opinion on your Arab-Arab conflicts, such as your dispute
with Kuwait. Secretary [of State James] Baker has directed me to
emphasize the instruction ... that Kuwait is not associated with
America.”22
This gave Hussein the green light to invade and after a
few invented stories about Iraqi soldiers throwing Kuwaiti babies
out of incubators, the West feverishly allied and war was declared.
500,000 dead Iraqi civilians later and we enter the second and final
phase of what is, in President Herbert Walker Bush’s own words,
“The
opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of
a New World
Order.”23
In 2003, the Bush administration was still arming Saddam
Hussein while it prepared to go to war with Iraq. The Export
Administration Act, which passed the Senate and looks set to pass
the House, would weaken already casual controls over the export of
sophisticated computer technology. Both Clinton and George W. Bush
sold the technology to China, which is a key component in the design
of nuclear bombs.
Insight Magazine reported,
The Bush administration has been “as
bad, if not worse” than the Clinton administration when it comes to
the transfer of sensitive technologies to the People’s Republic of
China (PRC), claims Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, a
nonpartisan public-interest law firm. Fitton says the Bush
administration even has “relaxed the rules put in place during the
Clinton years.”
Specifically, he tells Insight, the administration has allowed the
transfer of “computer technology
[whose] only practical purpose is for nuclear-weapon design.”24
China has had no qualms in the past about reselling such technology
to Iraq and
yet a bill that the Center for Security Policy refers to as the ‘Arm
Saddam Act’ has
the unbridled support of the Bush administration.
22 ‘US Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie’ – Carleton Cole – Christian
Science Monitor – May 27 1999 -http://csmweb2.emcweb.com/durable/1999/05/27/p23s3.htm
23 George Herbert Walker Bush - 1991
24 ‘High-Tech Transfers To China Continue’ – Zoli Simon – Insight
Magazine – July 8 2002 -http://www.insightmag.com/main.cfm/include/detail/storyid/257504.html
Five Republican U.S. senators
wrote a letter to President Bush,
It “warns that China is using legally acquired U.S. dual-use
technology to modernize its military.” Electronic warfare
capabilities have been accomplished “mainly through cooperation with
Western companies and by reverse engineering.” Further, the senators
tell the president, “it is important to note that Beijing continues
to transfer dual-use technology to states that support international
terror networks,” and in fact “have exported substantial dual-use
telecommunications equipment and technology to Iraq.”25
At time of
press, the bill looked set to receive instant approval on Capitol
Hill. Democrats and Republicans are not separate entities – they are
a ‘Hobson’s Choice’ – both abide by the same policies because they
are following the same agenda.
25 ‘Bush and Congress Push
the Arm Saddam Act’ – Wes Vernon – Newsmax – October 11 2002 -
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/10/10/193255.shtml
The agenda is order out of manufactured chaos.
Return to The Middle East Exopolitical Saga
How To Deal With a Psychopath: Give Him Nuclear Bombs
In late 2002, North Korea carried out its threat to remove UN seals
and dismantle monitoring cameras at a laboratory used to produce
weapons-grade plutonium. In January 2003 the country withdrew from
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which seeks to control
the spread of nuclear technology. The country threatened countless
times to utilize its nuclear arsenal, which is already vast
according to many experts.
On Christmas Eve 2002, Pyongyang vowed to “destroy the earth” if
anyone interfered with its interests. A similar threat was issued on
February 6th 2003 when North Korea publicly stated it would wage
“total war” on the United States by way of a pre-emptive nuclear
strike. Propaganda posters from the country show missiles hitting
the White House and other famous landmarks, along with North Korean
soldiers depicted as giants, crushing American soldiers in their
hands.
North Korea is controlled by a hereditary Stalinist dictatorship
that has starved two million of its citizens to death in favor of
building a million-man army.
Some people put the figure at four
million, one-quarter of the population. In the far north of the
country there is a network of forced labor gulags where people who
have ‘expressed a bland political opinion’ are, along with their
entire families, tortured, raped and executed. Horrific bio-chemical
experiments are performed on mass numbers of people. Babies are
delivered and then stamped to death by the camp guards. If the
mother screams while the guards are stamping on the baby’s neck, she
is immediately assassinated by a firing squad.
These guards are
rewarded with bonuses and promotions for ripping out prisoners’
eyeballs. MSNBC published satellite photos of the concentration
camps, Plainly visible are acres upon acres of barracks, laid out in
regimented military style.
Surrounding
each of them is 10-foot-high barbed-wire fencing along with land
mines and man traps. There is even a battery of anti-aircraft
guns to prevent a liberation by airborne troops.26
FIG 4.3
[CAPTION: A satellite image of the barracks and other facilities of
Camp 22 at Haengyong in northeastern North Korea.]
Does this sound like a regime that would respond to ‘diplomatic
negotiations’? Saddam Hussein is a puppy compared to Kim Jong-Il and
yet where is the invasion of North Korea? Where are the forces of
the ‘free’ world?
The New American magazine succinctly outlined the
difference between North Korea and Iraq, Crippled by the 1991 UN-led
Gulf War, intermittent bombings by U.S. and British aircraft, and 12
years of devastating sanctions, Saddam’s military poses little
threat to Iraq’s neighbors, let alone the United States. North
Korea, on the other hand, boasts the world’s fourth-largest
military; it has 37,000 U.S. troops within easy striking range of
its artillery.
Seoul, the South Korean capital, is 34 miles away
from the demilitarized zone and well within striking distance of
North Korean artillery tubes. And Kim’s regime has successfully
tested the Taepo Dong, a missile capable of hitting Japan; the
missile’s next generation may be able to strike Alaska.27 President
Bush publicly claims to loathe Kim Jong-Il and yet his
administration has, like Bill Clinton’s before him, armed North
Korea to the teeth with anything up to and beyond 200 nuclear bombs.
Every other month the media report on how the U.S. continues to
transfer highly
sensitive material to North Korea, all the while fear mongering
about how it’s not
a matter of if but when a city gets nuked. This isn’t merely a case
of double
standards - it’s absolute lunacy. Under the 1994 Agreed Framework,
the Clinton
administration agreed to replace North Korea’s domestically built
nuclear
reactors with light water nuclear reactors. So-called
government-funded ‘experts’
stated that light water reactors couldn’t be used to make bombs.
Not
so
according to Henry Sokolski, head of the Non-proliferation Policy
Education
Centre in Washington,
“LWRs could be used to produce dozens of bombs’ worth of
weapons-grade plutonium in both
North Korea and Iran. This is true of all LWRs—a depressing fact
U.S. policymakers have managed to block out.”28
Sokolski has also gone on the record as saying,
“These reactors are like all reactors, they have the potential to
make weapons. So you might end
up supplying the worst nuclear violator with the means to acquire
the very weapons we’re trying
to prevent it acquiring.”29
26 ‘Death, terror in N. Korea gulag’ – Robert Windrem – MSNBC –
January 15 2003 -http://www.msnbc.com/news/859191.asp?0cl=cR
27 ‘Aiding and Abetting the Axis’ - William Norman Grigg – The New
American – February 24 2003 -http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2003/02-24-2003/vo19no04_korea.htm
28 ‘Nuclear Succor for North Korea’ – Matt Bivens – Moscow Times –
September 16 2002 – available at
http://asp.afghanwar.spb.ru/cgi/answer_e.asp?ID=525
The U.S. State Department contends that the light water reactors
cannot be used to produce bomb grade material and yet in 2002 urged
Russia to end its nuclear co-operation with Iran for the reason that
it doesn’t want Iran armed with weapons of mass destruction. Russia
is building light water reactors in Iran. The State Department
announced on its own web site.
In the official answer to a question
asked at the January 31 State Department daily briefing, the State
Department said the United States has,
“consistently urged Russia to
cease all [nuclear] cooperation with Iran, including its assistance
to the light water reactor at Bushehr.”
“We have underscored to
Russia that an end to Russian nuclear assistance to Iran would allow
the United States and Russia to reap the full promise of our new
strategic relationship, benefiting Russia economically and
strategically far more than any short-term gain from construction of
additional reactors or other sensitive transfers to Iran.”30
Therefore according to the State Department, light water reactors in
Iran can produce nuclear material but somehow the same rule doesn’t
apply in North Korea.
More hypocrisy is encountered when we learn that the United States’
closest ally Britain has also shipped bomb grade material to Iran.
Sources for the BBC disclosed that the UK government rubber stamped
the shipment of key nuclear weapons-grade material to Iran, who have
publicly stated their desire to build an atomic bomb, The programme
has also interviewed a leading nuclear weapons expert in the UK who
says that the Beryllium and other items which the DTI has licensed
to Iran add up to a shopping list for a nuclear weapons programme.31
29 ‘US grants N Korea nuclear funds’ – BBC – April 3 2002 –
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1908571.stm
30 ‘State Department on Russia-Iran Nuclear Cooperation’ – U.S.
Department of State – January 31 2003 -http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/arms/03020321.htm
31 ‘UK sells bomb material to Iran’ – BBC – September 23 2002 -
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2275249.stm
Many questioned why, in late September 2001, UK Foreign Secretary
Jack Straw was suddenly dispatched to Iran to meet with Iranian
President Mohammad Khatami. Behind the public facade of ‘diplomatic
discussion’ it is now clear that Straw was bartering for the sale of
metal beryllium, a key component for the manufacture of nuclear
weapons. This, despite a ban on the sale of arms to Iran under
international protocol. Metal beryllium has virtually no
conventional use and is exclusive to the development of nuclear
weapons.
Let us return to the issue of North Korea and light water reactors.
Light water reactors are far more expensive to build than coal or
gas-fired plants so we can safely conclude that arming North Korea’s
nuclear arsenal is not a matter of saving money. On the contrary,
it’s like handing a psychopath a loaded gun.
The 1994 Agreed Framework deal gave North Korea the capacity to
generate
enough nuclear fuel to produce almost 100 nuclear bombs per year. A
1999
congressional study undertaken by the House North Korea Advisory
Group
warned,
Through the provision of two light water reactors [LWRs] under the
1994 Agreed Framework, the
United States, through KEDO, will provide North Korea with the
capacity to produce annually
enough fissile material for nearly 100 nuclear bombs, should the
Democratic People’s Republic of
Korea [DPRK] decide to violate the Nonproliferation Treaty [NPT]. 32
The group further cautioned that the country that receives the
largest amount of
U.S. foreign aid in the Asia-Pacific region now has the ability to
strike the
mainland United States with chemical, biological or nuclear weapons.
Two
renowned nuclear scientists briefed the panel, namely Dr. Victor Gilinsky, a
former Member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission during the Ford
and
Carter administrations and former head of the Physical Sciences
Department at
the RAND Corporation, and Dr. William R. Graham, a former Science
Advisor to
President Reagan and Deputy Administrator of NASA.
The scientists
cautioned,
The light water reactors could produce about 500 kilograms of
plutonium annually. They are so
much larger than the facilities North Korea stopped building, they
will actually produce more
plutonium than the gas graphite plants they will replace.33
If the United States government were really interested in upholding
vital national security interests, they would immediately halt the
construction of reactors and all aid to North Korea, and yet under
the ‘conservative’ Bush regime the Clinton program to arm North
Korea is being implemented. The North Korean people are enslaved by
a government that is using food as a weapon. Perhaps this is why The
EU and the United States, via the UN World Food Program, resumed the
shipment of hundreds of thousands of tons in food aid at the end of
February 2003.
This goes directly to the sitting dictatorship, which
then decides who gets it by their level of allegiance to the state.
Food aid only increases the power of Kim Jong-Il and yet it is
veiled by the UN in bleeding heart humanitarian rhetoric. The money
goes straight to enabling the North Korean leadership to live in the
lap of westernized luxury with casinos and lavish new cars (there’s
that working class communist ethic shining through).
In April 2002 the Bush administration announced that it would release
$95 million
of American taxpayer’s dollars to begin construction of the
‘harmless’ light water
reactors. Bush argued that arming the megalomaniac dictator Kim
Jong-Il with
the potential to produce a hundred nukes a year was, “vital to the
national
security interests of the United States.”
32 ‘Clinton Deal Gave N. Korea 100-Nuke-Per-Year Capacity’ – Carl
Limbacher – Newsmax – October 19 2002 -http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/10/19/114657
33 ‘Clinton-Gore North Korea Aid Will Provide Plutonium for Nuclear
Bombs, Scientists Warn’ – The House PolicyCommittee – April 14 2000 -http://web.archive.org/web/20011217031521/http://policy.house.gov/news/releases/2000/0414nk.htm
Bush released even more money in
January 2003, as reported by Bloomberg News,
President George W. Bush is seeking $3.5 million for the
international consortium that continues
to build two nuclear reactors for North Korea, even as the U.S.
confronts the communist regime
over nuclear arms.34
The company that got the contract to deliver equipment and services
to build the
two light water reactor stations was ABB (Asea Brown Boveri), which
describes
itself as,
“a leader in power and automation technologies that
enable utility and
industry customers to improve performance while lowering
environmental
impact.”
The contract was valued at $200 million and was signed in
January
2000.35
FIG 4.4
[CAPTION: One of the light water reactors than can
produce nuclear material, graciously handed to Kim Jong-Il by George
W. Bush.]
I t should not surprise us that our old friend Donald Rumsfeld, the
man who paved the way for U.S. companies to sell Iraq chemical and
biological weapons in 1983, was an executive director for ABB from
2000-2001. Rumsfeld resigned when he was appointed U.S. Secretary of
Defense.36
Wolfram Eberhardt, a spokesman for ABB confirmed that
Rumsfeld was at nearly all the board meetings during his involvement
with the company. The meetings were held quarterly in Zurich,
Switzerland. However, Rumsfeld again displays his uncanny ability to
forget things in stating that he ‘doesn’t remember’ the issue of
North Korea being brought before the ABB board. Swiss Info
concluded, Rumsfeld’s position at ABB could prove embarrassing for
the Bush administration since while he was a director he was also
active on issues of weapons proliferation, chairing the 1998
congressional Ballistic Missile Threat commission.37
34 ‘Bush Seeks $3.5 Million for Group Building N. Korean Reactors’ –
Todd Zeranski – Bloomberg – January 17 2003 –available at
http://www.prisonplanet.com/news_alert_012003_nkorea.html
35 ‘ABB to deliver systems, equipment to North Korean nuclear
plants’ – ABB press release – January 20 2000 -http://www.abb.com/global/abbzh/abbzh251.nsf!OpenDatabase&db=/global/ABBZH/abbzh250.nsf&v=c&e=us&c=316DCEEDCA12D32E4125686C00433604
36 ‘Biography of Donald H. Rumsfeld’ – NATO -
http://www.nato.int/usa/cv/rumsfeld.html
37 ‘Rumsfeld was on ABB
board during deal with North Korea’ – Swiss Info – February 24 2003
-
http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/swissinfo.html?siteSect=105&sid=1648385
Rumsfeld would
obviously have been a major influence in settling the contract that
ensured Kim Jong-Il got his dirty hands on that nuclear material. In
every single instance, where there’s a crazy dictator to be armed,
the same names step on up to arm him. These criminals do care about
the consequences of their actions, because their actions are
designed to obtain a specific consequence. If there’s a despot that
expresses a desire kill millions of people, the Globalists always
ensure the despot has the tools to do it.
North Korea has already fired nuclear-capable missiles that have hit
America. You didn’t hear about it – why?
Because how can an invasion of Iraq
be justified when another country known to possess nuclear weapons is already
firing missiles at America? It can’t, which is why CNN and the rest
completely ignored this
Korea Times report,
The warhead of a
long-range missile test-fired by North Korea was found in the U.S.
state of Alaska, a report to the National Assembly revealed
yesterday.
“According to a U.S. document, the last piece of a missile warhead
fired by North Korea was found in Alaska,” former Japanese foreign
minister Taro Nakayama was quoted as saying in the report.
“Washington, as well as Tokyo, has so far underrated Pyongyang’s
missile capabilities.” 38
38 ‘NK Missile Warhead Found in Alaska’ – Ryu Jin – Korea Times –
March 4 2003 -http //times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200303/kt2003030417272311970.htm
Ask yourself why an incident that should
have made national and international headlines for weeks wasn’t even
reported on in America. North Korea has threatened to and is capable
of striking an American city with a nuclear missile at any time. The
fact that they are further down the list of potential targets is
proof that this pre-emptive doctrine is not about protecting
America, it is about carefully coordinated imperial expansion.
The Globalists are using American military might to construct a
New
World Order.
The ultimate agenda behind arming North Korea is to later invade the
country and acquire a staging ground to challenge Chinese dominance
of North East Asia. China is well aware that any U.S. led takeover
of the country will result in American troops stationed on China’s
Manchurian border. Within Chinese political and military circles, it
is universally acknowledged that one of the strategic aims of future
American aggression against North Korea is to position the U.S. for
a devastating confrontation with China. Perhaps the Chinese should
expect this because they continue to provide North Korea with
chemical, biological and nuclear-arms goods and missile systems.
Many analysts agree that a looming U.S.-China clash will be the
catalyst for world war three. Rest assured, the whole thing was
planned that way.
Back to Contents
|